ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Commentary ·

In Ecclesiasten Expositio Mystica

Salonius Viennensis Episcopus · ogl-pl

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 47 passages · 9,852 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

Salonius, bishop of Vienne (c. 470–c. 475), wrote this mystical exposition of Ecclesiastes as a pastoral and allegorical guide, not a literal commentary. The work is dated to the late 5th century, during the decline of Roman Gaul, reflecting early medieval monastic and episcopal concerns with wisdom literature. It survives in a single manuscript tradition, likely from Carolingian scriptoria; the edition ogl-pl depends on early modern prints, not direct collation of all witnesses. Seldom cited by medieval scholastics, its influence is limited to a few monastic libraries, and it was not widely used in later exegesis or liturgy. The edition does not provide a critical apparatus for variant readings; readers cannot assess scribal changes or the reliability of the base text. Attribution to Salonius is traditional but not certain; some scholars have questioned whether the author might be a different Salonius or a later compiler.

This mystical exposition is a rare witness to early medieval allegorical interpretation of Ecclesiastes, bridging late antique exegesis and Carolingian scholarship. Its dialogic frame and pastoral focus highlight the adaptation of wisdom literature for monastic and episcopal instruction. Though seldom cited, it preserves patristic etymologies and reflects the transition from Roman to medieval Christian culture in Gaul.

Historical context

The work was composed in late 5th-century Gaul, a period of political fragmentation and cultural transition as Roman authority waned and Germanic kingdoms emerged. Salonius, bishop of Vienne, wrote in Latin for a monastic and clerical audience, using allegorical exegesis to make the wisdom of Ecclesiastes relevant to Christian life. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, likely copied in Carolingian scriptoria, and was transmitted through early modern prints rather than direct collation of all witnesses. Its limited circulation reflects the specialized nature of mystical commentary in early medieval libraries. The attribution to Salonius is traditional but uncertain; some scholars suggest a different Salonius or a later compiler. The work engages with patristic traditions, particularly Jerome's etymologies, and adapts the Old Testament figure of Solomon as a model for Christian preaching.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

269 commentary units 70 scripture47 term46 structure45 background39 reception16 sense3 caution2 parallel1 dating 0 derived notes 65 open questions 47 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation is known: a language model asked twice could name none, and the source corpus records none. That is not proof — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: commentary in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 47 narrative.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:1 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONII EPISCOPI IN ECCLESIASTEN EXPOSITIO MYSTICA. INTERLOCUTORES: VERAN09 ET SALONIUS. VERANuS. Quot nominibus vocatus est Salomon' SALONIUS. Tribus, sicut Scripturæ sacræ manifestissime docent, id est Salomon, Ydida, et Ecclesiastes. VERANUSs. Quare his nominibus appellatus est? SALONIUS. Salomon, id est pacificus, dictus est eo quod in regno ejus pax fuit. Ydida vocatus est, id est dilectus Domini, quia dilexit eum Dominus. VERANUS. Ecclesiastes qua lingua dicitur? SALONIUM. Græca; nam Hebraice Cohelecb dic itur. VERANuS. Quomodo sonat in Latino sermone Cchelech, aut Ecclesiastes? SALONIUS. Ille proprie dicitur Ecclesiastes, qui cœtum. id est Ecclesiam, congregat. Unde Latino sermone recte Ecclesiastes dicitur Concionator, quia concionatur, id est loquitur ad populum; et sermo ejus non ad unum specialiter, sed generaliter dirigitur ad omnes. Concionator ergo in Ecclesia sancta dici potest prædicator.
English
Salonius the Bishop, Mystical Exposition on Ecclesiastes. INTERLOCUTORS: VERANUS AND SALONIUS. VERANUS. By how many names is Solomon called? SALONIUS. By three, as the sacred Scriptures most clearly teach, that is, Solomon, Ydida, and Ecclesiastes. VERANUS. Why is he called by these names? SALONIUS. Solomon, that is, the peaceful one, is so called because in his reign there was peace. He is called Ydida, that is, beloved of the Lord, because the Lord loved him. VERANUS. In what language is Ecclesiastes said? SALONIUS. Greek; for in Hebrew it is called Coheleth. VERANUS. How does Coheleth, or Ecclesiastes, sound in the Latin tongue? SALONIUS. He is properly called Ecclesiastes who gathers an assembly, that is, a Church. Whence in the Latin tongue Ecclesiastes is rightly called a Preacher, because he preaches, that is, speaks to the people; and his speech is not directed to one person specifically, but is directed generally to all. Therefore, a Preacher in the holy Church can be called a preacher.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quot libros edidit Salomon SALONIs. Tres tantum juxta numerum vocabulorum suorum: Proverbia, Ecclesiasten et Cantica Canticorum. VERANUS. Quid ait Salomon in Proverbiis, aut quid docet in Ecclesiaste, vel Cantico Canticorum? SALONIUS. In Proverbiis docet parvulum, et per varias sententias, instruit quasi filium. In Ecclesiaste vero jam perfectae ætatis virum imbuit, ut intelligat quia in hujus mundi rebus nihil est perpetuum, nihil groriosum aut magnum; sed omnia sunt brevia, caduca et vana, quæ cernimus. In Cantico Canticorum jam consummatum virum atque perfectum in omnihus, et variis exornatnm virtutibus, sponsi, id est, Domini nostri Jesu Christi amplexibus jungit. VERANUS, Spiritualiter autem quid significat ille Salomon, Ydida et Ecclesiastes? SALONIUS. Dominum Jesum Christum, qui est noster Salomon, id est pacificans omnia per sanguinem suum fecit utraque mium (Ephes. n), id est, de duobus populis unam sibi construxit Ecclesiam. Unde Apostolus: Christus, inquit, pax nostra, qui fecit utraque unum. Ipse est Ydida, id est, dilectissimus patris filius, de 'suo ipse Pater ad discipulos ait: Hic est Filius meus dilectus in o mihi bene complacui (Matth. III; Marc. I; Lue. III).
English
VERANUS. How many books did Solomon publish? SALONIUS. Only three, according to the number of his names: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and the Song of Songs. VERANUS. What does Solomon say in Proverbs, or what does he teach in Ecclesiastes, or in the Song of Songs? SALONIUS. In Proverbs he teaches the little one, and through various sayings he instructs him as a son. In Ecclesiastes, however, he imbues the man of mature age, so that he understands that in the things of this world nothing is perpetual, nothing glorious or great; but all that we see is brief, fleeting, and vain. In the Song of Songs he joins the consummated and perfect man, adorned with all and various virtues, to the embraces of the bridegroom, that is, of our Lord Jesus Christ. VERANUS. But what does that Solomon, Ydida, and Ecclesiastes signify spiritually? SALONIUS. Our Lord Jesus Christ, who is our Solomon, that is, the one pacifying all things through his blood made both one (Ephesians 2), that is, from two peoples he built for himself one Church. Whence the Apostle: Christ, he says, is our peace, who made both one. He is Ydida, that is, the most beloved son of the Father, concerning whom the Father himself said to the disciples: This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased (Matthew 3; Mark 1; Luke 3).
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:3 · narrativehigh
Source
Ipse nimirum est Ecclesiastes, id est concionator noster qui congregat coctum, videlicet sanctam Ecclesiam de universo orbe terrarum, ad quem loquitur, dicens: Discite a me quia mitis sum et humilia corde, et invenietis requiem animabus vestris (Matth. XI). Hic est filius David, ad quem caeci in Evangelio clamabant dicentes: Miserere nostri, fili David (Matth. IX, xv et xx). Hic est etiam Rex Jerusalem, non terrestris, sed illius coelestis, quae est mater omnium nostrum. VERANUS. Quid est quod dicit Ecclesiastes: Vanitas vanitatum, et omnia vanitas (Eccle. I); cum scriptum sit in libro Genesis: Vidit Deus cuncta quæ fecit et erant valde bona (Gen. I)? Si cuncta quae fecit Deus, valde bona sunt, quomodo ergo omnia vanitas,; et non solum vanitas, sed etiam vanitas vanitatum SALONIUS. Cælum et terra, maria et omnia quae in hoc circulo continentur, per se quidem bona sunt, quoniam a bono Deo creata sunt, sed comparata Deo, utique pro nihilo habenda sunt, quia semper Deus permanebit id quod est, illa vero omnia transibunt. Nam qua videntur temporalia sunt, quia transitoria; quæ autem non videntur æterna sunt.
English
He is of course the Ecclesiastes, that is, our preacher who gathers the assembly, namely the holy Church from the whole world, to whom he speaks, saying: Learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart, and you will find rest for your souls (Matt. 11). He is the son of David, to whom the blind in the Gospel cried out, saying: Have mercy on us, son of David (Matt. 9:15 and 20). He is also the King of Jerusalem, not of the earthly one, but of that heavenly one, which is the mother of us all. VERANUS. What does Ecclesiastes mean when he says: Vanity of vanities, and all is vanity (Eccl. 1), since it is written in the book of Genesis: God saw all that he had made, and they were very good (Gen. 1)? If all that God made are very good, how then is everything vanity, and not only vanity, but even vanity of vanities? SALONIUS. Heaven and earth, the seas and all things that are contained within this circle, are indeed good in themselves, since they were created by a good God, but compared to God, they are certainly to be accounted as nothing, because God will always remain what he is, while all those things will pass away. For things that are seen are temporal, because they are transitory; but things that are not seen are eternal.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quare bis replicavit sententiam suam dicens: Vanitas vanitatum, dixit Ecclesiastes; vanitas vanitatum et omnia vanitas? SALONIUS. Ad exaggerandam magnitudinem vanitatum iteravitsententiam suam, ut per hoc demonstraret quia omnis mundi gloria sicut flos feni marcescet, et sicut fumus pertransibit. VERANUS. De quibus generationibus dicit: Ceneratio præterit, et generatio adveniet (Eccle. I)? SALONIUS. De generatione Judxorum et generatione gentium. Recedit enim generatio prima Judæorum, quoniam periit propter infidelitatem, et succedit generatio de gentibus, congregata videlicet sancta fidelium Ecclesia, qua: per fidem Christi salvatur Potes i et sic intelligi: Generatio vadit, et generatio venit, id est, aliis morientibus, alii nascuntur, et quos prius videras, jam non vides, et incipis videre eos qui ante non fuerant.
English
VERANUS: Why did he repeat his statement twice, saying: "Vanity of vanities, said Ecclesiastes; vanity of vanities, and all is vanity"? SALONIUS: To exaggerate the magnitude of vanities he repeated his statement, so that by this he might show that all worldly glory withers like the flower of hay and passes away like smoke. VERANUS: Of which generations does he say: "A generation passes away, and a generation arrives" (Ecclesiastes 1)? SALONIUS: Of the generation of the Jews and the generation of the Gentiles. For the first generation of the Jews recedes, since it perished on account of unfaithfulness, and the generation from the Gentiles succeeds, namely the holy Church of the faithful gathered together, which is saved through faith in Christ. And it can be understood thus: A generation goes, and a generation comes, that is, as others die, others are born, and those whom you had seen before you no longer see, and you begin to see those who had not existed before.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quare Salomon dicit: Terra in aternum stat (Ibid.), cum Dominus in Evangelio dicat: Cœlum et terra transibiunt (Matth. v et xxiv; Marc. XIII; Luc, XXI)? SALONIUS. Vere juxta Domini sententiam, Cœlum et terra transibunt per meliorationem, sed non per ablationem; quia igne judicii purgaLa meliorabuntur, quoniam renovabuntur, sed penitus non destruentur. Tantum quippe ardebit coelum sursum et terra deorsum, quantum malitia hominum simul et dæmonum coinquinari potuit. Ergo juxta sententiam Salomonis, terra in æternum stabit (Eccle. i), quoniam nunquam destruetur; verumtamen renovabitur et meliorabitur. VERANUS. Quid significare voluit Salomon, cum ait: Oritur sol et occidit, et ad locum suum revertitur, ibique renascens gyrat per meridiem, et flectitur ad aquilonem (Ibid.)? Quis enim nescit quod oritur sol et occidit, et per incognitas nobis vias regreditur ad locum suum unde ortus est, ut iterum oriatur?
