ANNO DOMINI DLV, PRIMASIUS ADRUMETANUS EPISCOPUS.
PRIMASII COMMENTARIA IN EPISTOLAS S. PAULI.
EPISTOLA AD ROMANOS.
CAPUT PRIMUM. Paulus, id est pusillus et ultimus; ex Saulo Paulus, sicut et Abram Abraham, ut etiam ipso vocabulo novus esset. Servus Jesu Christi. Sic.., Isaias dicit: Magnum tibi cst vocari servum meum. Vocatus apostolus. Jam in præscientia ad hoc vocatus et prædestinatus, ut esset apostolus. Seyregatus. Sicut in AcUbus apostolorum dicit: Segregate mihi Paulum et Barnabam ad opus ad quod elegi eos. In Evangelium Dei, quod ante promiserat. Evangelium bona annuntiatio dicitur, et quod majus bonum quam natum et passum resurrexisse Christum pro nobis? Per prophetas suos in Scripturis sanctis, de Filio suo, qui factus est ei. Ad nutriendam Judæorum fidem, asserit se illum praedicare quem prophetæ annuntiaverunt in Scripturis sanctis. Totus locus iste eontra Manichaeos facit, qui alium Deum prophetarum, alium dicunt Novi Testamenti. Ex semine David. Ex Maria, quae de David stirpe venit, sicut Isaias dixit: Ecce Virgo in utero babebit, et pariet filium. Secundum carnem. Et Photinum exstinxit, et qui solitarium hominem dicit, non intelligens in Christo duas esse sub. stantias. Qui prædestinatus est Filius Dei in virtute secundum spiritum sanctificationis ex resurrectione mortuorum Jesu Christi Domini nostri.
IN THE YEAR OF THE LORD 555, PRIMASIUS, BISHOP OF ADRUMETUM.
THE COMMENTARIES OF PRIMASIUS ON THE EPISTLES OF ST. PAUL.
THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS.
CHAPTER ONE. Paul, that is, little and last; from Saul, Paul, just as from Abram, Abraham, so that even in his very name he might be new. Servant of Jesus Christ. Thus Isaiah says: It is a great thing for you to be called my servant. Called an apostle. Already in foreknowledge he was called and predestined to this, that he might be an apostle. Set apart. As in the Acts of the Apostles he says: Set apart for me Paul and Barnabas for the work to which I have chosen them. In the Gospel of God, which he had promised before. The Gospel is called good announcement, and what greater good is there than that Christ was born and suffered and rose again for us? Through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was made for him. To nourish the faith of the Jews, he asserts that he preaches him whom the prophets announced in the holy Scriptures. This whole passage works against the Manichaeans, who say that the God of the prophets is one and the God of the New Testament another. From the seed of David. From Mary, who came from the stock of David, as Isaiah said: Behold, the virgin shall conceive in her womb and bear a son. According to the flesh. And he destroyed Photinus, and the one who calls him a mere man, not understanding that in Christ there are two substances. Who was predestined to be the Son of God in power according to the spirit of sanctification by the resurrection of the dead of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Praedestinatus est, ut prior omnibus resurgeret et filiis Dei viam resurrectionis aperiret, ut quomodo caput, sic et corpus ejus resurgeret. Per quem accepimus gratiam et apostolatum ad obediendum fidei in omnibus gentibus. Gratiam, ut credamus et baptizemur, et quia gratis et jam ipse justificatus est nullis meritis suis. Apostolatum vero accepit, quando directus est gentibus prædicare. Pro nomine ejus. Vice nominis ejus fungimur, sicut ipse dicit: Sicut misit me Pater, et ego mitto vos; et, Legatione fungimur pro Christo. In quibus estis et vos vocati Jetu Christi. Et in vobis Romanis apostolatum accepimus sicut et in omnibus gentibus. Omnibus qui sunt Romæ dilecti. Dei. Omnibus Dei fidelibas qui sunt Romæ, vocatis sanctis. Vocatione Dei sanctificatis, et gratia, non meritis operum suorum. Cratia vobis. Talis est ubique salutatio ejus, ut et commemoret beneficia Dei, et ea optet in nobis integra permanere, quia gratis nobis peccata donata sunt, non meritis nostris. Et pax a Deo Patre nostro et Domino Jesu Christo. Sicut ad Colossenses dicit: Pacificavit omnia quæ in coelo et quae in terra sunt, per sanguinem ejus, et quos redemit vult pacificos vivere. Primum quidem gratias ago Deo meo per Jetum Christum. Quia natura Deus omnium, merito et voluntate paucorum est, ideo dixit, Deo meo. Pro omnibus vobis. Non pro Judæis solis. Quia fides vestra annuntiatur in universo mundo.
He was predestined, so that he might rise first before all and open the way of resurrection to the children of God, so that just as the head, so also his body might rise. Through whom we have received grace and apostleship for obedience to the faith among all nations. Grace, that we may believe and be baptized, and because it is freely given and he himself has already been justified by no merits of his own. But he received apostleship when he was sent to preach to the nations. For his name. We act in place of his name, as he himself says: As the Father sent me, I also send you; and, We act as ambassadors for Christ. Among whom you also are called of Jesus Christ. And in you Romans we have received apostleship, just as also among all nations. To all who are at Rome, beloved of God. To all the faithful of God who are at Rome, called to be saints. Sanctified by the calling of God, and by grace, not by the merits of their works. Grace to you. Such is his greeting everywhere, that he both recalls the benefits of God and prays that they remain whole in us, because our sins have been freely forgiven us, not by our merits. And peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. As he says to the Colossians: He made peace with all things that are in heaven and on earth, through his blood, and those whom he redeemed he wills to live peaceably. First indeed I give thanks to my God through Jesus Christ. Because God is by nature the God of all, but by merit and will he is the God of few, therefore he said, my God. For you all. Not for the Jews alone. Because your faith is proclaimed in the whole world.
Subtiliter laudat, ut provocet ad profectum. Et vere ubique fides clara est Romanorum. Fides, inqnit, vestra, fidem dixit esse illorum, quae sine dubio Dei, et a Deo illis infusa est; sed consuetudo Scripturae hoc habet, sicut in Evangelio ait Dominus: Nonne scriptum est in lege vestra, Quia ego dixi, Dii estis? Vel illud: Sicut scriptum est in lege eorum, Quia odio habuerunt me gratis; et alibi: Nunquid lex nostra damnat aliquem inauditum? Ita ergo fides eorum dicitur, sicut lex eo um, cum nullus ignoret quod lex a Deo sii, sicut et fidis. Testis enim mihi est Deus, cui tervio in spiritu meo, in Evangelio Filii ejus. Hoc est, cui in toto corda mco prompta devotione et plena veritate deserv o. Quod sine intermissione memoriam vestri facio, semper in orationibus meis obsecrans. Hic ostendit se omnia cum dilectione dicturum, ut ab his libentius audiatur, et dat exemplum sine intermissione orandi. Si quomodo tandem aliquando prosperum iter habeam in voluntate Dei veniendi ad vos. Desidero enim videre vos, ut aliquid impertiar vobis gratiæ spiritualis.
He praises them subtly, so as to stir them on to progress. And truly the faith of the Romans is renowned everywhere. Your faith, he says—he called their faith that which is without doubt God's, and was poured into them by God; but such is the custom of Scripture, as in the Gospel the Lord says: Is it not written in your law, that I said, You are gods? Or that: As it is written in their law, that they hated me without cause; and elsewhere: Does our law judge anyone unheard? So then their faith is spoken of as their law, since no one is ignorant that the law is from God, as faith also is. For God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit, in the Gospel of his Son. That is, whom I serve with my whole heart in ready devotion and full truth. That without ceasing I make mention of you, always in my prayers beseeching. Here he shows that he will say all things with love, so that he may be heard by them more willingly, and he gives an example of praying without ceasing. If in some way at last I may have a prosperous journey, in the will of God, to come to you. For I long to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual grace.
Aliter etiam prosperum iter non habeo, nisi me voluntas Dei, quae omnia novit, et in bonis omnibus nos prævenit, et praecedit, et fovet, illo direxerit, ubi frucIum aliquem habeam, sicut de apostolis legimus, eos alio ire volentes, alio destinatos, non eo isse quo volebant, sed quo eos Deus misisset, sciens quando et ad quos ire deberent. Ad confirmandos vos. Hic ostendit, qualiter eos superius laudaverit qui ad confirmandum adhuc gratiae indigent spiritalis. Id eat, simul consolari in vobis per eam quce invicem est fidem vestram atque meam. Ut per communem fidem invicem consolemur, et de illuminatione sancti Spiritus invicem gratulemur. Nolo enim vos ignorare, fratres, quia sæpe proposui venire ad vos. Per commeantes enim fratres audire potuistis dispositionem meam. Et prohibitus sum* usque adhuc. Id est occupatus, dum aliis provinciis praedico, vel revelatione prohibilus, vel forte, sicut alibi dicit: Impedivit nos Sata. nas. Ut aliquem fructum habeam in vobis. Mercedem laboris sui nominat fructum. Sicut et in cæteri, gentibus, Græcis ac barbaris. Subaudilur habeo. Sapientibus et insipientibus debitor sum. Sapientes Graecos dicit, apud quos omnis philosophia est; insipientes barbaros appelat. Ita quod in me promptum est. Paratum est in me. Et vobis qui Romæ estis evangelizare. Æque ut sapientibus Graecis. Non enim erubesco Evanglium.
Otherwise I too have no prosperous journey unless the will of God, which knows all things and in all good things goes before us and precedes and fosters us, has directed me there where I may have some fruit, just as we read of the apostles: wishing to go to one place, appointed to another, they did not go where they wished, but where God had sent them, knowing when and to whom they ought to go. To confirm you. Here he shows how he praised them above, since those who still need spiritual grace are to be confirmed. That is, to be comforted together in you through the faith which is mutually yours and mine. That through our common faith we may comfort one another and rejoice together over the illumination of the Holy Spirit. For I do not want you to be ignorant, brothers, that I have often intended to come to you. For through the brothers who travel back and forth you could have heard of my intention. And I have been prevented until now. That is, occupied while I preach to other provinces, or prevented by revelation, or perhaps, as he says elsewhere: Satan hindered us. That I may have some fruit in you. He calls the reward of his labor fruit. As also in the other nations, Greeks and barbarians. "I have" is understood. I am a debtor to the wise and the foolish. He calls the Greeks wise, among whom is all philosophy; he calls the barbarians foolish. So what is ready in me. It is prepared in me. And to evangelize you who are at Rome. Equally as to the wise Greeks. For I am not ashamed of the Gospel.
Hoc subtiliter ad taxationem pertinet paganorum, qui merito de incestatoribus diis suis deberent erubescere: nec tamen erubescunt Deum suum Jovem credere, et erubescendum putant, Dominum propter salutem imagin I suæ credere, crucifixum cum in altero dedecus, in altero sit insigne virtutis. Et contra eos qui negant Christum in carne, et erubescunt nalivitatem Domini et crucem, qui putant hæc indigna Deo, non intelligentes nihil dignius Deo quam quod ad humanam salutem proficit. Nam si incredulisstultitia est, sed credentibus Dei virtus, et Dei sapientia. Virtu, enim Dei est in salutem. Nulla major virtus est quam devicta morte, homini vitam perditam reddere, quamvis infirmitas, id est humanitas, in virtute, hoc est in divinitate, incredibilis videatur incredulis. Omni credenti, Judoco primum et Græco; justitia enim Dei in eo revelatur. Ut quomodo Abraham credens es gentibus per fidem salvatus est, ita et cæteri credentes salventur. Ex fide in fidem, sicut scriptum est: Justus autem ex fide mea vivit. Ex fide Veteris Testamenti justificatur Judæus, ex Novi, gentilis, dum Judæus credit quod hoc ante prophetie prædixerint. Item aliter: Ex fide præsenti in futura, quia fides ad invisibilia pertinet, quæ et sub Veteri Testamento, ct in Novo duno Dei infusa est. Et ideo dicit: Justus autem ex fide mea vivit. Revelatur enim ira Dei de carlo.
This pertains subtly to the censure of the pagans, who by rights ought to blush for their incestuous gods; yet they do not blush to believe that their god Jove is such, and they think it a thing to blush for that the Lord was believed on for the salvation of His image, crucified—when in the one case it is a disgrace, in the other a mark of virtue. And this is against those who deny Christ in the flesh, and blush at the Lord's nativity and cross, who think these things unworthy of God, not understanding that nothing is more worthy of God than what profits human salvation. For if to unbelievers it is foolishness, yet to believers it is the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the power of God is unto salvation. There is no greater power than to have conquered death, to restore to man the life he lost, although the weakness—that is, the humanity—in the power, that is, in the divinity, seems incredible to unbelievers. To every believer, to the Jew first and to the Greek; for the righteousness of God is revealed in it. So that just as Abraham, believing, was saved for the nations through faith, so too the rest who believe may be saved. From faith unto faith, as it is written: But the just man lives by my faith. By the faith of the Old Testament the Jew is justified, by that of the New, the Gentile, when the Jew believes that the prophets foretold this beforehand. Likewise in another sense: from present faith unto future faith, because faith pertains to things invisible, which was infused by the gift of God both under the Old Testament and in the New. And therefore he says: But the just man lives by my faith. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven.
Contra partem gentium loquitur, dicitque Dei iram per Evangelium revelari. Noverant enim homines et benefic a et plagas exspectare de cœlis. Super omnem impietatem et injustitiam hominum. Prima impietas in Deum, peccare est aut pcr blasphemiam, aut per contemptum. Alia in parentes, aut injuria, aut despectu. Tertia in extraneum, quia omne contrarium pietati impietas est. Quarta in semetipsos, sicut Sapientia dicit: Qui autem peccant in me, impie faciunt in suas animas. Sive omnem impietatem, quia diversae sunt idolorum culturæ, ut impietas ad injuriam Dei, injustitia ad omnia peccata referatur. Eorum qui veritatem in justitia detinent. Qui veritatem nominis Dei in injustitia indignæ materiæ detinent idolorum. Quia quod notum est Dei, manifestum est iii illis. Omnis creatura ostendit se non esse Deum, sed esse alium qui eam fecerit, cui servitio parere necesse sit, naturaliter enim potest scire de Deo quod sit, et quod juslus sit, et ipsa creatura non esse a semelipsa, quia major per omnia omnibus nulla est, quia omnes se alterutram vincunt, aliæ magnitudine, ut cœlum; aliæ claritate, ut sol, et luna, vel stellæ præclaræ. Deus enim illis manifestavit. Virtutes ejus occultae ex iis quæ palam sunt manifestantur. Invisibilia enim ipsius a creatura mundi per ea quce facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur.
He speaks against the party of the gentiles, and says that the wrath of God is revealed through the Gospel. For men knew both to expect benefits and to expect blows from the heavens. Upon all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men. The first ungodliness is toward God: to sin either through blasphemy or through contempt. Another is toward parents, either by injury or by disdain. The third is toward a stranger, because everything contrary to piety is ungodliness. The fourth is toward themselves, as Wisdom says: But those who sin against me do wickedly against their own souls. Or "all ungodliness," because the cults of idols are diverse, so that ungodliness refers to injury against God, and unrighteousness to all sins. Of those who hold the truth in unrighteousness. Who hold the truth of God's name in unrighteousness, in the unworthy matter of idols. Because what is known of God is manifest in them. Every creature shows that it is not God, but that there is another who made it, whom it is necessary to obey in service; for naturally it can know concerning God that he is, and that he is just, and that the creature itself is not from itself, because there is none greater in all things than all things, because all surpass one another: some by magnitude, like heaven; others by brightness, like the sun and the moon, or the most brilliant stars. For God has manifested it to them. His hidden powers are made manifest from those things which are open. For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are understood and seen through those things which were made.
Si enim ea quæ videntur tam praeclara, ab illo facia sunt, ut quidam illa deos putarent, quanto magis factorem sempiternum intelliigere potuerunt? Sempiterna quoque ejus virtus et divinitas, ut sint inexcusabiles. Ergo Christus sempiternus, quia Dd virtus et Dei sapientia est. Quia cum cognovissent Deum. Quomodo cognoverunt? sive ex conscientia per insitam sibi rationem, sive ex mundi factura, quia omnia mutabilia sunt, solus Deus incommutabilis. Non sicut Deum glorificaverunt. Non illum per suam magnitudinum venerati sunt, sed pro Deo idola coluerunt. Aut gratias egerunt. Quia rationabiles ab eo facti sunt. Sed evanuerunt in cogitationibus suis. Putantes se Dei magnitudinem posse comprehendere. Et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum. Recedentes uliquc a limine veritatis, creaturam pro Creatore venerando, verum lumen, id est Dei sapientiam perdiderunt. Dicentes enim se esse sapientes. Quasi qui invenirent quomodo invisibilis Deus in simulacrum visibile coleretur. Stulti facti sunt. Non intelligentes Deum non esse, quem homo fecisset. Et mutaverunt gloriam incorruptibilis Dei in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis et volucris et quadrupedum et serpentum. Hic Jovis cultores appellat, quem propter amores fœdissimos toties asserunt transformatum, velut in cygnum, et taurum. Propter quod tradidit iUlo. Deus in desidena cordis corum.
For if those things which are seen are so exceedingly glorious, and were made by him, so that certain men thought them to be gods, how much more could they have understood the eternal Maker? His eternal power also and divinity, so that they are without excuse. Therefore Christ is eternal, because he is the power and wisdom of God. Because when they had known God. How did they know him? Either from conscience through reason implanted in them, or from the fashioning of the world, because all things are mutable, God alone is immutable. They did not glorify him as God. They did not venerate him according to his greatness, but instead of God they worshiped idols. Or gave thanks. Because they were made rational by him. But they became vain in their thoughts. Thinking that they could comprehend the greatness of God. And their foolish heart was darkened. Departing, that is, from the threshold of truth, by venerating the creature instead of the Creator, they lost the true light, that is, the wisdom of God. For saying that they were wise. As if they could find how the invisible God might be worshiped in a visible image. They became fools. Not understanding that he is not God, whom man had made. And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of corruptible man and of birds and of four-footed beasts and of serpents. Here he calls them worshipers of Jupiter, whom they repeatedly assert was transformed because of most shameful loves, as into a swan and a bull. For which cause God handed them over. God into the desires of their heart.
Tradere dicitur Deus, dum non retinet delinquentes justo judicio, propter arbitrii libertatem ad malum promptissimam. Derelinquit autem dereliquentes se, sicut dicit per Prophetam: Si autem reliqueritis cum, et ipse relinquet vos. Et iIlud: Dimisi eos secundum desideria cordis eorum, et ibunt in voluptatibus suis. In immunditiam. Quæ est in turpibus mysteriis idolorum. Ut contumeliis officiant corpora sua. Dum sibi characteres et ustiones infligunt in consecrationibus idolorum. In semetipsis. Vitam quam amantes nec sibi parcant, ut etiam in hoc erroris sui cœnam perferant. Qui commuta erunt veritatem Dei iu mendacium. Transtulerunt veri Dei culturam in mendacium idolorum, qui falso pro diis habentur, fallunt cnim, dum hoc se mentiuntur esse quod non sunt. Et coluerunt et servierunt creaturæ po ius quam Crea'ori. Non solum dixerunt, sed etiam servierunt, et quicunque alicujus creaturæ cupiditate vincitur, ipsi servit; a quo enim quis vincitur. hujus et servus est, in tantum ut et venter sit Deus. Qui est benedictus in sæcula. Cui si servissent, et ipsi benedicli in saecula fieri potuerunt. Maledicti ergo, et temporales cffecti sunt, qui benedictum in saecula reliquerunt. De talibus enim dicitur: Similiter odio sunt impius, et impietas ejus. Amen. Vere, sive fideliter. Propterea tradidit illos Deus in passiones ignominice.
God is said to hand them over when he does not restrain transgressors in his just judgment, on account of the freedom of will, which is most prone to evil. But he abandons those who abandon him, as he says through the Prophet: But if you forsake him, he will also forsake you. And that other passage: I sent them away according to the desires of their heart, and they will walk in their own lusts. Into uncleanness, which is in the shameful mysteries of idols. So that they do dishonor to their own bodies, while they inflict brands and burns upon themselves in the consecrations of idols. In themselves: they do not spare even their own life, which they love, so that in this too they may endure the banquet of their error. Who exchanged the truth of God for a lie: they turned the worship of the true God into the lie of idols, which are falsely held to be gods; for they deceive, while they lie that they are what they are not. And they worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator. They not only said it, but also served; and whoever is conquered by the desire for any creature serves it; for by whatever a man is conquered, of that he is also the slave, to such an extent that even the belly becomes his god. Who is blessed forever. If they had served him, they too could have become blessed forever. Therefore those who have forsaken the one blessed forever have become accursed and temporal. For of such it is said: In like manner the impious man and his impiety are hateful. Amen. Truly, or faithfully. Therefore God handed them over to shameful passions.
Propter causas superius memoratas etiam in his flagitiis dimissi sunt, ut passio vitii jam poena peccati sit. Nam feminæ eorum. Ideo ipsa crimina, evidenter expressit, ut cognoscas eos rationem perdidisse naturae, qui tamen amentes effecti sunt, ut omnia perverterent, in Deum perversi; neque enim ordinem naturæ servare possunt, qui auctorem naturæ dereliquerunt. Immutaverunt naturalem usum in eum usum qui est contra naturam. Omnia perverterunt, sicut scriptum est. Infandorum enim idolorum cultura omnis mali caput est, et initium, et finis. Similiter autem et masculi, relicto naturali usu feminæ. Quomodo enim ordinem naturæ servassent, auctore naturae derelicto? Exarserunt in desiderii. suis, invicem masculi in masculos turpitudinem operantes. Effrenata libido modum servare non novit. Et mercedem quam oportuit erroris sui in semetipsis recipientes. S currit ordo, ut qui Domini obliti fuerant, nec se ipsos cognoscerent. Et sicut non probaverunt Dominum. Non nescierunt, sed minime probaverunt. lUe enim Dominum probat habere se in notitia, qui semper taHquam praesentem timet, et peccare non audet. Tradidit eos Deus in reprobum sensum. Id est, relicti sunt in reprobum sensum. Ut faciant quæ non convenit. Quae non conveniunt homini facere. Repletos omni iniquitate et malitia. luiquitalem et malitiam principales causas ostendit esse vitiorum. Fornicatione, avaritia.
For the causes mentioned above, they were also abandoned in these shameful acts, so that the passion of vice might already be the punishment of sin. For their women. Therefore he clearly set forth the crimes themselves, so that you may know that those who have lost the reasoning of nature—who have nonetheless been made senseless so as to pervert all things, being perverse toward God—cannot keep the order of nature, since they have forsaken the author of nature. They changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. They perverted all things, as it is written. For the worship of unspeakable idols is the head, the beginning, and the end of every evil. Likewise also the males, having forsaken the natural use of the woman. For how would they have kept the order of nature, with the author of nature forsaken? They burned in their desires, males with males working shamefulness. Unbridled lust does not know how to keep a limit. And receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error. The order runs on, so that those who had forgotten the Lord would not even know themselves. And just as they did not approve of God. They did not fail to know, but they did not at all approve. For he approves of having the Lord in his knowledge who always fears him as present and does not dare to sin. God handed them over to a reprobate mind. That is, they were left in a reprobate mind. So that they do what is not fitting. Which are not fitting for a man to do. Filled with all iniquity and malice. He shows iniquity and malice to be the principal causes of vices. Fornication, covetousness.
Fornicationem et avaritiam simul junxit, quia utræque passiones idololatriæ comparantur, sicut dixit in Exodo: Fornicati sunt a Deo suo propter idoli sordem. Nam fornicatio est Christiano alicui rei adhaerere prætorquam neo, ct multis cupiditatibus corrumpi. Unde dicit Paulus, se uni viro nos virginem castam spopoudisse. Nequitia. Ideo insatiabilis est avaritia, quia post Dei divitias quantumvis quis habeat, parum est. Plenos inividia, homicidio. Pulchre homicidium invidiæ sociavit, quia prima hnjus criminis ip a materia est, quia primum homicidium et diaboli et Cain de invidia natum est. Contentione. Contentio est, ubi non ratione aliquid, sed animi pertinacia defenditur, et ubi non,.critas quæritur, sed animositas fatigatur. Primitus fraterni Meteris causa ex contentione evenit. Dolo, malignitate. Dnlus est occulta malitia blandis sermonibus adornata. Susurrones. Murmuratores, non in facie, sed in aure loquentes, vel de quibus dicitur, Neque murmuraveritis. Detractores Deo odibiles. De factores Deo odibiles, quia nihil tam odibile Deo quam idololatria, cui detractio comparatur, cum et idololatra et detractor eradicandi a Scriptura dicantur. Contumetiosos. Qui veloces sunt in verborum injuriis. Superbos. Qui vult supergredi quod est, superbus dicitur, sicut diabelus, qui prodidit hoc quod fuit. Et qui super alios vult esse, infra se fiet. Elatos, imentores malorum.
He joined fornication and greed together, because both passions are compared to idolatry, as he said in Exodus: They have fornicated away from their God because of the filth of an idol. For fornication for a Christian is to cling to anything other than God, and to be corrupted by many desires. Hence Paul says that he betrothed us as a chaste virgin to one man. Wickedness. Greed is therefore insatiable because, after the riches of God, however much anyone has, it is little. Full of envy, murder. He fittingly joined murder to envy, because the first matter of this crime is envy, since the first murder, that of the devil and of Cain, was born of envy. Strife. Strife is where something is defended not by reason but by stubbornness of mind, and where truth is not sought but passion is worn out. The first cause of brotherly death came from strife. Guile, malice. Guile is hidden malice adorned with flattering words. Whisperers. Murmurers, speaking not to the face but into the ear, or those of whom it is said, Do not murmur. Slanderers, hateful to God. Slanderers are hateful to God, because nothing is so hateful to God as idolatry, to which slander is compared, since both the idolater and the slanderer are said by Scripture to be rooted out. Insolent. Those who are swift in insults of words. Proud. He who wishes to go beyond what he is is called proud, like the devil, who betrayed what he was. And he who wishes to be above others will be brought below himself. Puffed up, inventors of evil things.
Elatus est qui effertur supra mensuras suas. Parentibus non obedientes. Hoc loco et doctores intellig pussunt, parentes animarum. Insipientes. Quia ab ipso fonte sapientis recesserunt. Incompositos. Omnis insipiens inordinatus. Sine affectione, absque honore. Affectio est adimpletio charitatis. Sine misericordia. Quomodo poterant aliis misereri, qui in se misericordes esse noluerunt? Qui cum justitiam Dei cognovissent. Per hoc, quod eis naturaliter displicet malum, Dei justitiam cognoverunt. Non intellexerunt. Qui si intellexissent, timuissent; si timuissent, nunquam tal a commisissent. Quoniam qui talia agunt, digni sunt morte. Judicii Dei, etsi non in praesentia, futuram tamen non effugient poenam. Non solum qui ea faciunt, sed et qui consentiunt facientibus. Consentiunt suscipiendo doctrinam, vel connivendo [alias convivendo].
He is puffed up who is carried beyond his own measure. Not obedient to parents. In this place even teachers can be understood, the parents of souls. Foolish. Because they have withdrawn from the very fountain of wisdom. Disorderly. Every fool is disorderly. Without affection, without honor. Affection is the fulfillment of charity. Without mercy. How could they show mercy to others, who were unwilling to be merciful to themselves? Who, when they had known the justice of God. By this, that evil is naturally displeasing to them, they have known the justice of God. They did not understand. If they had understood, they would have feared; if they had feared, they would never have committed such things. For those who do such things are worthy of death. They will not escape the future punishment of God's judgment, even if not in the present. Not only those who do them, but also those who consent to those doing them. They consent by receiving the teaching, or by conniving [otherwise, by living together].
CAP. II. Propter quod inexcusabilis es, o homo omnis qui judicas. In quo enim judicas alterum, teipsum condemnas; eadem enim agit quæ judicas. Omnes qui hujusmodi judicabant, maxime tamen qui habent examinandi potestatem, non solum judices. sed et domini conveniuntur. Quia naturali judicio justam factis profert unusquisquc sententiam. Omnesque norunt et innocentiam præmio, et maliliam dignam esse supplicio: et ideo inexcusabiles, quia Dei justitiam cognoverunt. Scimus enim quoniam judicium Dei est secundum veritatem in eo. qui talia agunt. Utique secundum veritatem est judicium, quo judicabuntur hujusmodi, qui condemnare alios sapuerunt, quæ per se committere non timebant. Si enim tu peccator peccatorem tui simitem judicas, quanto magis Deus justus te judicabit injustum? Et ideo judicium Dei secundum veritatem est, quippe quem sine personarum acceptione nec amicis suis, nec angelis peccantibus legimus pepercisse. Humanum autem judicium multis modis corrumpitur. Nam et amore, vel odio, sed et avaritia ac timore, nonnunquam et misericordia depravatur. Existimas autem hoc, o home, qui judicas eos qui talia agunt, et facis ea, quia tu effugies judicium Dei? Nunquid propterea tibi de impunitate blandir s, quia Deus in præsent non reddit, et patientiam ejus contemnis?
CHAPTER II. Therefore you are without excuse, O every man who judges. For in that you judge another, you condemn yourself; for you do the same things that you judge. All who judged in this way, but especially those who have the power of examining, are called to account—not only judges but also masters. Because by natural judgment each one pronounces a just sentence on deeds. And all know both that innocence is worthy of reward and that malice is worthy of punishment; and therefore they are without excuse, because they have known God's justice. For we know that the judgment of God is according to truth upon those who do such things. Certainly the judgment is according to truth by which such persons will be judged, who knew how to condemn others for things they did not fear to commit themselves. For if you, a sinner, judge a sinner like yourself, how much more will God, who is just, judge you, who are unjust? And therefore the judgment of God is according to truth, since we read that he spared neither his friends nor the angels who sinned, without respect of persons. Human judgment, however, is corrupted in many ways. For it is depraved by love or hatred, but also by greed and fear, and sometimes even by mercy. But do you think this, O man, who judge those who do such things and do them yourself, that you will escape the judgment of God? Surely you do not flatter yourself with impunity for this reason, because God does not repay in the present, and you despise his patience?
