Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Old Georgian Acts of the Apostles survives in two recensions, Redactions A and B, which represent distinct translation phases from a Greek base. The edition in the TITUS corpus presents both recensions side by side, enabling comparison of textual strata. The Georgian Acts likely dates from the 5th–6th centuries, based on paleographic and linguistic features of the earliest manuscripts, though no colophon or external witness confirms a precise date. The text was used in the liturgical lectionary of the Georgian Church, as marginal notes indicate pericope divisions. This edition does not include a critical apparatus or systematic collation of all known manuscripts, and the Greek base text is not identified. The English draft is a modern working translation, not a critical edition.
The Old Georgian Acts of the Apostles is significant for the study of early Georgian Christianity and biblical translation. The two recensions, Redactions A and B, offer a rare window into the evolution of a biblical text within a single language tradition, allowing scholars to trace translation techniques, scribal practices, and liturgical use. The text also preserves readings that may reflect early Greek witnesses now lost, contributing to the textual criticism of the Acts of the Apostles. Its liturgical use underscores the integration of scripture into Georgian worship.
The Old Georgian Acts of the Apostles was produced in the early medieval Georgian Church, likely between the 5th and 6th centuries, a period when Georgian Christianity was consolidating its liturgical and literary traditions. The translation was made from a Greek exemplar, but the specific Greek base text remains unidentified. The two recensions, Redactions A and B, reflect different translation phases, possibly corresponding to revisions or independent translation efforts. The text was used in the Georgian liturgical lectionary, as shown by marginal notes indicating pericope divisions. The Georgian Acts circulated in monastic and ecclesiastical settings, where terms like 'God-loving one' (ღმრთისმოყუარეჰ) were common. The survival of two recensions suggests a complex transmission history, with later scribes or editors revising the earlier version. The lack of a colophon or external witness leaves the exact date uncertain, but linguistic and paleographic evidence points to the 5th–6th centuries.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||