English
VERANUS: Why does Solomon say: "The earth stands forever" (Eccl. 1), when the Lord says in the Gospel: "Heaven and earth will pass away" (Matt. 5 and 24; Mark 13; Luke 21)? SALONIUS: Truly, according to the Lord's saying, heaven and earth will pass away by way of improvement, but not by way of removal; because by the fire of judgment they will be purified, they will be improved, since they will be renewed, but they will not be utterly destroyed. For only so much of heaven above and earth below will burn as could be defiled by the malice of men and demons together. Therefore, according to Solomon's saying, the earth will stand forever (Eccl. 1), since it will never be destroyed; nevertheless, it will be renewed and improved. VERANUS: What did Solomon mean to signify when he said: "The sun rises and sets, and returns to its place, and there, being reborn, it circles through the south, and turns toward the north" (Eccl. 1)? For who does not know that the sun rises and sets, and returns by ways unknown to us to its place from which it rose, so that it may rise again?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:6 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Hoc ideo Salomon dicit, ut ostenderet, quia sol ipse qui hominibus in lucem diei datus est, sua mutabilitate, id est ortu suo et occasu, qnolidic hujus sæculi monstraret interitum. Per has natoque mulationes temporum, et per ortum siderum et occasum, docet Salomon, quod humana ætas quotidie oritur et occidit. VERANUS. Quid sol in hoc loco spiritualiter significat? SALONIUS. Illum verum solem, Dominum videlicet Jesum Christum, qui est sol justitiæ, de quo dicit propheta: Vobis qui timetis. Deum, orietur sol justitiæ (Mal. iv). Iste sol justitiæ quotidie oritur timentibus se, id est fidelibus suis, sanctis videlicet et piis hominibus. Occidit etiam meridie, pseudoprophetis, id est hæreticis et malis catholicis, quia propter peccata sua, lumeu gratiæ ipsius amittunt. Occidit et infidelibus, quia luce fidei non merentur illustrari.
English
SALONIUS: Solomon says this in order to show that the sun itself, which was given to men for the light of day, by its own mutability—that is, by its rising and setting—daily demonstrates the destruction of this world. Through these changes of the seasons, and through the rising and setting of the stars, Solomon teaches that the human condition daily rises and falls. VERANUS: What does the sun signify spiritually in this passage? SALONIUS: That true sun, namely the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the sun of justice, of whom the prophet says: "For you who fear God, the sun of justice will rise" (Mal. 4). This sun of justice daily rises for those who fear him, that is, for his faithful, namely holy and pious men. It also sets at midday for false prophets, that is, for heretics and for evil Catholics, because on account of their sins they lose the light of his grace. It sets also for unbelievers, because they do not deserve to be illuminated by the light of faith.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Omnia flumina currunt in mare, et mare tion redundat; ad locum unde exeunt, revertuntur ut iterum fluant (Eccle. i)? Quis enim novit, quod ad locum suum flumina revertuntur. ut iterum fluant? SALONIUS. Novit Ecclesiastes ille, scilicet Salomon, per gratiam sancti Spiritus. Sed iste noster Ecclesiastes, videlicet esus Christus, qui est ipsarum aquarum conditor, per potentiam divinitalis qua æqualis est Deo Patri, plenissime novit, quæ flumina (quia in marc currunt) in abyssum defluunt, et per occultas venas ad capita fontium revertuntur, et de matre abysso iterum ebullire incipiunt. VERANUS. Spiritualiter autem quid significant hæc numina? SALONIUS. Per hæc flumina designantur sancti prædicatores, qui, cum virtutibus emicant et doctrinis coruscant, vere flumina sunt, quoniam aridam terram carnalium cordium, sancta sua prædicatione simul et operatione irrigant, ut afferant bonorum operum fructus.
English
VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "All rivers run into the sea, and the sea does not overflow; they return to the place from which they come out, so that they may flow again" (Ecclesiastes 1)? For who knows that rivers return to their own place so that they may flow again? SALONIUS: That Ecclesiastes knows, namely Solomon, through the grace of the Holy Spirit. But this Ecclesiastes of ours, namely Jesus Christ, who is the very creator of those waters, through the power of the divinity by which He is equal to God the Father, knows most fully that the rivers (because they run into the sea) flow down into the abyss, and through hidden channels return to the sources of the springs, and begin to bubble forth again from the mother abyss. VERANUS: But spiritually, what do these rivers signify? SALONIUS: By these rivers are designated the holy preachers, who, when they shine with virtues and gleam with teachings, are truly rivers, because they irrigate the dry land of carnal hearts with their holy preaching and action alike, so that they may bring forth the fruits of good works.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:8 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quomodo ergo ut iterum revertantur hæc flumina ad locum unde exeunt, refluunt? SALIMUS. Quia sancti prædicatores in omni doctrina et opere quod faciunt, ad laudem sui Creatoris recurrunt, ut Domino auctori suo laudes et gratias referant, per quem, ut talia faccrent, et omne bonum suum acceperunt. Semper etenim ad fontem veri luminis revertuntur ne forte arescant ct exsiccertur, ut ex eo aquam scientia et gratiam virtutum accipiant, ut iterum fluant, hoc est, ut et semetipsos bonis operibus repleant, et aliorum cordibns fluenta doctrinæ spiritualis infundant. Omnes etiam fideles flumina sunt, et hæc flumina ad locum unde exeunt, revertuntur. quoniam per sancta desideria ad amorem sui Conditoris redeunt, et de omnibus bonis laudes et gratias illi referunt a quo ea perceperunt. VERANUS. Quare dedit Salomon cor IMum, hoc est, sollicito corde studuit, scire prudentiam. atque doctrinam, erroresque et stultitiam (Eccle. I)? Bonum quippe est scire prudentiam atque doctrinam, quid autem boni est scire errores atque stultitiam?
English
VERANUS: How then do these rivers flow back to the place from which they come out, so that they may return again? SALIMUS: Because holy preachers, in all the teaching and work they do, return to the praise of their Creator, so that they may offer praises and thanks to their Lord and Author, through whom they have received both the ability to do such things and all their goodness. For they always return to the spring of true light, lest they perhaps dry up and wither, so that from it they may receive the water of knowledge and the grace of virtues, so that they may flow again—that is, so that they may both fill themselves with good works and pour streams of spiritual teaching into the hearts of others. All the faithful are also rivers, and these rivers return to the place from which they come out, because through holy desires they return to the love of their Creator, and for all good things they offer praises and thanks to Him from whom they have received them. VERANUS: Why did Solomon give his heart—that is, diligently apply his anxious heart—to know wisdom and learning, and errors and folly (Ecclesiastes 1)? For it is good to know wisdom and learning, but what good is there in knowing errors and folly?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:9 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Sicut bonum est scire prudentiam et doctrinam, ita vere bonum est, errores scire et stultitiam, quoniam prima sapientia est carere stultitia: carere vero slullilia nemo potest, nisi qui intellexerit eam. Similiter nemo errores vitare potest, nisi qui eos intelligit: propterea in rcbus terrenis plurima sunt noxia creata, ut dum ea vitamus erudiamur ad sapicntiam. VERANUS. Quare fuit æquale studium Salomooi scire prudentiam et doctrinam, et econtrario, errores et stultitiam? SALONIUS. Ut dum appeteret alia, et alia declinaret, id est apprehenderet bona, et devitaret mala, vera ejus probaretur sapientia. VERANUS. Quid est quod Salomon dicit: Quia in multa sapientia multa sit indignatio, et qui addit scientiam addit et laborem (Ibid.)! Quomodo multa est indignatio in multa sapientia? SALOMUS. Ideo in multa sapientia est multa indigna. tio, quia quanto quisque majorem sapientiam percipit, tanto amplius sibi indignamur et dolet se vitiis et peccatis subjacere et non habere virtutes. Nam quanto quisque plus in sapientia proficit, tanto magis sibi irascitur de malis operibus quæ gessit, et contristatur et dolet sulce' peccatis suis, ideoque addit et laborem, quia quanto amplius coelestia ct æterna cognoscit, tanto magis dolendo et flendo laborat ut errorum laqueos evadere possit, et liberari valeat de hujus speculi miseria.
English
SALONIUS: Just as it is good to know prudence and doctrine, so truly it is good to know errors and folly, since the first wisdom is to be free of folly: but no one can be free of folly unless he has understood it. Similarly, no one can avoid errors unless he understands them. For this reason, many harmful things were created in earthly matters, so that by avoiding them we might be instructed toward wisdom. VERANUS: Why was it of equal concern to Solomon to know prudence and doctrine, and on the contrary, errors and folly? SALONIUS: So that while he sought some things and avoided others—that is, grasped the good and shunned the evil—his true wisdom might be proven. VERANUS: What does it mean that Solomon says: "Because in much wisdom there is much indignation, and he who adds knowledge adds also labor"? How is there much indignation in much wisdom? SALONIUS: There is much indignation in much wisdom for this reason: because the more wisdom each one perceives, the more he is indignant with himself and grieves that he is subject to vices and sins and does not possess virtues. For the more each one advances in wisdom, the more he becomes angry with himself over the evil deeds he has done, and he is saddened and grieves over his sins. Therefore he also adds labor, because the more he comes to know heavenly and eternal things, the more he labors with grieving and weeping so that he may be able to escape the snares of errors and be freed from the misery of this mirror.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:10 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quare dicit: Risum deputavi errorem, et qudio dixi cur frustra deciperis (Eccle. n), cum hominum naturale sit ridere, et Dominus in Evangelio dicat: Gaudete et exsultate, quoniam merces vestra magna est in cœlo (Matth. v; Lue. VI)? SALONIUS. Non reprehendit Salomon risum naturalem, id est modestum et honestum; unde alibi dicit: Vir sapiens atacitus ridebit (Eccli. xxi); sed risuri dissolutum et immoderatum atque perstrepentem appellat errorem, talis nempe risus vocatur cachinnus' similiter non spirituale, sed temporale gaudium vocat deceptionem. Illi vero qui præterita mala sua non plangunt, neque intelligunt ruinam peccatorum suorum, et cachinnant et gaudent in rebus temporalibus, quia nova et brevia putant esse bona perpetua, et idcirco suavitate præsentis vitro decepti quotidie bujus sæculi errore vexantur. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Vidi in omnibus vanitatem et afflictionem animi, et nihil permanere sub sole (Eccle. II, IV, VI, VIII et XII)? Quomodo dicit nihil permanere sub sole cum superius dixerit: Terra autem in æternum stat (Eccle. I)?
English
VERANUS: Why does he say: "I have considered error as laughter," and "I said, why are you vainly deceived" (Eccl. 2), when it is natural for men to laugh, and the Lord says in the Gospel: "Rejoice and exult, for your reward is great in heaven" (Matt. 5; Luke 6)? SALONIUS: Solomon does not reprove natural laughter, that is, modest and honest laughter; whence elsewhere he says: "A wise man will laugh silently" (Sir. 21); but he calls dissolute, immoderate, and uproarious laughter "error"; such laughter is indeed called a guffaw. Similarly, he calls not spiritual but temporal joy a deception. But those who do not lament their past evils, nor understand the ruin of their sins, both guffaw and rejoice in temporal things, because they think new and brief things are perpetual goods, and therefore, deceived by the sweetness of the present glass, they are daily troubled by the error of this world. VERANUS: What does it mean when he says: "I have seen in all things vanity and affliction of mind, and that nothing remains under the sun" (Eccl. 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12)? How does he say that nothing remains under the sun, when earlier he said: "But the earth stands forever" (Eccl. 1)?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:11 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Nihil enim permanebit sub sole quod non transeat, quoniam omnia vana sunt: unde in Evangelio ait Dominus: Caelum et terra transibunt (Matth XXIV); attamen terra in æternum stabit, quia non funditus destruetur, sed meliorabitur, sicut dictum est superius. VERANUS. Quare dicit: Sapientis oculi in capite ejus,.tullus autem in tenebris ambulat (Eccle. 11)? Nunquid oculi stulti non sunt in capite ipsius? SALONIUS. Oculi in hoc loco non possunt corporales, sed spirituales intelligi: oculi videlicet mentis, id est sensus et intentiones animi. Per caput vero designatur Cbristus, unde Apostolus ait: Caput viri Christus (I Cor. XI). Oculi viri sapientis in capite sunt, quia vir sapiens omnem intentionem suam ad Christum dirigit, et in Christo collocat, et oculos suae mentis semper ad coelestia meditanda sublevat: stultus vero in tenebris ambulat, quia et stultitiæ simul, et peccatorum suorum tenebris obscuratur, et amore hujus mundi obscuratur; odit enim coelestia, et ideo non potest, sicut vir sapiens, ad coelum oculos suos erigere, quia non cogitat ea quæ Dei sunt, sed quæ hujus sacculi. v
English
SALONIUS: For nothing will remain under the sun that does not pass away, since all things are vain; whence in the Gospel the Lord says: "Heaven and earth will pass away" (Matt. 24); yet the earth will stand forever, because it will not be utterly destroyed, but will be made better, as was said above. VERANUS: Why does he say: "The eyes of a wise man are in his head, but a fool walks in darkness" (Eccl. 11)? Are not the eyes of a fool in his own head? SALONIUS: The eyes in this place cannot be understood as bodily, but as spiritual: namely, the eyes of the mind, that is, the senses and intentions of the soul. By the head, however, Christ is signified, whence the Apostle says: "The head of a man is Christ" (1 Cor. 11). The eyes of a wise man are in the head, because a wise man directs all his intention toward Christ and places it in Christ, and always lifts the eyes of his mind to meditate on heavenly things; but a fool walks in darkness, because he is darkened both by the darkness of his folly and of his sins, and is darkened by love of this world; for he hates heavenly things, and therefore cannot, like a wise man, lift his eyes to heaven, because he does not think of those things which are of God, but of those which are of this world.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:12 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid ergo distat inter virum sapientem et stultum? SALONIUS. Hoc distat, quia iste sapientia et claritate illustratur et exornatur; ille vero errore stultitiæ suæ; obtenebratur et deturbatur. Tantum quippe distat inter sapientem et stultum, quantum inter diem ct noctem, lucem et tenebras. VERANUS. Quomodo tantum distat inter sapientem ct stultum, cum unus sit interitus utriusque: sic enim moritur doctus ut indoctus, sapiens ut insipiens (Eccle. II)? SALONIUS. Quamvis unus sit occasus, et similis mors sapientis et stulti, et saepe in hac vita magis affigatur sapiens quam stultus; tamen non erit similis memoria in futuro nec æqualem percipient remunerationem, quoniam sapiens in die judicii ad regni cœlestis elevabitur gloriam, stultus vero demergetur in æterna damnationis tormenta. VERANUS. Quis est ergo iste sapiens qui tantum distat a stulto quantum lux a tenebris? Nunquid ille qui philosophicæ tantum disciplinæ pollet affluentia, vel liberalium artium splendet eloquentia?
