Work dossier · summary and historical context
Redaction G of the Georgian Song of Songs is preserved in a single manuscript (Tbilisi, National Centre of Manuscripts, A-95) and shows signs of revision toward the Greek Septuagint text. The Georgian version likely dates to the 10th–11th centuries, based on paleographic and linguistic features of the manuscript, but no explicit colophon provides a firm date. This redaction was not adopted into the standard Georgian liturgical canon; the later, more widely used version (Redaction A) replaced it in ecclesiastical use. The edition does not include a critical apparatus of variant readings from other Georgian manuscripts, so the textual history of Redaction G remains incomplete. The source edition (TITUS) transcribes the manuscript directly, without normalization of orthography or punctuation, preserving the scribal features of the 10th–11th century exemplar.
Redaction G provides rare evidence of a Septuagint-influenced revision of the Song of Songs in the Georgian tradition, distinct from the later canonical Redaction A. Its survival in a single manuscript highlights the diversity of medieval Georgian biblical texts and the processes of textual standardization. The edition's preservation of scribal features offers insights into 10th–11th century Georgian script and language, while its Marian interpretive elements connect it to broader Byzantine and Eastern Christian allegorical exegesis.
The Georgian Song of Songs Redaction G survives in a single manuscript (A-95) held at the National Centre of Manuscripts in Tbilisi. Paleographic and linguistic evidence suggests a date in the 10th–11th centuries, though no colophon confirms this. The text was revised toward the Greek Septuagint, indicating contact with Byzantine biblical traditions. It was produced within a Georgian Christian community, likely in a monastic or scholarly setting, but it never entered the standard Georgian liturgical canon, being superseded by Redaction A. The manuscript's direct transcription by TITUS preserves scribal features without normalization, offering a window into medieval Georgian orthography and punctuation. The redaction's incomplete textual history and lack of a critical apparatus limit understanding of its transmission and relation to other Georgian versions.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||