Non tardal, inquit, Dominus promissa, sed patienter agit propter vos, nolens aliquem perire, sed omnes ad poenilentiam converti; bonus est enim exspectando; justus est puniendo. An divitias bonitatis ejus. Abundantiam. Et patientiæ et longanimitatis contemnis? ignorans quoniam benignitas Dei ad pœnitentiam te adducit? Multum se homines per patientiam Dei seducunt, quia non vult statim pun re peccantes. Putant enim eum aut non curare res humanas, aut donare quod differt. Plerique etiam calumniantur, quare in præsenti non reddit? Miseri etiam in hoc ingrati, sicut in omnibus beneficiis Dei, qui ei imputant quod eorum dissimulatur interitus, non intelligentes, quia si statim redderet, nullus jam luminum remansisset, nec ex injustis fierent jusli. Q lid plura? Paulum quoque ipsum Ecclesia non haberet. Ideo autem hominibus videtur Deus diu exspectare peccantes, quia parvi temporis sumus, et centum annos pro infinito habemus. Ille autem apud quem mille anni tanquam una dies sunt, centum annos pro hora habet. Et ideo hoc parum est ante Dominum, cum et homines aliquantis diebus soleant exspectare pecNotes. Humanum est nempe delinquere, humanum est pro delicto poenitere. Nemo periculosius peccat quam qui peccata defendit. Secundum autem duritiam tuam, et impænitens cor thesaurizas tibi.
Not slow, he says, is the Lord concerning his promise, but he acts patiently for your sake, not willing that anyone perish, but that all be converted to repentance; for he is good in waiting; he is just in punishing. Or do you despise the riches of his goodness. The abundance. And of his patience and long-suffering? Not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? By the patience of God men greatly deceive themselves, because he does not wish to punish sinners at once. For they think that he either does not care about human affairs, or grants what he postpones. Many even slander him, asking why he does not repay in the present? Wretched men, ungrateful even in this, as in all the benefits of God, who impute to him that their destruction is overlooked, not understanding that if he repaid at once, no one of men would have remained, nor would the unjust become just. What more? The Church would not have Paul himself either. But God seems to men to wait long for sinners for this reason, because we are of small time, and we regard a hundred years as infinite. But he with whom a thousand years are as one day regards a hundred years as an hour. And therefore this is little before the Lord, since even men are accustomed to wait for a few days for their own. Notes. For it is human to transgress, human to repent of a fault. No one sins more dangerously than he who defends his sins. But according to your hardness and impenitent heart you treasure up for yourself.
Tu autem imprudens æger ipso remedio ad majora abuteris vulnera, sicut dicit Job: Dedit ei Deus locum pænitentiæ. et ille abutitur eo in superbiam. Non agnita enim pietas majus judicium parat, ut vindictam sentiat, qui misericordiam sentire despexit. lram in die iræ. Iram super iram ipse tibi apud Dominum recondis, quæd iebus definitis et certis lemporibusapparebit non ante diem, qui exspectaris (Sic). Et revelationis justi judicii Dei, qui reddit unicuique secundum opera ejus. Quia occultus est, etsi videlur modo per specilium in aenigmate, sive per velamen videtur. His quidem qui secundum patientiam boni operis. Boni operis merces per patientiam exspectatur: quia in praesenti vita non redditur. Per fidem enim ambulamus, et non per speciem, et tunc erit perfectum opus, si infinemusqueduraverit. Gloriam. Gloriam illam pr;p. dicat, qua sancti fulgebunt ut sol, et honorent Honarem filiorum Dei. Quid enim honoratius filiis Dei, qui etiam angelos judicabunt? Et incorruptionem. Incorruptionem, gloriam immortalitatis dicit. Quærentibus vitam æternam. Qui quaerit vitam aeternam, ista omnia consequetur, et qui habet hanc spem in eo, sanctificat se, sicut dicit: Sancti estote, sicut ille sanctus est. His autem qui ex contentione. Qui evangelicac veritati non credunt, et consentiunt iniquitali, qui relicto Creatore deserviunt creaturæ, qui contra quod sciunt defendunt, contentiosi sunt.
But you, imprudent and sick, abuse the very remedy itself into greater wounds, as Job says: God gave him a place of repentance, and he abuses it unto pride. For piety that is not acknowledged prepares a greater judgment, so that he may feel vengeance who disdained to feel mercy. Wrath in the day of wrath. You store up wrath upon wrath for yourself with the Lord, which will appear on defined days and fixed times, not before the day that you await. And of the revelation of the just judgment of God, who renders to each according to his works. Because it is hidden, even if it now seems to be seen through a mirror in an enigma, or is seen through a veil. To those indeed who according to patience of good work. The reward of good work is awaited through patience, because it is not rendered in the present life. For we walk by faith, and not by sight, and then will the work be perfect, if it has endured to the end. Glory. Let him speak of that glory, whereby the saints will shine as the sun, and be honored with the honor of the sons of God. For what is more honorable to the sons of God, who will even judge angels? And incorruption. By incorruption he means the glory of immortality. To those seeking eternal life. Whoever seeks eternal life will obtain all these things, and whoever has this hope in him sanctifies himself, as it says: Be holy, as he is holy. But to those who are of contention. Those who do not believe the truth of the gospel, and consent to iniquity, who, having forsaken the Creator, serve the creature, who defend against what they know, are contentious.
Timete contentionem, ne quæ sequuntur patiamini. Et qui non acquiescunt veritati. Evangelicæ. Credunt autem iniquitati. Quati norunt, qui credere voluerunt iniquitati: non enim æquum, derelicto Creatore omnium, creaturæ servire. Ira et indignatio. Hæc omnia peccatoribus in judicio praeparantur; tunc erit magna et infructuosa poenitentia. Tribulatio et angustia. Conscientiæ et van:p. pœnitentiæ, sicut scriptum est: Tunc dicent inter se poeniienles, et præ angustia spiritus gementes. In omnem animam hominis operantis malum, Quia anima prima peccat, ideo pœnam principaliler sentit; sive anima pro homine integro ponitur, sicut dicit quod Jacob in animabui intravit in Ægyptum. Judœi primum, et Graeci. Primi, quia primo Dominum agnoverunt, et primi in legem gravius prævaricati sunt. Vel primum pro quidem ponit, quia et ipse dicit: Non est personarum acceptio apud Deum, sic primum tempore, non honore. Gloria autem, et honor, et pax omni operanti bonum. Gloria contra iram, bonor contra indignationem, pax contra tribulationem et angustiam, et quod superius incorruptionem, hic pacem nominavit. Judæo primum, et Græco. Quod ibi in anima dixit Judæi et Græci, hic ipsum hominem posuit. Et, sicut dictum est, primum hic pro quidem ponit, sive primum, credulitatis tempore, non honore. Non est enim personarum acceptio apud Deum.
Fear contention, lest you suffer what follows. And those who do not consent to the truth. Of the Gospel. But they believe in iniquity. As those knew who wished to believe in iniquity; for it is not right, having forsaken the Creator of all things, to serve the creature. Wrath and indignation. All these things are prepared for sinners in judgment; then there will be great and fruitless repentance. Tribulation and distress. Of conscience and of vain repentance, as it is written: Then they will say among themselves, repenting, and groaning for the distress of spirit. Upon every soul of man that works evil. Because the soul sins first, therefore it principally feels the punishment; or the soul is put for the whole man, as he says that Jacob entered into Egypt in souls. To the Jew first, and to the Greek. First, because they first acknowledged the Lord, and first transgressed the law more grievously. Or he puts first for indeed, because he himself also says: There is no respect of persons with God, thus first in time, not in honor. But glory, and honor, and peace to everyone who works good. Glory against wrath, honor against indignation, peace against tribulation and distress, and what he named incorruption above, here he named peace. To the Jew first, and to the Greek. What he said there in the soul, of the Jew and the Greek, here he put as the man himself. And, as has been said, here he puts first for indeed, or first, in time of belief, not in honor. For there is no respect of persons with God.
Ne gentes se de Ignorantia excusarent, quia lege naturae sunt praediti-, nec Judæi de lese et circumcisione sibi blandiantur, quia non solum professio, sed et conversatio requirenda est. Quicunque enim sine lege peccaverunt, sine lege, peribunt, et quicunque in lege peccaverunt, per legem judicabuntur. Lege litterae, et lege naturae, hoc est, mentis et conscientiae. Pejus enim videtur esse perire qnam judicari. Sed cum hoc degentibus et de Judæis loquitur, quis audeat dicere, Judæos qui in lege peccant, non esse perituros, cum in Christo non crediderint? quandoquidem sine fide Christi nemo liberari potest, ac pro hoc ita judicabuntur. fer!bunt regno, sed supplicio non peribunt. Quis autem dubitat, sive gentes, siveJudacos, si Christo non crediderint, perituros? Non enim auditores legis justi sunt apud Deum, sed factores legis justificabuntur. Reddit rationem quare non sint a gentibus meliores, unde i i nos timere debemus, ne audientes legem, et non facientes. cum gentibus pereamus. Nec dicat Judæus: Sub lege vixi, gentili sum melior. Lex ergo auditores facit: gratia factores. Quis enim dicat non justificatos eos qui fuerunt ex fide legi obedientes? quando nisi justificarentur, non possunt esse obedientes. Sed dicimus lege fieri, ut Deus quid fieri velit audiatur: gratia vero fieri, ut legi obediatur, quia non auditores, sed factorcs legis justificabuntur.
Lest the Gentiles excuse themselves on the ground of ignorance, since they are endowed with the law of nature, nor let the Jews flatter themselves about the law and circumcision, because not only profession but also conduct is required. For whoever have sinned without the law will perish without the law, and whoever have sinned in the law will be judged by the law. By the law of the letter, and by the law of nature, that is, of the mind and conscience. For to perish seems worse than to be judged. But when he speaks this to those living thus and to the Jews, who would dare to say that the Jews who sin in the law will not perish, since they have not believed in Christ? Seeing that without faith in Christ no one can be saved, and on this account they will be judged thus. They will be borne to the kingdom, but they will not perish by punishment. But who doubts that either Gentiles or Jews, if they have not believed in Christ, will perish? For it is not the hearers of the law who are just before God, but the doers of the law will be justified. He gives the reason why they are not better than the Gentiles, whence we too ought to fear lest, hearing the law and not doing it, we perish with the Gentiles. Nor let the Jew say: I have lived under the law, I am better than the Gentile. The law, then, makes hearers; grace makes doers. For who would say that those who were obedient to the law from faith are not justified? Since unless they were justified, they cannot be obedient. But we say that by the law it is brought about that God is heard as to what he wills to be done; but by grace it is brought about that the law is obeyed, because not the hearers but the doers of the law will be justified.
Cum enim gentes quæ legem non habent. Ne si diceretur. qui legem litteræ non habent, quomodo poterunt jndicari? Naturaliter quæ legis sunt faciunt, ejusmodi legem non habentes. Sive dc bis dicit qui noturae legem custodiunt, qui quod sibi lunt fieri, aliis non faciunt, sive quod naturaliter etiam gentet laudant bonos, et judicant malos, quod est opus te. gis; sive de his qui etiam nunc, dum boni aliquid operantur, a Deo accepisse se copiam qua placer6 Deo valeant, profitentur vitia puniendo. Ipsi sibi sunt lex, qui ostendunt opus legis. Ostendit illos non fuisse sine lege, ut et gentes inexcusabiles faciat, et Judæis de proprietate legis gloriam tollat. Nam omnis homo de peccato in conscientia erubescit, et de bono facto lætatur. Scriptum in cordibus suis, testimonium red. dente illis conscientia. Naturae igitur legem in corda per testimonium conscientiæ, sive conscientia testatur legem se habere dum peccat, et gaudere dum pec. cata superat. Et inter se invicem cogitationum accusantium aut etiam defendentium, in die cum judicabit Deus occulta hominum.
For when the Gentiles, who do not have the law. Lest it be said: those who do not have the law of the letter, how can they be judged? They do by nature the things of the law, not having such a law. Whether he says this of those who keep the law of nature, who do not do to others what they do not wish done to themselves; or because the Gentiles also naturally praise the good and judge the wicked, which is the work of the law; or of those who even now, while they do some good, profess that they have received from God the abundance by which they are able to please God, by punishing vices. They are a law to themselves, who show the work of the law. He shows that they were not without a law, so as to make the Gentiles inexcusable and to take away from the Jews the glory of the law as their own possession. For every man is ashamed of sin in his conscience, and rejoices in a good deed. Written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them. Therefore the law of nature is in the heart through the testimony of conscience, or conscience testifies that it has a law when it sins, and rejoices when it overcomes sins. And between themselves in turn, of thoughts accusing or even defending, on the day when God will judge the hidden things of men.
Dicit altercationes cogitationum esse, cum quid aut faciendum, aut non faciendum, diu deliberantes dijudicamus, et secundum hoc nos in die Domini judicandos, quia bonum et malum non ignorasse probamur, sive conscientiæ nostre cogitationes erunt in die judicii ante oculos nostros tanquam historiæ agnoscendae, et haec nos aut accusabunt, aut etiam excusabunt. Secundum Evangelium meum per Jesum Christum. Secundum quod annuntio per Jcsum Christum, sive per Jesum Cbristum judicabit Deus occulta bominum. Si autem tu Judæus. Postquam allocutus est gentium partes, nunc ad Judæos convertitur, dicens, illum verum Judæum pro. bari, cuius bona magis sint occulta quam publica. Cognominaris. Nomine, non opere. Et requiescis in lege. Confidis, vel securus es. Et gloriaris in Deo. Gloriaris quia notus in Judaea tantum Deus, quod solus noveris Deum, vel solus intelligas voluntatem ejus. Et nosti voluntatem ejus. Subauditur Dei, unde beati su inis, si quae Deo placent, nobis nota sint, et faciamus quae jubet. Et probas utiliora instructus per legem. Legendo vel examinando, quia per naturam, licet infirmam, utilia multa probantur, per legem utiliora, quia per gratiam perfectiora. Iterum recapitulat expositionem: Qui in lege requiescis, quomodo transgredieris legem? Qui gloriaris in Deo, quare inhonoras Deum? Qui nosti voluntatem ejus, quare non facis eam?
He calls them the disputings of thoughts, when we decide after long deliberation what should or should not be done, and that we are to be judged on the day of the Lord according to this, because we are proved not to have been ignorant of good and evil; or else the thoughts of our conscience will be, on the day of judgment, before our eyes like histories to be acknowledged, and these will either accuse us or even excuse us. According to my gospel through Jesus Christ. According to what I announce through Jesus Christ, or through Jesus Christ God will judge the hidden things of men. But if you are a Jew. After he has addressed the side of the Gentiles, he now turns to the Jews, saying that the true Jew is proved to be the one whose good things are more hidden than public. You are called. In name, not in deed. And you rest in the law. You trust, or you are secure. And you glory in God. You glory because God is known in Judea only, because you alone know God, or you alone understand his will. And you know his will. God's is understood, whence you are blessed if the things that please God are known to us, and we do what he commands. And you approve the more useful things, instructed through the law. By reading or examining, because through nature, though weak, many useful things are approved; through the law, more useful things, because through grace, more perfect things. Again he recapitulates the exposition: You who rest in the law, how have you transgressed the law? You who glory in God, why do you dishonor God? You who know his will, why do you not do it?
Qui probas utilia, quare sectaris inutilia et vana? Dux cæcorum, quomodo viam non vides rectam? Si enim videres, per ipsam utique ambulares, lumen aliorum, quomodo non objicis opera tenebrarum i eruditor insipientium, cur etiam timorem Domini, qui est initium sapientiae, reliquisti? Magister infantium, puer es sensu, qui habes formam scientiae et veritatis in lege, nec ipse sequeris, nec alios sequi malo exemplo permiuis. Confidis teipsum ducem esse cœcorum. Eorum utique qui viam sine luce Mei perdiderunt. Lumen eorum qui in tenebris sunt. In tenebris ignorantiae. Eruditorem insipientium. Qui Dei sapientiam non habent. Magistrum infantium. Sive aetate, sive sensu parvulorum. Habentem formum scientiæ et veritatis in lege. Exemplum, quod illos p'Has sine lege vivere non posse, habes formam, ad quam st mper respiciens errare non possis. Qui ergo alium doces. Quod gentili dixit: In quo alterum judicas, teipsum condemnas. Teipaum non doce.. Quare non convenit vita tua doetrinæ luse, et opus tuum destruit fidem tuam, et ita fit ut lex non custodita non solum tibi nihil prosit, sed etiam majoris te criminis reum teneat, ut contemptorem suum. Qui prædicas non furandum, furaris. Quidam dicunt: Furaris Christum, id est, abscondis eum ab hominibus, vel sacras Scripturas, si possis, velis subtrahere. Qui dicis non mcechandum, mœcharis.
You who approve the useful things, why do you pursue the useless and vain? Guide of the blind, how do you not see the right way? For if you saw it, you would surely walk along it. Light of others, how do you not cast off the works of darkness? Instructor of the foolish, why have you also abandoned the fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom? Teacher of infants, you are a child in understanding, you who have the form of knowledge and truth in the law, and neither follow it yourself nor permit others to follow it by your bad example. You trust that you yourself are a guide of the blind—of those, surely, who have lost the way without the light of Me; a light of those who are in darkness, in the darkness of ignorance; an instructor of the foolish, who do not have the wisdom of God; a teacher of infants, whether in age or in the understanding of little children; one having the form of knowledge and truth in the law. You have the example, that they cannot live without the law; you have the form, by looking upon which you may always be unable to err. You, therefore, who teach another—what he said to the Gentile: In that you judge another, you condemn yourself. You do not teach yourself. Why does your life not agree with your teaching, and your work destroy your faith, and so it comes about that the law, not kept, not only profits you nothing but even holds you guilty of a greater crime, as its despiser? You who preach that one must not steal, steal. Some say: You steal Christ, that is, you hide him from men, or you wish to withdraw the sacred Scriptures, if you can. You who say that one must not commit adultery, commit adultery.
Non est una mœchatio, nam omne quod totum Deo debes, si alicui praeterquam Deo reddideris, mœcharis, sive amorem, sive timorem, sive servitium, sive obedientiam, sive spem, et ideo gravius ab illo delinquitur, a quo perfectio praedicatur. Qui abominaris idola, sacrilegiKm facis. Sacrilegium est quod proprie in Deum committitur, quasi sacri violatio, vel praevaricatio mandatorum. Qui in lege gloriatis. Dicens te beatum quod Dei noveris voluntatem. Per prœvaricationem legis Deum inhonoras. Exposuit sacrilegium, Nomen enim Dei per vos blasphematur inter gentes, sicut scriptum est. Væ quorum malis operibus nomen Domini fuerit blasphematum, sicut scriptum est: Polluerunt nomen sanctum meum inter gentes, dum dicuntur populus Dei, qui inter gentes captivi, peccatis suis facientibus, demorantur, ut dicerent gentes, Dotninum non posse populum suum defendere, se per idola sua exstitisse victores, non intelligentes quod Israel si Dominum tenuisset, semper illis fuerat dominaturus, et per hoc defensor. Circumcisio quidem prodest, si legem observes; si autem prævaricator legis Ii., circumcisio tua prceputium facta est. Prodest tempore suo, sive quia vivere facit Judæum, et non exterminari. Potest et ita intelligi: Circumcisio prodest, quia facit intelligi esse; quia perspecta, invenitur carnis circumcisione cessante veram cordis esse venturam.
It is not one kind of adultery; for whatever you owe wholly to God, if you render it to anyone other than God, you commit adultery—whether love, or fear, or service, or obedience, or hope. And therefore he sins more grievously from whom perfection is preached. You who abominate idols, you commit sacrilege. Sacrilege is what is properly committed against God, as it were a violation of a sacred thing, or a transgression of the commandments. You who glory in the law. Saying that you are blessed because you know the will of God. By the transgression of the law you dishonor God. He has explained sacrilege, for the name of God is blasphemed among you Gentiles, as it is written. Woe to those by whose evil works the name of the Lord has been blasphemed, as it is written: They have polluted my holy name among the Gentiles, while they are called the people of God, who linger among the Gentiles as captives, their sins bringing it about, so that the Gentiles would say that the Lord could not defend his people, and that they had become victors through their idols, not understanding that if Israel had held fast to the Lord, he would always have ruled over them, and through this been their defender. Circumcision indeed profits, if you observe the law; but if you are a transgressor of the law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. It profits in its own time, either because it makes a Jew live, and not be exterminated. It can also be understood thus: Circumcision profits, because it makes it understood that it exists; because, once perceived, it is found that when the circumcision of the flesh ceases, the true circumcision of the heart is to come.
Praevaricator legis est, dum nOli sequitur quod ibi prædictum est. Signum prodest, si res adsit, cæterum signum sine re superfluum erit. Nam et signum quod Cain accepit, hoc significavit quod Judæos circumcisio discerneret a reliquis. Et sicut ille vagus et profugus cum ipso signo usque ad mortem duravit, sic Judaei usque in finem cum ipso circumcisionis jam inani signo per orbem dispersi, pleni zelo et pavore discurrunt, et nullus eis aufert circumcisionem, sive sub paganis, sive sub Christianis principibus ipsum signum portant Christi homicidæ, sicut Cain fratricida portavit. Si igitur præputium justitias legis custodiat. Visibilia indigent invisibilibus, invisibilia non indigent visibilibus, eo quod visibilia imagines sint invisibilium. Circumcisio carnis indiget cordis circumcisione, circumcisio autem cordis non indiget carnis circumcisione, quia imagine non indiget veritas, imago vero indiget veritate. Quare ergo data est circumcisio, si sola non prodest? Primum, ut cognosceretur Dei populus inter gentes vel in bello.
He is a transgressor of the law, since he does not follow what was foretold there. The sign is of benefit if the reality is present; otherwise the sign without the reality will be superfluous. For even the sign that Cain received signified this: that circumcision would distinguish the Jews from the rest. And just as he, wandering and fugitive, endured with that very sign even to death, so the Jews, dispersed throughout the world even to the end with this now empty sign of circumcision, run about full of zeal and fear, and no one takes circumcision away from them; whether under pagan or under Christian rulers they bear that very sign, murderers of Christ, just as Cain the fratricide bore it. If, therefore, the foreskin keeps the righteous deeds of the law. Visible things need invisible things; invisible things do not need visible things, because visible things are images of invisible things. Circumcision of the flesh needs circumcision of the heart, but circumcision of the heart does not need circumcision of the flesh, because the truth does not need the image, but the image needs the truth. Why, then, was circumcision given, if it is of no benefit by itself? First, so that the people of God might be recognized among the nations, or in war.
Quod autem tali membro signamur, primum haec causa est, ne aliud membrum deturparetur, quod aspectu horreret; deinde propter gratiæ promissionem, in qua erat per castitatem placendum, sive ut Christus significaretur ex circumcisione venturus, usque ad quem futura erat carnalis circumcisio, cuius typum gerens Jesus filius Nave secundo circumciderejubetur filios Israel. Sed hoc figura fuit, in tantum ut diceretur: In novissimis diebus circumcidet Deus cor tuum.. Et: Circumcidite præputia cordis vestri. Et ut originale peccatum in eo membro ubi insertum iuerat, etiam legis tempore puniretur. Nonne præputium illius in circumcisionem reputabitur? et judicabit quod ex natura est. Quia habet justitiam, cujus signum est circumcisio. Præputium legem consummaM. Implens. Te qui per litteram et circumcisionem prævaricator legis es? Dum litterae circumcisionem sectaris, spiritus accipere non mereris. Non enim qui in manifesto Judæus est. Omnia quae ante circa exteriorem hominem gerebantur, figuram exterioris hominis praeferebant. Neque quæ in manifesto in carne circumcisio, sed qui in abscondito Judæus est. Ipse verus Judæus est. Et circumcisio cordis in spiritu. De qua scriptum est in lege: In novissimis diebus circumcidet Deus cor tuum, et cor seminis tui. In spiritu, inquit, id est secundum novum testamentum, quod interiora quaerit, quae solus videat Deus, et haec est vera circumcisio.
But the reason we are marked with such a member is first this: that no other member might be disfigured, one that would be horrifying to look at; then because of the promise of grace, in which one had to please by chastity, or so that Christ might be signified as coming from circumcision, up to whom carnal circumcision was to last, bearing whose type Jesus the son of Nave is commanded to circumcise the sons of Israel a second time. But this was a figure, to such an extent that it was said: In the last days God will circumcise your heart. And: Circumcise the foreskins of your heart. And so that original sin might be punished in that member where it had been implanted, even in the time of the law. Will not his foreskin be reckoned as circumcision? and will judge what is from nature. Because he has righteousness, of which circumcision is the sign. The foreskin consummates the law. Fulfilling. You who through the letter and circumcision are a transgressor of the law? While you pursue the circumcision of the letter, you do not deserve to receive that of the spirit. For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly. All the things that were formerly done concerning the outer man prefigured the outer man. Nor is circumcision that which is manifest in the flesh, but he is a Jew who is one inwardly. He is the true Jew. And circumcision of the heart in the spirit. Concerning which it is written in the law: In the last days God will circumcise your heart, and the heart of your seed. In the spirit, he says, that is, according to the new testament, which seeks the inner things, which God alone sees, and this is true circumcision.
Non littera, cujus laus, non ex hominibus, sed ex Deo est. Littera occidit, spiritus autem vivificat. Lex litteræ non est data justis, sed injustis, et ideo laudem hominum merebatur. Lex autem Christi jam non minatur gladium peccantibus, sed promittit praemium libere servientibus, et ideo laudem a Deo habet, qui solus videt cor, quia ex fide precatur.
CAP. III. Quid ergo amplius est Judæo? aut quiB utilitas circumcisionis? Reddit rationem quod lex inanis non fuerit, sed quod carnalis circumcisionis praerogativa vana sit, nullis operibus fulta. Interrogat, Quid amplius habeat Judæus. Respondet sive ex se, sive ex persona Judæorum, Multum per omnem modum, Nam si ipsius est sensus, Multum per omnem modum; et, Omnis homo mendax, quomodo postea convenit dicens:Si autem iniquitasnostra, et caetera. Postremo, quomodo negat præcellere Judæos multum per omnem modum? Multa illa utilitas erit, si eloquia, quae meruit accipere, studeatcustodire. Primum quidem, quia credita sunt illis eloquia Dei. Quod genlibus nulla. Quid enim si quidam illorum non crediderunl? Nunquid incredulilas illorum fidem Dei evacuavit? Absit. Nec enim credentibus præjudicat incredulitas transgressorum, et promissio Dei, quae ad Abraham facta est, si circa prævaricatores evacuatur, circa obedientes impletur, quia mentiri veritas nescit, sicut scriptum est: Est autem Deus verax, omnis vero homo mendax.
Not the letter, whose praise is not from men but from God. The letter kills, but the spirit gives life. The law of the letter was not given to the just but to the unjust, and therefore it deserved the praise of men. But the law of Christ no longer threatens sinners with the sword, but promises a reward to those who serve freely, and therefore it has praise from God, who alone sees the heart, because one prays from faith.
CHAPTER III. What then is the advantage of the Jew? Or what is the benefit of circumcision? He gives the reason: that the law was not in vain, but that the prerogative of carnal circumcision is vain, supported by no works. He asks what advantage the Jew has. He answers, whether from himself or in the person of the Jews, Much in every way. For if this is his meaning, Much in every way; and, Every man is a liar, how does it later fit when he says: But if our iniquity, and the rest. Finally, how does he deny that the Jews excel much in every way? That benefit will be great if they strive to keep the oracles which they were deemed worthy to receive. First indeed, because the oracles of God were entrusted to them. Which is nothing to the Gentiles. What then if some of them did not believe? Has their unbelief made void the faith of God? By no means. For the unbelief of transgressors does not prejudice those who believe, and the promise of God, which was made to Abraham, if it is made void for the prevaricators, is fulfilled for the obedient, because the truth cannot lie, as it is written: But God is true, and every man is a liar.
Quia nemo sine peccato, præter illum solum qui nec nascendo habuit, nec vivendo contraxit. Ideo solus verax, implens quæ promisit quia in semine ejus benedicendae essent gentes, et benedicunlur in Christo, et per Christum, quia in ipso per ejus gratiam crediderunt; nam et si incredulis Judæis evacuata est.in eis, qui de populo ipso dono Domini crediderunt, et impleta est, et usque in finem quotidie plenius adimpletur, quia verax est qui promisit, et fallere nullatenus potest. Est autem Deus verax, omnis autem homo mendax: iicut scriptum est. Ut justus proberis, cum in peccatoribus vindicas: Ut justificeris in sermonibus tuis, et vincas cum judicaris. Vincis cum judicaris, cum mihi peccata mea, me confitente et damnante, dimittis. Ut justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis, est enim Deus verax; nam etsi vacuata est apostolatus benedictio in traditore Juda, sed in Petro, qui fidem conservavit, impleta est. Evacuata est promissio in populo, qui propter transgressiones periit in deserto; impleta est in eis qui in terram sanctam dono Domini, fide cooperante, perducti sunt. Adjicit etiam de psalmo L testimonium: Ut justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis, et vincas cum judicaris.
Because no one is without sin except that one alone who neither had sin by being born nor contracted it by living. Therefore he alone is truthful, fulfilling what he promised—that the nations would be blessed in his seed, and they are blessed in Christ and through Christ, because they believed in him through his grace. For even if for the unbelieving Jews it was made void in them, yet in those from that same people who believed by the gift of the Lord, it has been fulfilled and is being fulfilled, and is daily more fully fulfilled even to the end, because he who promised is truthful and can in no way deceive. But God is truthful, and every man is a liar, as it is written: That you may be proved just when you take vengeance on sinners; that you may be justified in your words, and overcome when you are judged. You overcome when you are judged, when, as I confess and condemn my sins, you forgive me. That you may be justified, he says, in your words, for God is truthful. For even if the blessing of apostleship was made void in the traitor Judas, yet in Peter, who kept the faith, it was fulfilled. The promise was made void in the people who perished in the wilderness because of their transgressions; it was fulfilled in those who, by the gift of the Lord and with faith cooperating, were led into the holy land. He also adds testimony from Psalm 50: That you may be justified, he says, in your words, and overcome when you are judged.
In psalmi ordine et locutio prophetae ita se habet: Domine, pronuntiasti quidem sine personarum acceptione te in peccalores vindicaturum, et quidem nunc dum mihi remittis, patientiam tuam mendacium judicanl, sed vincis cum judicaris, dum mihi peccata, me confitente et damnante, dimittis, quia non judieas bis in idipsum. Id est, dum homo ipse sui judex culpam in se lamentatione et contritione persequitur, injusta esse pietatis tuæ indulgentia non probatur. Dum me immanis commissi reum arguis per prophetam, probas te habere de nostris operibus curam, et vincis eos qui te incuriosum humanorum acuum judicabaut. Ideo de isto sensu Apostoli totam expositionem cujusdam sancti viri posui, ut plenius lectoris sollicitudo imbueretur, et ubicunque sic invenis, paginas plenas, pro instructione hoc posui. Ul justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis, et vincas cum judicaris. Videamus quomodo sibi hoc loco Apostoli sermo consentiat cum testimonio quod ex propheta, sermonem suum confirmaturus, assumpsit.