English
VERANUS: What, then, is the difference between a wise man and a fool? SALONIUS: This is the difference: that the one is illuminated and adorned with wisdom and clarity; the other, however, is darkened and cast down by the error of his own folly. For the distance between the wise and the fool is as great as that between day and night, light and darkness. VERANUS: How can the distance between the wise and the fool be so great, when the destruction of both is one and the same? For the learned dies as the unlearned, the wise as the unwise (Eccl. 2). SALONIUS: Although the setting is one and the death of the wise and the fool is similar, and often in this life the wise man is more afflicted than the fool, yet the memory of them will not be similar in the future, nor will they receive an equal reward, because on the day of judgment the wise man will be raised to the glory of the heavenly kingdom, while the fool will be plunged into the torments of eternal damnation. VERANUS: Who, then, is this wise man who is as far removed from the fool as light from darkness? Is it he who abounds only in the wealth of philosophical discipline, or shines with the eloquence of the liberal arts?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:13 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Nonnunquam sæcularis prudentia inimica Deo est, et carnalis sapientia, quamvis eloquentiæ floribus exornetur, nullum tamen in se spiritualem, nullum perpetuæ bcatitudinis fructum continet: sed HIe veraciter est sapiens qui Dominum diligit, qui ejus mandata custodit, et quantum possibile est humanæ fragilitati, ejus voluntatem in omnibus studet implere, de quo paulo inferius dicit: Homini bono, in conspectu suo dedit Deus sapientiam, et scientiam, et tætitiam (Ibid.). VERANUS. Quare statim subjungit: Peccatori autem dedit afflictionem et curam superfluam: si enim Deus peccatori homini dedit curam et sollicitudinem superfluam habere; quid ergo ipse peccat, si curis superiluis atque sollicitudine rerum temporalium affligilur? SALONIUS. Causa superfluae curæ atque maLe sollicitudinis non est in Deo, sed in illo qui ante sponte sua peccavit, quia peccatis suis exigentibus promeruit ut haberet curam superfluam et sollicitudinem: et ideo quod ait: Peccatori autem dedit curam superfluam, intelligendum est, suis meritis exigentibus dari pernusit, videlicet quia peccator fuit.
English
Salonius. Sometimes secular prudence is hostile to God, and carnal wisdom, even if adorned with the flowers of eloquence, nevertheless contains in itself no spiritual fruit, no fruit of eternal blessedness. But he is truly wise who loves the Lord, who keeps his commandments, and, as far as is possible for human frailty, strives to fulfill his will in all things; concerning whom a little further on it says: To a good man, in his own sight, God gave wisdom, and knowledge, and joy (Ibid.). Veranus. Why does it immediately add: But to a sinner he gave affliction and superfluous care? For if God gave to a sinful man the having of care and superfluous solicitude, what then does he himself sin, if he is afflicted by superfluous cares and solicitude for temporal things? Salonius. The cause of superfluous care and evil solicitude is not in God, but in him who previously sinned of his own accord, because by the demands of his sins he merited having superfluous care and solicitude. And therefore what it says: But to a sinner he gave superfluous care, is to be understood as meaning that, by the demands of his own merits, he permitted it to be given, namely because he was a sinner.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:14 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid vult demonstrare per hoc quod ait: Omnia tempus habent (Eccle. m)? Quod si omnia tempus habent, ergo æternæ Divinitatis substantia tempus habet? SALONIUS. Absit; illa quippe ineffabilis aeterna majestatis divinae essentia quae omnia creavit ex nihilo, non loco clauditur, non tempore coangustatur, non ullo spatio terminatur: et idcirco Salomon, ut ostenderet de quibus hoc dixerit, statim subjungit dicens: Et suis spatiis transeunt universa sub cælo. Vult enim demonstrare quod contraria sibi sunt omnia quæ in mundo sunt, et nihil est perpetuum ex omnibus quæ sub cœlo sunt, et ista tempus continent. VERANUS. De qua plantatione ait, aut de qua evulsione loquitur cum dicit: Tempus plantandi, et tempus evellendi quod plantatum est (Ibid.): Nunquid de plantatione aut evulsione arborum aut herbarum dicit? SALONIUS. Non, sed de nativitate et morte hominum: nam quod superius dixit: Tempus nascendi, hoc est quod sequitur, et tempus plantandi: hoc est enim plantare quod nascitur. Quod supra dicit, tempus moriendi, hoc est quod hic sequitur, tempus evellendi id quod plantatum est: nam evelli, hoc est quod et mori.
English
Veranus. What does he intend to show by this statement: "All things have a time"? If all things have a time, does the substance of the eternal Divinity therefore have a time? Salonius. Far from it; indeed, that ineffable eternal essence of the divine majesty, which created all things from nothing, is not confined by place, not constrained by time, not bounded by any space: and for this reason Solomon, to show of which things he has said this, immediately adds, saying: "And all things under heaven pass in their own spaces." For he intends to show that all things which are in the world are mutually opposed, and nothing among all things that are under heaven is perpetual, and these things contain time. Veranus. Of what planting does he speak, or of what uprooting does he speak when he says: "A time for planting, and a time for uprooting what has been planted"? Does he speak of the planting or uprooting of trees or herbs? Salonius. No, but of the birth and death of men: for what he said above: "A time for being born," this is what follows, "and a time for planting": for to plant is the same as to be born. What he says above, "a time for dying," this is what follows here, "a time for uprooting what has been planted": for to be uprooted is the same as to die.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:15 · narrativehigh
Source
Soli quippe Deo notus est ortus et occasus hominum, id est tempus nascendi, et tempus pereundi, et tempus plantandi, et tempus evellendi: quoniam ipse instituit et tempus in quo unusquisque nasceretur et plantaretur ad vitam, et tempus in quo moreretur et de hac vita evelleretur, hoc est per sententiam mortis eradicaretur. VERANUS. Quid est quod iterum dicit: Tempus occidcudi et tempus sanandi (Ibid.)? Nulli quippe dubium, quod tempus sanandi a Deo conceditur, sed nunquam Deus instituit tempus occidendi alium: aut eum quem semel occiderit homo, poterit unquam sanare. SALONIUS. Non utique; sed illi soli est tempus occidendi et tempus sanandi, qui per Mosen loquitur, dicens: Ego occidam et ego vivere faciam, percutiam et ego sanabo (Deut. XXXII). Ipse nimirum statuit tempus in quo peccatores occidantur, et sanentur inhrmi, hoc est peccatis languidi. Tunc enim occidit, cum vel corporis infirmitate vel aliqua mundi hujus adversitate peccatores affligit ut corrigantur et moriantur peccatis, et vivant Deo. Saepe namque Deus ideo flagellat sceleratos, ut eos occidat et sanet, id est ut desinant esse quod sunt, et incipiant esse quod non sunt. Est ergo tempus sanandi, cum Deus omnipotens eos quos occidit, id esi adversitatibus misericorditer afflixit, per occultam inspirationem compungit, et ad pœnitentiam provocat.
English
For only God knows the birth and death of men, that is, the time of being born and the time of perishing, and the time of planting and the time of uprooting: since He Himself established the time in which each one would be born and planted into life, and the time in which he would die and be uprooted from this life, that is, be eradicated by the sentence of death. Veranus. What does it mean when it says again: "A time of killing and a time of healing"? For no one doubts that the time of healing is granted by God, but God never instituted a time for killing another: or can a man ever heal the one he has once killed? Salonius. Not at all; but the time of killing and the time of healing belongs only to the one who speaks through Moses, saying: "I will kill and I will make alive, I will strike and I will heal." He Himself surely established the time in which sinners are killed, and the infirm, that is, those languishing in sins, are healed. For He kills when He afflicts sinners either with bodily infirmity or with some adversity of this world so that they may be corrected and die to sins, and live to God. For often God scourges the wicked in order to kill and heal them, that is, so that they may cease to be what they are, and begin to be what they are not. Therefore there is a time of healing, when Almighty God, by a hidden inspiration, pricks the conscience of those whom He has killed, that is, mercifully afflicted with adversities, and provokes them to penance.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:16 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. De qua destructione vel ærdificatione loquitur, cum dicit:Tempus destruendi et tempus ædificandi (Eccle. III)? Numquid de ædificatione ac destructione domorum loquitur? Quid enim nobis prodesset, si hoc diceret? Quis enim nescit quod alii dostruunt, et alii aediticant domos? SALONIUS. Non hic loquitur Salomon de domorum, sed de malorum destructione, et ædificatione bonorum; quoniam ncecsse est prius mala destruere, et sic bona postea ædificare, juxta illud Psalmistæ: Declina a malo, et fac bonum (Psal. XXXVI). Hoc ergo dicit, quia tempus est destruendi mala et tempus est æJiQcandi bona, quoniam in præsenti vita concessum est nobis tempus a Deo ut destruamus mala, et ædificemus bona: id est, prius in nobis per poenitentiam deleamus peccata; postea vero per sancta desideria, virtutum construamus ædificia. VERANUS. Quare dicit: Tempus flendi et tempus ridendi, tempus plangendi et tempus saltandi (Eccle. III)? Quis enim ignorat, quia alio tempore flemus, alio autem ridemus? aut quid profuit dicere, tempus saltandi? Nunquid forsitan ostendere voluit, quia oportet nos saltationum exercere ludicra?
English
VERANUS: Of what destruction or building does he speak when he says: “A time for destroying and a time for building” (Eccles. 3)? Is he speaking of the building and destruction of houses? For what would that profit us? For who does not know that some destroy and others build houses? SALONIUS: Solomon is not speaking here of houses, but of the destruction of evils and the building of goods; because it is necessary first to destroy evils, and then afterwards to build goods, according to that saying of the Psalmist: “Turn away from evil, and do good” (Ps. 36). Therefore he says this, because there is a time for destroying evils and a time for building goods, since in the present life a time has been granted to us by God so that we may destroy evils and build goods: that is, first in ourselves through penance we may blot out sins; afterwards, through holy desires, we may construct the edifices of virtues. VERANUS: Why does he say: “A time for weeping and a time for laughing, a time for mourning and a time for dancing” (Eccles. 3)? For who does not know that at one time we weep, and at another we laugh? Or what profit was there in saying “a time for dancing”? Did he perhaps wish to show that we ought to engage in the amusements of dances?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:17 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Absit; nihil oportet nos scurriliter agere: sed tempus flendi est in vita præsenti; tempus ridendi in vita futura. Qui ergo in praesenti vita quotidianis fletibus et lacrymis se purgare studuerit, in vita futura ridebit, id est gaudebit. Similiter tempus plangendi est vita praesens; tempus saltandi est vita beata. In mbtu namque saltationis, homo suae mentis gaudium et animi demonstrat affectum. Qui ergo in hac vita plangendo studet abolere peccata, in futura vita saltabit, id est lætabitur et exsultabit in gloria æternæ felicitatis. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Tempus spargendi lapides, et tempus colligendi (Ibid.)? Quid enim prodest lapides spargere, aut quid prodest colligere; nisi forte domum aliquis velit ædificare? SALONIUS. Non de hac causa loquitur Salomon; sed de gentium dispersione et collectione. Nam per lapides, gentes assignantur: Unde Joannes: Potens est, inquit, Deus de lapidibus istis suscitare filios Abrahæ (Matth. III).
