Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Sermons of John of Bolnisi (Io.Boln.) is a rare early Georgian homiletic cycle preserved in a single 10th-century manuscript, likely from the Sinai Georgian corpus. Traditionally attributed to John of Bolnisi, a bishop active in the late 6th–early 7th century, the work consists of liturgical discourses (თქუმული) for feast days, including the Transfiguration. The sermons reflect anti-Chalcedonian Christological emphases, such as the repeated use of 'complete' (სრული) to affirm Christ's full divinity and humanity. The text was incorporated into later medieval Georgian homiliaries, influencing collections like the Klarjeti. The lack of a critical edition and reliance on a single manuscript base preclude reconstruction of the original 7th-century text.
The Sermons of John of Bolnisi are a rare witness to early Georgian homiletics and liturgical practice, reflecting the theological concerns of the post-Chalcedonian period. They influenced later medieval Georgian homiliaries and provide insight into the development of Georgian ecclesiastical literature. The work's anti-Chalcedonian Christology and liturgical context connect it to broader debates in Eastern Christianity.
The Sermons are attributed to John of Bolnisi, a bishop associated with the Bolnisi Sioni church in Georgia, traditionally dated to the late 6th–early 7th century. This period saw the consolidation of Georgian ecclesiastical identity under the influence of the Church of the East and ongoing Christological debates. The sole surviving manuscript is a 10th-century copy, likely from the Sinai Georgian corpus, a major repository of early Georgian texts. The sermons were used in liturgical settings for feast-day readings, indicating their integration into the Georgian liturgical tradition. The genre of homily (თქუმული) was central to early Christian preaching, and these works were later incorporated into medieval homiliaries such as the Klarjeti collection. The attribution to John rests on later colophons and internal references, but the evidence is thin, and the manuscript tradition shows variation in incipits, suggesting possible editorial additions.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||