In the order of the psalm the prophet's utterance stands as follows: Lord, you declared that without respect of persons you would take vengeance on sinners, and indeed now while you forgive me, they judge your patience a lie; but you overcome when you are judged, when, as I confess and condemn my sins, you forgive them, because you do not judge the same thing twice. That is, when a man himself, as his own judge, pursues his guilt within himself with lamentation and contrition, the indulgence of your loving-kindness is not proven to be unjust. When you, through the prophet, convict me, guilty of a monstrous deed, you prove that you have care for our works, and you overcome those who judged you to be unconcerned about human affairs. Therefore, from this understanding of the Apostle I have set down the whole exposition of a certain holy man, so that the reader's diligence might be more fully imbued, and wherever you find full pages of this kind, I have placed this for instruction. That you may be justified, he says, in your words, and overcome when you are judged. Let us see how in this place the Apostle's discourse agrees with the testimony which he took up from the prophet to confirm his discourse.
Sententiam hanc evidenter illo sensu Apostolus ponit, quo dudum David sub pœnitentiæ voce protulerat, dicens: Domine, de semine meo esse venturum Salvatorem humani generis promisisti: nunc dum me videt populus tuus duplici crimine vulneratum, blasphemare feci filios Israel, ut, dum in adulterio et homicidio perspiciunt reatum meum, te putent esse mentitum, et ideo precem satisfactionis agnosce, et tu remitte quod ipse condemno, ut cum me indulta propitiatione reparaveris, et dignum promissione tua feceris, in sermooibus tuis justus appareas, et vincas cum a reprehensoribus judicaris, et ita nunc hanc lineam Apostolus sequitur dicens: Licet transgressores Judæi fecerint nomen Domini blasphemari, quo dicatur: Hæc erat illa gens sancta et populus electus, qui se nunc transgressione et inexpiabili sacrilegio et crimine impietatis involvit; ecce per scelus pravaricatorum Dei promissa vacuata sunt. Sed non ita est, nam si transgressores a gratia exciderunt, veridicam Domini sponsionem obedientia fidelium consequitur, ac sic confusis illis qui eloquia divina in irritum adducta jactabant, justificatur Dominus in sermonibus suis, et vincit cum judicatur, dum gratiam ab incredulis repudiatam credentibus confert.
The Apostle sets down this sentence evidently in that sense which David had long before brought forth in the voice of penitence, saying: Lord, you promised that the Savior of the human race would come from my seed; now, while your people see me wounded by a twofold crime, I have caused the children of Israel to blaspheme, so that, when they perceive my guilt in adultery and homicide, they think that you have lied; and therefore accept the prayer of satisfaction, and you forgive what I myself condemn, so that when you have restored me by the granted propitiation and have made me worthy of your promise, you may appear just in your words and may overcome when you are judged by your critics. And so now the Apostle follows this line, saying: Although the transgressing Jews have caused the name of the Lord to be blasphemed, by which it is said, "This was that holy nation and chosen people," which now involves itself in transgression and inexpiable sacrilege and the crime of impiety—behold, through the wickedness of the depraved, the promises of God have been made void. But it is not so; for if the transgressors have fallen from grace, the truthful promise of the Lord is fulfilled by the obedience of the faithful, and thus, with those confounded who boasted that the divine oracles had been brought to nothing, the Lord is justified in his words and overcomes when he is judged, while he confers on believers the grace that has been rejected by unbelievers.
Quod vero dicit: Est autem Deus verax, omnis autem homo mendax, et iterum: Si autem iniquitas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, infideles utrumque hoc testimonium in rationabili sensu accipiant. Si autem iniquitas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, quid dicemus Nunquid iniquus Deus, qui infert iram? Si autem iniquitas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, iniquum est, inquit, si in illos vindicat, qui ideo peccavcrunt ut justior appareret: qua enim justitia damnabit injustitiam, si secundum te humana iniquitate fit justior? Hoc loco magistro gentium disserente, duarum ratio vertitur personarum, id est, sub imperitia male interpretanlis, et sub doctrina Apostoli refellenlis, et tanquam si Apostolo pars diversa imprudenter credens ita diccret: Apostole, magnum peccatis nostris solatium contulisti, dicendo quod justificetur Deus in nostrorum indulgentia delictorum, et quia veritatem Dei mendacia nostra commendant, et peccata nostra misericordiæ materiam Deo ingerunt, ut per iniquitates nostras ejus bonitas exerceatur et gloria dilatelur, iujuste peccata nostra pupiuntur, quae ad manifestandam Dei patientiam benevolentiamque proficiunt, statim infert.
But as for what he says: "But God is true, and every man a liar," and again: "But if our iniquity commends the justice of God," let the faithless take both of these testimonies in a rational sense. "But if our iniquity commends the justice of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust, who inflicts wrath?" But if our iniquity commends the justice of God, he says, it is unjust if he takes vengeance on those who sinned precisely so that he might appear more just; for by what justice will he condemn injustice, if, according to you, he is made more just by human iniquity? In this passage, as the teacher of the Gentiles discusses, the reasoning of two persons is turned about, that is, under the ignorance of one who misinterprets, and under the teaching of the Apostle who refutes, and as if the opposing party, foolishly believing, were to say to the Apostle: Apostle, you have brought great comfort to our sins by saying that God is justified in the forgiveness of our transgressions, and that our lies commend the truth of God, and that our sins supply God with material for mercy, so that through our iniquities his goodness may be exercised and his glory enlarged—[then] our sins are unjustly punished, which profit toward manifesting God's patience and benevolence; he immediately adds.
Hucusque objectio* adversa, hic respondet Apostolus illorum sensui: Iniquus est, inquit, Deus, si in illos vindicat per quorum peccata benignus apparet, et non debeo judicari, qui mentior, quia meo mendacio Dei veritas collecta praedicabilior invenitur. Et ideo quanto majora mala fecerimus, tanto majora bona ab illo pro cujus laude peccavimus, recipiemus. Hoc fortassis ideo imprudentes ita intelligi debere arbitrabantur, quia legimus: Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia, quasi quæ peccati det meritum, dum clemenliae Dei praestet augmentum. Sed longe aliter intelligenda est ista sententia. Et quod ita per satisfactionem et emendationem consumpta sit abundantia peccatorum, ut emendati non solum veniam, sed etiam præmia mererentur: ut justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis. Hoc testimonium pars adversa ita proposuit quasi dixerit David: Propterea ego peccavi, ut dum me judicas, tu justus appareas, aut misericors, dum remittes; et ideo parcere mihi debes, quia iniquitas mea, aut misericordiam tuam, aut justitiam commendat. Hinc eorum errorem Apostolus retractat, et interjectis sententiis destruit dicens: Si, quemadmodum aiunt nos quidam dicere, iniquilas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, ergo iniquus est Deus, qui infert iram, cum iniquitas nostra ejus prædicet misericordiam. Secundum hominem dico. Absit.
Up to this point the objection was on the opposing side; here the Apostle responds to their way of thinking: "God is unjust," he says, "if he takes vengeance on those through whose sins he appears benign, and I ought not to be judged, I who lie, because by my lie the truth of God, gathered together, is found more worthy of praise." And therefore the greater the evils we have done, the greater the goods we shall receive from him for whose praise we sinned. Perhaps the foolish thought this ought to be understood in that way because we read: "Where sin abounded, grace superabounded," as if it granted merit to sin while it supplies an increase of God's mercy. But that statement must be understood far otherwise. And [they say] that the abundance of sins has been consumed through satisfaction and amendment, so that those amended merited not only pardon but even rewards: "that you may be justified," he says, "in your words." The opposing side set forth this testimony as though David had said: "For this reason I have sinned, so that while you judge me, you may appear just, or merciful while you forgive; and therefore you ought to spare me, because my iniquity commends either your mercy or your justice." From this the Apostle refutes their error, and by the statements inserted in between he destroys it, saying: "If, as certain ones claim that we say, our iniquity commends the justice of God, then God is unjust, who brings wrath, since our iniquity proclaims his mercy. I speak after the manner of men. Far be it.
Id est secundum carnalem sensum tuum, vel secundum te, qui de supcnon sententia tam imperite sentis et tam imprudenter intelligis. Qua enim justitia damnabit injustitiam, ai juxta opinionem tuam humana iniquitate sit justior? Sed non ita est. Nam Deum nostrum non tam peccata quam bonorum operum gesta glorificant, et ideo in puniendis peccatis justus agnoscitur, qui sanctis operibus delectatur. Alioquin quomodo judicabit Dem nunc munuum, si non bonis bona, et malis mala retribuit, ut justis præmium pro justitia, et peccatoribus quOd merentur tribuit? Si enim verita. Dei in meo mendaci. abundavit in gloriam ipsius, quid? Id est, utquid judicor quasi malefaciens? et non sient quidam nos dicunt dicere, ut quanto majora mala fecerimus, tanto ampliora bona recipiamuS. Adhuc. Insuper. Et ego tanquam peccator. Homo qui mentior. Judicor. A Deo in die judicii. Iste est sensus, tanquam si diceret: infidelis, ex verbis meis peccatorum tuorum asSeris defensionem, dicendo quod justitiam Dei iniquitas nostra commendet, et veritas ejus ex nostris mendaciis crescat, et imbecillitati nostræ comparata, magis magisque major appareat. Sed dum ita malis tuis inimica severitate blandiris, justa damnatione puniendUs es ab illo qui secundum uniuscujuscunque opera judicabit mundum.
That is, according to your carnal sense, or according to you, who judge so ignorantly and understand so foolishly from your perverse opinion. For by what justice will he condemn injustice, if according to your opinion he is more just by human iniquity? But it is not so. For our God is glorified not so much by sins as by the deeds of good works, and therefore in punishing sins he is acknowledged just, who delights in holy works. Otherwise how will God judge the world now, if he does not repay good things to the good and evil things to the evil, so that he gives to the just a reward for justice, and to sinners what they deserve? For if the truth of God has abounded in my lie unto his glory, what? That is, why am I judged as an evildoer? and not as certain ones say that we say, that the greater the evils we have done, the more abundant the good things we receive. Still. Moreover. And I as a sinner. A man who lies. I am judged. By God on the day of judgment. This is the sense, as if he were saying: O unbeliever, from my words you assert a defense of your sins, saying that our iniquity commends the justice of God, and that his truth grows from our lies, and compared to our weakness, appears greater and greater. But while you thus flatter your evils with hostile severity, you are to be punished by just condemnation by him who will judge the world according to the works of each one.
Unde hic locus ideo difficilior videtur, quia ab imperitis diversæ partis quaestionibus obscuratur, sicut alio loco Apostolus irrationabilia objecta proponit et respuit: Quid enim dicimus, permanebimus in peccato, ut gratia abundet? Absit. Et paulo post: Quid ergo? peccabimus, quia non sumus sub lege, sed sub gratia? Absit. Ad extremum Apostolus sensu veritatis evacuans quæstionem ita dicit: Et non sicut blasphemamur, et sicut aiunt quidam nos dicere: Faciamus mala, ut eveniant bona. Et hæc stulterum objectio est, quam subjungens destruit dicens: Quorum damnatio justa est. Quid enim justius quam ut aliquis pœnam peccati sui sentiat? quam nos negare mentiti sunt, qui nihil magis quam justum Dei jndicium prædicamus. Quid igitur? prœcellimus eos? Nos Judæi, id est nullam unde alterutra pars præcellat causam invenio, quia omnes sub peccato esse judicamus, hoc enim ipsa ratio deprehendit, sub peccato esse Judæos et gentes, ut etiam psalmi testimonio comprobatur. Nequaquam. Ipse respondit sibi. Causati enim sumus. Ratiocinati somus. Judæos et Græco. omnes sub peccato esse. Atque gentiles. Sicut scriptum est: Quia non est justus. Psahnus unde boc testimonium sumpsit, de insipiente loquitur, quod in adventu Cbristi impletum ostendit, quo tempore nullus justus inventus est. Quisquam. Nec Judæus, nec Graecus. Non est intelligens, non est requirens Deum.
Hence this passage seems more difficult for the reason that it is obscured by the questions of the unskilled of the other party, just as in another place the Apostle sets forth and rejects irrational objections: For what do we say—shall we remain in sin, that grace may abound? By no means. And a little later: What then? Shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? By no means. Finally the Apostle, emptying out the question by the sense of truth, says thus: And not as we are blasphemed, and as some say that we say: Let us do evil, that good may come. And this is the objection of fools, which, subjoining, he destroys, saying: Whose condemnation is just. For what is more just than that anyone should feel the punishment of his own sin? Which they have falsely claimed that we deny, who preach nothing more than the just judgment of God. What then? Do we excel them? We Jews—that is, I find no cause from which either party may excel, because we judge that all are under sin; for reason itself apprehends this, that Jews and Gentiles are under sin, as is also confirmed by the testimony of the psalm. By no means. He himself answered himself. For we have made the charge. We have reasoned. That Jews and Greeks. All are under sin. And Gentiles. As it is written: Because there is no just one. The psalm from which he took this testimony speaks of the fool, which he shows to have been fulfilled at the coming of Christ, at which time no just one was found. Anyone. Neither Jew nor Greek. There is none who understands, there is none who seeks God.
Quia nOn intelligit, non requirit. Deus autem tunc quæritur, cum ejus inquiritur voluntas et impletur. Omnes declinaverunt. Necesse est ut declinet qui requirere noluit firmamentum. Simul mutiles facti sunt. Ad opus ad quod fuerant procreati. Non est qui faciat bonum. Non ergo erat qui faceret bonum, cum Judaeos prævaricatio mandatorum, gentes vero naturae lex condemnaret. Cum ergo ex alteratra parte aliquis bonam fecerit, gratiae se debere noverit, non naturæ, sicut propheta ad Dominum referens dicit: Apud quem nemo per se innocens est. Et Isaias in cantico dicit: Domine Deus noster, dabis pacem nobis: omnia enini opera nostra operatos es in nobis. Non est usque ad unum. Quidam dicunt, usque ad Christum. Sepulerum patens est guttur eorum Violentiam' pestiferi odoris exaggerant fetore doctrinae. Omnis odor mortis procedit de ore eorum: hoc est vei a pestifera et adulatoria quæ interficiunt audientes. Ideo enim sepulcra clauduntur, ne in vita positis exhalatione sui generent pestem. Linguis suis dolose agebant. Aliud ore promentes, aliud corde meditantes. Venenum aspidum. Horum serpentum perniciosius cæteris esse fertur venenum. Sub labiis eorum. Id est in corde. Quorum os maledictione. Quidquid enim malo voto dicitur, sine dubio male dicitur. Et amaritudine plenum est. Amaritudo Antichristi contraria est dulcedini verbi Dei. Veloces pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem.
Because he does not understand, he does not seek. But God is then sought, when his will is inquired into and fulfilled. All have turned aside. It is necessary that he turn aside who refused to seek the firmament. Together they became maimed. For the work for which they had been created. There is none who does good. Therefore there was none who did good, since the transgression of the commandments condemned the Jews, and the law of nature condemned the Gentiles. When therefore someone from either side has done good, let him know that he owes it to grace, not to nature, as the prophet says, referring to the Lord: With whom no one is innocent by himself. And Isaiah says in his song: Lord our God, you will give peace to us: for you have accomplished all our works in us. There is not even one. Some say, even to Christ. Their throat is an open sepulcher. They exaggerate violence of pestilential odor by the stench of their teaching. Every odor of death proceeds from their mouth: that is, truly pestilential and flattering words which kill the hearers. For this reason sepulchers are closed, lest by their exhalation they breed pestilence in those placed in life. With their tongues they acted deceitfully. Bringing forth one thing with the mouth, meditating another in the heart. The poison of asps. The poison of these serpents is said to be more pernicious than the rest. Under their lips. That is, in the heart. Whose mouth is full of cursing. For whatever is said with an evil wish is without doubt said evilly. And it is full of bitterness. The bitterness of Antichrist is contrary to the sweetness of the word of God. Their feet are swift to shed blood.
Non ad liberandas animas, sed ad perdendas, sive inlerficienles animas, non illis annuntiando peccata sua, sed adulatione confirmando eas in ipsis. Unde Paulus dicit: Mundus sum a sanguine omnium. Contritio et infelicitas in viis eorum. Conteruntur et infelices efficiuntur animæ in viis eorum, hoc est in doctrinis vel in exemplis conversationis eorum. Et viam pacis non cognoverunt. Doctrinam Patris, qua Deus hominibus pacaretur, non cognoverunt: quia pax nostra Christus est. Hoc egit a capite epistolæ, ut ostenderet omnes indigere misericordia Dei, misericordia autem in potestate donantis est. Nemo eniin potest dicere se amplius accipere debuisse. Non est timor Dei ante oculos eorum. In timore Dei conclusit: quia si timorem Dei semper ante oculos habuissent, utique non peccassent: neque enim servus audet Domino praesente peccare. Scimus autem quoniam quæcunque lex loquitur, his qui in lege sunt loquitur. Ne dicerent Judæi, hoc de gentibus dictum est: Quomodo Judæi dixerunt: Non est Deus, non utique verbo, sed opere. Dominum enin contitentur se nosse, factis autem negant. Ergo gentes hic non tangit, sed jam de gentibus prius dixerat, et de eorum sceleribus nemo dubitabat. Ne dicerent hoc de gentibus scriplum, ostendit omne quod in lege de gentibus dicitur, etiam ipsum de Judaeis dici, quia ipsorum principalis est causa. Ut omne os obstruatur.
Not to free souls but to destroy them, or rather to kill souls, not by announcing their sins to them but by confirming them in those very sins through flattery. Hence Paul says: I am clean from the blood of all. Contrition and misery are in their ways. Souls are crushed and made miserable in their ways, that is, in the teachings or in the examples of their conduct. And they have not known the way of peace. They have not known the teaching of the Father, by which God was to be reconciled to men, because our peace is Christ. He has done this from the beginning of the epistle, to show that all need the mercy of God, but mercy is in the power of the one who gives it. For no one can say that he ought to have received more. There is no fear of God before their eyes. He concluded with the fear of God, because if they had always kept the fear of God before their eyes, they surely would not have sinned; for a servant does not dare to sin in his master's presence. Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are in the law. Lest the Jews should say, This was said of the Gentiles—as the Jews said, There is no God, certainly not in word but in deed. For they confess that they know the Lord, but they deny him by their deeds. Therefore he does not touch on the Gentiles here, but he had already spoken earlier about the Gentiles, and no one doubted their crimes. Lest they should say that this was written about the Gentiles, he shows that everything said in the law about the Gentiles is said also of the Jews themselves, because their case is the principal one. That every mouth may be stopped.
Non solum gentium, sed tnam Judæorum: cum uon habeant unde possint gloriari. Et subditus fiat omnis mundus Deo. Ut sciat se sine gratia Dei salvum esse non posse: vel certe in confessione peccati speret misericordiam, cognoscens se esse in peccatis. Quis ex operibus legis. Hoc contra Pelagianos facit, qui dicunt quod lex justificet. Opera autem legis eircumcisionem dicit, et sabbatum, et reliqua. Non justificabitur omnis. Non justificabitur, quia nihil ad perfectum lex adduxit. Hinc contra eos incipit disputare, magno diuturnoque conflictu, quit gloriabantur in lege, et per legem se justificari credebant, et non per gratiam: docens par ordinem legem non potuisse auferre, sed potius auxisse peccatum, quod aufert gratia, quia lex jubere novit, cui succumbit infirmitus, sicut gratia juvare, qua infunditur charitas. Non dicimus nos justificatos eos fuisse qui fuerunt legi obedientes, sed nisi justificarentur, non essent obedientes. Caro. Homo. Coram illo. Non omnia justitia coram Domino justificat, sed ea quae ex mera Dei voluntate procedit, non illa cujus præceptum humanam lactat iniirmitatem: sicut istorum quibus tunc justitia Dei non poterat revelari, sed sola eis peccati cognitio demonstrala, quia suam quærentes statuere, justitiæ Dei non erant subjecti. Per legem enim cognitio peccati.
Not only of the Gentiles, but also of the Jews, since they have nothing of which they can boast. And let every mouth be stopped before God, that the world may know it cannot be saved without the grace of God—or at least, in the confession of sin, hope for mercy, recognizing itself to be in sins. Who is from the works of the law. This works against the Pelagians, who say that the law justifies. But by works of the law he means circumcision, and the sabbath, and the rest. No one will be justified. No one will be justified, because the law brought nothing to perfection. Hence he begins to dispute against those who boasted in the law and believed they were justified through the law and not through grace, with a great and long-lasting conflict, teaching that the law could not remove the stain but rather increased sin, which grace removes; because the law knows how to command, to which infirmity succumbs, just as grace knows how to help, by which charity is infused. We do not say that those who were obedient to the law were justified, but unless they were justified, they would not be obedient. Flesh. Man. In his sight. Not every righteousness justifies before the Lord, but that which proceeds from the pure will of God, not that whose precept flatters human infirmity—as with those to whom the righteousness of God could not then be revealed, but only the knowledge of sin was shown to them, because, seeking to establish their own, they were not subject to the righteousness of God. For through the law comes the knowledge of sin.
Non remissio, non consumptio, sed cognitio, aut quia in oblivione erat lex naturae, aut quia ante legem litteræ leviora quæque non cognoscebantur esse peccata, sicut concupiscentia, et cætera quae non alteri nocebant, sed ipsi. Nunc aulem sine lege justitia Dei. Quæ nobis a Deo gratis donata est, non nostro labore quæsita. Manifesta est. Quæ erat occulta. Testificata a lege et prophetis. Hæc justitia legis oraculis prædicata est novissimis ventura temporibus. Justitia autem Dei per fidem Jesu Christi. Justitia haec, quas confertur per fidem, fides ipsa occulta insDiratione Dei gratiae dono infunditur, non labore humano, nec opere Veteris Testamenti acquiritur, quia, ut dictum est, ipsius donum est ut credamus. Super omnes qui credunt. Non super solos Judaeos. Ostendit illos ideo talem legem accepisse, quia non credebant, quapropter in praesenti sive peccati, sive justitiæmeritum referebant. Non enim est distinctio. Omnes enim peccaverunt et egent gloria Dei. Id est, inter Judaeum et gentilem, quia utraque pars in incredulitate conclusa est, et egent gloria Redemptoris, quae in salutem credentium dilatatur. Nam Judæi legem litterae, gentiles naturæ legem transgrediendo, pariter peccatores inventi sunt, et per originale peccatum, et per actuale. Justificati gratis. Sine ullis praecedentibus meritis, per baptismum juslificali.
Not a remission, not a consumption, but a knowledge—either because the law of nature was in oblivion, or because before the law of the letter, whatever sins were lighter were not recognized as sins, such as concupiscence and the rest which harmed no one else but the person himself. But now without the law, the righteousness of God. Which has been freely given to us by God, not sought by our own labor. It is manifest. Which was hidden. Testified by the law and the prophets. This righteousness was proclaimed by the oracles of the law as about to come in the last times. But the righteousness of God is through faith in Jesus Christ. This righteousness, which is conferred through faith, faith itself is poured in secretly by the inspiration of God's grace as a gift, not acquired by human labor nor by the work of the Old Testament, because, as has been said, it is his gift that we believe. Over all who believe. Not over Jews alone. He shows that they received such a law for this reason, because they did not believe, wherefore in the present they were bringing forward the merit either of sin or of righteousness. For there is no distinction. For all have sinned and need the glory of God. That is, between Jew and Gentile, because both parties have been shut up in unbelief, and they need the glory of the Redeemer, which is spread abroad for the salvation of believers. For the Jews, by transgressing the law of the letter, and the Gentiles, the law of nature, have been found equally sinners, both through original sin and through actual sin. Justified freely. Without any preceding merits, through the baptism of justification.
Cum omnibus non merentibus gratis peccata donavit, audi gratis, et tace de meritis. Per gratiam ipsius. Quia quod non debebat pro nobis exsolvit, ut nos gratis redemptos salvaret. Per redemptionem quæ est in Christo Jesu. De captivitate peccati redempti sumus, non natura, quia natura semper ipsius fuimus, quia qui redimit, suum docet fuisse quem redimit, sicut docet propheta: Gratis venundati estis, et sine pecunia redimemini. Christus ergo nos redemit, sicut dicit Petrus: Scientes quia non corruptibilibus argento et auro redempti estis de vana vestra conversatione, et reliqua; et Paulus: Empti enim estis pretio magno. Redempti ergo sumus de morte. cui per peccatum venditi fueramus, secundum Isaiam dicentem: Quis liber repudii? Peccatis enim vestris venundati estis. Quam mortem Christus evicit, qui peccatum non fecit, quia omnes debitores eramus morti per peccatum. Ille autem se tradidit morti, cui nihil debebat, ut nos suo sanguine a morte redimeret. Non emit, quia per naturam ipsius fueramus; sed redemit, quia captivi tenebamur. Quem proposuit Deus propitiationem per fidem in sanguine ipsius. In promptu posuit, quia gratis dat, ut nec desperet aliquis, nec de suis meritis extollatur, quia propitiatio et remissio peccatorum per sanguinem est Christi collata, in cujns typo etiam in Veteri Testamento pro peccalis populi victimarum sanguis offerebatur.
Since he freely forgave the sins of all who did not deserve it, hear this freely and be silent about merits. Through his grace. Because he paid what he did not owe on our behalf, so that he might save us freely redeemed. Through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. We were redeemed from the captivity of sin, not by nature, because by nature we were always his, since he who redeems shows that the one he redeems was his own, as the prophet shows: You were sold for nothing, and you will be redeemed without money. Christ therefore redeemed us, as Peter says: Knowing that you were redeemed from your vain way of life not with corruptible silver and gold, and the rest; and Paul: For you were bought with a great price. We were therefore redeemed from death, to which we had been sold through sin, according to Isaiah saying: Who is the bill of divorce? For you were sold for your sins. Christ conquered that death, he who committed no sin, because we were all debtors to death through sin. But he handed himself over to death, to which he owed nothing, so that by his blood he might redeem us from death. He did not buy us, because we were his by nature; but he redeemed us, because we were held as captives. Whom God set forth as a propitiation through faith in his blood. He set him forth openly, because he gives freely, so that no one may despair, nor exalt himself over his own merits, because the propitiation and remission of sins were conferred through the blood of Christ, in whose figure even in the Old Testament the blood of victims was offered for the sins of the people.
Ad ostensionem justitiæ suæ. In hoc dicit ostendisse justitiam, quod indefensam tenuit pro emendationis nostrae exspectatione patientiam; ita nobis fit misericordia remissionis, dum ille patitur qui nihil peccavit, quia omnia Deus juste facit. Juste ergo diabolus perdidit debitorem, quia injuste occidit innocentem. Propter remissionem præcedentium delictorum. Quare præcedentium? nisi originalium debitorum. In sustentatione Dei. Sustentatio Dei ad majora peccata profecerat. Ad ostensionem justitiae ejus. Ut revelaret justitiam quae ex fide est, hoc est Christum, in hoc tempore novissimo. Ut ipse sic justus et justificans. Qui solus justus inventus est, et quæ ipse justificaverit, quia peccatum nescivit, ideo peccata damnavit. Eum qui ex fide est Jesu. Ex fide, inquit, Jesu, quam ipse Jesus dedit, et non ex operibus legis aut naturae. Ubi est eryo gloriatio tua? Exclusa est. Ad Judæos dicit. Ubi est elatio tua, in qua gloriabaris te meliorem esse per circumcisionem carnalem? Exclusa est gloriatio tua. Per quam legem? factorum? Non, sed per legem fidei. Sequitur: Nunquid per factorum, id est opera legis? et respondet: Non, sed legem fidei. Legem dicit fidei gratiam, per quam ad Christum accedimus, per quam fidem accipimus. Arbitramur enim justificari hominem per fidem. Definimus, certi sumus, hoc judicamus. Sine operibus legis. Addendo legis, ostendit esse et fidei opera.
For the showing forth of his righteousness. In this he says that he showed his righteousness, in that he kept his patience undefended in expectation of our amendment; thus the mercy of forgiveness comes to us, while he suffers who committed no sin, because God does all things justly. Justly, therefore, the devil lost his debtor, because he unjustly killed the innocent one. For the remission of former sins. Why former? Unless of original debts. In the sustaining of God. The sustaining of God had advanced to greater sins. For the showing forth of his righteousness. That he might reveal the righteousness which is of faith, that is, Christ, in this most recent time. That he himself might thus be just and justifying. He who alone was found just, and those whom he himself justified, because he knew no sin, and therefore condemned sins. Him who is of the faith of Jesus. Of the faith, he says, of Jesus, which Jesus himself gave, and not of the works of the law or of nature. Where then is your boasting? It is excluded. He speaks to the Jews. Where is your elation, in which you boasted that you were better through carnal circumcision? Your boasting is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faith. It follows: Is it by works, that is, the works of the law? And he answers: No, but the law of faith. He calls the grace of faith a law, through which we come to Christ, through which we receive faith. For we reckon that a man is justified by faith. We define, we are certain, we judge this. Without the works of the law. By adding "of the law," he shows that there are also works of faith.
Quomodo ergo Jacobus ait: Fides sine operibus mortua est? Sed Paulus de operibus legis dicit, Jacobus autem de operibus quae fidelem hominem esse probant, sicut ipse in sequentibus exponit: Ostende mihi ex operibus fidem tuam. Opera sunt per quae fides agnoscitur. An Judæorum Deus? Nonne omnes Deus fecit, et similiter de omnibus cura est ei? Non solum vobis, sed et gentibus venit Christus ex lege promissus, imo magis ipsis. Tantum. Quasi Judaei dicant: Sed gentes Deum dereliquerunt, et respondeatur eis: Et vos. Illi peccaverunt, et vos. Sed nos convertimur, et illi. Nobis Christus venit promissus, et illis. Non ergo vester tantum est Deus, aut quasi vos nesciatis quod omnes ex Adam nati sunt, et quod scriptum sit, gentes Christo credituras, sicut dicit: Domus mea, domus orationis vocabitur omnibus gentibus. Et iterum: Audite vocem tubae, et dixerunl: Non audiemus. Propter hoc audient gentes. Nonne et gentium? Ex gentibus credentium, quia frequenter prophetæ de eorum vocatione dixerunt. Imo et gentium. Id est multo magis et gentium, quia ante legem sancti Deo placuerunt. Optime autem modum servavit in verbis: imo dixit, ut ostenderet magis gentes, quia ante fuerunt sancti præputiati quam circumcisi, et Abraham ante circumcisionem justificatus credidit. Quoniam quidem unus Deus qui justificat circumcisionem ex fide.
