Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Ethiopic version of 2 Kings (4 Kings in the Septuagint tradition) is an anonymous translation preserved in Geʿez as part of the broader Octateuch corpus. Its text derives from a Greek Vorlage, likely transmitted via Arabic intermediaries, and is attested in manuscripts such as those held by Harvard College Library. The translation date is uncertain, though Ethiopic biblical books were generally rendered between the 4th and 7th centuries CE. The work is used liturgically in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, but its exact liturgical role is not specified in the source edition. No critical apparatus or variant readings are provided, and textual differences from the Masoretic or Septuagint traditions remain unannotated.
This work is significant as a witness to the Ethiopic biblical canon and the transmission of the Deuteronomistic history in the Horn of Africa. It reflects the adaptation of a Greek Vorlage (via Arabic) for liturgical use in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church. Its textual variants and hagiographic expansions (e.g., the description of Elijah as 'hairy') offer insights into local exegetical traditions. The work also contributes to the study of the Octateuch corpus and the broader history of biblical translation in late antique and medieval Christianity.
The Ethiopic version of 2 Kings (4 Kings in the LXX tradition) belongs to the Octateuch corpus translated into Geʿez, the classical language of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church. The translation likely occurred between the 4th and 7th centuries CE, a period when biblical books were rendered from Greek (and later Arabic) sources to serve the liturgical and educational needs of the Aksumite and post-Aksumite Christian communities. The Geʿez text derives from a Greek Vorlage, probably via Arabic intermediaries, reflecting the complex transmission of biblical texts through the Syriac, Greek, and Arabic traditions. Manuscripts are preserved in collections such as the Harvard College Library, but the work lacks a critical edition. Its liturgical use is attested, though specific details are absent. The translation is anonymous, and later manuscript attributions are unverified. The work's textual history is complicated by the lack of a critical apparatus, and its relationship to the Masoretic and Septuagint traditions is not annotated in the source edition.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||