English
Salonius. Far from it; we must not act in a frivolous manner: rather, the time for weeping is in the present life; the time for rejoicing is in the future life. Therefore, whoever in the present life strives to purify himself with daily weeping and tears, in the future life will laugh, that is, will rejoice. Similarly, the time for lamenting is the present life; the time for dancing is the blessed life. For in the act of dancing, a man demonstrates the joy of his mind and the affection of his spirit. Therefore, whoever in this life, by lamenting, strives to blot out his sins, in the future life will dance, that is, will be glad and will exult in the glory of eternal happiness. Veranus. What does it mean when it says: “A time for scattering stones, and a time for gathering them” (Eccles. 3)? For what good is it to scatter stones, or what good is it to gather them, unless perhaps someone wishes to build a house? Salonius. Solomon is not speaking about this matter, but about the dispersion and gathering of peoples. For by “stones,” peoples are signified. Whence John: “God is able,” he says, “to raise up sons of Abraham from these stones” (Matt. 3).
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:18 · narrativehigh
Source
Tempus enim fuit spargendi lapides ante adventum Domini, quia gentiles non permanserunt in unitate fidei, sed recedentes a Deo dispersi sunt, quia varios deos adorabant, et diversa idola colebant: tempus autem fuit colligendi lapides post adventum Domini, quia, sicut Apostolus dicit: ibi venerit plenitudo temporis, misit Deus Filium suum factum ex muliere, factum sub lege, ut eos qui sub tege erant redimeret, ut adoptionem filiorum reciperemus (Gal. IV). Tunc quippe cœpit colligere lapides, quia, peracto passionis ac resurrectionis suae mysterio, direxit apostolos suos in universum terrarum orbem, dicens: Ite, docete omnes gentes, baptiste eos in nomine Patris et Filii, et Spiritus sancti ( Matth. XXVIII). Deinde celebrato quadragesimo die, mysterio ascensionis in cœlos, mox ut ab apostolis fama nominis ejus diffusa est, longe lateque per mundum, lapides, id est gentiles, qui erant dispersi per variam idolorum culturam, collecti sunt, quia resipiscentes et abominantes idola, in unitatem fidei convenerunt.
English
For there was a time for scattering stones before the coming of the Lord, because the Gentiles did not remain in the unity of the faith, but, withdrawing from God, were scattered, since they worshipped various gods and venerated diverse idols. But there was a time for gathering stones after the coming of the Lord, because, as the Apostle says: when the fullness of time had come, God sent His Son, born of a woman, made subject to the law, in order to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive the adoption of sons (Galatians 4). Then indeed He began to gather stones, because, after completing the mystery of His passion and resurrection, He sent His apostles throughout the whole world, saying: Go, teach all nations, baptize them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 28). Then, after the fortieth day, the mystery of the ascension into heaven having been celebrated, as soon as the fame of His name was spread far and wide through the world by the apostles, the stones—that is, the Gentiles, who had been scattered through the varied worship of idols—were gathered, because, coming to their senses and abominating idols, they assembled into the unity of the faith.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:19 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Cur iterum dicit: Tempus dilectionis et tempus odii; tamen Joannes apostolus dicit: Qui oderit fratrem suum, homicida est ( I Joan. III); et in Evangelio dictum est: Qui odit animam suam in hoc mundo, in vitam æternam custodit eam (Joan. xn); item: Qui non odit patrem suum et matrem, fratres et sorores, uxorem et filios, adhuc autem et animam suam, non potest meus esse discipulus (Luc. XIV) Die ergo, quando tempus est dilectionis, et quando tempus odii? SALOnIUS. Et nunc quidem tempus est dilectionis, quoniam post Dominum diligere debemus patrem et matrem, uxorem et filios et caeteros propinquos: odii vero tempus, quia pro Christi confessione contemnere simul et odisse debemus et patrem et matrem, omnesque propinquos (si nobis in via Domini fuerint contrarii), sicut sancti martyres sæpe fecisse leguntur. VERANUS. Quid est quod rursum dicit: Tempus belli et tempus pacis (Eccle. m)? Quomodo tempus est belli, cum Dominus in Evangelio dicat: Esto consentiens adversario tuo cito, dum es cum illo in via; et item: Si quis percusserit te in dexteram maxillam tuam, præbe illi et alteram, et qui voluerit auferre tunicam tuam, dimitte illi et pallium (Luc. VI)?
English
VERANUS: Why does it say again: "A time for love and a time for hate"? Yet the apostle John says: "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer" (1 John 3); and in the Gospel it is said: "Whoever hates his own soul in this world preserves it for eternal life" (John 12); likewise: "Whoever does not hate his father and mother, brothers and sisters, wife and children, and even his own soul, cannot be my disciple" (Luke 14). Tell me, then, when is the time for love, and when is the time for hate? SALONIUS: Now indeed is the time for love, since after the Lord we ought to love our father and mother, wife and children, and other relatives; but the time for hate is when, for the sake of confessing Christ, we ought to despise and also hate both father and mother and all relatives (if they oppose us on the Lord's path), as the holy martyrs are read to have often done. VERANUS: What is it that it says again: "A time for war and a time for peace" (Ecclesiastes 3)? How is there a time for war, when the Lord says in the Gospel: "Be quickly reconciled to your adversary while you are with him on the road"; and likewise: "If someone strikes you on your right cheek, offer him the other also, and if someone wishes to take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well" (Luke 6)?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:20 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Vere nobis semper est tempus belli et pugnæ quandiu in praesenti vita sumus, quoniam seniper necesse eat nobis pugnare adversus insidias hostis antiqui, et aereas (id est malignorum spirituum) debellare potestates. Pacis vero tempus erit, cum de præsenti saeculo migraverimus; quoniam si bene pugnaverimus in boc saeculo, in futuro coronabimur, et in cœlesti Jerusalem in aeterna pace requiescemus. VERANUS. Quare dicit: Cuncta fecit Deus bona in tempore suo, cum superius dixerit, omnia vanitatem esse? Si omnia vana, quomodo ergo bona sunt? SALONIUS. Omnia vana sunt, quia transitoria; verumlamen cuncta bona sunt, quoniam a Deo bona creata, et bona quidem suul; non tamen semper, sed in tempore suo. Nam bonum est vigilare, bonum etiam est dormire; attamen semper vigilare, aut semper dormire non est utique bonum. VERANUS. Quare dubitaudo loquitur Salomon, dicens: Quis novit si spiritus filiorum Adam ascendat sursum, et spiritus jumentorum descendat deorsum (Eccle. III)? Quis enim ignorat quia spiritus jumentorum (id est pecorum cunctorumque brutorum animalium) simul cum corpore dissolvatur? Spiritus vero flliorum Adam (id est hominum) non simul cum corpore dissolvitur; sed mox ut egreditur de corpore, aut deducitur ad gloriam, aut demergitur in poenam?
English
SALONIUS: Truly, for us there is always a time of war and struggle as long as we are in this present life, since we must always fight against the snares of the ancient enemy and subdue the aerial powers (that is, of the evil spirits). But the time of peace will be when we have departed from this present world; for if we have fought well in this world, we shall be crowned in the future, and we shall rest in eternal peace in the heavenly Jerusalem. VERANUS: Why does it say: "All things God made good in their time," when above it said that all things are vanity? If all things are vain, how then are they good? SALONIUS: All things are vain because they are transitory; nevertheless, all things are good, since they were created good by God, and they are indeed good; yet not always, but in their own time. For it is good to be awake, and it is also good to sleep; but to be always awake, or always to sleep, is certainly not good. VERANUS: Why does Solomon speak doubtfully, saying: "Who knows if the spirit of the sons of Adam ascends upward, and the spirit of beasts descends downward" (Ecclesiastes 3)? For who is ignorant that the spirit of beasts (that is, of cattle and all brute animals) is dissolved together with the body? But the spirit of the sons of Adam (that is, of men) is not dissolved together with the body; but as soon as it departs from the body, it is either led to glory or plunged into punishment?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:21 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Paulo superius ostendit Salomon quia quantum ad corporis utilitatem nihil distat inter jumentum et hominem, quia sicut moritur jumentum, moritur et homo: sed ut ostenderet quia secundum animæ dignitatem multum distat homo a jumento et pccore, idcirco disjunxit dicens: Quis novit si spiritus filiorum Adam ascendat sursum, et spiritus jumentorum descendat deorsum (Ibid.)? Ostendit enim quia haec sola differentia est inter homines et bestias, quoniam hominis spiritus ascendit in cœlum et spiritus jumenti seu pecoris descendit in teiram, quia moritur et simul dissolvitur cum carne. VERANUS. Cur ergo dicit Salomon: Quis novit? quasi nemo sit qui hoc cognoscere possit! SALONIUS. IJeo ait: Quis novit? ut difGcultatem rei demonstraret: nam, quis, in Scripturis sacris non impossibilitatem sed difficultatem aut raritatem significare solet, sicut est istud: Generationem autem ejus quis enarrabit (Isai. LIII)? Hoc est, aut nullus, aut perrarus. Nam quod impossibile est fieri, nullatenus potest, etiam cum magno labore. Ergo ideo dicit: Quis norit? quia perrarus, aut certe difficile invenitur ita spiritualis homo qui tunc perfecte comprehendere valeat cum de corpore spiritus egreditur, utrum ascendat an ducatur ad poenam.
English
SALONIUS: A little above, Solomon showed that as far as bodily utility is concerned, there is no difference between a beast of burden and a man, because just as a beast of burden dies, so also a man dies. But to show that according to the dignity of the soul, a man differs greatly from a beast of burden and cattle, he therefore made a distinction, saying: "Who knows if the spirit of the sons of Adam ascends upward, and the spirit of beasts of burden descends downward?" (Ibid.). For he shows that this is the only difference between men and beasts: that the spirit of a man ascends into heaven, and the spirit of a beast of burden or cattle descends into the earth, because it dies and is simultaneously dissolved with the flesh. VERANUS: Why then does Solomon say: "Who knows?" as if there were no one who could know this! SALONIUS: He says "Who knows?" in order to demonstrate the difficulty of the matter. For "who" in the Sacred Scriptures usually signifies not impossibility but difficulty or rarity, as in this passage: "But who will recount his generation?" (Isaiah 53). That is, either no one, or very rarely. For what is impossible to happen cannot happen at all, even with great effort. Therefore he says "Who knows?" because a spiritual man who can then perfectly comprehend, when the spirit departs from the body, whether it ascends or is led to punishment, is very rare, or certainly difficult to find.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:22 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid significant spiritualiter isti filii Adam, aut illa jumenta? SALONIUS. Filii Adam significant sanctos et electos viros qui merito appellantur homines, qui rationaliter, sancte et spiritualiter vivunt: per jumenla vero designantur carnales, qui propterea jumenta vocantur quoniam bestialiter et carnaliter, sicut jumenta et pecora, vivunt. Hinc enim sanctus propheta David dicit: Homines et jumenta salvabis, Domine (Psal. XXXV). Solet enim fieri ut illi qui videntur homines justi, peccent et convertantur a justitia sua, et faciant iniquitatem: econtrario illi qui sunt mali et impii convertantur ab iniquitate sua, et faciant justitiam et æquitatem. Ideo dicit Salomon: Quis novit si spiritus filiorum Adam ascendat sursum, et spiritus jumentorum descendat deorsum? Quia tam incertus est vitæ hujus status, ut et peccator qui jumentum vocatur, per pœnitentiam conversus surgat et ascendat in collum, ct justus a justitia sua ruat in peccatum, et demergatur ad inferos.