How then does James say, Faith without works is dead? But Paul speaks of the works of the law, whereas James speaks of the works that prove a man to be faithful, as he himself sets out in what follows: Show me your faith from your works. Works are the things by which faith is recognized. Is he the God of the Jews only? Did not God make all, and is his care not likewise for all? Christ came promised by the law not only to you but also to the Gentiles—indeed, more to them. Only. As if the Jews were saying, But the Gentiles have forsaken God, and it be answered to them: And so have you. They sinned, and so did you. But we are converted, and so are they. Christ came promised to us, and to them. Therefore God is not yours only, nor is it as though you did not know that all are born of Adam, and that it is written that the Gentiles would believe in Christ, as he says: My house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations. And again: Hear the sound of the trumpet, and they said: We will not hear. For this cause the Gentiles shall hear. Is he not also the God of the Gentiles? Of the Gentiles who believe, because the prophets often spoke of their calling. Indeed, also of the Gentiles. That is, much more also of the Gentiles, because before the law the saints pleased God. And he kept the manner of expression excellently in his words: indeed, he said, to show the Gentiles the more, because those of the uncircumcision were saints before those of the circumcision, and Abraham, before circumcision, believed and was justified. Since indeed there is one God who justifies the circumcision by faith.
Utramque gentem per fidem Christi salvandam esse denuntiat, hoc est, ex fide. Nam nec praeputium, nec circumcisio sine fide justificatur. Et præputium per fidem. Sicut Abel, Noe, et caeteri. Legem ergo destruimus per fidem? Absit. Legem ergo per fidem destruimus, quæ circumcisionem docuit? Absit. In tantum ut dicat Moysen propter circumcisum filium pene interfectum fuisse. Ne ergo illi dicerent: Legem ergo destruis, in qua omnes qui crediderunt justi circumcisi fuerunt ante legem incircumcisi, sed tamen nullus incircumcisus in lege. Non solus, ait, non destruo, sed confirmo, dum hanc praedico circumcisionem, quam ille praedixit: In novissimis, inquit, diebus circumcidet Dominus Deus cor tuum, et cor seminis tui, ad Deum tuum amandum. Hæc est fides. Tunc destruerem legem, si illam mentitam dicerem, hoc est non cessaturam, cum illa se promiserit cessaturam, sicut dicit Jeremias: Dabo vobis testamentum novum. Et Isaias: Ex Sion egredietur lex, et verbum Domini de Jerusalem. Sed legem statuimus. Stare facimus, dum probamus verum esse quod dixit de antiquis justis et gentibus credituris, et spiritualem circumcisionem venturam, dum hoc efficit fides, quod lex jubet, quae fides si non sit, jubet tantum lex, et non implentes jussa reos tenet, quae non impletur, nisi per cbaritatem, quam Spiritus sanctus infundit per gratiam suam.
He declares that both peoples are to be saved through faith in Christ, that is, by faith. For neither uncircumcision nor circumcision is justified without faith. And uncircumcision is justified through faith, as with Abel, Noah, and the others. Do we therefore destroy the law through faith? By no means. Do we therefore destroy the law through faith, the law that taught circumcision? By no means. So much so that he says Moses was nearly killed because of his circumcised son. So then, let them not say: You are therefore destroying the law, in which all who believed were justified—circumcised before the law, uncircumcised, yet no one uncircumcised under the law. Not only, he says, do I not destroy it, but I confirm it, when I preach this circumcision which he foretold: In the last days, he says, the Lord God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your offspring, to love the Lord your God. This is faith. I would then destroy the law if I said it had lied, that is, that it would not cease, when it promised that it would cease, as Jeremiah says: I will give you a new covenant. And Isaiah: Out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. But we establish the law. We make it stand, when we prove that what it said about the ancient righteous and about the Gentiles who would believe is true, and that a spiritual circumcision would come, when faith accomplishes what the law commands; if that faith is not present, the law only commands, and holding guilty those who do not fulfill its commands, it is not fulfilled except through love, which the Holy Spirit pours in through his grace.
CAP. IV. Quid ergo dicimus invenisse Abraham patrem nostrum? Revocat illos ad caput circumcisionis, ut quod initio constiterit, id habeatur in toto. Circumcisio in carne est, fides autem in mente consistit. Abraham secundum fidem per praeputium pater est gentium, secundum carnem pater est circumcisionis. Fides autem qua pater est gentium, non in carne, sed in mente consistit. Secundum carnem, Id est secundum carnis circumcisionem. Si enim Abraham ex operibus justificatus est, habet gloriam. Quomodo ex operibui, cum et ipse ex gentibus venerit? Sed non apud Deum. Sed apud semetipsum habet, quia jussa perficit; aliter ergo nihil. Illi Deus donavit, sed ex se, sed ex operibus suis habuit gloriam. Sed quia illum fides a Deo donata sine operum praesumptione justificat, non sibi, sed Domino ex gratuita largitate dat gloriam. Dicit ergo beatum Abraham non ex operibus (quia ante legem fuit), sed ex fide (quia promissis Dei credidit) invenisse justitiam, et quia fides per gratiam Dei non solum peccatorem, sed et impium pro Dei bonitate justificat, dum non ex operibus habet fiduciam, sed per omnia se Deo intelligit debitorem, quia nihil invenit quod sibi arrogare possit ex meritis. Quid enim Scriptura dicit? Scripturam interrogemus. Credidit Abraham Deo. Probavit, et ideo apud Deum habet gloriam.
CHAPTER IV. What then shall we say that Abraham our father found? He calls them back to the source of circumcision, so that what was established at the beginning may be held in the whole. Circumcision is in the flesh, but faith consists in the mind. Abraham according to faith through uncircumcision is the father of the Gentiles; according to the flesh he is the father of circumcision. But the faith by which he is the father of the Gentiles consists not in the flesh but in the mind. According to the flesh, that is, according to circumcision of the flesh. For if Abraham was justified by works, he has glory. How by works, when he himself also came from the Gentiles? But not before God. But he has it before himself, because he fulfills the commands; otherwise, nothing. God gave to him, but from himself, but from his own works he had glory. But because the faith given to him by God justifies him without presumption of works, he gives glory not to himself but to the Lord from gratuitous bounty. He says, therefore, that blessed Abraham found righteousness not from works (because he was before the law), but from faith (because he believed the promises of God), and because faith through the grace of God justifies not only the sinner but even the ungodly, according to the goodness of God, since he has confidence not from works but understands himself in all things to be a debtor to God, because he finds nothing that he can claim for himself from merits. For what does the Scripture say? Let us question the Scripture. Abraham believed God. He proved it, and therefore he has glory before God.
Tam magna fuit dono Dei fides Abrahæ, ut et pristina ei peccata donarentur, et sola ei pro omni justitia duceretur, accepto et tanto amore flagravit, ut deinceps semper Deo placeret. Et reputatum est illi ad justitiam. Compensatum sola fides. Ei autetn qui operatur, merces non imputatur secundum gratiam, sed secundum debitum. Exponit ipsum exemplum. Et quia lex opera requirit, per quae elatus furat Pharisaeus; cum ergo justificat impium divina miseratio, locum meriti non potest habere praesumptio. Debitor enim est antequam pareat praeceptis, et nisi paruerit, damnatus. Si autem fecerit, non habet gloriam, quia inutilis servus est, qui nihil amplius operatur. Si vero qui non operatur. De circumcisione dicit, et caeteris bujusmodi. Credenti autem in eum, qui justificat impium. Impium per soiam fidem justificat, non opera, quae non habuit; si enim secundum opera, puniendus est, non liberandus. Simul attendendum non peccatorem justificari per fidem, sed impium. Reputatur fides ejus ad justitiam, secundum propositum gratiæ Dei: sicut et David dicit. Sicut Abrahæ; et nostra filiorum ejus per gratiam. Beatitudinem hominis. Magna beatitudo est, sine labore legis, vel pœnitentiæ fidem per solam gratiam promereri, secundum propositum Dei, quo proposuit gratis peccata dimittere. Cui Deus accepto fert justitiam sine operibus.
So great was the faith of Abraham by the gift of God that his former sins were forgiven him, and it alone was reckoned to him for all righteousness, and he burned with such great love, having been accepted, that thereafter he always pleased God. And it was reckoned to him as righteousness. Faith alone made the compensation. But to the one who works, the reward is not imputed according to grace, but according to debt. He sets forth this very example. And because the law requires works, by which the Pharisee was puffed up; when, therefore, the divine mercy justifies the ungodly, presumption cannot have a place of merit. For he is a debtor before he obeys the commandments, and unless he has obeyed, he is condemned. But if he has done them, he has no glory, because he is an unprofitable servant, who does nothing more. But if the one who does not work. He speaks of circumcision, and other things of this kind. But to the one who believes in him who justifies the ungodly. He justifies the ungodly through faith alone, not by works, which he did not have; for if according to works, he is to be punished, not set free. At the same time it must be noted that it is not the sinner who is justified by faith, but the ungodly. His faith is reckoned as righteousness, according to the purpose of the grace of God: as David also says. As to Abraham; so also to us, his sons, through grace. The blessedness of the man. Great is the blessedness, without the labor of the law or of penitence, to obtain faith through grace alone, according to the purpose of God, by which he purposed freely to forgive sins. To whom God imputes righteousness without works.
Illi accepto fertur justitiam * sine operibus, qui per fidem, qua primum Deo credidit, et de præterito absolvitur, et de praesenti justifica. tur, et ad futura fidei opera praeparatur. Probare vult et in ipsa lege praedici, justitiam sine operibus prodesse, nec se hoc suo defendere, sed prophetae exemplo firmare. Quod remittitur, non est, quod te. gitur non patet, et ideo nec imputatur. Beati quorum remissæ sunt iniquitates. Contra Judaei arrogantiam, quia beatitudo et remissio peccatorum credulitatis opus est, non laboris. Quidam dicunt remitti peccata per baptismum, tegi lacrymis pœnitentiæ, non imputari ulla peccata in martyrio. Quamvis totum in fide baptismi possit intelligi, tamen cum remissa fuerint delicta, diligitur Deus. Cui enim plus dimittitur, plus diligit, et ideo charitas operit multitudinem peccatorum, ut superet dilectio pristinum contemptum. Non autem imputat, dum bonis ejus deinceps operibus, quae per charitatem fiunt, delectatur, nec reminiscitur ejus ante factorum. Et quorum tecta sunt peccata. Charitate. Beatus vir cui non imputavit Dominus peccatum. Ne rememoratur. Beatitudo ergo hæc in circumcisione, an etiam in præputio? Volunt aliqui istam beatitudinem tribus temporibus assignare, Naturae, Circumcisioni et Christianitati, sed ut eos a gloria privilegii excludat, ipse dicit, non in circumcisione, sed in praeputio.
To him who has received it, righteousness is reckoned without works, since through the faith by which he first believed God he is both absolved of the past and justified in the present and prepared for future works of faith. He wishes to prove that this is also foretold in the law itself—that righteousness without works is profitable—and that he does not defend this by his own authority but confirms it by the example of the prophet. What is remitted is not; what is covered is not open; and therefore it is not imputed either. Blessed are those whose iniquities are forgiven. This is against the arrogance of the Jews, because blessedness and the remission of sins are the work of believing, not of laboring. Some say that sins are remitted through baptism, covered by the tears of penitence, and not imputed at all in martyrdom. Although the whole can be understood in the faith of baptism, yet when sins have been forgiven, God is loved. For to whom more is forgiven, he loves more, and therefore charity covers a multitude of sins, so that love may overcome former contempt. But he does not impute, so long as he takes delight in his good works thereafter, which are done through charity, and does not remember his former deeds. And whose sins are covered. By charity. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord has not imputed sin. Lest it be remembered. Is this blessedness then in circumcision, or also in uncircumcision? Some wish to assign this blessedness to three times—Nature, Circumcision, and Christianity—but in order to exclude them from the glory of privilege, he himself says, not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.
Dicimus enim quia reputata est Abrahæ fides ad justitiam. Quia utrique confitemur justificatum; quia ergo de Abraham tractamus, quod de ipso inveniret ralio, hoc in omnibus accipiamus, hoc omnes indubitanter teneamus, quia fides haec non soli Abrahæ profuerit, sed omnibus qui credulitatis suae sequuntur exemplum, sicut ia sequentibus legimus, ut reputetur illi ad justitiam. Quomodo ergo reputata est, in circumcisione an in præputio?Videamus utrum propterea justus, quia circumcisus; an ideo circumcisus, quia justus inventus est: utrum circumcisio de justitia, an justitia de circumcisione sit nata. Non in circumcisione, sed in præputio. Ante justificatus est quam circumcideretur. Non ergo propter circumcisionem justificatus est. Et signum accepit circumcisionis. Ne dicerent: Quid ergo circumcisus est, si non indigebat circumcisione? Signum est, inquit, justitiae, non augmentum. Item aliter: Ut ostenderet quam justus et fidelis esset, qui dolorem sibi ex mandato Dei non dubitavit inferre, non putans superfluum, quod ab scientiarum Domino jubebatur. sicut nec parricidium impium, quod fons praeceperat pietatis. Signaculum justitiæ fidei. Ut significaret justitiam Christi, quæ ex fide est, quae nunc est in præputio, sive quae ei in præputio est nata. Item aliter: Tam perfecta fuit fides cujus, ut signaculum mereretur, semper res plena signatur et magna. Quæ est in præputio.
For we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham as righteousness. Because we both confess that he was justified; therefore, since we are treating of Abraham, what reasoning finds in his case let us accept in the case of all, let us all hold without doubt that this faith profited not Abraham alone, but all who follow the example of his believing, as we read in the following verses, that it might be reckoned to him as righteousness. How then was it reckoned, in circumcision or in uncircumcision? Let us see whether he was righteous because he was circumcised, or was circumcised because he was found righteous: whether circumcision was born of righteousness, or righteousness of circumcision. Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. He was justified before he was circumcised. Therefore he was not justified on account of circumcision. And he received the sign of circumcision. Lest they should say: Why then was he circumcised, if he did not need circumcision? It is a sign, he says, of righteousness, not an increase. Again, in another sense: to show how righteous and faithful he was, who did not hesitate to inflict pain on himself at God's command, not thinking superfluous what was commanded by the Lord of knowledge, just as neither did he think the impious parricide [to be] what the fount of piety had commanded. A seal of the righteousness of faith. To signify the righteousness of Christ, which is from faith, which now is in uncircumcision, or which was born to him in uncircumcision. Again, in another sense: so perfect was his faith that it deserved a seal; a thing is always sealed when it is full and great. Which is in uncircumcision.
Nunc in his quae ex gentibus credunt. Ut sit pater omnium credentium per præputium. Ut omnes qui ex gentibus credunt, secundum fidem filii sint Abrahæ: dum et illis sola fides ad justiliam reputatur, etiam et ipsi circumcisi non carne, sed corde: sive quia ante circumcisionem justus esset præputiatorum pater justorum. Ut reputetur et illis ad justitiam, et sit pater cir. cumcisionis. Cum justificati fuerint, circumcisi sunt: quia præputiatus si justus est, praeputium ejus in circumcisione reputabitur. Modo enim signo non est opus, per quod ab hominibus cognoscatur. Non enim una gens est Dei, sed ex omnibus congregatio: quia jam venit exspectatio gentium Christus. Non his tantum qui sunt ex circumcisione fidele., sed et his qui sectantur vestigia fidei, quæ est in præputio patris nostri Abrahæ. Si illum imitantur. Non enim per legem. Non per legem, sed ante legem: quia in lege quidem de fide et promissione Abrahae creditum est: sed Moyses, qui scripsit legem, postea fuit. Deinde ipse ad Galatas dicit: Quia post quadringentos et triginta annos facta est lex quae non irritum facit ad evacuandam promissionem. Promissio Abrahæ, aut semini ejus, ut hæres esset mundi. Non per circumcisionem. Sed per justitiam fidei.
Now in the case of those who believe from among the Gentiles. That he might be the father of all who believe through uncircumcision. That all who believe from among the Gentiles may, according to faith, be sons of Abraham: since faith alone is reckoned to them also for righteousness, and they too are circumcised not in the flesh but in the heart: or because before circumcision he was righteous, the father of the righteous uncircumcised. That it might be reckoned to them also for righteousness, and that he might be the father of circumcision. When they have been justified, they are circumcised: because if one uncircumcised is righteous, his uncircumcision will be reckoned as circumcision. For now there is no need of a sign by which he may be recognized by men. For the people of God is not one nation, but a congregation from all: because Christ, the expectation of the Gentiles, has now come. Not only to those who are of the circumcision and are faithful, but also to those who follow the footsteps of the faith which is in the uncircumcision of our father Abraham. If they imitate him. For not through the law. Not through the law, but before the law: because in the law indeed belief was placed in the faith and promise of Abraham: but Moses, who wrote the law, came afterward. Then he says to the Galatians: Because after four hundred and thirty years the law was made, which does not make void so as to evacuate the promise. The promise to Abraham, or to his seed, that he should be heir of the world. Not through circumcision. But through the righteousness of faith.
Ut in semine Abrahæ, id est Chrisio, benedicerentur omnes gentes, cui datæ sunt a Patre gentes in hxreditatem; sive ut curo eo requiescant gentes, sicut dicit Salvator: Venient ab Oriente et Occidente, et recumbent cum Abraham, et Isaac, et Jacob. Si enim qui ex lege hæredes sunt. Si ex circumcisione, secundum vos: si illi soli, ut vos vultis, liaeredes, non reddidit Deus Abrabae quod promisit per justitiam ut pater esset multarum gentium, et videtur sine causa credidisse. Sed non ita est: nam implevit Deus Abrahae promissionem, quia ex omni parte mundi gentes credunt in Cbristo. Exinanita est fides, abolita est promissio. Ergo nemo justificatur ex fide, nec ipse Abraham. SeU quoniam fides exinaniri non potest, nec promissio abolcri, superest ut non sit ex lege hæreditas, sed per justitiam fidei. Lex enim peccata non donat, sed indicat Alias vinditat sive judicat]. Et ideo non potest filios facere Abrahae, quia secundum quod omnes sub peccato inventi sunt, omnes erant puniendi, Ideo ergo ex fide, ut dimissis per gratiam peccatis, fiant filii Abrahæ. Lex enim iram aperatur. Quae injustis est posita, quae magis gravavit peccantes, non absolvit, quia injustis est posita: in praesenti enim poenam transgressoribus inferebat. Lex enim quid aliud quam sola littera est eis qui eam legere noverunt, et implere non possunt?
So that in the seed of Abraham, that is, in Christ, all the Gentiles might be blessed, to whom the Gentiles were given by the Father as an inheritance; or so that the Gentiles might rest with him, as the Savior says: They will come from the East and the West, and will recline with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob. For if those who are of the law are heirs. If from circumcision, according to you: if they alone, as you wish, are heirs, then God did not fulfill for Abraham what he promised through righteousness, that he should be the father of many nations, and he seems to have believed without cause. But it is not so: for God fulfilled the promise to Abraham, because from every part of the world the Gentiles believe in Christ. Faith is emptied out, the promise is abolished. Therefore no one is justified by faith, not even Abraham himself. But since faith cannot be emptied out, nor can the promise be abolished, it remains that the inheritance is not from the law, but through the righteousness of faith. For the law does not forgive sins, but points them out [otherwise it avenges or judges]. And therefore it cannot make sons of Abraham, because insofar as all are found under sin, all were to be punished. Therefore it is by faith, so that sins being forgiven through grace, they may become sons of Abraham. For the law opens up wrath. It is appointed for the unjust, which weighed down more heavily on those who sin, it did not absolve, because it is appointed for the unjust: for in the present it brought punishment upon transgressors. For what else is the law but the bare letter to those who know how to read it and cannot fulfill it?
quæ talibus littera est, quia non est adjutrix legentium, sed testis peccantium. Ideo quippe lex iram operatur, ut territo atque converso ad justitiam legis implendam Dei misericordia gratiam largiatur per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum, qui est Dei sapientia; de quo scriptum est: Legem et misericordiam in lingua portat. Legem, quæ terrcat, miscricordiam, qua subveniat. Cognitio itaque legis facit superbum praevaricatorem: per donum autem charitatis delectat legis esse factorem. Lex, inquit, iram operatur, hoc ideo, quia ira Dei major est in praevaricatorem, qui per legem cognoscit peccatum et tamen facit. Ubi enim non est lex. nec prævaricatio. Quae propter transgressionem posita est: ubi enim venit ex lege praeceptio, abundavit et praevaricationis occasio. Ideo ex fide. Hæredes ex fide, non ex lege. Ut secundum gratiam. Diligenter adverte, quia secundum gratiam dixit, ut cesset praesumptio, quae sibi blanditur de meritis. Firma sit promissio omni semini. Non ei qui ex lege est solum, sed et ei qui ex fide est Abrahæ. Quia omnes gentes credunt, et completur promissio Abrahæ. Qui est pater omnium nostrum, sicut scriptum est. Pateret praeputiatorumet circuracisorum. Hoc loco ubi Abraham multarum gentium pater dicitur, Judæorum superbia confunditur, quia Judaeorum per carnem, gentium per fidem est pater. Quia patrem multarum gentium posui te ante Deum, cui credidisti.
For such a letter is not a helper to those who read it, but a witness against those who sin. For this reason indeed the law works wrath, so that, once a man is terrified and converted to fulfilling the justice of the law, God's mercy may bestow grace through Jesus Christ our Lord, who is the wisdom of God; of whom it is written: He bears law and mercy in his tongue. Law, which terrifies; mercy, which comes to his aid. The knowledge of the law, therefore, makes a man a proud transgressor; but through the gift of love he delights to be a doer of the law. The law, he says, works wrath—for this reason, because the wrath of God is greater against the transgressor, who through the law knows his sin and yet commits it. For where there is no law, neither is there transgression. Which was set in place because of transgression: for where the precept came through the law, the occasion of transgression also abounded. Therefore by faith. Heirs by faith, not by law. That it might be according to grace. Carefully take note that he said according to grace, so that presumption may cease, which flatters itself on its merits. Let the promise be firm to all the seed. Not to him only who is of the law, but also to him who is of the faith of Abraham. Because all the nations believe, and the promise to Abraham is fulfilled. Who is the father of us all, as it is written. The father of the uncircumcised and of the circumcised. In this place, where Abraham is called the father of many nations, the pride of the Jews is confounded, because he is the father of the Jews according to the flesh, and of the Gentiles according to faith. Because I have made you the father of many nations before God, in whom you believed.
Quia per se nec unius filii poterat pater esse. Qui vivificat mortuos. Ad generandum mortuos dicit, ut et praesertim Saram, ut praesertim clausæ conveniat: quia fructum sobolis, quem aetas non obtinuerat, fides perfecta promeruit. Et vocat ea quæ non sunt, tanquam ea quæ sunt. Quamvis in principio vocaverit ea quae non erant, et ad nutum jubentis statim esse coeperunt, tamen hic de filii desperata conceptione significat. Qui contra spem. Contra spem naturae erat ut vetula pareret, et semen suum sicut stellas coeli futurum: In spem credidit. In spe potentiae Dei. Ut fieret pater multarum gentium. Quia adhuc unius filii pater erat. Secundum quod dictum est: Sic trit semen tuum sicut atellæ coeli et arena maris. Quia scientibus legem loquebatur Apostolus, in arena Judæos, in stellis gentes, quae credunt significavit: illos terrenos, istos coelestes intellige; quia etiam de ipso genere Judaeorum primitivorum Ecclesia, quae credidit, cœlo et stellis merito comparatur. Et non est infirmatus fide, nec consideravit corpus suum emortuum, cum fere centum annorum esset, et emortuam vulvam Saræ. Nihil naturae considerat fides: quia in his quæ promittit Deus, facile natura suo servit auctori. Quaeritur quomodo Abraham postea de Cethura filios generaverit, qui de Sara ante non potuit. Idcirco de Sara non genuit, quia anus erat et sterilis.
Because by himself he could not be the father even of one son. He who gives life to the dead. He speaks of begetting from the dead, so that it applies especially to Sarah, especially to her who was closed: because the fruit of offspring, which her age had not obtained, perfect faith merited. And he calls those things that are not, as though they were. Although in the beginning he called those things that were not, and at his commanding nod they immediately began to be, yet here he signifies concerning the desperate conception of a son. Who against hope. It was against the hope of nature that an old woman should give birth, and that his seed should be as the stars of heaven: he believed in hope. In the hope of God's power. That he might become the father of many nations. Because he was still the father of one son. According to what was said: So shall your seed be as the stars of heaven and the sand of the sea. Because the Apostle was speaking to those who know the law, he signified the Jews by the sand and the nations that believe by the stars: understand those as earthly, these as heavenly; because even from the very race of the Jews the Church of the firstfruits, which believed, is deservedly compared to heaven and the stars. And he was not weakened in faith, nor did he consider his own body dead, when he was almost a hundred years old, and the dead womb of Sarah. Faith considers nothing of nature: because in those things that God promises, nature easily serves its author. It is asked how Abraham afterwards begot sons from Keturah, who could not before from Sarah. For this reason he did not beget from Sarah, because she was old and barren.
De illa vero quae in aetatis juventute posita erat, facile valuit procreari. In repromissione autem Dei non hæsitavit diffidentia, sed confortatus est fide, dans gloriam Deo. Nec de senectutis impossibilitate, nec de promissionis magnitudine dubitaviL: quia non ad annos suos, sed ad Omnipotentis promissa respexit, dans gloriam Deo, tanquam de percepto gratias agens. Plenissime sciens quia quæcunque promisitDeus,potens est et facere. Id est, certissime, Ips igitur fidem gentium facit, qui potens est facere quod promisit, Ipse ergo operatur in cordibus nostri fidem miro et ineffabili modo ut credamus. Ideo et reputatum est illi ad justitiam. Non est autem scriptum tantum propter ipsum, quia reputatum est illi. Quia si * credidit. Et aliter, Advertendum, quia apud Deum non solum devotio operis habet meritum, sed etiam firma et perfecta credulitas. Sed et propter nos,quibus reputabitur. Non ut sciremustantum qualis fuerit, sed ut nobis omnibus rexemplo sit, ut filiis pater: sicut omnia exempla sanctorum, sive tentationes, ut se ipsi scirent, et nos, eorum exempla sequeremur. Ideo tentantur sancti, ut ipsi se agnoscant: ideo probati justificantur, ut DOS eorum vesligia subsequamur. Credentibus in eum, qui suscitavit Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum a mortuis.
But as for her who was placed in the youth of age, it could easily have been brought about. Yet in the promise of God he did not waver with distrust, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God. He doubted neither the impossibility of old age nor the greatness of the promise, because he looked not to his own years but to the promises of the Almighty, giving glory to God, as one giving thanks for what he had received. Knowing most fully that whatever God has promised, he is able also to do. That is, most certainly. He therefore who is able to do what he promised makes the faith of the nations; he therefore works faith in our hearts in a wondrous and ineffable way, so that we may believe. Therefore it was also reckoned to him as righteousness. But it was not written for his sake alone, that it was reckoned to him. Because if he believed. And in another sense, it must be noted that with God not only the devotion of the work has merit, but also firm and perfect belief. But also for our sake, to whom it shall be reckoned. Not so that we should know only what sort he was, but so that he might be an example to us all, as a father to his sons: just as all the examples of the saints, or their trials, were so that they might know themselves, and we might follow their examples. Therefore the saints are tried, so that they may know themselves; therefore the proven are justified, so that we may follow their footsteps. To those who believe in him who raised Jesus Christ our Lord from the dead.
Videamus quo ordine hoc loco ad Christi transierit resurrectionem: id est, et nobis reputabitur, si tam perfecte crediderimus Christum a mortuis resurrexisse, quomodo ille credidit corpus Saræ emortuum posse ad concipiendum vivificari. Qui traditus est propter delicta nostra. In traditione misericordia, in resurrectione potentia demonstrata est: et ut novae ex resurrectione vitæ, quae est justificatio nostra, nobis daretur exemplum; ut peccata nostra porlaret, mortuus est: resurrexit ut per resurrectionem suam gloriam nostræ justificationis ostenderet. Et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram. Ideo mortuus est, ut vitam mortuis redderet. Ideo in ipso corpore quo est crucifixus apparuir, ut fidem atque justitiam credentium confirmaret, cum in plenitudine promissionis fructum sive credulitatis agnosceret.
CAP. v. Justificati igitur. Cum Judæi et gentes inter se disceptarent, et illi de antiquæ legis operibus, hi denova Christi vocatione præsumerent, pertractata causa quia nemo eorum est ex merito suo justificatus, sed omnes per gratiam, quae fidem infundit, et veritatem ostendit; et quod nec genus, nec circumcisio, sed fides faciat filios Abrahæ, qui ante circumcisionem ex sola credulitate justificatus est: qua ratione conclusa pacem eos habere bortatur ad Deum, quia nemo suis meritis, sed omnes Dei gratia et misericordia sunt salvati. Ex fide.
Let us see in what order he has passed over in this place to the resurrection of Christ: that is, it will also be reckoned to us, if we have believed as perfectly that Christ rose from the dead, as he believed that the dead body of Sarah could be made alive for conceiving. Who was handed over for our offenses. In the handing over, mercy was shown; in the resurrection, power: and so that an example of the new life from the resurrection, which is our justification, might be given to us; to bear our sins, he died: he rose again so that through his resurrection he might show the glory of our justification. And he rose again for our justification. For this reason he died, that he might restore life to the dead. For this reason he appeared in the very body in which he was crucified, that he might confirm the faith and righteousness of believers, when in the fullness of the promise he acknowledged the fruit of belief.
CHAPTER V. Justified therefore. When the Jews and the Gentiles were disputing among themselves, and the former presumed on the works of the ancient law, the latter on the new calling of Christ, the matter having been examined, because none of them was justified by his own merit, but all through grace, which pours in faith and shows the truth; and that neither lineage nor circumcision, but faith, makes sons of Abraham, who before circumcision was justified by belief alone: for this reason, having concluded peace, he urges them to have peace with God, because no one is saved by his own merits, but all by the grace and mercy of God. By faith.
