Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Miracles of Māmās is an anonymous Geʿez hagiographic collection recounting four miracles attributed to the Ethiopian saint Māmās, possibly a local adaptation of the Greek martyr Mamas of Caesarea. The text survives in a single manuscript (betmas:LIT6471TaammeraMamas) dated paleographically to the 18th–19th century, with no earlier witnesses. Its composition is conventionally placed in the late medieval or early modern period, but this remains uncertain. The work is not cited in the standard Synaxarion or liturgical readings, suggesting limited liturgical use. The edition provides only the Geʿez text without translation or commentary, relying on manuscript images or diplomatic transcription.
The Miracles of Māmās is significant as a rare witness to a local Ethiopian hagiographic tradition that diverges from mainstream Greek and Syriac sources. Its survival in a single manuscript highlights the fragility of such texts and the need for further manuscript discoveries. The work offers insight into the development of miracle collections in the Ethiopian Orthodox tradition and the adaptation of foreign saint cults to local contexts.
The Miracles of Māmās is preserved in a single Ethiopic manuscript likely produced in the 18th–19th century, held in a European collection. The work is anonymous and undated; its composition is conventionally assigned to the late medieval or early modern period based on paleography and internal references, but this is speculative. The saint Māmās is venerated in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, but the miracle collection does not appear in the standard Synaxarion or liturgical readings, indicating it had limited liturgical circulation. The toponyms Qǝfrǝyā and Sesewi suggest a local Ethiopian setting, possibly in the highlands. The name Māmās may derive from the Greek martyr Mamas of Caesarea, but the hagiographic details diverge from known Greek or Syriac traditions, pointing to an independent Ethiopian development. The text's transmission is poorly understood; no collation with other witnesses has been performed, and the sole manuscript may represent a unique or late recension.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||