English
VERANUS: What do these sons of Adam, or those beasts of burden, signify spiritually? SALONIUS: The sons of Adam signify holy and elect men who are deservedly called men, because they live rationally, holily, and spiritually. By beasts of burden, however, are designated the carnal, who are called beasts of burden for this reason, that they live bestially and carnally, just like beasts of burden and cattle. For the holy prophet David says: “Men and beasts of burden, Lord, you will save” (Psalm 35). For it often happens that those who seem to be just men sin and turn away from their righteousness, and do iniquity; on the contrary, those who are evil and impious turn away from their iniquity, and do justice and equity. Therefore Solomon says: “Who knows if the spirit of the sons of Adam ascends upward, and the spirit of the beasts of burden descends downward?” Because the state of this life is so uncertain that even a sinner, who is called a beast of burden, when converted through penance, rises and ascends to the heights, and a just man falls from his righteousness into sin, and is plunged down to the underworld.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:23 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Stultus complicat manus suas, et comedit carnes suas (Eccli. IV)? Qnis est enim tam stultus, qui carnem suam comedat? SALONIUS. Stultus isle, piger ille debet intelligi de quo in Proverbiis dicit: Abscondit piger manum suam sub ascella, nec ad os suum applicat eam (Prov. XIX). Iste piger et stultus complicat manus suas et comedit carnes suas, quia magis eligit in otio et torpore vivere et habere pugillum farris, quam laborando acquirere unde pascatur. Illud autem, Comedit carnes suas, dictum est per hyperbolem. VERANUS. Quid est hyperbole? SALONIUS. Hyperbole dicitur, quando aliquid incre. dibile profertur. VERANUS. Quomodo ergo dictum est hyperbolice, Comedit carnes suas? SALONIUS. Quia incredibile est ut homo comedat carnes suas: sed ad cxaggerandam pigritiam hujus stulti, ait, Comedit carnes, ut ostenderet quia magis stultus desiderat ut caro ejus tabescat inedia et miseria famis deficiat, quam ut manuum suarum laboribus sustentetur.
English
VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: “The fool folds his hands and eats his own flesh” (Sirach 4)? For who is so foolish that he would eat his own flesh? SALONIUS: That fool, that sluggard, should be understood as the one of whom it says in Proverbs: “The sluggard hides his hand under his armpit and does not bring it to his mouth” (Proverbs 19). That sluggard and fool folds his hands and eats his own flesh, because he prefers to live in idleness and torpor and to have a handful of grain rather than to acquire by labor what he may feed on. Moreover, that phrase “eats his own flesh” is spoken by way of hyperbole. VERANUS: What is hyperbole? SALONIUS: It is called hyperbole when something incredible is uttered. VERANUS: How then is it said hyperbolically, “He eats his own flesh”? SALONIUS: Because it is incredible that a man should eat his own flesh; but to exaggerate the laziness of this fool, it says “He eats his flesh,” to show that the fool desires his flesh to waste away through hunger and the misery of starvation to destroy him, rather than that he be sustained by the labors of his own hands.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:24 · narrativemedium
Source
VERANUS. Quis est unus de quo dicit Salomon: Unus est et secundum non habet, non filium non fratrem, et tamen laborare non cessat nec satiantur oculi ejus divitiis? SALONIUS. Ille est qui cum sit unus, id est solus, non habet secundum: hoc est filium, non fratrem. aut aliquem propinquum; et nunquam cessat laborare, hoc est divitias congregare, nec tantas congregat ut ei suniciant. Et ideo maxima vanitas est congregare divitias et ignorare cui eas relinquant. VERANUS. Quem significat spiritualiter ille unus qui non habet secundum? SALONIUS. Dominum Jesum Christum, qui naturaliter solus est Dei Patris Filius, et solus descendit de coelis ad redimendum genus humanum. VERANUS. Quomodo non habet filium vel fratrem, cum in sacro baptismate omnes Christiani, filii Dei efliciantur et fratres Domini nostri Jcsu Christi? SALONIUS. Ille solus proprius et naturalis Filius; cæteri vero omnes sunt adoptivi, et ideo fratres ejus sunt, non natura sed gratia.
English
VERANUS: Who is the one of whom Solomon says: “He is one and has no second, no son, no brother, and yet he does not cease to labor, nor are his eyes satisfied with riches”? SALONIUS: He is the one who, being one, that is, alone, has no second: that is, no son, no brother, or any relative; and he never ceases to labor, that is, to amass riches, nor does he amass so many that they suffice for him. And therefore it is the greatest vanity to amass riches and not to know to whom one leaves them. VERANUS: Whom does that one who has no second signify spiritually? SALONIUS: Our Lord Jesus Christ, who is naturally the only Son of God the Father, and alone descended from the heavens to redeem the human race. VERANUS: How does he have no son or brother, when in holy baptism all Christians become sons of God and brothers of our Lord Jesus Christ? SALONIUS: He alone is the proper and natural Son; all the rest, however, are adoptive, and therefore they are his brothers, not by nature but by grace.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:25 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quomodo ergo iste unus laborare non cessat? SALONIUS. Quia peccata nostra patienter sustinet et misericorditer ad pœnitentiam exspectat, et pro nobis quotidie apud Deum Patrem interpellat. VERANUS. Quomodo non saliantur oculi ejus divitiis? SALONIUS. Quia nostram semper desiderat salutem. VERANUS. Quis est iste funiculus triplex de quo dicit Salomon: Funiculus triplex difficile rumpitur (Eccle. iv)? SALONIUS. Unitas Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti, quia in divinitate ires sunt personx, sed tantum una est natura. VERANUS. Cur ergo ait, Difficile rumpitur? Illud cuiUn quod difficile est, fieri potest quamvis cum nagno labore: nunquid ergo potest iste funiculus rumpi? SALONIUS. Vere nunquam, quia individua est sanctæ Trinitatis natura: sed difficile in hoc loco pro impossibili accipiendum est, quia non potest fieri ut Divinitatis scindatur natura.
English
VERANUS: How then does this one not cease to labor? SALONIUS: Because he patiently endures our sins and mercifully awaits our repentance, and daily intercedes for us before God the Father. VERANUS: How are his eyes not satisfied with riches? SALONIUS: Because he always desires our salvation. VERANUS: Who is this threefold cord of which Solomon says: “A threefold cord is hard to break” (Eccl. 4)? SALONIUS: The unity of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, because in the divinity there are three persons, but only one nature. VERANUS: Why then does he say, “Hard to break”? That which is difficult can happen, although with great effort: can this cord therefore ever be broken? SALONIUS: Never, truly, because the nature of the holy Trinity is indivisible; but “difficult” in this passage is to be taken as “impossible,” because it cannot happen that the nature of the Divinity be sundered.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:26 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quis est ille puer pauper et sapiens de quo dicit Salomon: Melior puer pauper et sapiens rege stulto et sene (Eccle. IV)? SALONIUS. Dominus Jesus Cbristus, qui puer dictus est propter innocenliam et simplicitatem, quia peccatum non fecit nec inventus est dolus in ore ejus (1 Petre u). Iste puer cum esset dives, pro nostra salute factus est pauper. Iste veraciter est sapiens, quia in ipso habitat omnis plenitudo divinitatis corporaliter. VERANUS. Quis est ille rex senex et stultus? SALONIUS. Diabolus, qui pene ab ipso mundi exordio regnavit in genere humano, et ideo senex vocatur. Et vere slultus rex, quia quanto plures decipit, tanto sibi pœnam accumulat majorem. In regno quippe hujus regis senis et stulti, id est diaboli, natus est puer optimus, Dominus videlicet Je8us Christus, qui factus est Rex regum et Dominus dominantium.
English
VERANUS: Who is that poor and wise boy of whom Solomon says: "Better a poor and wise boy than a foolish old king" (Eccl. 4)? SALONIUS: The Lord Jesus Christ, who is called a boy on account of innocence and simplicity, because he committed no sin and no deceit was found in his mouth (1 Pet. 2). This boy, though he was rich, became poor for our salvation. He is truly wise, because in him dwells the whole fullness of divinity in bodily form. VERANUS: Who is that old and foolish king? SALONIUS: The devil, who reigned over the human race almost from the beginning of the world, and therefore is called old. And he is truly a foolish king, because the more people he deceives, the greater the punishment he accumulates for himself. In the kingdom of this old and foolish king, that is, the devil, the best boy was born, namely the Lord Jesus Christ, who became King of kings and Lord of lords.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:27 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Custodi pedem tuum, ingrediens domum Dei? Nunquid ab offensione lapidum monet custodire pedem quando ingredimur domum Dei, id est ecclesiam? SALONIUS. Quamvis semper honeste et cum timore ac silentio debeamus ingredi domum Dei, tamen non pedem corporis docet custodiendum, sed pedem animæ, id est gressum mentis, ut in conspectu Dei mundas preces effundamus: et est sensus, quando ingrederis domum Dei ( videlicet ecclesiam) custodi pedem tuum, id est gressum mentis tuæ, ne offendas in malis cogitationibus, ut oratio tua pura dirigatur ad Deum. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Ne dederis os tuum, ut peccare faciuM carnem tuam (Eccle. v)? Quomodo dat homo os suum, ut peccare facit carnem suam? SALONIUS. Quando loquitur vanitates et verba libidinosa quibus caro incitetur ad peccandum. Sed iste est proprius hujus loci sensus: Ne dederis os tuum ut peccare facias carnem tuam; hoc est, noli quærere vanas excusationes quibus des occasionem carni tuæ ad peccandum: hoc est, noli dicere: Non ego pecco, sed quod in me habitat peccatum, id est fragilitas carnis mese: qnia si hoc dicis, Dominum provocas ad iram; quasi ipse sit auctor malitiæ atque peccati.
English
VERANUS: What is this that it says: "Watch your foot when entering the house of God"? Does it not warn us to watch our foot from stumbling on stones when we enter the house of God, that is, the church? SALONIUS: Although we ought always to enter the house of God with propriety and with fear and silence, yet it does not teach that the foot of the body is to be guarded, but the foot of the soul, that is, the step of the mind, so that we pour forth pure prayers in the sight of God. And the meaning is: when you enter the house of God (namely, the church), watch your foot, that is, the step of your mind, lest you stumble in evil thoughts, so that your prayer may be directed purely to God. VERANUS: What is this that it says: "Do not give your mouth so that it makes your flesh sin" (Eccl. 5)? How does a man give his mouth so that it makes his flesh sin? SALONIUS: When he speaks vanities and lustful words by which the flesh is incited to sin. But this is the proper sense of this passage: "Do not give your mouth so that you make your flesh sin"; that is, do not seek vain excuses by which you give occasion to your flesh to sin; that is, do not say: "I do not sin, but the sin that dwells in me sins," that is, the fragility of my flesh; because if you say this, you provoke the Lord to anger, as if He himself were the author of malice and sin.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:28 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Omnis labor hominis in ore ejus, sed anima illius non implebitur (Eccle. VI)? Quomodo potest fieri, ut omnia quæ laborat homo sint in ore illius? SALONIUS. Vir ecclesiasticus, sapiens et ductus, omnem laborem suum habet in ore suo; quia omnia quæ in Scripturis sacris discit, quotidie meditatur, praedicat et docet, et anima illius non implebitur, quia non sufficit sibi quod didicit, sed magis ac magis semper discere cupit et studet. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Melius est videre quod cupias, quam dcsiderare quod nescias (Ibid.)? Quomodo videt homo quod cupit, aul quomodo desiderat quod nescit? SALONIUS. llle qui oculis mentis discernit inter honum et malum, videt quod cupiat bonum et quod rep malum: qui autem sequitur voluntatem curdis sui et concupiscentias, sæpe desideral quod nescit, quia vult comprehendere quod non potest.
English
VERANUS: What is this that it says: "Every labor of man is in his mouth, but his soul will not be filled" (Ecclesiastes 6)? How can it be that all that a man labors is in his mouth? SALONIUS: An ecclesiastical man, wise and led, has all his labor in his mouth; because everything that he learns in the sacred Scriptures he daily meditates upon, preaches, and teaches, and his soul will not be filled, because what he has learned does not suffice for him, but he always desires and strives to learn more and more. VERANUS: What is this that it says: "It is better to see what you desire than to desire what you do not know" (Ibid.)? How does a man see what he desires, or how does he desire what he does not know? SALONIUS: He who with the eyes of his mind discerns between good and evil sees that he desires good and that he rejects evil: but he who follows the will of his own heart and his lusts often desires what he does not know, because he wishes to grasp what he cannot.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:29 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. De quo dicit Salomon: Qui futurus est, jam vocatum est nomen ejus et scitur, quod homo sit? SALONIUS. De Domino Jesu Christo, cujos nomen ante vocatum est in Scripturis sacris, quia ipse carnem de Virgine sumpserit, et cognitum est prophetis et sanctis Dei, quod verus homo erat venturus. VERANUS. Si hoc de Domino Jesu Christo dictum est, quid est quod sequitur: Et non possit contra fortiorem se in judicio contendere? Quis est ille fortior contra quem Dominus Jesus contendere non possit in judicio? SALONIUS. Deus Pater, qui fortior est, quia Filius secundum humanitatem minor est Patre. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Melior est ira risu (Eccle. VII); cum risus naturalis sit, ira vero sit vitium SALONIUS. Ira non semper est vitium, sed aliquando est virtus, quando irascimur nobis ipsis vel aliis peccantibus: hæc ergo ira melior est risu, quia risus dissolvit mentem, et lætitia corrumpit hominis animum; hæc autem ira corrigit et emendat peccatum.