Quae ex Deo est, ut credamus; sicut et ad Galatas dicit: At ubi venit fides, jam non sumus sub pædagogo. Et ad Нebræos: Aspicientes in auctorem et consummatorem fidei Jesum Christum. Pacem habeamus ad Deum. Vel subjecti simus Deo: vel pacem Dei, non saeculi habeamus. Per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Non ex operibus, per quem habemus accessum per fidem in gratiam istam. Per quem accessimus prope, qui eramus longe. In qua stamus. Quia ante gratiam jacebamos. Et gloriamur in spe gloriæ filiorum Dei. In hoc quod incredibile videtur, nos per fidem gloriamur liliorum Dei sperare nos adoptionem, tantumque est quod speramus, quantum ex se præsumere nullus anderet, quia in sola Dei virtute est, ut homo in filiorum Dei numero possit ascendere; ostendit et nos babere unde recte et sine periculo gioriemur. Magna enim gloria est per fidem ac spem in numero filiorum Dei adscisci. In spe gloria filiorum Dei illud nobis promittitur, quod, sicut dictum est, sperare nullus audebat: quod si forte in mentem alicujus incidisset, poterat aestimare se in blasphemiam incurrisse: quod adeo magnum est, ut a multis pro ipsa magnitudine incredibile videatur: eo quod speramus gloriam filiorum Dei nos consecuturos. Non solum autem, sed etiam gloriamur in tribulationibus.
Which is from God, that we may believe; as he also says to the Galatians: But when faith came, we are no longer under a pedagogue. And to the Hebrews: Looking to Jesus Christ, the author and finisher of faith. Let us have peace with God. Or let us be subject to God: or let us have the peace of God, not of the world. Through our Lord Jesus Christ. Not from works, through whom we have access by faith into this grace. Through whom we have drawn near, who were far off. In which we stand. Because before grace we lay fallen. And we glory in the hope of the glory of the children of God. In this, which seems incredible, we glory through faith that we hope for the adoption as children of God, and what we hope for is as great as no one would dare to presume on his own, because it is in the power of God alone that a man can ascend to the number of the children of God; he shows that we also have reason to glory rightly and without danger. For it is great glory to be received by faith and hope into the number of the children of God. In the hope of the glory of the children of God that is promised to us which, as has been said, no one dared to hope for: but if perhaps it had entered anyone's mind, he might have thought that he had fallen into blasphemy: which is so great that by many, because of its very greatness, it seems incredible: in that we hope that we shall obtain the glory of the children of God. Not only so, but we glory also in tribulations.
Ideo in tribulationibus gloriatur, quia per eas patientiæ virtus ostenditur, et de patientia fidei approbatio nascitur: spes vero de invicti animi probatione nutritur. Gloriantur ergo sancti de tolerantia tribulationis sine periculo vanitatis. Non solum enim in gloria spei, sed etiam in saluberrimis nobis tribulationibus gloriamur, scientes quantam habeat remunerationem, sicut ait Jacobus: Omne gaudium existimate, fratres mei, cum in tentationes varias incideritis. Et illud: Beatus vir qui suffert tentationem: quia cum probatus fuerit, accipiet coronam vitæ. De tribulatione enim gloriosa permittitur nobis ut gloriemur: quod et si fecerimus, tale est quale si quis, nummo aneo aut plumbeo contempto, gemmam regiam consequatur. Quanquam non sit digna comparatio: quia hic, quamvis pretium distet, manet tamen utriusque corruptio: ibi derogan parvis tnagna, et caducis succedunt alterna. Scientes quod tributatio. Sciri jam dicitur, quod firmissime creditur. Patientiam operatur. In tribulatione apparet patientia sive augetur. Optant fideles aliquid pati pro nomine Domini, ut acquirant de tribulatione finienda praemia sine fine mansura. Patientia butem probationem: probatio vero spem. Qui in omnibus patiens fuerit, probatus est. Vasa enim figuli probat fornax, et homines juslos tentatio tribulationis. Spes autem non confundit.
Therefore he glories in tribulations, because through them the virtue of patience is shown, and from patience the approval of faith is born; but hope is nourished by the proving of an unconquered spirit. Therefore the saints glory in the endurance of tribulation without the danger of vanity. For not only in the glory of hope, but also in tribulations most healthful for us, we glory, knowing how great a recompense it has, as James says: Count it all joy, my brothers, when you fall into various temptations. And that: Blessed is the man who endures temptation, because when he has been proved, he will receive the crown of life. For from glorious tribulation it is permitted us to glory; and if we have done so, it is such as if someone, despising a bronze or lead coin, obtains a royal gem. Although the comparison is not worthy: because here, however much the value differs, the corruption of both remains; there great things are set against small, and things that pass away succeed one another. Knowing that tribulation. To be known is now said of that which is most firmly believed. It works patience. In tribulation patience appears or is increased. The faithful desire to suffer something for the name of the Lord, that from tribulation they may acquire rewards that will endure without end. But patience works proof: proof truly hope. He who has been patient in all things has been proved. For the furnace proves the vessels of the potter, and the temptation of tribulation proves just men. But hope does not confound.
Spes futurorum omnem confusionem expelHt praesentium, unde probatur non habere spem, qui praeceptis Christi contunditur. Quia charitas Dei. Quomodo nos Deus diligat ex hoc cognoscimus, quia non solum nobis per mortem Filii sui peccata dimisit, sed etiam donum in nobis sancti Spiritus contulit, qui purgat et illuminat occulta cordium, et jam nune revelat gloriam futurorum. Diffusa,est in cordibus no, stris per Spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. Magnitudo beneficiorum excitat in se magnitudinem charitatis, quæ perfecta timere non novit, neque confunditur: quae tamen in nobis non per proprium meritum, sed per Spiritum sanctum donatur: quia ipsa charitas plenitudo legis esse cognoscitur. Et ideo nemo in se, sed in Deo, cujus donum est, glorietur nec dicat: Ego naturali legi credidi, et sic accepi Spiritum sanctum: quia nemo praevenit Deum, sed illius semper misericordia praevenimur. Utquid enim Christus cum adhuc infirmi essemus. Vult hinc ostendere, quia pro impiis mortuus est, et beneficiorum ejus magnitudinem commendare, ut indebite ab eo tantum dilecti, quantum eum diligere debeamus, videamus, aut si tam sancto et tanto beneficio aliquid praeponendum sit, cum ille nobis impiis nec vitam suam præposuerit, nec denegaverit mortem. Secundum tempus pro impiis mortuus est.
The hope of future things expels all confusion of present things; hence it is proved that he has no hope who is crushed by the precepts of Christ. Because the love of God. From this we know how God loves us, because he not only forgave us our sins through the death of his Son, but also conferred upon us the gift of the Holy Spirit, who purifies and illuminates the hidden things of hearts, and now reveals the glory of future things. It has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. The greatness of benefits stirs up in itself the greatness of love, which, being perfect, knows not how to fear, nor is it confounded; yet it is given in us not through our own merit, but through the Holy Spirit, because this same love is recognized to be the fullness of the law. And therefore let no one glory in himself, but in God, whose gift it is, nor let him say: I believed the natural law, and so I received the Holy Spirit; because no one precedes God, but we are always preceded by his mercy. For why did Christ, when we were still weak. He wishes to show from this that he died for the ungodly, and to commend the greatness of his benefits, so that we may see that, having been loved by him beyond what we deserve, we ought to love him in return, or whether anything is to be preferred to so holy and so great a benefit, since he did not prefer his own life to us who were ungodly, nor deny his death. At the appointed time he died for the ungodly.
Sive quia in ultimo saeculi passus est Christus, sive ad praesens, vel ad tridui tempus, ut praedicabatur, est mortuus. Qui ergo pro impiis mortuus est dicens, ostendit, quod pium Dominum usque ad mortem diligere debeamus, quem, pro impiis servis cruciatum mortis excepisse cognoscimus: simulque notandum, quod ait, pro impiis, ut praesumptio humana reprimatur, ne suis meritis aliquid tribuat. Vix enim pro justo quis moritur. Hoc contra Pelagium facit qui negat originale peccatum, quod si hominem non obligasset, mors Christi non fuisset necessaria. Dignum autem est ut homo pro confessione boni Domini vitam incunctanter effundat, qui non pro justis, sed pro impiis mortuus est, et vel sic de nobis præsumere desinamus. Nam si vix pro justo quis moritur, quis pro iniquo et impio, nisi ille qui venerat salvum facere quod perierat: cui nullus prior dedit, sed ab illo accepit, ut crederet? Nam pro bono forsitan quis audeat mori. Tam facile: nam bonum hoc est quod justum, secundum illud mandatum, justum et bonum. Commendat autem suam charitatem. Quando indebite aliquid redditur, tunc charitas commendatur. Quid ergo tam indebitum quam ut sine peccato Dominus pius pro servo impio moreretur Deus in nobis. Quantum nos diligat ex morte sua cognoscimus. Quoniam cum adhuc peccalores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est. Multo igitur magis justificati nunc in sanguine ipsius, salvi erimus.
Whether because Christ suffered at the end of the age, or whether at the present time, or for the space of three days, as it was preached, he died. He therefore who died for the ungodly, in saying this, shows that we ought to love the pious Lord even unto death, whom we know endured the torment of death for ungodly servants; and at the same time it must be noted that he said "for the ungodly," so that human presumption may be restrained, lest it attribute anything to its own merits. For scarcely does anyone die for a just man. This works against Pelagius, who denies original sin; for if it had not bound man, the death of Christ would not have been necessary. But it is fitting that man should pour out his life without hesitation for the confession of the good Lord, who died not for the just but for the ungodly, and even so let us cease to presume of ourselves. For if scarcely anyone dies for a just man, who would die for the wicked and ungodly, except he who had come to save what had perished: to whom no one first gave, but from whom he received, that he might believe? For perhaps someone might dare to die for a good man. So readily: for this good is what is just, according to that commandment, "just and good." But he commends his own love. When something is repaid undeservedly, then love is commended. What therefore is so undeserved as that the pious Lord should die without sin for an ungodly servant? God in us. How much he loves us we know from his death. For while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Much more therefore, now justified in his blood, we shall be saved.
Si peccatores tantum dilexit, quanto magis jam quos justos fecit custodiet? et si pro extraneis intercessit, multo magis suos perire non patitur. Si semetipsum dedit pro impio, quomodo sua poterit denegare? Non jam per animalium cruorem, sicut in lege; sed per sanguinem Filii Dei debitores esse nos admonet. Et ut intelligamus quantum diligat receptos, qui reconciliavit inimicos. Ab ira. Iram judicii. Per ipsum. Per ipsum salvabimur, non per nos: hoc est, si membrum ejus fuerimus: cum enim omnia ardebunt, solum cor. pus salvabitur judicantis. Si enim cum inimici essemus. lnimici eramus ante donum gratiae ipsius, et ante baptismi sacramentum; sed et illi inimici esse noscuntur, qui post baptismum fiagitiis et sceleribus se involvunt, nec poenitentia volunt emendare errores, sicut dicit Jacobus: Amicitia hujus mundi inimicitia est Dei. Inimici ergo non natura, sed contraria voluntate. Reconciliati sumus. Quia alienati et inimici facti fueramusper transgressionem. Nemo enim reconciliatur, nisi ex inimicitiis. Inimicos autem nos primi parentis transgressio fecit. Per mortem Filii ejus: multo magis reconciliati salui crimus in vita ipsius. Si per mortem Christi salvati sumus, quanto magis in vita ipsius glorificabimur, si et vitam ejus imitemur et mortem, et in præceptorum ejus adjulorioipsius studuerimus permanere custodia. Non solum autem, sed et gloriamur in Deo.
If he loved sinners so much, how much more will he guard those whom he has already made righteous? And if he interceded for strangers, much more does he not allow his own to perish. If he gave himself for the ungodly, how can he deny his own? Not now through the blood of animals, as in the law, but through the blood of the Son of God he reminds us that we are debtors. And so that we may understand how greatly he loves those he has received, he who reconciled enemies. From wrath. The wrath of judgment. Through him. Through him we shall be saved, not through ourselves: that is, if we are his members; for when all things burn, only the body of the one who judges will be saved. For if, when we were enemies. We were enemies before the gift of his grace, and before the sacrament of baptism; but those also are known to be enemies who after baptism entangle themselves in shameful deeds and crimes, and do not wish to correct their errors by repentance, as James says: Friendship with this world is enmity with God. Enemies, then, not by nature, but by a contrary will. We have been reconciled. Because we had been alienated and made enemies through transgression. For no one is reconciled except from enmity. But the transgression of our first parent made us enemies. Through the death of his Son: much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved in his life. If through the death of Christ we have been saved, how much more shall we be glorified in his life, if we imitate both his life and his death, and strive to remain in the help of his precepts and in his keeping. Not only so, but we also glory in God.
Non solum nobis vita dabitur Christi in illa. resurrectionis immutatione, sed et gloria, sicut dicit Joannes Apostolus: Nondum apparuit quid erimus: scimus quoniam cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus. Per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Ut per ipsius gratiam similitudinem ejus mereamur, et simus in gloria Dei Patris. Per quem nunc reconcitiationem accepimus. Nunc reconciliationem, tunc gloriam. Propterea sicut per unum hominem in hunc mundum. Hinc ostendere vult propterea Christum passum, ut qui a Deo per Adam discesseramus, per Christum reconciliaremur. Peccalumintravit. Traduce etexemplo; quomodo enim cum non esset peccatum, per Adam advenit, ita et cum jam apud nullum esset justitia, per Christum revocata est; et quomodo per illius peccatum mors, ita per hujus justiliam vita. Et per peccatum. In hoc loco contra abruplum Pelagianæ impietatis errorem mortem studet ostendere non a Deo factam, sed per culpam transgressionis illatam: quia sicut per primi Adæ peccatum salus amissa est, ita per secundi justitiam reparata est. Hic Apostolus hoc intendit asserere, quia magna fuit Adae transgressio, sed ditior est Christi redemptio; et inde dixit: Et non sicut per unum hominem peccatum, ita et donum. Ex uno peccato ille intulit mortem: hic ex multorum abolitione reddidit vitam. Et ideo plus prævaluit justitia in vivificando, quam peccatum in occidendo. Mors.
Not only will the life of Christ be given to us in that change of the resurrection, but glory also, as the Apostle John says: It has not yet appeared what we shall be; we know that when it has appeared, we shall be like him. Through our Lord Jesus Christ. That through his grace we may deserve to be like him, and may be in the glory of God the Father. Through whom we have now received reconciliation. Now reconciliation, then glory. Therefore, just as through one man into this world. From this he wishes to show that Christ suffered for this reason: that we, who had departed from God through Adam, might be reconciled through Christ. Sin entered. Draw the example from this: for just as, when there was no sin, it came in through Adam, so also, when righteousness was already in no one, it was recalled through Christ; and just as death came through that man's sin, so life through this man's righteousness. And through sin. In this place, against the abrupt error of Pelagian impiety, he is eager to show that death was not made by God, but brought in through the guilt of transgression: because just as salvation was lost through the sin of the first Adam, so it was repaired through the righteousness of the second. Here the Apostle intends to assert this: that Adam's transgression was great, but Christ's redemption is richer; and hence he said: And not as through one man the sin, so also the gift. From one sin that man brought in death; this man from the abolition of many restored life. And therefore righteousness prevailed more in giving life than sin in killing. Death.
Illa de qua dicit: Cum mortui essetis in peccatis, convivificavit vos Christo. Mors a morsu serpentis nomen accepit. Et ita. Quomodo in illo. In omnes homines mors pertransiit. Mors tam animæ quam corporis pertransit ex originali peccato et in Abraham, et in Isaac, et in Jacob, sed Dei sunt vivificati gratia, de quibus dicitur: Non est Deus mortuorum; sicut et Apostolus dicit etiam in eos qui non peccaverunt: id esi, capitale peccatum sic in homines pertransiit, quia non solum ille mortuus est qui transgressus est, sed etiam illi qui ex transgressoribus sunt procreati, per naturae vinculum tenentur obnoxii, id est per omnes ramos vitium suum radix corrupta transmisit. Adam occidit, Christus vivificavit. In quo omnes peccaverunt. Sive peccato inobedientiæ, sive in Adam omnium peccantium poena præmonstrata est. Usque ad legem enim peccatum erat in mundo. Requirendum est quod peccatum: id est, illud solum peccatum usque ad legem viguit, quod praevaricatio primi parentis invexit. Ces. sabat enim transgressiunis delictum ante legis adventum. In primo saeculo peccatores libertate praesentis vitae securius fruebantur. Erat quidem ante legem ex operatione peccatum, sed non ita imputabatur, quia jam pene obiitterata fuerat scientia naturalis, cujus intellectus quasi mortuus revixit ex lege. Lex vindex peccati advenit. Peccattun autem non imputabatur, cum lex non esset.
That [death] of which he says: When you were dead in your sins, he made you alive together with Christ. Death took its name from the bite of the serpent. And so. Just as in him. Death passed into all men. Death of both soul and body passed over from original sin, both into Abraham and into Isaac and into Jacob, but they were made alive by the grace of God, of whom it is said: He is not the God of the dead; as the Apostle also says even of those who did not sin: that is, capital sin thus passed into men, because not only did he die who transgressed, but also those who were procreated from transgressors are held liable through the bond of nature, that is, through all the branches the corrupted root transmitted its vice. Adam killed, Christ gave life. In whom all sinned. Whether by the sin of disobedience, or in Adam the punishment of all who sin was foretold. For until the law sin was in the world. It must be asked what sin: that is, that one sin alone prevailed until the law, which the transgression of the first parent brought in. For the offense of transgression ceased before the coming of the law. In the first age sinners more securely enjoyed the freedom of the present life. There was indeed sin before the law from action, but it was not so imputed, because the knowledge of nature had by now been almost obscured, whose understanding, as if dead, revived from the law. The law came as the avenger of sin. But sin was not imputed, when there was no law.
Erat: sed agrestibus hominibus non imputabatur, nec ab aliis credebatur esse peccatum. Sed regnavit mors ab Adam usque ad Moysen. Id est, mors ex originali malo veniens usque ad legem sola regnavit. Ideo dixit: Regnavit, quia totum mundum generaliler occupaverat. Alia vero peccata nequaquam regnare videbantur, quia non per universos generaliter regnabat iniquitas. Naturalis enim aliquantula justitia vigebat in plurimis, sicut in multis philosophis: et caetera delicta quamvis ex vitiata natura, tamen voluntaria erant. Secutum est aliud novum, id est praevaricationis contempta lege delictum. Ergo obligatio sola primi hominis usque ad Moysen per se mortem operata regnavit. A legis autem tempore gei nus aliud delictorum in reatum neglectae legis accessit, quod ante ejus promulgationem non poterat imputari. Ac sic introeuntibus novis præceptis iniquitas multiplicata est. Lex enim non ut tolleret peccatum, sed ut demonstraret, vel judicaret, advenit: et ideo hic abundantiam gratiæ Apostoli doctrina commendat, quia non tantum Adae debitum, quod solum usque ad legem, velut tyrannica dominationc regnaverat; sed etiam innumeras offensas prævaricationis et reprobae conversationis Redemptoris bonitas redonavit. Propterea dixit: Nam judicium quidem ex uno in condemnationem.
It was, but it was not imputed to rustic men, nor was it believed by others to be sin. But death reigned from Adam until Moses. That is, death, coming from the original evil, reigned alone until the law. Therefore he said: It reigned, because it had generally occupied the whole world. But other sins did not at all seem to reign, because iniquity did not reign generally through all. For a certain small natural justice flourished in very many, as in many philosophers; and other offenses, although from a corrupted nature, were nevertheless voluntary. There followed another new offense, that is, the offense of transgression by contempt of the law. Therefore the liability of the first man alone, working death through itself until Moses, reigned. But from the time of the law another kind of offenses was added to the guilt of neglected law, which could not be imputed before its promulgation. And so, as new precepts entered, iniquity was multiplied. For the law came not to take away sin, but to demonstrate or judge it; and therefore the Apostle's teaching here commends the abundance of grace, because the goodness of the Redeemer gave back not only the debt of Adam, which alone had reigned as if with tyrannical domination until the law, but also the innumerable offenses of transgression and of reprobate conduct. For this reason he said: For judgment indeed was from one unto condemnation.
Quod autem dicit: usque ad Moysen, id est usque ad finem legis et initium gratiæ debitum naturale regnavit: sicut dicimus, verbi gratia: Fuerunt Hunni usque ad Auilam. Non utique principium regni ejus, sed finem designamus: sic et usque ad Moysen, id est usque ad finem legis, et principium gratiae. Reliqua delicta, quæ non intelligebantur peccata esse usque ad principium legis, quousque diceret lex: Non concupisces, per legem revixerunt. Nam originale hodieque usque ad baptismum regnat, scd fenoris sui perdidit usum, postquam Christi sanguis chirographum originale delevit. Sed dicet aliquis: Quare adhuc in multis gentibus regnat originis malum? Cui respondet: Tunc vere pestis late diffusa regnabat, quando medicus deerat, quando mortalitas generalis omnes vastabat. Ubi vero portam paradisi remissio de cælis missa patefacit, mors perdidit potestatem: ac sic non regnat, quia regnum ejus destructum est per gratiam Christi. Etiam in eos qui non peccaverunt, in similitudinem prævaricationis Adæ, qui est forma futuri. Forma futuri, forma e contrario; quomodo ille peccati, ita hic justitiæ: sive ille in anima vivente, iste in spiritu vivificante. Christi forma Adam fuit: quia sicut Adam sine commercio conjugali Dei manibus est factus, ita et Christus ex virsine. Deo operante, processit. Sed non sicut delictum, ita et donum.
But when he says, "until Moses," that is, until the end of the law and the beginning of grace, the natural debt reigned; just as we say, for example: "The Huns existed until Attila." We are certainly not designating the beginning of his reign, but the end; so also "until Moses," that is, until the end of the law and the beginning of grace. The remaining offenses, which were not understood to be sins until the beginning of the law—until the law said, "You shall not covet"—came to life again through the law. For the original [sin] reigns even today until baptism, but it has lost the use of its interest, after the blood of Christ wiped out the original record of debt. But someone will say: Why does the evil of origin still reign in many nations? To him it is answered: Then truly the widely spread plague reigned, when the physician was absent, when general mortality was devastating all. But where forgiveness sent from heaven opens the gate of paradise, death has lost its power; and thus it does not reign, because its kingdom has been destroyed through the grace of Christ. Even in those who did not sin, in the likeness of Adam's transgression, who is the form of the one to come. The form of the one to come, a form by contrast; as he is of sin, so this one is of righteousness: whether he in a living soul, this one in a life-giving spirit. Adam was the form of Christ, because just as Adam was made by the hands of God without marital commerce, so also Christ came forth from the virgin, with God working. But not as the offense, so also the gift.
Si enim unius deiicio multi mortui sunt: multo magis gratia Dei, et donum in gratia unius hominis Jesu Christi in plures abundavit. Et non sicut per unum peccatum, ita et donum. Id est, plus praevaluit justitia in vivificando, quam peccatum in occidendo: quia Adæ peccatum et se et suos posteros interfecit: Christus autem et quos in corpore invenit, et suum hominem, et posteros salvavit. Sed forte dicit aliquis: Caro, quae ex transgressore venit, juste trahit origioale peccatum; anima vero, quæ inuocens nascitur, unde trahit originale peccatum, ut si non baptizatus infans moriatur, in aeternum damnetur? Audiat et agnoscat quia magis anima primum in Adam pro appetitu divinitatis tuam caro peccavit. Isto vero loco omnino cavenda est opinio quæ dicit: Sicut caro ex carne Adæ, ita anima nostra ex anima Adæ occulta Dei operatione creatur.
For if by the offense of the one many died, much more the grace of God and the gift in the grace of the one man Jesus Christ abounded unto many. And not as through the one sin, so also the gift. That is, justice prevailed more in giving life than sin in killing, because the sin of Adam killed both himself and his posterity; but Christ saved both those whom he found in the body and his own man and his posterity. But perhaps someone says: The flesh, which comes from a transgressor, justly draws original sin; but the soul, which is born innocent, whence does it draw original sin, so that if an unbaptized infant dies, it is condemned forever? Let him hear and acknowledge that it was rather the soul that first sinned in Adam, at the prompting of the desire for divinity, and then your flesh. But in this place we must altogether beware of the opinion that says: Just as the flesh comes from the flesh of Adam, so our soul is created from the soul of Adam by the hidden operation of God.
Sicut quidam dixit: Lege latenti fundet opus natura suum, quae nisi hic fuerit liberata per gratiam, perpetua poena in aeternum damnabitur. Nam judicium. Subauditur mortis. Ex uno in condemnationem. Subauditur, peccante sive peccato primum. Gratia autem ex multis delictis in justificationem. Ac si prima obligatioveteris offensæ usque ad Christum dominata est. Alia vero delicta ante interdictum legis non videbantur vel non intelligebantur esse tam gravia: adveniens ergo gratia, non solum origioale debitum, sed et actuale donavit per baptismum. Et ideo ex multis delictis justificavit. Si enim unius delicto mars regnavit per unum. Id est per Adæ transgressionem. Multo magis abundantiam gratiæ. Major estredemptio Salvatoris quam perdilio transgressoris: quia per Christum omnia peccata dimissa sunt, non solum originalia, verum etiam et actualia. Et donationis, et justitiæ accipientes in vitam regnabunt per unum Jesum Chritum. Quia et ut juste vivamus, et ut cum ipso regnemus, muneris ipsius largitate donatum est. Donationes audimus: de nostris meritis taceamus. Igitur sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines in condemnationem, sic et per unius justitiam in omnes homines in justificationem vitæ. Mors regnavit, subaudiendum. Qui ergo ex hac condemnatione liberatur, gratiam diligat; qui non liberatur, debitum agnoscat.
As someone has said: By a hidden law nature pours forth its own work, and unless it has been set free here through grace, it will be condemned to perpetual punishment forever. For judgment—death is understood. From one unto condemnation—that is, from the one man sinning, or from the first sin. But grace from many offenses unto justification. As if the first obligation of the old offense held dominion up to Christ. But other offenses before the prohibition of the law did not seem, or were not understood, to be so grave; therefore when grace arrived, it forgave through baptism not only the original debt but also actual sins. And therefore it justified from many offenses. For if by the offense of one death reigned through one—that is, through Adam's transgression—much more the abundance of grace. Greater is the redemption of the Savior than the ruin of the transgressor, because through Christ all sins have been forgiven, not only original but also actual. And those who receive the gift and of righteousness unto life will reign through one Jesus Christ. Because both that we may live justly and that we may reign with him has been granted by the generosity of his gift. We hear gifts; let us be silent about our own merits. Therefore as through the offense of one unto all men unto condemnation, so also through the righteousness of one unto all men unto justification of life. Death reigned—this is to be understood. Therefore let him who is freed from this condemnation love grace; let him who is not freed acknowledge his debt.
Si in remittendo debito bonitas, in exigendo æquitas intelligitur: nusquam enim esse apud Deum iniquitas invenitur. Sicut enim per inobedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti sunt multi, ita et per unius obeditionem justi constituuntur multi. Sicut exemplo inobedientiae Adae peccaverunt multi, ita et Christi obelitione justilicantur muli. Grande crimen inobedientiae, quam qui habuerit Christianus, quodcunque boni fecerii evacuat. Obedientiam, inquit, malo quam sacrificium. Lex autem subintravit, ut abundaret delictum. Ne dicerent nobis: Lex peccata dimisit: Non, inquit, venit dimittere, sed monstrare: qua contempta, incœpit abundare delictum per scientiam: quasi diceret: Ut video, lex peccata non minuit, sed adjecit, non tamen suo vitio, sed illorum. Lex, inquit, subintravit, ut abundaret delictum: quod supervenientis I gratiae largitate vacuatum est. Aperte ergo ex hoc testimonio advertimus, Apostolum de duobus loqui generibus peccatorum, quae vel ex naturali legis transgressione veniebant, ubi causam explicuit naturalem, legalem subdidit, dicens: Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia. Ubi autem abundavit peccatum Totus hic sensus est: Vetus Adam per unum delictum intulit mortem; novus Adam ex innumerabilium delictorum indulgentia donavit salutem. Ubi, inquit, abundavit peccatum: quia accepta lege peccatum non cum ignorantia, sed cum scientia perpetratur.
If in forgiving debt goodness is understood, and in exacting it equity—for nowhere is iniquity found in God. For just as through the disobedience of one man many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of one man many are made righteous. As by the example of Adam's disobedience many sinned, so also by Christ's obedience many are justified. Great is the crime of disobedience, which, if a Christian has it, empties out whatever good he has done. Obedience, he says, I prefer to sacrifice. But the law entered in, that the trespass might abound. Lest they should say to us: The law forgave sins—No, he says, it came not to forgive but to show; and when it was despised, the trespass began to abound through knowledge; as if he were saying: As I see it, the law did not diminish sins but added them—yet not by its own fault, but by theirs. The law, he says, entered in, that the trespass might abound: which was emptied out by the largess of supervening grace. Openly, then, from this testimony we perceive that the Apostle speaks of two kinds of sins, those which came either from the transgression of the natural law—where he set forth the natural cause, he subjoined the legal, saying: Where sin abounded, grace did superabound. But where sin abounded—the whole sense is this: the old Adam by one trespass brought in death; the new Adam by the forgiveness of countless trespasses granted salvation. Where, he says, sin abounded: because, once the law was received, sin is committed not with ignorance but with knowledge.
Ideo incipit abundare delictum. Superabundavit gratia. Ut sicut regnavit peccatum in mortem. Quomodo dicit Salvator: Cui plus dimittitur, plus diligit. Manifestata est quantitas peccati, ut scirent magnitudinem cratiae, et redderent magnitudinem charitatis, et ex indulgentia remissionis cresceret debitum charitatis. Ita et gratia regnet per justitiam in vitam æternam per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Manifestantur beneficia dum econtrario indignorum meritis comparantur: mors enim per Adam regnavit, vita per Cbristum. Ut sicut confirmatum est regnum peccati per legem contemptam, quæ abstulit excusationem ignorantiæ, ita et regnum gratiae confirmetur per multorum remissa peccatorum.
CAP. VI. — Quid ergo dicemus? Permanebimus in peccato, ut gratia abundet? Illorum hic infertur objectio, qui adhuc parum intelligentes dicere poterant: Si gratia crescet in magnitudine delictorum, peccare debemus, ut gratia abundet, ut possit magis ac magis munificentia ejus in peccatoribus abundare. Absit. Absit. Illi tam imperite loquuntur, qui adhuc inlirmi inveniuntur. Nos vero persuasionem hujus ignorantiæ respuamus, qui jam mortui sumus peccato, ut gratiæ viveremus. Qui enim mortui sumus peccato, quomodo adhuc vivemus in illo?
Therefore sin begins to abound. Grace has superabounded. So that just as sin reigned unto death, in the same way the Savior says: To whom more is forgiven, he loves more. The quantity of sin has been made manifest, so that they might know the greatness of grace, and return the greatness of love, and that from the indulgence of remission the debt of love might grow. Thus also grace may reign through righteousness unto eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. The benefits are made manifest when they are compared with the contrary merits of the unworthy: for death reigned through Adam, life through Christ. So that just as the kingdom of sin was confirmed through the despised law, which took away the excuse of ignorance, so also the kingdom of grace may be confirmed through the remission of the sins of many.
CHAPTER VI. — What then shall we say? Shall we remain in sin, that grace may abound? Here the objection of those is introduced who, still understanding little, could say: If grace will increase in the greatness of sins, we ought to sin, that grace may abound, so that its munificence may be able to abound more and more in sinners. Far be it. Far be it. Those speak so ignorantly who are still found weak. But let us reject the persuasion of this ignorance, who have already died to sin, that we might live to grace. For we who have died to sin, how shall we still live in it?
Vult tam firmum esse baptizatum, tamque perfectum, quasi qui ad capitalia committenda mortuo quodammodo comparetur: ut jam peccare non debeat, id est, crimen admittere. An ignoratis quia quicunque baptizali sumus in Christo Jesu. Aut nunquid sacramentum ipsius baptismatis ignoratis? In Scripturis baptismatum sunt genera tria: aquæ, ut Joannes; Spiritus, qui et ignis, ut in Actibus apostolorum. Descendit Spiritus sanctus quasi ignis, de cujus deitate alio loco demonstrat: Deus, inquit, noster ignis consumens est. Tertium genus est baptismi in sanguine, quo martyres baptizantur. Unde ipse Dominus jam baptizatus in Evangelio protestatur: Baptismo habeo baptizari quod vos nescitis. Sicut in Joannis apostoli epistola legimus: Tria sunt quae perhibent testimonium: aqua, sanguis, Spiritns. Unum in ministerio, non in natura. Aqua per figuram testis est dominicæ scpulturæ; sanguis testis est mortis; Spiritus testis est resurrcctionis: quia Spiritus auctor est vitae. In morte ipsius baptizati sumus. In morte Christi baptizamur, ut in ipsius morte credentes, quasi mortui viveremus. Quippe quibus nihil esset cum hoc mundo commune. Et quibus totus mundus erat auctoris exemplo moriturus, sicut multi sancti vel fecerunt vel faciunt: quia Christus pro omnibus mortuus est. Ergo omnes mortui sunt, ut et qui vivunt jam non sibi vivant, sed ei qui pro illis mortuus est.
He wants the baptized to be as firm and as perfect as one who is reckoned, in a manner of speaking, dead to the committing of capital sins, so that he ought no longer to sin, that is, to commit a crime. Do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus? Or do you not know the sacrament of baptism itself? In the Scriptures there are three kinds of baptisms: of water, as John's; of the Spirit, which is also fire, as in the Acts of the Apostles. The Holy Spirit descended like fire, concerning whose divinity he shows elsewhere: Our God, he says, is a consuming fire. The third kind is the baptism in blood, by which martyrs are baptized. Hence the Lord himself, already baptized in the Gospel, declares: I have a baptism to be baptized with, which you do not know. As we read in the epistle of John the apostle: There are three that bear witness: water, blood, and Spirit. One in ministry, not in nature. Water is a witness by figure of the Lord's burial; blood is a witness of his death; the Spirit is a witness of his resurrection, because the Spirit is the author of life. In his death we have been baptized. We are baptized into the death of Christ, so that, believing in his death, we might live as though dead—we, that is, for whom there would be nothing in common with this world. And for whom the whole world was to die, by the example of the Author, as many of the saints have done or are doing, because Christ died for all. Therefore all have died, so that those who live should no longer live for themselves, but for him who died for them.
Vivo autem non jam ego: vivit vero in me Christus. Et, Mihi mundus crucifixus est, et ego mundo. Fieri enim non potest, nisi ut mortuo capite, omnia membra commoriantur. Caput enim pro omnibus membris pertulit pœnas, ut omnia in eum membra morerentur, et ita peccato mortua viverent Deo. Quomodo enim mortuus peccare non potest, ita et nos, qui Christo sumus commortui, implicari peccatis capitalibus non debemus. Qui crucifixus est, nihil aliud facit, nisi quod horam mortis exspectat, et in manus Patris commendat spiA ritum suum. Plenius requirendum est quid intelligi debeat, in morte ipsius baptizati sumus. Praecipit Apostolus ut quia propter nos Christus crucifixus, morluus et sepultus est, et resurrexit, nos quoque ad passionis suae similitudinem voluntates et cupiditates nostras crucifigamus, et in baptismatis mysterio mortis, sepulturæ ac resurrectionis ejus exemplum imitemur, ut si passionum socii fuerimus, simus etiam consolationum. Sed requirendum quomodo possit in vita positus mori, et nondum mortuus sepeliri; et nondum sepultus, quomodo valeat suscitari. Hoc utique modo dum de filiis perditionis filii adoptionis efficimur, priori naturæ secunda nativitate præmorimur; et dum sub cognato terrae elemento submergimur, sepelimur; dum e sinu fontis assurgimus, suscitamur: et ex huc maximum baptismatis sacramentum est.
But I live, now not I: truly Christ lives in me. And, The world is crucified to me, and I to the world. For it cannot be otherwise than that, the head being dead, all the members die with it. For the head endured punishments for all the members, so that all the members might die in him, and thus, dead to sin, live to God. For just as a dead man cannot sin, so we also, who have died with Christ, ought not to be entangled in capital sins. He who is crucified does nothing else but await the hour of death and commend his spirit into the hands of the Father. It must be more fully examined what ought to be understood by "we were baptized into his death." The Apostle instructs that, because Christ was crucified, died, and was buried for us, and rose again, we too, in the likeness of his passion, should crucify our wills and desires, and in the mystery of baptism imitate the example of his death, burial, and resurrection, so that if we have been sharers in his sufferings, we may also be sharers in his consolations. But it must be asked how one who is placed in life can die, and, not yet dead, be buried; and, not yet buried, how he can be raised up. In this way, surely, while we are made from children of perdition into children of adoption, we die beforehand to our former nature by a second birth; and while we are submerged beneath the kindred element of earth, we are buried; while we rise from the bosom of the font, we are raised up: and herein is the greatest sacrament of baptism.
Et ideo dixit: Consepulti sumus cum illo per baptismum in mortem. Et in consequenti: Si, inquit, mortui sumus cum Christo, credimus quia simul etiam vivimus cum Christo. Elaborandum est itaque ut nihil de sordibus veteris hominis agnoscatur in nobis. Unde si quis nostrum forte praevenitur dono Domini per pœnitentiam diluatur. Si ergo fuerimus novi, et immutati in conversatione, similiter novi et immutati efficiemur in gloria. Scientes quia vetus homo noster simul crucifixus est. Vetus homo dicitur qui veterem et terrenum Adam aut deposuisse nondum videtur, aut eumdem, in cœnum prioris vitæ relapsus, imitatur. Sicut autem redemptor ille innoxium corpus appendit, ita nos noxium suspendamus a vitiis. In quo mysterio crucis Moyses serpentem æreum in dorso * suspendit, ut destruatur corpus peccati. Hoc est, ut non ex parte, sed omne vitium destruatur. Consepulti enim sumus cum illo per baplismum in mortem. In exemplo Christi ad cum imitandum consepelimur in baptismo, ut mortui veteribus criminibus renuntiemns diabolo et pompis ejus. Ostendit nos ita baptizari ut consepeliamur Christo. Ut quomodo surrexit Christus a mortuis per gloriam Patris. Ut quomodo glorificatur Pater per resurrectionem Filii, ita et per conversationis nostræ novitatem gloriflcetur. Ita et nos in novitate vitæ ambulemus.
And therefore he said: We are buried with him through baptism into death. And in what follows: If, he says, we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live together with Christ. And so we must labor that nothing of the filth of the old man be found in us. Whence if any one of us is perhaps overtaken beforehand, let him be washed clean by the gift of the Lord through repentance. If therefore we have been made new and changed in our conduct, we shall likewise be made new and changed in glory. Knowing that our old man has been crucified together with him. The old man is said to be he who either does not yet appear to have put off the old and earthly Adam, or, having relapsed into the mire of his former life, imitates the same. But just as that Redeemer hung up an innocent body, so let us suspend our guilty body from vices. In which mystery of the cross Moses hung up the bronze serpent on a pole, that the body of sin may be destroyed. That is, that not in part, but every vice may be destroyed. For we are buried together with him through baptism into death. In the example of Christ, for imitating him, we are buried together in baptism, so that, dead to our old crimes, we may renounce the devil and his pomps. He shows that we are so baptized as to be buried together with Christ. That just as Christ rose from the dead through the glory of the Father. That just as the Father is glorified through the resurrection of the Son, so also may he be glorified through the newness of our conduct. So let us also walk in newness of life.
Ostendit quomodo viventes mortui esse possimus, nec aliquid velle aut cupere debeamus, quod volunt aut cupiunt ii qui novi non sunt. Si enim complantati facti sumus similitudini mortis ejus, simul et resurrectionis erimus. Si consepulti sumus, et resurrectionis erimus participes. Si complantati non sumus, nec conresurgemus: et si fuerimus novi in vita, erimus in gloria. Si similitudinem mortis habuerimus, et resurrectionis habebimus. Hoc scientes, quia vetus homo noster simul crucifixus est. Qui veterem hominem et terrenum imitando peccabant. Nam vetus homo Adam intelligitur, sicut novus Christus. Ut destruatur corpus peccati. Unum vitium membrum est peccati: corpus vero universitas delictorum, quorum prineipium originale peccatum. Christus autem non ex parte, sed integer est crucifixus, ut nos ex toto moriamur peccato, et vivamus Deo; sive ut corpus nostrum destruatur a servitute peccati, et fiat justitiæ mancipium, quod solebat esse delicti. Ut ultra non serviamus peccato. Omnis enim qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati. Qui enim mortuus est justificatus est a peccato. Hoc est, alienatus est a peccato, jani non potest peccare: crucifixus enim, omnibus membris dolore occupatis, peccare non potest; sed concnpiscentiis et passionibus contradicit. Si aulem mortui sumus cum Christo, credimus quia simul eliam vivemus cum Christo.
He shows how we who are living can be dead, and that we ought not to will or desire anything that those who are not new [in Christ] will or desire. For if we have been made partakers of the likeness of his death, we shall also be partakers of the resurrection. If we have been buried together, we shall also be partakers of the resurrection. If we have not been made partakers, neither shall we rise together; and if we have been made new in life, we shall be in glory. If we have had the likeness of his death, we shall also have that of the resurrection. Knowing this, that our old man was crucified together with him—those who sinned by imitating the old and earthly man. For the old man is understood as Adam, just as the new man is Christ. That the body of sin may be destroyed. One vice is a member of sin; but the body is the whole mass of transgressions, whose beginning is original sin. But Christ was crucified not in part, but whole, so that we may die wholly to sin and live to God; or that our body may be destroyed from the slavery of sin and become the servant of righteousness, which it used to be of transgression. That we may no longer serve sin. For everyone who commits sin is the servant of sin. For he who has died has been justified from sin. That is, he has been alienated from sin, and can no longer sin; for one who is crucified, with all his members occupied by pain, cannot sin, but contradicts his desires and passions. But if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live together with Christ.
Sicut et alibi dicit: Si commortui sumus, et convivemus. Scientes quod Christus surgens a mortuis, jam non moritur. Sic et nos, si mortui fuerimus vitiis, mortem secundam non timebimus. Aut certe ita: sicut jam pro vobis non potest, si criminose vixeritis, Christus iterum cruciligi, ita et vos non potestis iterum baptizari, sicut alibi dicit: Impossibile est eos qui semel sunt illuminati, et participes sunt effecti, renovari rursus ad pœnitentiam, rursus crucifigentes in se Filium Dei; quibus non pœnitentiam, sed innovationem, id est iterationem baptismatis interdicit. Mors illi ultra non dominabitur. Si ultra non dominabitur, ergo jam dominata est, contra Manicbxos, quia negant Christum veram carnem babuissc. Quod enim mortuus est peccato. Sive quod pro peccato generis humani, sive quod morti ipsi, quae in eum ultra locum non potuerit habere, sit mortuus. Mortuus est semel. Id est sicut caput vestrum semel est mortuum, sic et vos membra illius effecti, vitae ejus exempla sectamini, ut nihil morti ulterius debeatis, hoc est, ut in vobis locum mors secunda non babeat. Nam qui credit baptismum posse iierare, credit Cbristum posse iterum crucifigi. Quod autem vivit, vivit Deo. Vivit in deitate, ipse homo Deus. Ita et vos existimate vos. Quasi filii vel membra ejns vos intelligite. Mortuos quidem esse peccato.
As he also says elsewhere: If we have died together, we shall also live together. Knowing that Christ, rising from the dead, dies no more. So we too, if we have died to vices, will not fear the second death. Or certainly it is thus: just as Christ can no longer be crucified again for you, if you have lived criminally, so you also cannot be baptized again, as he says elsewhere: It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened and have been made partakers to be renewed again to repentance, crucifying again in themselves the Son of God; to whom he forbids not repentance but renewal, that is, the repetition of baptism. Death shall no longer have dominion over him. If it shall no longer have dominion, therefore it has already had dominion, against the Manichaeans, because they deny that Christ had true flesh. For that he died, he died to sin. Whether because he died for the sin of the human race, or because he died to death itself, which could have no further place in him. He died once. That is, just as your head has died once, so you also, having been made his members, follow the examples of his life, so that you may owe nothing further to death, that is, so that the second death may have no place in you. For whoever believes that baptism can be repeated believes that Christ can be crucified again. But that he lives, he lives to God. He lives in the Godhead, himself man and God. So you also reckon yourselves. Understand yourselves as his sons or members. Dead indeed to sin.
Sicut imitator ejus dicebat: Vivo autem jam non ego, vivit vero in me Christus. Viventes autem. Hoc est, ejus vitam sequentes, in nobis nondum vivimus, sed jam in Christo vivimus omnes. Mortui enim sumus, et vita nostra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo. Deo in Christo Jesu. llle autem vivit Deo, qui Christi vestigia humilitate, şanctificatione, pietate sectatur. Non ergo regnet peccatum in vestro mortali corpore, ut obediatis concupiscentiis ejus. Ostendit quomodo regnet. Ille enim regnat, cui omnes obediunt. Quomodo in corpore peccatum regnet exposuit, id est, si vitiatae naturae praebeamus obedientiam et consentiamus. Non dixit: Non sit, quia jam ibi est; sed: Non regnet, id est, non fiat quod jubet. Surgit ira: noli dare iræ linguam ad maledicendum, non manum ad feriendum, non membra libidini: quæ non surgeret, nisi peccatum esset in membris nostris. Inest quidem peccatum in membris; sed non regnat, si non obediatur desideriis ejus. Et ideo dum quod non vult, agit, id est, non vult concupiscere, concupiscit, consentit I legi, quoniam bona est: hoc enim vult et ipse quod lex, quia vult ipse non concupiscere, et lex dixit: Non concupisces. Sed neque exhibeatis membra vestra arma iniquitatis peccato.
As his imitator was saying: But I now live, no longer I, but Christ lives in me. But those who are living. That is, following his life, we do not yet live in ourselves, but we all already live in Christ. For we have died, and our life is hidden with Christ in God. To God in Christ Jesus. But that one lives to God who follows the footsteps of Christ in humility, sanctification, and piety. Therefore let not sin reign in your mortal body, so that you obey its desires. He shows how it reigns. For that one reigns to whom all obey. He has explained how sin reigns in the body, that is, if we offer obedience and consent to a corrupted nature. He did not say: Let it not be, because it is already there; but: Let it not reign, that is, let what it commands not be done. Anger rises up: do not give anger a tongue for cursing, not a hand for striking, not members to lust: which would not rise up unless sin were in our members. Sin is indeed present in our members; but it does not reign, if its desires are not obeyed. And therefore, while it does what it does not will, that is, it does not will to desire, yet desires, it consents to the law, because it is good: for it itself wills what the law wills, because it itself wills not to desire, and the law said: You shall not desire. But neither should you exhibit your members as weapons of iniquity to sin.
Unumquodque membrum si officium saum in malos usus converterit, arma iniquitatis efficitur ad justitiam expugnandam: si manus ad furtum, lingua ad mendacium vel blasphemiam; si oculus concupiscentiae serviat ad pudicitiam expugnandam, et caetera. Sed exhibete vos Deo tanquam ex mortuis viventes. Tanquam jam resurrexeritis: post resurrectionem autem non carnaliter vivitur, nec peccatur. Et membra vestra arma justitiæ DeoUt oculus qui ante videbat ad peccandum, nunc videat ad boni operis ministerium; qui ante videbat ad exspoliandum, nunc videat ad vestiendum: sic etiam de reliquis membris adverte, ut de iniquitate ad misericordiam commutentur. Peccatum enim nobis non dominabitur. Non vos vincat peccatum: non enim estis parvuli, sed perfecti; quasi pædagogus puero dicat: Noli facere vitium sermonis, non enim adhuc audis grammaticum, sed oratorem. Sive non dominabitur, non habet dominari. Non enim sub lege estis, sed sub gratia. Id est, suh benevolentia Redemptoris, qui pugnandi atque vincendi et conatus dedit, et doctrinam praebuit; sed et exemplum insuper, et virtutem per consolationem Spiritus sancti donavit, per quam liberamur a dominatione peccati. Quid ergo? peccabimus quia non sumus sub lege? Qui sub lege est premitur a lege, dum non implet legem; non est sub lege, sed cum lege. Sed sub gratia? Absit.
Each member, if it turns its own function to evil uses, becomes a weapon of iniquity for fighting against righteousness: if the hand turns to theft, the tongue to lying or blasphemy; if the eye serves lust for fighting against chastity, and so on. But present yourselves to God as those living from the dead. As if you had already risen; but after the resurrection one does not live carnally, nor does one sin. And your members as weapons of righteousness to God—so that the eye which before looked to sin, now looks to the service of good works; which before looked to despoiling, now looks to clothing; so also observe concerning the remaining members, that they be changed from iniquity to mercy. For sin will not have dominion over us. Let sin not conquer you: for you are not little children, but perfect; as a tutor might say to a boy: Do not commit a fault of speech, for you are not yet listening to the grammarian, but to the orator. Or, it will not have dominion—it does not have the right to rule. For you are not under the law, but under grace. That is, under the benevolence of the Redeemer, who both gave the effort of fighting and conquering, and provided teaching; but also, in addition, gave an example, and granted power through the consolation of the Holy Spirit, through which we are freed from the dominion of sin. What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law? He who is under the law is pressed by the law, while he does not fulfill the law; he is not under the law, but with the law. But under grace? Far be it.
An nescitis quoniam cui exhibetis vos servos ad obediendum, servi estis ejus cui obedistis, sive peccati ad mortem, sive obeditionis ad justitiam? Ne indocti et in fide rudes objicerent: Ergo cessante vindicta legis, impune peccabimus. Absit. Gratia quae et donavit quomodo vincamus, non vult nos omnino peccare: si volueritis peccare, dominabitur vobis legis sententia, quae vindicat in peccantes. Si autem justitiae servieritis, non estis sub lege, sed sub gratia. Non enim, inquit, potestis duobus servire. Hic quod dixit, peccabimus, criminalia et capitalia peccata intelligamus, non minuta, sine quibus esse non possumus. Hoc et ubique intellige, ubi prohibemur peccare; quia et de ipsis peccatis loquebatur, quae et lex damnare consueverat, secundum illud: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, etc. Gratias autem Deo quod fuistis servi peccati. Gratias Deo, quia fuistis, sed ipso liberante et adjuvante jam non estis: quia obeditis, quia resistitis adjulore Deo. Obedistis autem. Ut dono et exemplo Christi vivatis, qui non solum peccata, sed occasiones auferre donavit et docuit delictorum. Imitatores, inquit, mei estote, sicut et ego Christi ex cordc, ex fide. In eam formam doctrinæ in qua traditi estis. Novi Teslamenli. Liberati autem a peccato. Liberi facti. Servi facti estis justitiæ. Per gratiam Dei. Humanum dico. Quia non potestis ad. huc audire divinum.
Do you not know that to whomever you present yourselves as servants to obey, you are servants of him whom you obey, whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness? Lest the unlearned and those untrained in the faith object: Therefore, when the punishment of the law ceases, we shall sin with impunity. Far be it. The grace that has also granted us the means by which we may conquer does not wish us to sin at all: if you wish to sin, the sentence of the law will rule over you, which takes vengeance on those who sin. But if you serve righteousness, you are not under the law, but under grace. For, he says, you cannot serve two masters. Here, in what he said, "we shall sin," let us understand criminal and capital sins, not the minor ones, without which we cannot be. Understand this also everywhere where we are forbidden to sin; because he was speaking also of those very sins which the law was accustomed to condemn, according to that saying: If we say that we have no sin, etc. But thanks be to God that you were servants of sin. Thanks be to God, because you were, but with him freeing and helping you, you now are not: because you obey, because you resist with God as your helper. But you have obeyed. So that by the gift and example of Christ you may live, who granted and taught us to take away not only sins but also the occasions of sins. Be, he says, imitators of me, as I also am of Christ, from the heart, from faith. Into that form of doctrine in which you were delivered. Of the New Testament. But freed from sin. Made free. You have been made servants of righteousness. Through the grace of God. I speak after the manner of men. Because you cannot yet hear what is divine.
Sive sic: humanitate dignum est quod dico, quod etiam apud homines rationem habet, et facile intelligi potest. Hoc est: Majora quidem exigere a vobis pro divinae servitutis retributione deberem; sed condescendens et temperans infirmitati vestrae, humana et possibilia prædico atque persuideo: ut sicut prompti fuistis ad sectanda DOlia atque contraria, ita alacres sitis ad ea quae utilia et saluti amica sunt peragenda. Propter infirmitalem carnis velor. Corpus quod corrumpitur aggravat animam, quia quidquid anima carnaliter fecerit, carni deputatur; et quando anima cœlestia agit, totus homo spiritalis est. Carnalis si vincitur a coneupiscentiis; spiritalis, cum dono Dei vincit concupiseentias. Sicut enim exhibuistis membra vestra servire, ita nunc voluntate mutata exhibeamus nos servire justitiæ, non sicut Manichaei, qui dicunt naturam corporis ita in se per conditionem insertum habere peccatum, ut illud superare non possit; sed per gratiam renovati non exhibeamus membra nostra ad malum: nam non est ex se corpus malum, sed voluntates quas mutare jubemur, quae per transgressoris reatum vitio naturae inesse noscuntur, non conditione. Immunditiæ et iniquitati. Luxuriæ sive idololatriæ. Ad iniquitatem. Ad iniquitatem faciendam. Ita nunc exhibete membra vestra servire justitiæ.
Or thus: what I say is worthy of human nature, since it has reason even among men and can be easily understood. That is: I ought indeed to demand greater things from you in return for divine service; but condescending and accommodating myself to your weakness, I preach and persuade what is human and possible: that just as you were prompt to follow base and contrary things, so you may be eager to accomplish what is useful and friendly to salvation. I speak on account of the weakness of the flesh. The body that is corrupted weighs down the soul, because whatever the soul does carnally is attributed to the flesh; and when the soul does heavenly things, the whole man is spiritual. He is carnal if he is conquered by desires; he is spiritual when, by the gift of God, he conquers desires. For just as you presented your members to serve, so now, with your will changed, let us present ourselves to serve righteousness—not as the Manichaeans say, who claim that the nature of the body has sin so implanted in itself by its condition that it cannot be overcome; but, renewed by grace, let us not present our members to evil: for the body is not evil of itself, but the wills which we are commanded to change, which are known to be present in the nature as a defect through the guilt of the transgressor, not by condition. To uncleanness and iniquity. To luxury or idolatry. To iniquity. To doing iniquity. So now present your members to serve righteousness.
Ut quomodo perfecti fuistis in malo, ex originali peccato, ita perfecti sitis in bono, gratiae dono; ut manus quæ antea rapiebat, modo porrigat misericordiam; et pedes qui antea ad malum currebant, modo ad visitandos infirmos, et in carcerem ad opus bonum currant; oculi qui antea videbant ad concupiscendum, ad invadendum, videant modo ad miserandum, ad largiendum. Ecce sic mutentur membra nostra. In sanctificationem. Ut recipiatis sanctificationem, sive possideatis. Cum enim servi essetis peccati, liberi fuistis justitiæ. Hoc est, in nullo servistis justitiæ. Ita et nunc liberi estote a peccato, ut in nullo ei serviatis. Ecce ostenduntur etiam peccato minime potuisse, nisi alia libertate servire. Liberi ergo a justitia non sunt, nisi arbitrio voluntatis. Liberati autem a peccato non fiunt, nisi gratia Salvatoris. Liberos dixit justitiæ, non liberatos; a peccato autem non liberos, ne sibi hoc tribuerent, sed liberatos: id est, si vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis. Quem ergo fructum habuistis tunc, in quibus nunc erubescitis? Qualem fructum in actione illius habuistis, in cujus etiam recordatione verecundia est? Quicunque se cognoverit bonum, erubescit se fuisse malum. Et quicunque se erubescit bonum, malus est, quia nec in præsenti fructum habet, et finem mortem. Nam finis illorum, malorum scilicet, mors est. Poena perpetua. Nunc vero liberati a peccato.
So that just as you were perfect in evil, from original sin, so you may be perfect in good, by the gift of grace; so that the hand that previously seized may now extend mercy; and the feet that previously ran to evil may now run to visit the sick and to the prison for a good work; the eyes that previously looked to lust, to plunder, may now look to pity, to give generously. Behold, thus let our members be changed. Unto sanctification. That you may receive sanctification, or possess it. For when you were servants of sin, you were free to righteousness. That is, you served righteousness in nothing. So also now be free from sin, that you may serve it in nothing. Behold, it is shown that they could not even [serve] sin except by serving under another liberty. Therefore they are not free from righteousness, except by the judgment of the will. But they are not made free from sin except by the grace of the Savior. He called them free to righteousness, not freed; but from sin, not free, lest they attribute this to themselves, but freed: that is, if the Son has freed you, then you will truly be free. What fruit therefore did you have then, in those things of which you are now ashamed? What sort of fruit did you have in the action of that thing, at the recollection of which there is also shame? Whoever has known himself to be good is ashamed that he was evil. And whoever is ashamed that he is good, is evil, because he has no fruit even in the present, and his end is death. For the end of those, namely of the evil, is death. Everlasting punishment. But now, freed from sin.
Attende quia liberati dixit, ut non nobis, sed Deo demus gloriam. Servi autem facti Deo, habetis fructum vestrum in sancti ficationem, finem vero vitam æternam. In Dei servitio permanere, hoc ipsum jam fructus est quod vivitis, saoctificati per baptismum. Servus autem Dei vicem inimicis non reddit sicut Joseph, qui dixit fratribus: Nolite timere, servus enim Dei ego sum. Dei autem servi in praesenti fructum ha* bent donum Spiritus sancti, et finem vitam aeternam, sive sanctificationem bonae vitae. Ergo in ista vita adhuc ex qua parte servi sumus Deo, liberl sumus peccato; ex qua parte adhuc servimus legi, peccati adhuc servi sumus. Et ideo dixit: Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem. Ecce unde liberi, unde condelectamur legi Dei? Libertas enim delectat: nam quandiu timore facis quod justum est, non Deus te delectat. Stipendia enim peccati mors. Remuneralio dicitur stipendium. Merito ergo stipendium, quia malitiæ diabolicae mors æterna, tanquam debitum redditur. Qui militat peccato, mercedem accipit mortem. Gratia aulem Dei vita æterna, in Christo Jeiu Domino nostro. Gratia sub qua estis. Simulque notandum quia non dixit stipendia justitiæ, quia non illam habemus ex nobis. Ergo quamvis nostra non sit, sed gratiae, tamen custodita Dei adjutorio vitam dat æternam, transacta vita tempora!!.
Attend, because he said "you have been set free," so that we may give glory not to ourselves but to God. "But having become servants of God, you have your fruit unto sanctification, but the end everlasting life." To remain in God's service—this very fact that you live is already fruit, having been sanctified through baptism. But the servant of God does not repay his enemies in kind, like Joseph, who said to his brothers: "Do not fear, for I am a servant of God." But the servants of God in the present have as fruit the gift of the Holy Spirit, and as their end everlasting life, or the sanctification of a good life. Therefore in this life, insofar as we are still servants of God, we are free from sin; insofar as we still serve the law, we are still servants of sin. And therefore he said: "For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man." Behold from what source we are free, from what source we delight in the law of God. For freedom gives delight; for as long as you do what is just out of fear, God does not give you delight. "For the wages of sin is death." A stipend is called a recompense. Rightly, therefore, it is a stipend, because eternal death is rendered to the malice of the devil as though it were a debt. He who serves as a soldier for sin receives death as his pay. "But the grace of God is everlasting life, in Christ Jesus our Lord"—the grace under which you are. And at the same time it must be noted that he did not say "the stipends of righteousness," because we do not have that from ourselves. Therefore, although it is not ours but belongs to grace, nevertheless, guarded by God's help, it gives everlasting life, once the time of this life has passed.
CAP. VII. — An ignoratis, fratres, scientibus enim legem loquor. Hinc incipit difficultatem legis ostendere, ut illos hortetur sine timore sub gratia vivere: quia modo actu cessante, lex nobis non vivit, sed sibi; et vivit in Novo Testamento, per quod reformatur. Quia lex in homine dominatur quanto tempore vivit. Nam quæ suo viro est mulier, vivente viro alligata est legi. Si autem mortuus fuerit vir, soluta est a lege viri. Comparationem inducit: mandatum legis dicit virum: plebem autem, vel animam, mulierem, ut ostendat legem, quae iram operatur, sine effectu, quasi mortuam, nobis jam mortificatis, impedire non posse quominus ejus esse possimus, qui a mortuis resurrexit: quæ merito nobis viveret, si inveniret quod puniret in nobis. Tandiu enim dicit esse sub lege hominem, quandiu vivit in peccato. Hoc autem peccatum intelligendum est, quod accessit ex lege. Ubi enim non est gratia liberatoris, auget peccandi desiderium prohibitio peccatorum. Igitur vivente viro vocabitur adultera si fuerit cum alio viro: si autem mortuus fuerit vir ejus, liberata est a lege, ut non sit adultera, si fuerit cum alio viro. Quandiu vivit vir, tandiu ei secundum ejus necesse est vivere voluntatem. Si autem dormierit vir, et mulier alii fuerit juncta viro, jam non ei secundum prioris viri consuetudinem est vivendum. Itaque fratres mei et vos mortificati estis legi.