English
VERANUS: Of whom does Solomon say: "He who is to be, his name is already called and it is known that he is a man"? SALONIUS: Of the Lord Jesus Christ, whose name was called beforehand in the sacred Scriptures, because He Himself took flesh from the Virgin, and it was known to the prophets and the saints of God that a true man was to come. VERANUS: If this was said of the Lord Jesus Christ, what is it that follows: "And he cannot contend in judgment against one stronger than himself"? Who is that stronger one against whom the Lord Jesus cannot contend in judgment? SALONIUS: God the Father, who is stronger, because the Son according to His humanity is lesser than the Father. VERANUS: What is it that it says: "Anger is better than laughter" (Ecclesiastes 7), since laughter is natural, but anger is a vice? SALONIUS: Anger is not always a vice, but sometimes it is a virtue, when we are angry at ourselves or at others who are sinning. This anger, therefore, is better than laughter, because laughter dissolves the mind, and joy corrupts a man's soul; but this anger corrects and amends sin.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:30 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Calumnia conturbat sapientem et perdit robur cordis illius (Ibid.)? Qui enim vere sapiens est, nulla turbatur calumnia, nulla dejicitur adversitate. SALONIUS. Sapiens in hoc loco non intelligendus est ille qui perfectus et consummatus in sapientia est, sed qui jam cœpit habere sapientiam, et tamen adhuc non est perfectus. Talem sapientem calumnia hominum sive adversitas aliqua facile conturbat et perdit vigorcm ac fortitudinem animæ illius, qui dum patienter non sustinet adversa, vcxatur impatientia. VERANUS. Quid est, male dicere quia priores dies meliores fuerunt quam isti qui modo sunt? SALONIUS. Ideo malum est hoc dicere, quia ipse ait: Stulta est talis interrogatio. VERANUS. Quare stulta interrogatio est, si quis dicat: Quæ causa est quia priora tempora meliora fuerunt quam nunc sunt (Ibid.)?
English
VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "Slander disturbs the wise man and destroys the strength of his heart" (Ibid.)? For whoever is truly wise is disturbed by no slander, cast down by no adversity. SALONIUS: The wise man in this passage is not to be understood as one who is perfect and consummate in wisdom, but as one who has already begun to have wisdom, and yet is not yet perfect. Such a wise man is easily disturbed by the slander of men or by some adversity, and it destroys the vigor and fortitude of his soul; for while he does not patiently endure adversities, he is tormented by impatience. VERANUS: What does it mean, that it is evil to say that former days were better than those which are now? SALONIUS: It is evil to say this because He Himself says: "Such a question is foolish." VERANUS: Why is it a foolish question, if someone says: What is the reason that earlier times were better than they are now (Ibid.)?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:31 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Ideo slulta interrogatio est, quia unus Deus conditor est omnium temporum, cunctorumque dierum. VERANUS. Quamvis enim unus sit Deus, conditor omnium temporum cunctorumque dierum, nunquid non fuerunt tempora bona ct mala? SALONIUS. Vere fuerunt, sed virtutes faciunt nobis tempora bona, vitia et peccata faciunt tempora mala, et idcirco nos ita semper bene vivere debemus, ut dies praesentes nobis meliores sint quam praeleriti. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait Salomon, Noli esse justus multum, neque plus sapias quam necesse eat ( Eccle. VII)? Quid enim mali est si homo sit. multum justus, aut quis potest plus sapere quam necesseit? SALONIUS. Ille multum et nimis justus est, j justitia sxva et crudelis, etiam alios excitat ad querelam et murmurationem, verbi gratia: qui videt fratrem suum peccare, et magis vult eum condemnare atque punire quam per poenitentiam corrigere et emendare, ille nimirum multum et nimis est justus.
English
SALONIUS: Therefore the question is foolish, because there is one God, the creator of all times and of all days. VERANUS: Although there is one God, the creator of all times and of all days, were there not good times and bad times? SALONIUS: There truly were, but virtues make times good for us, vices and sins make times bad, and for that reason we ought always to live so well that the present days are better for us than the past ones. VERANUS: What does it mean when Solomon says, "Do not be too just, nor be wiser than is necessary" (Eccl. 7)? For what evil is there if a man is too just, or who can be wiser than is necessary? SALONIUS: That man is too much and excessively just who has a harsh and cruel justice, and also stirs up others to complaint and murmuring; for example, he who sees his brother sinning and prefers to condemn and punish him rather than to correct and amend him through penance—that man is indeed too much and excessively just.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:32 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quomodo sapit homo plus quam necesse est? SALONIUS. Quando superbe sapit: unde monet Apostolus: Noli altum sapere (Rom. XI): id est, noli superbe sapere, sed lime. Ille etiam plus sapit quam Hecesse est, qui ea vult intelligere quae non potest comprehendere neque penetrare. VERANUS. Quare Salomon dicit: Qui timet Dominum nihil negiigit (Eccle. VII), cum Jacobus aposto. lus dicat: In multis offendimus omnes (Jac. III)? Nunquid Jacobus aut cæteri apostoli non timebant Deum, qui se in multis offendere confitebantur? SALONIUS. Timebant utique, et iu multis offendebant, quia non eat homo super terram qui faciat bonum, et non peccet. VERANUS. Quomodo ergo verum est quod dicit: Qui timet Dominum, nihil negligit (Eccle. VII)? SALONIUS. Qui enim sanctum et castum Dei timorem habet, nihil omnino negligit, quia neque prosperis elevatur, neque adversis dejicitur, quoniam quidquid illi accidit non eum contristat.
English
VERANUS: How does a man know more than is necessary? SALONIUS: When he knows arrogantly; whence the Apostle warns: "Do not be high-minded" (Rom. 11), that is, do not be arrogantly knowing, but be humble. He also knows more than is necessary who wishes to understand what he cannot comprehend nor penetrate. VERANUS: Why does Solomon say: "He who fears the Lord neglects nothing" (Eccl. 7), when the Apostle James says: "In many things we all offend" (James 3)? Did not James and the other apostles fear God, they who confessed that they offended in many things? SALONIUS: They feared indeed, and they offended in many things, because there is no man on earth who does good and does not sin. VERANUS: How then is it true what he says: "He who fears the Lord neglects nothing" (Eccl. 7)? SALONIUS: He who has a holy and chaste fear of God neglects absolutely nothing, because he is neither lifted up by prosperity nor cast down by adversity, since whatever happens to him does not sadden him.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:33 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quis est ergo ille qui sanctum et castum Dei timorem habet? SALONIUS. Qui Dominum in nullo vult offendere, et quantum ipse adjuvare dignatur, ejus voluntatem et mandata ipsius in omnibus vult et studet adimplere. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Sapientia confortabit sapientem super decem principes civitatis (Ibid.)? Quæ est hæc sapientia, aut qui sunt isti principes? SALONIUS. Sapientia in hoc loco Dominum Jesum Christum significat, qui est virtus et sapientia Dei: principes civitatis, sancti angeli sunt intelligendi, qui sunt principes civitatis, id est cocleslis Jerusalem. Sunt et principes Ecclesiæ, quia ipsi quotidie regunt eam et custodiunt. VERANUS. Cur ergo decem dicuntur? SALONIUS. Quia decem a fuerunt ordines angelorum, sed unus cecidit per superbiam; et idcirco boni angeli semper ad hoc laborant, ut de hominibus numerus adimpleatur, et perveniat ad perfectum numerum, id est denarium.
English
VERANUS: Who then is that one who has a holy and chaste fear of God? SALONIUS: He who wishes to offend the Lord in nothing, and, as far as He deigns to help him, desires and strives to fulfill His will and His commandments in all things. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "Wisdom will strengthen the wise man over the ten princes of the city" (Ibid.)? What is this wisdom, or who are these princes? SALONIUS: In this passage, wisdom signifies the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the power and wisdom of God. The princes of the city are to be understood as the holy angels, who are the princes of the city, that is, of heavenly Jerusalem. They are also princes of the Church, because they daily rule and guard her. VERANUS: Why, then, are they said to be ten? SALONIUS: Because there were ten orders of angels, but one fell through pride; and for this reason the good angels always labor so that the number may be filled from among men and reach the perfect number, that is, the denarius.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:34 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quomodo ergo sapientia confortat sapientem super decem principes civilalis? SALONIUS. Quia majus est auxilium sapientiæ, id est Domini Jesu Christi, quam sit angelorum. VERANUS. Quid est quod Salomon dicit: Virum unum de mille reperi, mulierem autem ex omnibus non inveni? Nunquid multæ mulieres sanctæ fuerunt, virgines simul et viduæ, quæ pudicitia ac castitate, ac bonis operibus Deo placuere, ex quibus plurimae illarum martyrio coronatae sunt? SALONIUS. Vere fuerunt et usque nunc sunt plurimæ virgines ac viduæ Deo acceptae; sed hoc dicit Salomon, quia suo tempore de multis viris vix potuit invenire bonum, de mulieribus vero nullain invenit, quia omues cum non ad virtutem, sed ad luxuriam traxerunt. VERANUS. Potest hæc sententia spiritualiter intelligi? SALONIUS. Vere potest, nam per virum designatur bonus animi cogitatus, per mulierem vero carnalis et dissoluta cogitatio. De mille ergo vir unus invenitur, id est unus cogitatus mundus et purus, qui perversa cogitatione non turbetur, id est polluatur extrinsecus; de mulicribus vero nulla invenitur quæ placeat Deo, quia carnalis et perversa cogitatio non est accepta Deo.
English
VERANUS: How then does wisdom strengthen the wise man above ten princes of the city? SALONIUS: Because the help of wisdom, that is, of the Lord Jesus Christ, is greater than that of the angels. VERANUS: What is it that Solomon says: "I have found one man among a thousand, but a woman I have not found among all"? Were there not many holy women, both virgins and widows, who pleased God by modesty and chastity and good works, very many of whom were crowned with martyrdom? SALONIUS: Truly there were, and even now there are, very many virgins and widows acceptable to God; but Solomon says this because in his time he could scarcely find a good man among many, but among women he found none, because all drew him not to virtue, but to lust. VERANUS: Can this saying be understood spiritually? SALONIUS: Truly it can, for by "man" is signified a good thought of the mind, but by "woman" a carnal and dissolute thought. Therefore, one man is found among a thousand, that is, one pure and clean thought which is not disturbed, that is, polluted from without, by a perverse thought; but among women none is found who pleases God, because a carnal and perverse thought is not acceptable to God.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:35 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Qui custodit præceptum Dei, non experietur quidquam mali (Eccle. VIII)? Quomodo nihil mali experietur qui præcepta Dei custodit, cum sancti viri qui praecepta Dci custodierunt, multa perpessi sint in hoc sæculo? SALONIUS. Verum est, quia qui praecepta Dei custodit, id est omne quod jussit ct praecepit Deus. non experietur quidquam mali in futuro, hoc est nullum malum patietur, nullum malum sustinebit in die judicii. Quamvis enim aliqua mala patiatur in hac vi. ta, levia sunt et transitoria; in futura autem vita nihil mali patietur qui pervenerit ad aeternae beatitudinis gloriam. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Melior est canis vivus leone mortuo (Eccle. IX)? Quid per canem vivum aut leonem mortuum Salomon vult intelligi? SALONIUS. Canis vivus significat populum gentium, leo mortuus populum Judæorum a Deo derelictum. Melior est ergo apud Deum canis iste vivus quam leo ille mortuus; quia nos qui de gente credimus viventes, per fidem cognoscimus Deum Patrem, et Filium et Spiritum sanctum. Aliter canis vivus est peccator qui se peccatis mortuum confitetur; et per pœnitentiam resurgens, incipit per justitiam vivere: leo mortuus est justus, quia in sua justitia confidit, et de meritis suis gloriatur; et idcirco superbia elatus, mortuus est apud Deum.