CHAPTER VII. — Do you not know, brothers—for I speak to those who know the law. Here he begins to show the difficulty of the law, so as to exhort them to live under grace without fear: because now, with the action ceasing, the law does not live for us, but for itself; and it lives in the New Testament, through which it is reformed. Because the law rules over a man for as long as it lives. For the woman who is with her husband, while her husband lives, is bound to the law. But if her husband has died, she is freed from the law of her husband. He introduces a comparison: he calls the commandment of the law the husband; but the people, or the soul, the woman, so as to show that the law, which works wrath, being without effect, as if dead, cannot hinder us, now that we have been put to death, from being able to belong to him who rose from the dead: which law would rightly live for us, if it found something in us to punish. For he says that a man is under the law for as long as he lives in sin. But this sin is to be understood as that which came in through the law. For where the grace of the liberator is not present, the prohibition of sins increases the desire to sin. Therefore, while the husband lives, she will be called an adulteress if she is with another man; but if her husband has died, she is freed from the law, so that she is not an adulteress if she is with another man. For as long as the husband lives, for that long it is necessary for her to live according to his will. But if the husband has fallen asleep, and the woman has been joined to another husband, she must no longer live according to the custom of her former husband. Therefore, my brothers, you also have been put to death to the law.
Juxtacorpus noluit dicere, mortificata est vobis lex; sed reliquit intellectui, sicut in multis locis. Juxta comparationem debuit dicere, magis illis legem mortuam quam ipsos legi, sed quod inter Judaeos dicere adhuc intractabile videbatur, intellectui derelinquit: satis evidenter ostendens, legem non potuisse auferre, sed potius auxisse peccatum, quod aufert gratia: quoniam lex jubere novit, cui succumbit infirmitas, non juvare, quod facit gratia Christi. Ab hoc loco, et tota ista lectione, usque: Quis liberabit me de corpore mortis hujus, videt Apostolus transfiguratum esse in se hominem sub lege positum, cujus verbis ex persona sua loquitur, et qui dixerat: Evacuali sumus a lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litteræ. Per haec verba videtur legem reprehendisse, sed non ita est, quia subjecit: Lex peccatum est! Absit. et reliqua. Haec vero auricula est non mendax. Crucifixa carne, per quam nobis dominabatur damnando peccatum, jam actum non habet. Ante erant imitatores Moysi: nunc vero Christi; sic dictum est: Mortui estis legi, ac si diceretur, Mortui estis supplicio legis. Cur mortui sumus legi per corpus Christi, si bona est lex? Quia mortui sumus legi dominanti: liberati ab eo effectu quem lex punit et damnat. Usitatius enim vocatur lex, quando minatur et terret, ac vindicat.
Accordingly, he did not wish to say, "The law is put to death for you," but left it to the understanding, as in many places. By way of comparison, he ought to have said that the law was dead to them rather than they to the law, but because saying this among the Jews still seemed unmanageable, he left it to the understanding, showing clearly enough that the law could not take away sin but rather had increased it, which grace takes away; since the law knows how to command, to which weakness yields, not how to help, which the grace of Christ does. From this place, and through this whole reading, up to "Who will deliver me from the body of this death," the Apostle sees that the man placed under the law has been transfigured in himself, in whose words he speaks in his own person, and who had said: "We have been discharged from the law of death, in which we were held, so that we may serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter." Through these words he seems to have reproached the law, but it is not so, because he added: "Is the law sin? Far be it," and the rest. But this is no deceitful ear. The flesh having been crucified, through which sin used to rule over us by condemning us, it no longer has any hold. Before, they were imitators of Moses; now truly of Christ; thus it was said: "You have died to the law," as if it were said, "You have died to the punishment of the law." Why have we died to the law through the body of Christ, if the law is good? Because we have died to the law that dominates: freed from that effect which the law punishes and condemns. For more commonly it is called the law when it threatens and terrifies, and takes vengeance.
Itaque idem præceptum timentibus lex est, amantibus gratia est. Per corpus Christi, commoriendo Christo, qui damnavit peccatum in carne. Ut sitis alterius qui ex mortuis resurrexit. Subaudiendum alterius viri. Ut fructificetis Deo. Fructificat cujus exemplo populus Dei crescit, sicut dicit: Ut aliquem fructum habeamus in vobis. Cum enim essemus in carne. Cum essemus in carnali conversatione, passio concupiscentiæ operabatur in oculis et caeteris membris, quae tamen per legem ostendebantur esse peccata, ut fructificarent morti peccati. In carne, inquit: id est carnalibus desideriis obstricti teneremur. Passiones peccatorum, quæ per legem erant, operabamur in membris nostris. Is passionibus moritur, qui jam mente servit legi Dei, quamvis passiones ipsæ necdum mortuæ sint. Auctam dicit concupiscentiam, cum lex prohibet. Augmentum concupiscentiæ de inhibitione, et reatum poenae de praevaricatione. Hoc est, quia per bonum operatum est mortem. Ut fructificarent morti. Id est, ut nos in iisdem passionibus positos legis severitas interficeret, et fructum morti de nostra perditione præberet, quia fructus peccati mors est. Fructificamus morti, dum prohibita facimus. Nunc autem soluti sumus a lege morientes. Lex mortis, quae occidit peccatores, id cst criminosos; sed et lex peccati ideo dicitur, non quia ipsa peccatum est, sed quia peccatoribus imponitur.
Therefore the same commandment is law to those who fear, and grace to those who love. Through the body of Christ, by dying together with Christ, who condemned sin in the flesh. That you may be another's who rose from the dead. Another man is to be understood. That you may bear fruit to God. He bears fruit by whose example the people of God grow, as he says: That we may have some fruit among you. For when we were in the flesh. When we were in carnal conduct, the passion of concupiscence worked in the eyes and the other members, which nonetheless were shown by the law to be sins, so that they might bear fruit to the death of sin. In the flesh, he says: that is, we were held bound by carnal desires. The passions of sins, which were through the law, we worked in our members. He dies to these passions who already serves the law of God in his mind, although those passions are not yet dead. He says that concupiscence is increased when the law forbids. The increase of concupiscence comes from the prohibition, and the guilt of punishment from transgression. That is, because through the good it worked death. That they might bear fruit to death. That is, that the severity of the law might kill us as we are placed in these same passions, and offer fruit to death from our perdition, because the fruit of sin is death. We bear fruit to death when we do what is forbidden. But now we have been released from the law, dying. The law of death, which kills sinners, that is, the guilty; but it is also called the law of sin, not because it is itself sin, but because it is imposed on sinners.
Ideo etiam mortis dicitur, quia stipendium peccati mors, aculeus autem mortis peccatum: virtus vero peccati lex. In qua detinebamur. Detinebamur per peccatum. lta ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate lilteræ. Spiritalis gratiae praeceptis obedientes, non litteram legis sequentes. Quid ergo dicemus, lex peccatum est? Quia dixerat, quod passiones per legem morti fructificarent, ideo sibi objicit, lex peccatum est? et respondet: Abati. Hoc facit contra Manichæos, qui Vetus Testamentum negant. Quod si dixerint: Ideo hic propter Judaeos asserit legem, quia timuit scandalum, respondendum est: Ergo semper timuit scandalum, quia nunquam contra legem locutus est. Cum ergo multis locis opera legis destruxerit, nunc merito in hoc eam laudat, in quo spiritalis est, et Manichæos ejus insinuatione confundit. Absit. Ne quis enim propter haec testimonia vituperet legem, et malam esse contendat, praevidit Apostolus male intelligentibus quid possit occurrere, eamdem sibi ipse proposuit quaestionem. Quid ergo dicimus, inquit: lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem. Hoc jam superius dixerat, per legem cognitio peccati. Non ergo ablatio, sed cognitio est. Quae ideo data est, non ut peccatum tolleret neque ut exstirparetur, sed tantum ut demonstraretur, ut quia peccatum sine gratia Dei vinci non potest, ipsa reatus sollicitudo cogat ad gratiam couvolare.
For this reason it is also called death, because the wages of sin is death, and the sting of death is sin; but the strength of sin is the law. In which we were held. We were held by sin. So that we may serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. Obedient to the precepts of spiritual grace, not following the letter of the law. What then shall we say, is the law sin? Because he had said that the passions through the law bore fruit for death, therefore he objects to himself, is the law sin? and he answers: By no means. He does this against the Manichaeans, who deny the Old Testament. But if they should say: For this reason he asserts the law here on account of the Jews, because he feared scandal, it must be answered: Therefore he always feared scandal, because he never spoke against the law. Since therefore in many places he has destroyed the works of the law, now with good reason he praises it in that in which it is spiritual, and by its implication confounds the Manichaeans. By no means. For lest anyone on account of these testimonies should disparage the law and contend that it is evil, the Apostle foresaw what could occur to those who understand badly, and he himself proposed to himself the same question. What then do we say, he says: is the law sin? By no means. But I did not know sin except through the law. He had already said this above, that through the law comes the knowledge of sin. Therefore it is not the removal, but the knowledge. Which was given for this reason, not that it might take away sin nor that it might be eradicated, but only that it might be shown, so that, since sin cannot be conquered without the grace of God, the very anxiety of guilt might compel us to fly to grace.
Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Hinc incipit Apostolus quasi de se dicere, et de se dare exemplum, qui sub lege vixerat, quae per se non salvat, sed ostendat peccatum; nam nec tollit, nec juslificat, sed in transgressoribus vindicat. Non ait, peccatum non feci, nisi per legem; sed, peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem, quae ostendit peccatum esse concupiscentiam: quod ego nesciebam esse peccatum. Concupiscentiam, inquit, nesciebam. Non dixit: Non habe-, bam, aut non faciebam, sed nesciebam esse peccatum. Unde apparet concupiscentiam per legem non insitam, sed demonstratam, quae docet quid quisque facere debeat, vel vitare. Sed verus homo adhuc trahitur consuetudine delinquendi: concupiscentia enim nostrae naturae est, accedens per peccatum, non Dei conditio. Et ideo malum ipsum non Dei disjunctione separandum, sed Dei miseratione sanandum est. Occasione autem accepta. Hinc Apostolus praeteritam vitam suam, quando sub lege vivebat, et adolescentiæ suae pugnam commemorat. Et quod ait: Ego autem vivebam sine lege, primam suam aetatem insinuat: Adveniente, inquit, mandato, peccatum revixit. Ego autem mortuus sum: jam se praecepti capacem, sed non efficacem fuisse testatur.
But I did not know sin except through the law. For I did not know covetousness, unless the law had said: You shall not covet. Here the Apostle begins, as it were, to speak of himself and to give an example from himself, who had lived under the law, which does not save by itself but shows sin; for it neither takes it away nor justifies, but takes vengeance on transgressors. He did not say, I did not commit sin except through the law, but, I did not know sin except through the law, which shows that covetousness is sin: which I did not know to be sin. Covetousness, he says, I did not know. He did not say, I did not have it, or I did not do it, but I did not know it to be sin. From this it appears that covetousness was not implanted by the law but demonstrated by it, which teaches what each person ought to do or avoid. But the true man is still drawn by the habit of sinning; for covetousness belongs to our nature, coming through sin, not to God's creation. And therefore that evil itself is not to be separated out by God's rejection but healed by God's mercy. But taking occasion. Here the Apostle recalls his past life, when he lived under the law, and the struggle of his youth. And what he says: But I was alive without the law, he indicates his first age: When the commandment came, he says, sin revived. But I died: he now testifies that he had become capable of the precept but not effective.
Et ideo ut praevaricatorem se legis ostenderet, in quibus interioribus talem se fuisse sciebat Apostolus ante gratiam Dei, quae per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum est. Et ad Ephesios hoc apertissime confitetur: In quibus, inquit, ut nos omnes conversati sumus, in desideriis carnis et cogitationum: et eramus natura filii iMae, sicut et caeteri, et reliqua. Et ad Titum: Fuimus et nos, inquit, aliquando stulti et increduli, errantes, et reliqua quæ ibi sequuntur. Talis ante gratiam fuit. Peccatum per mandatum operatum est. Sicut qui iovidet, tunc magis occasionem nocendi accipit, quando ei cui nocere vult, aliquid creditur. In me omnem concupiscentiam. Omnem quae scripta est in lege: Non concupisces uxorem, neque agrum, neque quidquam proximi tui, et reliqua. Habet hoc per transgressionem humanae mentis infirmitas, ut difficilius observari possint prohibita. Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum erat: id est, latebat, non apparebat, ignorabatur, mihi mortuum videbatur: vel in oblivionem erat naturalis lex, quæ ostendebat quid esset peccatum. Ideo et lex data est litterae, quae commemoraret legem naturae. Ego autem vivebam aliquando. Quasi justus et liber a peccato vivere mihi videbar. Sine lege. Unde manifestat, non ex persona sua proprie, sed generaliter ex persona hominis loqui.
And therefore, to show himself a transgressor of the law, in those inner matters the Apostle knew himself to have been such before the grace of God, which is through Jesus Christ our Lord. And to the Ephesians he confesses this most openly: Among whom, he says, we all once lived, in the desires of the flesh and of the thoughts, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest, and the rest. And to Titus: We also, he says, were once foolish and unbelieving, going astray, and the rest that follows there. Such was he before grace. Sin, worked through the commandment. Just as one who envies then more greatly receives an occasion of doing harm, when something is believed by the one whom he wishes to harm. In me all covetousness. All that is written in the law: You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his field, nor anything of your neighbor's, and the rest. The weakness of the human mind has this through transgression, that forbidden things can be observed with greater difficulty. For without the law sin was dead: that is, it lay hidden, it did not appear, it was unknown, it seemed dead to me: or the natural law was in oblivion, which showed what sin was. Therefore the law of the letter was also given, which would call to mind the law of nature. But I once lived. I seemed to myself to live as righteous and free from sin. Without the law. Hence he makes clear that he speaks not properly in his own person, but generally in the person of man.
Sed cum venisset mandatum: id est, in oblivionem venerat esse peccatum; at ubi venit mandatum, recognitum est peccatam, ut omnis qui illud fecerit, mortuum se esse cognoscat. Revixit. Id est, enituit et apparuit. Revixit, ait: non vixit; vixerat enim aliquando in Paradiso, quando contra datum praeceptum satis apparebat admissum. Peccatum rexit, ego autem mortuus sum. Hoc est, apparuit quod fuerat occultum, quia vixerat per scientiam naturalem, et mortuum fuerat per oblivionem: quia prævaricatus suin jam sciens, et Dortuum me esse peccatt manifestatione perspexi: quia jam praevaricatione peccat, qui videt per legem quid facere non debeat, et tamen facit sive titillatione, sive delectatione, etsi non consensione: vel quia reatus praevaricationis certum mortis supplicium comminatur. Et inventum est mihi mandatum. Quod custoditum proficiebat ad vitam, hoc neglectum perdunt ad mortem: quia sciens illud non custodivi. Hoc totum ideo, ut ostendat legem quidem datam ad vitam, sed quia non dedit adjutorium, quomodo possimus salvari, ut nos deducat ad gratiam, quæ totum habet, et misericordiam, et adjutorium, et exemplum. Quod erat ad vitam, hoc esse ad mortem. Si vis ad vitam venire, serva mandata. Custoditum mandatum vitam tribuit: non custoditum, mortem, quae transgressio est. Nam peccatum occasione accepta.
But when the commandment had come: that is, sin had come into forgetfulness; but when the commandment came, it was recognized that there was sin, so that everyone who has done it may know himself to be dead. It revived. That is, it shone forth and appeared. It revived, he says; it did not live; for it had once lived in Paradise, when against the given commandment the offense was quite apparent. Sin reigned, but I died. That is, what had been hidden appeared, because it had lived through natural knowledge, and had been dead through forgetfulness: because I had already transgressed knowingly, and I perceived that I was dead by the manifestation of sin: because he now sins by transgression, who sees through the law what he ought not to do, and yet does it, whether by titillation or by delight, even if not by consent: or because the guilt of transgression threatens the certain punishment of death. And the commandment was found to me. What, when kept, was profitable unto life, this, when neglected, they lose unto death: because knowing it, I did not keep it. All this for this reason, that he may show that the law was indeed given unto life, but because it did not give help, how we might be saved, so that it may lead us to grace, which has everything: both mercy and help and example. What was unto life, this is unto death. If you wish to come unto life, keep the commandments. A commandment kept bestows life; one not kept, death, which is transgression. For sin, having taken occasion.
Si quid contra legem videtur dicere, eis imputat, qui perfectiora accipere non valuerunt. Ideo occasionem dixit fuisse peccati. Per mandatum. Quia suasio delinquendi ad peccatum vehementior est, cum adest prohibitio: et non solum peccatorem, sed et transgressorem facit. Quia ergo ab hominibos nondum spiritalem gratiam accipientibus suavius admittitur quod vetatur, fallit peccatum 'falsa dulcedine: quia vero accidit reatus prævaricationis, et occidit: quia pretium mortiferæ voluptatis amplectitur dulcedinem illam qua fallitur, et delectatur etiam contra legem facere: et tanto magis libet, quanto minus licet. Seduxit me, et per illud occidit. Neque enim nullum peccatum, nisi concupiscendo cotnmittitur. Proinde quae hoc prohibet, bona et laudabilis lex est. Sed ubi sanctus adjuvat Spiritus, inspirans pro concupiscentia mala concupiscentiam bonam, hoc est charitatem diffundens in cordibus nostris, profecto illa lex quamvis bona auget prohibendo desiderium malum. Sicut aquæ impetus si in eam partem non cesset Onere, vehementior fit obice opposito, cujus molem cum evicerit majori cumulo præcipitatus violentius per prona provolvitur. Nescio quo enim modo Loc ipsum quod concupiscitur, fit jucundius dum vetatur. Et hoc cst quod fallit peccatum per mandatum, et per illud occidit: Cum accidit etiam prævaricatio, quae nuila est. Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum et justum.
If it seems to say anything against the law, it imputes it to those who were unable to receive the more perfect things. Therefore he said that it was an occasion of sin through the commandment, because the persuasion to transgress is more vehement when prohibition is present, and it makes a person not only a sinner but also a transgressor. Since, therefore, by men who have not yet received spiritual grace that which is forbidden is more sweetly admitted, sin deceives by a false sweetness; but because the guilt of transgression befalls, it also kills, since the price of deadly pleasure embraces that sweetness by which it is deceived, and it delights even to act against the law, and the less it is permitted, the more it pleases. It seduced me, and through it killed me. For no sin is committed except by concupiscence. Accordingly, the law that forbids this is good and praiseworthy. But where the Holy Spirit helps, inspiring a good concupiscence in place of evil concupiscence—that is, pouring love into our hearts—then surely that law, though good, increases the evil desire by forbidding it. Just as the force of water, if it does not cease flowing in that direction, becomes more vehement when an obstacle is placed against it, and when it has overcome the mass of that obstacle, it is carried down more violently with a greater surge. For I know not in what way the very thing that is desired becomes more pleasant while it is forbidden. And this is what sin does: it deceives through the commandment, and through it kills, when transgression also befalls, which is nothing. Therefore the law is indeed holy, and the commandment holy and just.
Contra iuipugnatores legis, et contra eos qui justitiam a bonitate secernunt, lex et sancta et bona dicitur, et gratia justa. Nisi enim abundaverit justitia vestra, et reliqua. Sed et Deus in Veteri Testamento nonnunquam bonus, et in NoVo dicitur justus: ut cst illud, Pater juste. Et hoc contra Marcionistas: tamen nihil ex ea recte fit sine gratia, quia non est data quae possit vivificare, sed prævaricationis causa posita eSt; ut convictos concluderet sub peccato, non justificandis impiis, sed convincendis superbis prævaricationis causa posita. Et contra Manichaeos est, quia laudatur; et contra Pelagianos, quia nemo ex lege justificatur; et ideo vivificandis eis quos littera occidit, spiritus gratiæ gratis opiLulatur. Nam nihil ex ea recte fit, sicut dictum est, sine gratia: quia non est data quæ possit vivificare. Et bonum. Custodien-; tibns. Quod ergo bonum eat, mihi factum est mors? Absit. Non mihi mandatum per se causa mortis exstitit; sed ego mihi facio qui peccando morte digna committo. In male utente quippe vilium est, non in mandato ipso, quod bonum est, quoniam bona est lex. Sed peccatum, ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum eat mortem. Per legem apparet peccatum, et per ipsam punitur. Ergo per bonum, id est, per legem, quae bona est, si quis ea legitime utatur, mihi operatur mortem, cum ejus transgressor efficior.
Against the opponents of the law, and against those who separate righteousness from goodness, the law is called both holy and good, and grace righteous. For unless your righteousness abounds, and the rest. But God is also sometimes called good in the Old Testament, and righteous in the New, as in that passage, Righteous Father. And this is against the Marcionites. Yet nothing is done rightly from it without grace, because it was not given as something that could give life, but was set as the cause of transgression, so that it might shut up those who were convicted under sin—set as the cause of transgression not for justifying the ungodly, but for convicting the proud. And it is against the Manichaeans, because it is praised; and against the Pelagians, because no one is justified from the law; and therefore, for those whom the letter kills, to give them life, the Spirit of grace helps freely. For nothing is done rightly from it, as has been said, without grace, because it was not given as something that could give life. And good. To those who keep it. What then, was that which is good made death to me? Far be it. The commandment did not of itself become the cause of death to me; but I make it so for myself, who by sinning commit things worthy of death. For in the one who uses it badly, the fault lies in the vices, not in the commandment itself, which is good, since the law is good. But sin, so that it might appear as sin, worked death in me through what is good. Through the law sin appears, and through it sin is punished. Therefore through what is good, that is, through the law, which is good—if anyone uses it lawfully—it works death in me, when I become a transgressor of it.
Ut fiat supra modum peccans peccatum per mandatum. Iniquitatis exigit magnitudo ut homo jam non peccator, sed peccatum vocetur. Ante legem modum habebat peccati appetitus per ignorantiam: supra modum est quod scienter admittitur. Scimus enim. Id est, quod lex ardua, sed spiritalia praecipit, sed ege cum juxta carnalem consuetudinem titillor, ab ejus perfectione dissentio, perfecta perimit imperfectum. Quod lex spiritalis est. Expositum est hoc. Mandat quæ spiritus sunt opera: unde ostendit non posse impleri legem, nisi ab spiritali. Ego autem carnalis sum. Qui legem accipio, consuevi carnaliter vivere: id est, carni consentiens, nondum spirituali gratia liberatus. Bonum est enim non concupiscere: et hoc bonum vult justus, qui ex flde vivit, et tamen facit quod odit, quia concupiscit, quamvis post concupiscentias suas non eat. Quod si fecerit, tunc vere ipse facit, ut cedat, ut consentiat, ut desiderio peccati obediat. Venundatus sub pescato. Id est pretium temporalis voluptatis. Inter vendentem autem et ementem hoc loco istud probatur esse commercium. Proponit inimicus iniquitatis consilium, et accipit voluntatis assensum. Accipio ergo amissae innocentiæ pretium, ipsam peccandi voluptatem ac mortiferam de iniqua suavitate dulcedinem.
So that sin might become exceedingly sinful through the commandment. The magnitude of iniquity demands that man be called no longer a sinner, but sin itself. Before the law, the appetite for sin had a limit through ignorance; what is admitted knowingly is beyond measure. For we know. That is, that the law is arduous, but it commands spiritual things, yet when I am weighed down according to carnal custom, I dissent from its perfection; the perfect destroys the imperfect. That the law is spiritual. This has been explained. It commands the works that are of the spirit; hence it shows that the law cannot be fulfilled except by a spiritual man. But I am carnal. I who receive the law have been accustomed to live carnally: that is, consenting to the flesh, not yet freed by spiritual grace. For it is good not to covet; and this good the righteous man wills, who lives by faith, and yet he does what he hates, because he covets, although he does not go after his covetous desires. But if he does so, then truly he himself does it, so as to yield, to consent, to obey the desire of sin. Sold under sin. That is, the price of temporal pleasure. But between the seller and the buyer in this place this commerce is shown to be: the enemy proposes the counsel of iniquity, and receives the assent of the will. I receive, therefore, as the price of lost innocence, the very pleasure of sinning and the death-bearing sweetness from iniquitous delight.
Venundati, inquit, estis peccatis vestris, ne quisquam eum nondum redemptum Christi sanguine existimet; sed redemptionem, iJ est immortalitatem exspectat. Vel venundatum sub pcccato in prima transgressione præcepti, ut haberet corpus corruptibile, quod aggravat animam. Nunc vero, tanquam emptum mancipium, cogitur servire libidini. Quod enim operor non intelligo. Nunquid non intelligo malum esse quod invitus admitto? quomodo non intelligit qui hoc agit quod non vult, etquododit, illud facit? Non parvum intelligentiae indicium est, odisse delictum: ergo quod operor non intelligo, id est, non consentio, non approbo, non facio, et quamlibet victus contrarium esse decerno: et rectum non esse evidenter intelligo, non agnosco esse in praeceptis veritatis. Non enim quod volo bonum, hoc ago. Huc usque sunt verha hominis, ut aliqui putant, sub lege constituti, nondum sub gratia: ut aliquis etiamsi nolit peccare, vincitur a peccato, invaluit enim consnetudo carnalis, et naturale vinculum mortalitatis. Ne forte ex his verbis quispiam consentire carnii concupiscentiæ ad opera mala S. Apostolum suspicetur, sed consideret quod adjunxit: Si autem quod nolo, hoc facio, consentio legi, quoniam bona est: magis enim se dicit legi consentire, quam carnis concupiscentiae: banc enim peccati nomine appellat. Facere ergo se dixit, non affectu consentiendi et implendi, sed ipso motu concupiscendi.
You were sold, he says, under your sins, lest anyone think that he has not yet been redeemed by the blood of Christ; but he awaits redemption, that is, immortality. Or he was sold under sin in the first transgression of the commandment, so that he might have a corruptible body, which weighs down the soul. But now, like a purchased slave, he is compelled to serve lust. For what I do, I do not understand. Surely I do not fail to understand that what I commit unwillingly is evil? How does he not understand, who does what he does not will, and does the very thing he hates? It is no small indication of understanding to hate the offense. Therefore, what I do, I do not understand—that is, I do not consent, I do not approve, I do not do it, and however much I am overcome, I judge the opposite to be true; and I clearly understand that it is not right, and I do not acknowledge it to be among the precepts of truth. For the good that I will, that I do not do. Up to this point, as some think, these are the words of a man established under the law, not yet under grace: so that even if someone does not wish to sin, he is overcome by sin, for carnal custom has prevailed, and the natural bond of mortality. Lest perhaps from these words someone suspect that the blessed Apostle consents to carnal concupiscence for evil works, let him consider what he added: But if I do what I do not will, I consent to the law, that it is good. For he says that he consents to the law rather than to the concupiscence of the flesh; for this he calls by the name of sin. Therefore he said that he does it, not by the affection of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of concupiscence.
Sed quod odio malum, illud facio. Bonum est enim non concupiseere: et hoc bonum vult justus, qui ex fide vivit, et tamen facit quod odit, quia coucupiscit, quamvis post concupiscenlias non eat: quod si fecerit, tunc vere ipse facit ut cedat, ut consentiat, ut desiderio peccati obediat. Si autem quod odio, illud facio. Id est, dum nolo facere quod committo, utique cum lege concordo, quae mala et non vult, et prohibet; ideoque ei mente consentio, opere contradico, atque ita aliud in me conscientia aliud infirmitas agit, quæ jugo peccati, judicio contradicente, succumbit; facere ergo se dixit, et operari, non affectu consentiendi et implendi, sed ipso motu concupiscendi. Consentio legi, quoniam bona est. Quia nolo quod non vult, conscientiae lege ei consentio: quia quod nolo facio. Nunc autem. Nunc jam sub gratia, quae me liberavit a consensione. Jam non ego operor illud. Id est, non consentio. Nam si et concupiscit et consentit, et agit, quomodo non ipse illud operatur? etiamsi se ipse operari doleat, et vinci graviter ingemiscat. Non ego operor: hoc est, non interior mens: nec consentio exhibere membra mea arma iniquitatis. Antequam lex prohiberet, libens ipse faciebam; sed postquam lex venit, invitus pecco, quia consuetudine vincor. Sed quod habitat in me peccatum. Habitat quasi hospes, et dominatur, et quasi aliud in alio non quasi unum habiiat in me adhuc carnalis affectus.
But that which I hate, that I do. For it is good not to covet; and this good the righteous man wills, who lives by faith, and yet he does what he hates, because he covets, although he does not go after his covetous desires; for if he should do so, then he truly himself does it, so as to yield, to consent, to obey the desire of sin. But if what I hate, that I do. That is, while I do not wish to do what I commit, I certainly agree with the law, which both hates evils and forbids them; and therefore I consent to it in mind, I contradict it in deed, and thus in me conscience does one thing and weakness another, which yields to the yoke of sin while judgment contradicts it; therefore he said that he does and works it, not by the affection of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of coveting. I consent to the law, since it is good. Because I do not will what it does not will, I consent to it by the law of conscience; because what I do not will, I do. But now. Now already under grace, which has freed me from consenting. Now it is no longer I who work that. That is, I do not consent. For if he both covets and consents and acts, how is it not he himself who works it? even if he himself grieves that he works it, and groans heavily that he is conquered. It is not I who work: that is, not the inner mind; nor do I consent to present my members as weapons of iniquity. Before the law forbade, I myself did it willingly; but after the law came, I sin unwillingly, because I am conquered by habit. But the sin that dwells in me. It dwells as a guest, and rules, and as one thing in another—not as one—the carnal affection still dwells in me.
Scio enim quia jam non habitat in me. Ex eo quod scit, consentit legi: ex eo quod facit, cedit peccato: ut in me ita prævaleat, quasi innatum videatur: quod quidem non a Deo conditum, sed ex vitiata natura procedit. Hic incipit dicere, quod ipse titillationem carnis habuit. Notandum etiam quod titillationem ipsam Apostolus se sensisse testetur. Hoc est in carne mea bonum. Non dixit: Caro mea non est bona: sed bonum in carne mea non habitat, quam peccati deprimit consuetudo, quod vincere nequeo: quia dum de opere legis conlido, gratiæ adjutorium non requiro. Hoc autem quod inhabitat, ex traduce mortalitatis per transgressorem in omnes homines venit. Nam velle adjacet mihi. Est quidem in me voluntas aDeo praeparata atque donata, sed non est effectus: quia carualis consuetudo voluntati ipsi resistit, adhuc in ista vita mortali. Aliqui æstimant quod voces istae sint hominis sub lege constitui, nondum sub gratia. Perficere autem bonum non invenio. Sine adminiculo gratiae non invenio bonæ voluntatis effectum. Nam ut velle sit, jam voluntas a Deo præparata est: quia ipse est qui in nobis operatur et velle. Et hoc notandum, quod non dixit: Facere bonum non invenio, sed perficere: quæ est enim perfectio boni, nisi exstinctio maii? Perfectio boni est, non concopiscere: quid enim facilius homini sub lege constituto, quam velle bonum, et facere malum?