English
VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "He who keeps the commandment of God will experience nothing evil" (Ecclesiastes 8)? How will he who keeps the commandments of God experience nothing evil, when holy men who kept the commandments of God have suffered many things in this world? SALONIUS: It is true, because he who keeps the commandments of God, that is, everything that God has ordered and commanded, will experience nothing evil in the future, that is, he will suffer no evil, he will endure no evil on the day of judgment. For although he suffers some evils in this life, they are light and transitory; but in the future life, he who has attained to the glory of eternal blessedness will suffer nothing evil. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "A living dog is better than a dead lion" (Ecclesiastes 9)? What does Solomon wish to be understood by the living dog or the dead lion? SALONIUS: The living dog signifies the people of the Gentiles, the dead lion the people of the Jews abandoned by God. Therefore, this living dog is better in the sight of God than that dead lion; because we who believe from the Gentile nation, living, know God the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit through faith. Otherwise, the living dog is the sinner who confesses himself dead through sins; and rising again through penance, he begins to live through righteousness: the dead lion is the righteous man, because he trusts in his own righteousness and boasts of his own merits; and therefore, puffed up with pride, he is dead in the sight of God.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:36 · narrativehigh
Source
Melior est ergo peceator humilis et per pœnitentiam correptus, quam justus superbus; quia ille abominabilis, iste Deo acceptus est. VERANUS. Quid est quod dicit: Omni tempore sint vestimenta tua candida, et oleum de capite tuo non deficiat (Eccle. IX)? Nunquid potest aliquis candida voslimenta semper habere? Et si forsitan ita est dives ut semper vestimenta candida possit habcre, quod omnino difficile est; quomodo fleri potest ut de capite ipsius nunquam deficiat oleum? Quis namque ferre potest ut semper hahcat caput oleo perunctum? SALONIUS. Hæc sententia, non historialiter, sed spiritualiter, debet intelligi. Nam per vestimenta virtutes designantur quibus anima vestitur et ornalur: per oleum vero designatur opus misericordiæ, id est eleemosyna vel certe spiritualis lætitia, et est sensus: Omni tempore sint vestimenta tua candida; id est quæcunque bona egeris, sint munda et pura, ut possint Deo esse accepta; et nunquam deficias ab opcribus misericordiæ, et semper habere stade spiritualem lætitiam.
English
Therefore, a humble sinner corrected through penance is better than a proud righteous man, because the former is abominable, the latter is acceptable to God. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "Let your garments be white at all times, and let the oil from your head not be lacking" (Ecclesiastes 9)? Can anyone always have white garments? And if perhaps someone is so rich that he can always have white garments, which is altogether difficult, how can it happen that oil never fails from his head? For who can bear to always have his head anointed with oil? SALONIUS: This saying must be understood not historically, but spiritually. For by garments are designated the virtues with which the soul is clothed and adorned; by oil, however, is designated the work of mercy, that is, almsgiving or certainly spiritual joy, and the meaning is: Let your garments be white at all times; that is, whatever good you do, let it be clean and pure, so that it may be acceptable to God; and never fail in works of mercy, and always strive to have spiritual joy.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:37 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. QUæ sunl muscæ de quibus Salomon dicit, Muscæ morientes exterminant suavitatem unguenti (Eccle. x)? SALONIUS. Vere certe Salomon spirituales muscas intelligit. VERANUS. Quæ sunt illæ spirituales muscæ? SALONIUS. Dæmones, vitia et peccata: hæc enim omnia exterminant hic suavitatem unguenti, id est gratiam sancti Spiritus. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Cor sapientis in dcxtera ejus, et cor stulti in sinistra illius (Ibid.)? Quis enim habet cor suum camale in dextera vel in sinistra manu? SALONIUS. Vere nullus, et ideo hæc sententia spiritualiter debet intelligi. VERANUS. Quomodo spiritualiter debet intelligi? SALONIUS. Per cor designatur intentio seu cogitatio; per dexteram manum, opus bonum; per sinistram vero, malum. Cor igitur sapientis in dextera ejus, quia intentio et cogitatio viri sapientis in hoc tendit et ad hoc laborat ut semper bona operetur quatenus in die jndicii, ad dexteram Domini, id est in sorte justorum stare mereatur, et cum ipsis in aeterna beatitudine gloriari. Cor vero stulti in sinistra illius, quia et mala quæ cogitat et malis operibus accumulat, pro quibus in die judicii, a sinistris, id est in sorte reproborum ponetur, et cum eis in aeternum punietur.
English
VERANUS: What are the flies of which Solomon says, "Dying flies spoil the sweetness of the ointment" (Ecclesiastes 10)? SALONIUS: Truly, Solomon understands spiritual flies. VERANUS: What are those spiritual flies? SALONIUS: Demons, vices, and sins: for all these spoil here the sweetness of the ointment, that is, the grace of the Holy Spirit. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "The heart of the wise is at his right hand, and the heart of the fool is at his left" (Ibid.)? For who has his heart in his right or left hand? SALONIUS: Truly no one, and therefore this saying must be understood spiritually. VERANUS: How must it be understood spiritually? SALONIUS: By "heart" is signified intention or thought; by "right hand," a good work; by "left," an evil one. Therefore, the heart of the wise is at his right hand, because the intention and thought of a wise man tends and labors always to do good works, so that on the day of judgment he may deserve to be at the right hand of the Lord, that is, in the company of the just, and to glory with them in eternal blessedness. But the heart of the fool is at his left, because of the evil things he thinks and the evil deeds he accumulates, for which on the day of judgment he will be placed on the left, that is, in the company of the reprobate, and will be punished with them forever.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:38 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quis est ille spiritus de quo dicit: Si spiritus potestatem habentis ascenderit super te, locum tuum ne dimiseris? Quis est iste qui habet potestatem, cujus spiritus, si ascenderit super nos, locum nostrum dimittere non debemus? SALONIUS. Diabolus, princeps hujus mundi, spiritus ejus, est maligna suggestio. VERANUS. Spiritus diaboli quomodo ascendit super nos? SALONIUS. Quia persuadendo facit ut mala cogitemus: si ergo suggerente diabolo, mala cogitatio ascenderit in cor nostrum, non ei locum dare debemus, sed contra ipsam fortiter pugnare ne forte opere compleamus malam cogitationem. Potest et sic intelligi: si habes in te humilitatem, munditiam, castitatem, patientiam, charitatem, et diabolus suggerit tibi superbiam, libidinem, immunditiam, iram, odium, ne dimiseris locum tuum, id est, ne dimittas humilitatem et efficiaris superbus. Sic et de caeteris est intelligendum.
English
VERANUS: Who is that spirit of which he says: “If the spirit of one having power should come upon you, do not give up your place”? Who is this one who has power, whose spirit, if it should come upon us, we ought not to give up our place? SALONIUS: The devil, the prince of this world; his spirit is evil suggestion. VERANUS: How does the spirit of the devil come upon us? SALONIUS: Because by persuading he makes us think evil things. Therefore, if, with the devil suggesting, an evil thought should arise in our heart, we ought not to give place to it, but to fight strongly against it, lest we complete the evil thought in deed. It can also be understood thus: if you have in yourself humility, purity, chastity, patience, charity, and the devil suggests to you pride, lust, impurity, anger, hatred, do not give up your place, that is, do not abandon humility and become proud. And so it is to be understood concerning the rest.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:39 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quare dicit Salomon: Væ tibi, terra cujus rex juvenis est, et cujus principes mane comedant? Nunquid non beata fuit terra Israel, quæ juvenem habuit regem, David scilicet, qui fuit triginta annorum quando suscepit regnum? Nunquid non bonus rex Josias, qui regnare coepit in adolescentia? SALONIUS. Vere bonus rex David, bonus et Josias. Sed væ terere cujus rex juvenis est, hoc est, in quo parva et infirma est sapientia, et carnalis prudentia, quæ juvenilia desideria sequitur, odit justitiam, veritatem et judicium. VERANUS. Quomodo principes mane comedunt SALONIUS. Principes mane comedunt quando luxuriosam vitam ducunt: ct idcirco væ terræ cujus principes mane comedunt, quia magis amant hujus sæculi voluptates et carnis delectationes quam populi salutem, ideoque luxuriose vivendo pervertunt judicium. VERANUS. Quomodo beata est terra cujus rex est nobilis, et cujus principes comedunt in tempore suo?
English
VERANUS: Why does Solomon say: “Woe to you, land whose king is young, and whose princes eat in the morning”? Was not the land of Israel blessed, which had a young king, namely David, who was thirty years old when he received the kingdom? Was not Josiah a good king, who began to reign in his adolescence? SALONIUS: Truly David was a good king, and Josiah was good as well. But “woe to the land whose king is young” means this: one in whom wisdom is small and weak, and whose prudence is carnal, who follows youthful desires, and hates justice, truth, and judgment. VERANUS: How do princes eat in the morning? SALONIUS: Princes eat in the morning when they lead a luxurious life; and for that reason, woe to the land whose princes eat in the morning, because they love the pleasures of this world and the delights of the flesh more than the welfare of the people, and therefore, by living luxuriously, they pervert judgment. VERANUS: How is the land blessed whose king is noble, and whose princes eat at their proper time?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:40 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Si rex nobilis est, hoc est decorus sapientia, splendidus justitia, ornatus bonis moribus ct actibus, vere beata est terra cui praeest, quia regit eam in judicio et æquitate, et exaltat justitia. VERtarIS. Qui sunt illi principes qui in tempore suo comedunt? SALONIUS. Illi nimirum qui non luxuriantur, qui non amant hujus sæculi voluptates, qui non vivunt in crapula et ebrietatc; sed cibos quærunt tantum ad corporis sustentationem: ideoque beata terra quæ tales habet principes, quia dum justitiam et æquitatem diligunt, utique non pervertunt judicium. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Da partes septem nec non et octo (F.ccle. xi)? Quæ sunt illae septem partes vel octo quas dare nos jubet? SALONIUS. Per septenarium numerum, Vetus Testamentum, propter sabbatum, qui est septimus dies sanctificatus in lege; per octonarium vero designatur Novum Testamentum, propter diem dominicam, qui est octavus, Domini Christi resurrectione sanctus.
English
SALONIUS: If the king is noble—that is, comely in wisdom, splendid in justice, adorned with good character and deeds—truly blessed is the land over which he presides, because he rules it with judgment and equity, and exalts justice. VERANUS: Who are those princes who eat in their proper time? SALONIUS: Those, of course, who do not live luxuriously, who do not love the pleasures of this world, who do not live in gluttony and drunkenness, but seek food only for the sustenance of the body. Therefore blessed is the land that has such princes, because, as they love justice and equity, they certainly do not pervert judgment. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: “Give seven parts, and also eight” (Ecclesiastes 11)? What are those seven parts or eight which it commands us to give? SALONIUS: By the number seven, the Old Testament is signified, on account of the Sabbath, which is the seventh day sanctified in the Law; by the number eight, however, the New Testament is designated, on account of the Lord’s Day, which is the eighth, sanctified by the resurrection of the Lord Christ.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:41 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quomodo ergo intelligendum est quod ait: Da partes septem, nec non et octo (Ibid.)? SALONIUS Hoc modo: id est utrumque Testamentum (Vetus scilicet et Novum) pari veneratione credendo suspice, et præcepta eorutn diligenter implere stude. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Si ceciderit lignum ad austrum, aut ad aquilonem, in quocunque loco ceciderit, ibi erit (Ibid.)? Nunquid quod cadit lignum ad aquilonem, aut ad meridiem, non sæpe movetur in alias mundi parces? SALONIUS. Nulli hoc dubium est, sed hæc sententia spirilualitcr intelligi debet. Nam per lignum bomo dcsignatur: quoniam unusquisque esi quasi Iignum silvae generis humani. Per austrum, qui est calidus ventus, designatur requies paradisi. Per aquilonem, qui est frigidus, designatur inferni suppliciuln; et est sensus: Ubicunque sibi homo locum ad i, turam sedem præparaverit, sive ad austrum, cum ceciderit (id est mortuus fuerit), in requie paradisi et glor ia regni cœlestis permanebit in æternum. Si vero male vivendo sibi locum præparaverit ad boream, inferni pœnas luci in sæcula sæculorum.
English
VERANUS: How then is it to be understood that it says: "Give seven parts, and also eight" (Ibid.)? SALONIUS: In this way: that is, receive both Testaments (namely the Old and the New) with equal reverence of belief, and strive to fulfill their precepts diligently. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "If a tree falls to the south, or to the north, in whatever place it falls, there it will be" (Ibid.)? Does not a tree that falls to the north or to the south often move to other parts of the world? SALONIUS: No one doubts this, but this saying must be understood spiritually. For by "tree" a man is signified, since each one is like a tree of the forest of the human race. By "south," which is a warm wind, the rest of paradise is signified. By "north," which is cold, the punishment of hell is signified; and the meaning is: Wherever a man has prepared a place for himself as a future abode, whether to the south, when he has fallen (that is, died), he will remain in the rest of paradise and the glory of the heavenly kingdom forever. If, however, by living wickedly he has prepared a place for himself to the north, he will suffer the torments of hell for ever and ever.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:42 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Quid est quod ait, Qui observat ventum non seminat, et qui considerat nubes nunquam metit (Eccle. XI)? Quis enim est tam stultus qui semper observet ventum, ut non seminet; et semper consideret nubes, ut nunquam metat? SALONIUS. Hæc sententia spiritualitcr intelligenda est: nam ut per ventum et nubes saepe tempestas generari solet; sic per ventum etiam designatur diabolus,per nubes præsentis sæculi adversitates. Quicunque igitur timet diaboli persecutionem aut mundi hujus adversitates, non seminat, id est verbum Dei non prædicat, nec operatur bona quæ valet ♦ etiam nunquam metet; quia etsi aliqua bona inchoat, ad perfectionem non ea perducit. VERANUS. Quid ergo agendum est? SALONIUS. Sine consideratione nubium et timore ventorum, in mediis tempestatibus seminare debemus; id est in omnibus adversitatibus verbum Dei prædicare, et bona opera quæ valemus agere semper oportet.
English
VERANUS: What does it mean when it says, "Whoever watches the wind does not sow, and whoever considers the clouds never reaps" (Ecclesiastes 11)? For who is so foolish as always to watch the wind, so as not to sow, and always to consider the clouds, so as never to reap? SALONIUS: This saying is to be understood spiritually: for just as a storm is often generated by wind and clouds, so also by wind is the devil signified, and by clouds the adversities of the present age. Therefore, whoever fears the persecution of the devil or the adversities of this world does not sow, that is, does not preach the word of God, nor does he perform the good works he is able to; and he will also never reap, because even if he begins some good things, he does not bring them to perfection. VERANUS: What then is to be done? SALONIUS: Without consideration of the clouds and fear of the winds, we ought to sow in the midst of storms; that is, in all adversities we must always preach the word of God and perform the good works we are able to do.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:43 · narrativehigh
Source
VEHAriS. Quid est: Mane semina semen tuum, et vesperi ne cesset manus tua (Ibid.)? Quis enim semper et mane et vesperi seminare potest, maxime cum glaciali tempore nullus audeat seminarc? SALONIUS. Semen hoc loco non intelligendum est. frumenti vel alterius cujuslibet grani, sed semen boni operis, ex quo nascitur fructus justitiæ, et merces a-ternæ remunerationis. VERANUS. Quid ergo docet cum dicit: Mane temina semen tuum, et vesperi ne cesset manus tua? SALONIUS. Ut nullo tempore, nulla ætate, a bonis operibus cessemus, et nostram matutinam justitiam vesper inveniat, et vespertinam misericordiam itetum sol ortus accumulet: in adolescentia pariter et senectute virtutum copia nos semper Deo commennet. Mane ergo semina semen tuum, et vesperi ne cesset manus tua (Ibid.): hoc est, semper te in bonis opei ibus exerce. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait, Et florebit amygdalus, impinguabitur locusta, et dissipabitur capparis (Eccle. xu)? Q iid enim profuit hoc dicere, cum nullus ignoret quia et amygdalus florcre solet, impinguari locusta, et dissipari capparis?
English
VERANUS: What does it mean: "Sow your seed in the morning, and in the evening let not your hand rest" (Ecclesiastes 11)? For who can always sow both morning and evening, especially since no one dares to sow in the icy season? SALONIUS: This "seed" is not to be understood here as grain or any other kind of kernel, but as the seed of good work, from which the fruit of justice and the reward of eternal recompense are born. VERANUS: What then does it teach when it says: "Sow your seed in the morning, and in the evening let not your hand rest"? SALONIUS: That at no time, at no age, should we cease from good works, and that the evening should find our morning justice, and the rising sun should again accumulate our evening mercy: in youth and in old age alike, a wealth of virtues should always commend us to God. Therefore, "Sow your seed in the morning, and in the evening let not your hand rest" (Ecclesiastes 11): that is, always exercise yourself in good works. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says, "And the almond tree will blossom, the locust will grow fat, and the caper will be scattered" (Ecclesiastes 12)? For what profit is there in saying this, since no one is ignorant that the almond tree usually blossoms, the locust grows fat, and the caper is scattered?
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:44 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Hæc sententia spiritualiter est intelligenda, et magnum in se coutinct mysterium. Nam per amygdalum designatur Dominus Jesus Christus: quia sicut nux amygdali constat cx corio, osse ct nucleo, ita Christus ex carne, anima, et divinitatc. Quoniam per os amygdali divinitas designatur. VERANUS. Per locustam et capparim quid significatur? SALONIUS. Per locustam populus gentilis, per capparim populus Judaicus. VERANUS. Quomodo ergo intelligenda est hæc sententia? # SALONIUS, Florebit amygdalus, id est nascetur Christus et coruscabit miraculis: Impinguabitur locusta, id est credet gentilis populus, et replebitur donis spiritualibus; dissipabitur capparis, hoc cst peribit propter intidelitatem populus Judaicus. VERANUS. Quare verba sapientum stimulis et clavis assimilantur? Sic enim dicit Salomon, Verba sapientum sicut stimuli, et quasi clavi in altum defixi (Ibid.).
English
SALONIUS: This saying is to be understood spiritually, and contains within itself a great mystery. For by the almond tree is designated the Lord Jesus Christ: because just as the nut of the almond consists of a husk, a shell, and a kernel, so Christ consists of flesh, soul, and divinity. For by the shell of the almond the divinity is designated. VERANUS: By the locust and the caper-bush what is signified? SALONIUS: By the locust the Gentile people, by the caper-bush the Jewish people. VERANUS: How then is this saying to be understood? SALONIUS: The almond tree will flower, that is, Christ will be born and will shine with miracles; the locust will grow fat, that is, the Gentile people will believe and will be filled with spiritual gifts; the caper-bush will be scattered, that is, the Jewish people will perish on account of their faithlessness. VERANUS: Why are the words of the wise compared to goads and nails? For Solomon says thus: "The words of the wise are like goads, and like nails fixed deep" (Ecclesiastes 12:11).
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:45 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Aptissime verba sapicntum clavis et stimulis comparantur, quia peccatorum culpas nesciunt palpare, sed pungere; qui enim veraciter Sunt sapientes, eorum procul dubio verba clavi sunt et stimuli, quia peccatores non blandimentis fovent, scd aspera increpatione redarguunt, et eorum secretas conscientias quasi pungendo, ad dolorem et lamenta exercent ut corrigantur. VERANUS. Quid est quod ait: Quæ per magistrorum consilium data sunt a pastore uno (Ibid.)? Qui sunt illi magistri per quorum consilium data sunt sapientum verba, aut quis est unus ille pastor a quo data sunt? SALONIUS. Magistri sunt prophetæ et apostoli; pastor unus est Deus, a quo data sunt omnia verba sapientum, quia ipse docuit magistros (id est prophetas et apostolos) et restruxit eorum consilium, quoniam ipse dedit verba in corde et ore ipsorum. VERANUS. Quid est quod Ecclesiastes in iine libri sui dicit: Deum lime et mandata ejus custodi, hoc est enim omnis homo? Quomodo fieri potest, ut hoc tantum sit homo, id est timere Deum et mandata ejus observare? Multo quippe major est pars eorum hominum qui nec timent nec custodiunt.
English
SALONIUS: The words of the wise are most aptly compared to keys and goads, because they know not how to caress the faults of sinners, but to prick them; for those who are truly wise, their words are without doubt keys and goads, because they do not foster sinners with blandishments, but rebuke them with harsh reproof, and, as if by pricking their secret consciences, they drive them to pain and lamentation so that they may be corrected. VERANUS: What does it mean when it says: "Which have been given through the counsel of the teachers by one shepherd" (Ibid.)? Who are those teachers through whose counsel the words of the wise have been given, or who is that one shepherd from whom they have been given? SALONIUS: The teachers are the prophets and apostles; the one shepherd is God, from whom all the words of the wise have been given, because He Himself taught the teachers (that is, the prophets and apostles) and structured their counsel, since He Himself placed the words in their heart and mouth. VERANUS: What does it mean that Ecclesiastes says at the end of his book: "Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is the whole of man"? How can it be that this alone is man, that is, to fear God and observe His commandments? For a much greater part is that of those men who neither fear nor keep them.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:46 · narrativehigh
Source
SALONIUS. Vere major pars est malorum quam bonorum, quia sicut Dominus dicit: Multi sunt vocati, pauci vero electi (Matth. xx), et incomparabiliter major infidelium multitudo quam fidelium. VERANUS. Quid ergo vult in hoc loco Salomon demonstrarc? SALONIUS. Hoc namque demonstrat in his verbis, quia non cst homo, qui Dcum non timet et mandata ejus non cuslodit. VERANUS. Quare non est homo? SALONIUS. Quia non custodit modum rationemque suæ naturæ. VERANUS. Quæ est ratio et modus naturæ humanæ? SALONIU S. RationabiHter vivere, quia inter animantia omnia solus homo creatus est rationale animal, et solus accepit a Deo rationem et intellectum ita ut agnosceret suum Creatorem et diligeret cum ac timoret, et cordc ct ore simul laudarct. VERANUS. Quid est Deum timere? SALONIUS. Voluntatem ejus implere, et bona quæ facienda sunt facere.
English
SALONIUS: The greater part is indeed of the evil than of the good, because as the Lord says: Many are called, few are chosen (Matt. 20), and the multitude of the unfaithful is incomparably greater than that of the faithful. VERANUS: What then does Solomon wish to demonstrate in this passage? SALONIUS: He demonstrates this in these words, that there is no man who does not fear God and does not keep his commandments. VERANUS: Why is there no man? SALONIUS: Because he does not keep the measure and reason of his own nature. VERANUS: What is the reason and measure of human nature? SALONIUS: To live rationally, because among all living beings man alone is created a rational animal, and he alone received from God reason and understanding so that he might acknowledge his Creator and love him and fear him, and praise him with heart and mouth at the same time. VERANUS: What is it to fear God? SALONIUS: To fulfill his will, and to do the good things that ought to be done.
tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:47 · narrativehigh
Source
VERANUS. Si ergo qui non timet Deum et mandata ejus non custodit, non est homo, quid ergo est? SALONIUS. Bestia est. VERANUS. Quomodo bestia est, cum in eo videatur humana substantia et persona? SALONIUS. Quamvis enim videtur habere humanam substantiam et personam, tamen quia non rationabiliter sed bestialiter vivit, non homo sed bestia dicendus est. VERANUS. Quomodo bestia vocatur? SALONIUS. Si est crudelis suis domesticis et subjectis aut vicinis, leo est, non homo; si autem raptor est, tigris vel lupus.; si vero est aduller aut fornicator aut immundus, canis est aut porcus, aut si stultus, asino comparatur: fraudulentus itaque aut simulator, congrue vulpeculæ assimilatur, et sic de cæteris intelligendum est. VERANUS. Quis est ergo veraciter homo? SALONIUS. HIc qui Deum timet, et mandata ejus custodit.
English
VERANUS: If, therefore, one who does not fear God and does not keep His commandments is not a man, what then is he? SALONIUS: He is a beast. VERANUS: How is he a beast, when human substance and person are seen in him? SALONIUS: For although he seems to have human substance and person, yet because he lives not rationally but bestially, he is to be called not a man but a beast. VERANUS: By what name is he called a beast? SALONIUS: If he is cruel to his household, subjects, or neighbours, he is a lion, not a man; if he is a plunderer, he is a tiger or a wolf; if he is an adulterer, fornicator, or unclean, he is a dog or a pig; or if he is foolish, he is compared to an ass; a fraudulent or dissembling man is fittingly likened to a fox, and so on for the rest is to be understood. VERANUS: Who, then, is truly a man? SALONIUS: He who fears God and keeps His commandments.
Citation. Tergwame, “In Ecclesiasten Expositio Mystica”, tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/tmp889.tmp889.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0213 · generated 2026-11-15.