For I know that it no longer dwells in me. Insofar as he knows, he consents to the law; insofar as he does, he yields to sin, so that it prevails in me as though it seemed innate—which indeed does not proceed from God as created, but from corrupted nature. Here he begins to say that he himself had the titillation of the flesh. It should also be noted that the Apostle testifies that he himself felt that very titillation. This is in my flesh, good. He did not say: My flesh is not good; but the good does not dwell in my flesh, which the habit of sin weighs down, which I cannot overcome, because while I rely on the work of the law, I do not seek the aid of grace. But this which dwells, comes upon all men from the transmission of mortality through the transgressor. For to will is present with me. There is indeed in me the will prepared and given by God, but the effect is not, because carnal habit resists that very will, still in this mortal life. Some think that these utterances are those of a man placed under the law, not yet under grace. But to perfect the good I do not find. Without the support of grace I do not find the effect of good will. For that the willing may be, the will has already been prepared by God, because it is he who works in us both to will. And this should be noted, that he did not say: To do the good I do not find, but to perfect it; for what is the perfection of good, except the extinction of evil? The perfection of good is not to covet; for what is easier for a man placed under the law than to will the good and to do the evil?
Nam hoc est perficere bonum, nt ncc concupiscat homo. Imperfectum est bonum, quando concupiscit: etiamsi concupiscentiae non consentit ad malum. Non invenio, id est non possum. Non enim quod volo bonum hoc facio: sed quod nolo matum, hoc ago. Vincente consuetudine quod nolo facio: sicut si quis jurare consuevit, quando non putat incurrit. Si autem quod nolo, illud facio. Facere ergo se dixit, et operari, non affectu consentiendi et implendi: sed ipso motu concupiscendi. Non jam ego operor illud. Non ego, quia invitus; sed ego, quia ipse mihi hanc per vim consuetudinis imposui necessitatem. Sed quod habitat in me peccatum. HaLitat in me consuetudo peccati, quae mihi ptr transgressionem primi parentis ex vitiata natura transfusa est. Invenio igitur legem volenti mihi facere bonum. Mente invenio legem bonum facere contra malum, quod est in carne mea. Legem consentaneam habeo interioris hominis ut excludatur malum, quod mihi per vitiatam naturam inest: sed sine gratia Dei fieri non potest. Ideo dico: Quis me liherabit de corpore mortis hujus? Quoniam mihi malum adjacet. Id est, desideria mala, vel consilia inimici, vel bella carnis, quibus inveterato consensu obtemperare consuevi. Adjacet autem malum ex concupiscentia, cui non consentit, qui dixit: Jam non ego operor illud. Condelector enim legi Dei.
For this is to accomplish the good, that a man not even desire. The good is imperfect when he desires, even if he does not consent to the desire for evil. I do not find, that is, I cannot. For the good that I will, this I do not do; but the evil that I do not will, this I do. With habit prevailing, I do what I do not will, as when someone has grown accustomed to swear, he falls into it when he does not think of it. But if what I do not will, that I do. He said, then, that he does and works it, not by the affection of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of desiring. Now I no longer work that. Not I, because unwilling; but I, because I myself have imposed this necessity on myself through the force of habit. But the sin that dwells in me. The habit of sin dwells in me, which has been transmitted to me through the transgression of the first parent from a corrupted nature. I find, therefore, the law, for me who wills to do good. In the mind I find the law to do good against the evil that is in my flesh. I have a law agreeable to the inner man, that the evil which is in me through corrupted nature may be excluded; but this cannot be done without the grace of God. Therefore I say: Who will deliver me from the body of this death? Because evil lies close to me. That is, evil desires, or the counsels of the enemy, or the wars of the flesh, which by long-standing consent I have been accustomed to obey. But evil lies close from concupiscence, to which he does not consent, who said: Now I no longer work that. For I delight in the law of God.
Hic duas leges ponit: legem spiritus, et legem carnis, quæ resistit legi mentis: id est, vel conscientiae naturali, vel legi divinae, quae in mente consistii. Libertas enim delectat: nam quandiu timore facis quod justum est, non Deus te delectat: quandiu non te delectat, adhuc servus facis. Delectet te, et liberes. Delectat me lex, delecta! quod lex jubet, delectat me ipsa justitia. Secundum interiorem hominem. Secundum mentem. Video autem aliam legem in membris meis. Hæc est, quae remansit infirmitas. Repugnantem legi mentis meæ, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quæ est in membris meis. Ex hac parte sentit captivitatem, ubi non est impleta justitia. Video autem aliam legem in membris meis: desideria carnis et motiones vitiatæ naturæ: id est, concupiscentiam. Sed ista concupiscenlia si vocatur peccatum, ideo, quia a peccato facta est, sic vocatur: sicut scriptura manus cujusque dicitur, quod manus eam fecerit: peccata autem sum quæ secundum carnis concupiscentiam illicite fiunt. Legem appellat in membris suis, onus ipsum mortalitatis, in quo ingemiscimus gravati. Corpus quod corrumpitur, aggravat animam: per quod fit etiam sæpe, ut invite delectet quod non licet: quam sarcinam ideo legem appellat, quia jure supplicii imposita est. Repugnantem legi mentis meæ. Quæ alibi mortificari jubet in membris. Mortificate, inquit, membra vestra.
Here he sets down two laws: the law of the spirit and the law of the flesh, which resists the law of the mind—that is, either the natural conscience or the divine law, which consists in the mind. For freedom gives delight; for as long as you do what is just out of fear, God does not delight you; as long as he does not delight you, you are still acting as a slave. Let him delight you, and you will be free. The law delights me—let it delight! What the law commands, that very justice delights me. According to the inner man. According to the mind. But I see another law in my members. This is the infirmity that has remained. Resisting the law of my mind, and leading me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members. From this part he feels captivity, where justice has not been fulfilled. But I see another law in my members: the desires of the flesh and the motions of a corrupted nature—that is, concupiscence. But if this concupiscence is called sin, it is so called because it was made by sin; just as the writing is called the hand of each person, because the hand made it. But the sins are those things which are done unlawfully according to the concupiscence of the flesh. He calls the law in his members that very burden of mortality, under which we groan, weighed down. The body that is corrupted weighs down the soul; through which it often happens that what is not lawful delights us against our will; and he calls this burden a law because it was imposed by the right of punishment. Resisting the law of my mind. Which elsewhere he commands to be mortified in the members. Mortify, he says, your members.
Legi, inquit, Dei: quæ in mente est et captivantem me. Captivum se esse deplorat: quia sentit in se desideria surgere puritati mentis contraria: contra quæ gratiam liberatoris implorat. Et hoc potest intelligi, quod captivitatem dixerit carne, non mente; occasione, non consensione; et ideo eaplivantem, quia et in ipsa carne non est aliena natura, sed nostra. Potest etiam videri Aposiolus eum describere qui sub lege adhuc vivit, nondum sub gratia. Quod dicit captivantem me, hoc est, carnem meam: legi peccati, quae est in membris meis. Sed etsi de ipso accipitur, non quod ipse immoderata libidine pollutus fuerit, sed a consensione prava liber: de concupiscentia tamen carnis, quam moderando frenabat, tanta humilitate et pietate gemuisse, ut optaret eam non habere potius quam domare. In lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. Quæ damnat peccatum, sive malam consuetudinem, quæ in membris est: quasi diceret, et captivantem me in lege sua. Ideo captivus, quia non facit quae vult. Quandiu caro concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem. Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit? Qui sic tentor. Verba sunt hominis sub gratia constituti, cujus actio habet quidem reluctantem mortalitatem carnis, sed non vincentem ad consensionem peccati. Quis neget Apostolum, cum haec diceret, adhuc fuisse in corpore mortis hujus?
I read," he says, "the law of God, which is in the mind, and it takes me captive." He laments that he is captive, because he feels desires rising within him contrary to the purity of the mind, against which he implores the grace of the liberator. And this can be understood as meaning that he called it captivity with respect to the flesh, not the mind; by occasion, not by consent; and therefore "taking me captive," because even in the flesh itself it is not an alien nature, but our own. The Apostle can also be seen to be describing the man who still lives under the law, not yet under grace. What he says, "taking me captive," means my flesh: "to the law of sin, which is in my members." But even if this is taken of him, it is not that he himself was polluted by unrestrained lust, but that he was free from depraved consent; yet he groaned with such humility and piety over the concupiscence of the flesh, which he restrained by governing it, that he wished not to have it rather than to tame it. "In the law of sin, which is in my members." Which condemns sin, or evil habit, which is in the members; as if he were saying, "and taking me captive in its own law." Therefore he is a captive, because he does not do what he wishes. As long as the flesh lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh. "Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me?" Who is thus tempted. These are the words of a man established under grace, whose action indeed has the resisting mortality of the flesh, but not one that prevails unto consent to sin. Who would deny that the Apostle, when he said these things, was still in this body of death?
a quo utique vel impii non liberantur, quibus eadem corpora ad tormenta aeterna redduntur. Liberari ergo est a corpore mortis bujus, omni sanato languore carnis concupiscentiæ non ad poenam corpus recipere, sed ad gloriam: sicut et alibi dicit: Et ipsi in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus adoptionem exspectantes, redemptionem corporis nostri. Liberari enim se a vitiis corporalibus et mortiferis deprecatur.Si nos, inquit,Filius liberaverit, vere liberi eritis. De corpore morit. hujus? Gratia Dei per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Corpus mortis est littera occidens. Corpus mortis est mortifera voluptas, et carnalis delectatio, et corpora lis infirmitas, et violentia consuetudinis, quae ad mortem trahit. De qua consuetudine non lex, sed gratia liberat, per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Ante legem nulla pugna erat cum voluptatibus bujus saeculi, quia totum licebat: sub lege vero pugnatur, sed vincimur: sub gratia autem pugnamus, et Deo adjuvante vincimus, quia non timore, sed dilectione servimus. De quo corpore mortis non omnis liberatur, qui finit hanc vitam, sed qui in hac vita susceperit gratiam, et ne inaniter suscipiat, bonis operibus egerit et fuerit cooperatus. Aliud est enim exire de hoc corpore, aliud est liberari de corpore mortis hujus: quod sola Dei gratia impartit. Igitur ego ipse. Recapitulat aut concludit. Mente servio legi Dei. Quandiu carnalis sum, duplex sum.
From which, indeed, the impious are not freed, since their same bodies are handed over to eternal torments. To be freed, then, from this body of death is, once every sickness of fleshly concupiscence has been healed, to receive the body not for punishment but for glory; as he says elsewhere: And we ourselves groan within ourselves, awaiting adoption, the redemption of our body. For he prays that he may be freed from bodily and deadly vices. If the Son, he says, has freed us, you will be truly free. From this body of death? By the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. The body of death is the letter that kills. The body of death is deadly pleasure, and carnal delight, and bodily infirmity, and the violence of habit, which drags one to death. From this habit not the law but grace frees, through our Lord Jesus Christ. Before the law there was no struggle with the pleasures of this world, because everything was permitted; under the law, however, there is struggle, but we are conquered; under grace, however, we struggle, and with God's help we conquer, because we serve not from fear but from love. From this body of death not everyone who ends this life is freed, but he who has received grace in this life, and, lest he receive it in vain, has performed good works and has cooperated. For it is one thing to depart from this body, another to be freed from this body of death, which the grace of God alone imparts. Therefore I myself. He recapitulates or concludes. With the mind I serve the law of God. As long as I am carnal, I am twofold.
Carne autem. Carne servit legi peccati concupiscendo; mente legi Dei, eidem concupiscentiæ non consentiendo. Homo geminae et duplicis voluntatis: id est, aut carnalis, aut spiritualis, quodammodo in semetipso divisus juxta operum qualitatem. Lex quidem una est, sed duo sunt genera mandatorum: unum quod docet bonum, aliud quod prohibet malum. Quod docet bonum, Dei est; quod prohibet malum, nostrum vitium est, quibus lex opus sit dari, qui peccamus. Legi peccati. COa. suetudini, vel vitiatae naturæ, tandiu quandiu languor obluctatur saluti, et caro concupiscit adversus spiritum.
CAP. VIII. Nihil ergo nunc damnationis est iis qui sunt in Christo Jesu. Non enim damnatur, nisi qui concupiscentiæ carnis consentit ad malum: nam carne mortua, nihil habet in se quod damnari possit. Qui non secundum carnem ambulant. Qui a Christo didicerunt carnem crucifigere, et non carnaliter vivunt. Lex enim spiritus vitæ in Christo Jesu liberavit me. Advertendum quia gratiam, legem appellat. Gratia Novi Teslamenti liberat nos a consuetudine peccati et mortis: auferendo etiam occasiones, et dando adjutorium et exemplum vivendi, ne scilicet consensionem meam concupiscentia sibi vindicet carnis. A lege peccati et mortis. Quae occidit, et morUMcat peccatores: id est, lege litterae, sive ab illa lege quam supra in membris dixerat dominari. Nam quod impossibile erat legi.
But in the flesh. He serves the law of sin in the flesh by lusting; in the mind he serves the law of God by not consenting to that same lust. Man is of a twofold and double will—that is, either carnal or spiritual—in a certain manner divided within himself according to the quality of his works. The law is indeed one, but there are two kinds of commandments: one that teaches good, another that forbids evil. What teaches good is God's; what forbids evil is our own vice, for whom the law needs to be given, we who sin. To the law of sin. That is, to habit, or to corrupted nature, for as long as the sickness struggles against health, and the flesh lusts against the spirit.
CHAPTER VIII. There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. For no one is condemned except he who consents to the lust of the flesh unto evil; for when the flesh is dead, it has nothing in itself that can be condemned. Who walk not according to the flesh. Who have learned from Christ to crucify the flesh, and do not live carnally. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed me. It must be noted that he calls grace a law. The grace of the New Testament frees us from the habit of sin and death, by taking away even the occasions, and by giving help and an example of living, so that, namely, the lust of the flesh may not claim my consent for itself. From the law of sin and death. Which kills and mortifies sinners; that is, the law of the letter, or from that law which he had said above reigns in the members. For what was impossible for the law.
Quia nibil ad perfectum lex adducit, impossibile erat legi ut homines carnales faceret fidei custodire justitiam: sed hoc Christus et praecepto, et exemplo, et adjutorio fecit esse possibile. Impossibile est enim legem implere per carnem, qua superbi, ignorantes Dei justitiam, id est quae ex Deo est homini ut sit justus, et suam volentes constituere, tanquam per eorum non adjutum divinitus arbitrium lex possit impleri, justitiae Dei non sunt subjecti: ideo justitia legis in eis impletur, qui non secundum carnem ambulant: id est, secundum hominem ignorantem Dei justitiam, sed ambulant secundum spiritum. In quo infirmabatur per carnem. Infirmabatur per concupiscentias, id est per desideria carnalia: ideo non implebatur lex, quia ipsius justitiae nondum erat charitas, quae interiore delectatione teneret mentem, ne ad peccatum delectatione rerum temporalium traheretur. Ergo infirmabatur lex per carnem: id est, non efficiebat justos deditos carni. Deus Filium suum mittens in similitudinem. Similem carnem suscepit cæteris hominibus sine peccato: quia nec de concupiscentia, nec de coitu, sed de virgine nata est. Facit hoc contra Photinum, qui negat Filium ante partum fuisse virginis. Carnis peccati. Non caro peccati erat, quae non carnali delectalione nata erat: tamen inerat similitudo carnis peccati, quia mortalis caro erat. Et de peccato damnavit peccatum.
Because the law brings nothing to perfection, it was impossible for the law to make carnal men keep the righteousness of faith; but Christ made this possible by precept, by example, and by help. For it is impossible to fulfill the law through the flesh, in which men, proud and ignorant of the righteousness of God—that is, the righteousness which comes from God so that man may be righteous—and wishing to establish their own, as though the law could be fulfilled through their own free will unaided by God, are not subject to the righteousness of God. Therefore the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in those who do not walk according to the flesh—that is, according to man ignorant of the righteousness of God—but walk according to the spirit. In which it was weak through the flesh. It was weak through lusts, that is, through carnal desires; therefore the law was not fulfilled, because the love of righteousness itself was not yet present, which would hold the mind by inward delight, so that it would not be drawn to sin by delight in temporal things. Therefore the law was weak through the flesh—that is, it did not make righteous those given over to the flesh. God, sending his Son in the likeness. He took flesh like that of other men, without sin, because it was born neither of lust nor of intercourse, but of a virgin. This is directed against Photinus, who denies that the Son existed before the virgin gave birth. Of the flesh of sin. It was not flesh of sin, since it was not born of carnal delight; yet the likeness of the flesh of sin was in it, because it was mortal flesh. And of sin he condemned sin.
Et de carne, quae in nobis ante serviebat peccato, vicit peccatum non peccando: quomodo si quis de barbaris vincat barbaros. Hosliae quas offerebant pro peccato in lege, peccati nomine vocabantur, cum ipsae peccatum nescirent: Sic et peccati caro, quae pro peccatis nostris oblata est, peccati nomen accepit. Quidam dicunt de peccato Judaeorum, qui occiderunt Dominum, peccatum diaboli quo hominem implicuerit, condemnavit: sicut ad Haebraeos scriptum est, ut per mortem destrueret eum, qui habebat mortis imperium. Et recte mors peccatum dicitur, quam de peccato constat esse generatam. Quidam dicunt de peccato Judaeorum, qui eum crucifixerant, factum est, ut sanguinem suum in remissionem fUnderet peccatorum. In carne. In ipsa carne vicit peccatum, ut naturam, quæ fuerat bona per condiUonem, et per transgressionem est vitiata, per suam gratiam reformaret, ut ejus adjutorio vincere possit peccatum: quæ prius sic fuerat facta, ut pessit non peccare si velit. Sed ante transgressionem hoc, ut dixi: nam modo per gratiam Dei potet peccatum aut declinare, aut vincere: sic tamen, ut Utinum semper adjutorem imploret. Ut justificatio legis impleretur in nobis.
And concerning the flesh, which in us formerly served sin, he conquered sin by not sinning: as if someone from among the barbarians should conquer barbarians. The victims which they offered for sin in the law were called by the name of sin, although they themselves knew not sin: so also the flesh of sin, which was offered for our sins, received the name of sin. Some say that by the sin of the Jews, who killed the Lord, he condemned the sin of the devil by which he entangled man: as it is written to the Hebrews, that through death he might destroy him who had the power of death. And rightly is death called sin, which is established to have been begotten from sin. Some say that by the sin of the Jews, who had crucified him, it was brought about that he shed his blood for the remission of sins. In the flesh. In that very flesh he conquered sin, so that the nature which had been good by condition, and was corrupted by transgression, he might reform through his grace, so that by its help it might be able to conquer sin: which had first been so made that it could not sin if it wished. But before transgression this was so, as I said: for now through the grace of God it can either avoid sin or conquer it: yet in such a way that it always implores its helper. That the justification of the law might be fulfilled in us.
Hic aut ipsam gratiam legem vocat, aut certe illam justificationem legis, quæ spiritu intra litteram latente est mani* festata: ut quoniam in illis viva et repugnante carne, justificatio legis impleri non potuit, in nobis impleatur, qui Christi adjutorio earnem mortificamus cum vitiis. Præcepta legis implentur per charitatem, quæ per timorem non poterant impleri. Qui non secundum carnem ambulamus. Conversamur. Sed tecundnm spiritum. Caro de terra facta est, spiritus autem a Deo datus est. Utraque ergo illa desiderant unde sunt: caro terrena, spiritus cœlestia. Si igitur spiritus carnem superaverit, operantur caelestia; si autem consenserit, rrena prævalebunt. Quis au em ambulat secundum spiritum, nisi qui agitur Dei Spiritu? Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, ii filii Hei sunt. Qui enim. Unus homo ex spiritu constat et carne: quando ergo seCundum carnem ambulat, caro est; quando secundum spiritum, spiritus est. Secundum carnem sunt. Manifesta sunt opera carnis. Quæ carnis sunt sapiunt. Terrena et carnalia bona pro summis bonis concupiscunt. Qui vero secundum spirtium, quæ sunt spiritus sentiunt. Id est divina. Deus cnim spiritus est: quisquis non resistit vnlunuti Dei, quae sunt spiritus sentit. Nam prudentia carnis mors est. Prudentia a providendo dicitur. Ipse alibi dicit, prudentiam humanam esse, malo vicem referre.
Here he calls either grace itself the law, or certainly that justification of the law which is made manifest by the Spirit hidden within the letter: so that, since in them, with the flesh alive and resisting, the justification of the law could not be fulfilled, it may be fulfilled in us, who by the help of Christ put to death the flesh with its vices. The precepts of the law are fulfilled through love, which through fear could not be fulfilled. We who do not walk according to the flesh. We conduct ourselves. But according to the spirit. The flesh was made from the earth, but the spirit was given by God. Both, therefore, desire those things from which they are: the flesh earthly things, the spirit heavenly things. If, then, the spirit has overcome the flesh, heavenly things are wrought; but if it has consented, earthly things will prevail. But who walks according to the spirit, except he who is led by the Spirit of God? For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God. For he who. One man consists of spirit and flesh: when, therefore, he walks according to the flesh, he is flesh; when according to the spirit, he is spirit. Those who are according to the flesh. The works of the flesh are manifest. Those who are of the flesh savor the things of the flesh. They desire earthly and carnal goods as the highest goods. But those who are according to the spirit perceive the things of the spirit. That is, divine things. For God is spirit: whoever does not resist the will of God perceives the things of the spirit. For the prudence of the flesh is death. Prudence is so called from providing. He says elsewhere that human prudence is to return evil for evil.
Talis ergo prudentia mortem parat transgrediendo præceptum. Ergo prudentia carnis est, ut unusquisque velit se vindicare. Prudentia vero spiritus, non reddere malum pro malo: Anima cum inferiora appetit, prudenliam carnis habere dicitur; cum superiora, prudentiam spiritus. Non quia prudentia carnis substantia est, qua anima induitur aut exuitur; sed ipsius animæ affectio est, quæ omnino esse desinet, cum se totam ad superiora converterit. Prudentia autem spiritus, vita et pax. Prudentia spiritus et in praesenti pacem habet, non reddendo malum pro malo; et in æternum vitam æternam meretur, propter obedientiam et pacem, dum per suam patientiam non sinit crescere peccatum. Quoniam sa. plentia carnis. Non caro, sed carnalis actus. Inimicitia est in Deum. Omne enim quod non est subjectum Deo inimicum est: et quicunque se vult vindicare; excedit modum etiam veLeris legis: non quia Deo quid nocere potesi, sed sibi nocet. Legi enim Dei non subjicitur, nec enim potest. Impossibile pentus dixit, ut vel sic illos a carnis illecebris et luxuria revocaret: velut si dicamus, injustitia esse non potest justa: tanquam si dicecretur: Nix non calefacit, nec enim potest: quandiu enim nix est, non calefacit; sed resolvi potest, potest et fervere ut calefaciat, sed cum hoc facit, jam nix non est.
Such prudence therefore prepares death by transgressing the commandment. So the prudence of the flesh is that each one wishes to avenge himself. But the prudence of the spirit is not to return evil for evil. When the soul desires lower things, it is said to have the prudence of the flesh; when higher things, the prudence of the spirit. Not because the prudence of the flesh is a substance with which the soul is clothed or stripped, but it is an affection of the soul itself, which will altogether cease to be when it has turned itself wholly to higher things. But the prudence of the spirit is life and peace. The prudence of the spirit even in the present has peace, by not returning evil for evil; and for eternity it merits eternal life, on account of obedience and peace, while through its patience it does not allow sin to grow. For the wisdom of the flesh—not the flesh, but a carnal act—is enmity against God. For everything that is not subject to God is hostile; and whoever wishes to avenge himself exceeds the measure even of the old law: not because he can harm God in any way, but he harms himself. For it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be. He said "impossible" altogether, so as to recall them from the enticements of the flesh and from luxury even in this way: as if we should say, injustice cannot be just; as if it were said: snow does not warm, nor indeed can it; for as long as it is snow, it does not warm; but it can be melted, and it can also boil so as to warm, but when it does this, it is already not snow.
Sic et prudentia carnis dicitur, cum mundaua pro coelestibus concupiscit: sed cum coelestia desi lerare incœperit, desinit esse carualis prudentia. Qui autem in carne sunt. Hinc probatur, quia non de substantia dixerit carnis. Deo placere non possunt. Quia fieri non potest ut non peccent qui carnaliter vivunt, et carnis voluntatibus acquiescunt. Vos autem in carne non eMis. Hoc est, in carnalibus desideriis, sed in spiritualibus. Sed in spiritu. In spiritali actu illi spiritualiter vivunt qui Spiritum Dei habent: in illos Spiritus Dei est, in quos apparuerit fructus ejus, sicut ad Galatas ait, fructus Spiritus. Si tamen Spiritus Dei habitat iii vobis. Si quis autem Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus. Qui inimicos diligit, intelliget sanctum Spiritum sicut ex Patris, ita etiam ex Filii substantia procedere: quia unius esi atque ejusdem substantiæ, qui ejus Spiritum habet. Et ideo sicut Patris, ita et Filii appellatur. Et ideo dixit in Evangelio, de meO accipiet. Si quis, inquit, Spiritum Dci non habet: hoc est, ut orei pro persequentibus, ut diligat inimicos, ut in omnibus cum imitetur, sicut dicit Petrus apostolus: Christus passus pro vobis, reliquit vobis exemplum, etc. Dicit enim ipse discipulis: Nescitis cujus spiritus sitis, hi spiritus ejus erant, quia in hie, et spe, et charitate, vivebant. Si autem Christus. Si Christum semper imitamiui.
Thus also it is called the prudence of the flesh when it desires worldly things instead of heavenly ones; but when it has begun to desire heavenly things, it ceases to be carnal prudence. But those who are in the flesh. From this it is proved that he did not speak of the substance of the flesh. They cannot please God. Because it cannot happen that those who live carnally and yield to the desires of the flesh do not sin. But you are not in the flesh. That is, in carnal desires, but in spiritual ones. But in the spirit. In spiritual action those live spiritually who have the Spirit of God; the Spirit of God is in those in whom its fruit has appeared, as he says to the Galatians, the fruit of the Spirit. If indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not his. He who loves his enemies will understand that the Holy Spirit proceeds as from the substance of the Father, so also from that of the Son: because he who has his Spirit is of one and the same substance. And therefore, as he is called the Spirit of the Father, so also of the Son. And therefore he said in the Gospel, he will receive from what is mine. If anyone, he says, does not have the Spirit of God: that is, so as to pray for his persecutors, to love his enemies, to imitate him in all things, as the apostle Peter says: Christ suffered for you, he left you an example, etc. For he himself says to his disciples: You do not know of what spirit you are; they were of his spirit, because they lived in faith, and hope, and love. But if Christ. If we always imitate Christ.
Corpus quasi mortuum, etsi resistit, non vincit, sicut David dicit: Ego autem sicut surdus non audiebam: et tu exaudies me, Domine Deus meus. In vobis est. Per gratiam suam. Corpus quidem. Spiritus vivit et vivificat, ut justitiam faciamus: ca: o autem mortua est, n6 ab ea vincantur. Non hoc solum quaritur, ut caro moriatur, sed etiam ut spiritus vivificetur. Simul adverte quod vita anianae justitia sil: oportet ergo ut non solum a carnalibus cessemus, sed etiam spiritualia faciamus. Mortuum est propter peccatum. Mortuum corpus dicit quandiu tale esi, ut indigentia rerum corporalium molestet animam, et quibusdam motibus sollicitet et inquietet. Nam peccatum ideo concupiscentia nuncupatur, quia merito peccati contigit: sicut scriptura manus cujusque dicimur, quod manus eam fecerit. Spiritus vcro vivit propter justificationem. Ille homo hic describitur, qui sub gratia vivit, et nondum habet perfectam picem. quæ corporis resurrectione et immutatione futura esi. Nam quandiuin hac vita sumus, non deest aut titillatio, aut delectatio: quamvis enim non cedat qui sub gratia vivit, et mente servit legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati. Quod si Spiritus ejus, qui suscitavit Jesum II mortuis, habitet in vobis, qui suscitavit Jesum Christum a mortuis.
The body is, as it were, dead: even if it resists, it does not conquer, as David says: But I, like a deaf man, did not hear; and you will hear me, O Lord my God. In you. By his grace. The body indeed. The spirit lives and gives life, that we may do righteousness; but the body is dead, so that we may not be conquered by it. It is not only sought that the flesh die, but also that the spirit be given life. At the same time observe that the life of the soul is righteousness; therefore it is necessary that we not only cease from carnal things, but also do spiritual things. It is dead because of sin. He calls the body dead as long as it is such that the lack of bodily things troubles the soul, and disturbs and unsettles it with certain motions. For sin is for this reason called concupiscence, because it came about by the merit of sin; just as we are called the hand of each person by Scripture, because the hand made it. But the spirit lives because of justification. Here that man is described who lives under grace, and does not yet have the perfect faith which will be in the resurrection and change of the body. For as long as we are in this life, neither titillation nor delight is absent; for even if the one who lives under grace does not yield, and serves the law of God in his mind, yet in the flesh he serves the law of sin. But if his Spirit, who raised Jesus from the dead, dwells in you, he who raised Jesus Christ from the dead.
Si vos ita exhibeatis ut digni sitis in quibus Spiritus sanctus habitet, non patietur templuni sui Spiritus interiro Deus: sed quomodo suscitavit Jesum a mortuis, ita et nos vivificavit. Virificabit mortalia corpora vestra, propter inhabitantem Spiritum ejus in vobis. Vivificatis igi ur mortalibus corporibus vestris, non solum ad peccandum consensio nulla erit, sed nec ipsa cui consentiatur, carnis concupiscentia. Ergo, fratres, debitores sumus. Hoc totum facit, ut ostendat legem veterem fidclibus non necessariam, quæ carnalibus et peccatoribus data est. Non carni, ut secundum carnem vivamus. Id est, jam non sumus subjecti carnali consuetudini. Si enim secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini. Si secundum rationem supra expositam, quod carnales homines justitiam custodire non possunt. Si autem Spiritu facta carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis. Expostrit quid SUpra dixerit carnem, hoc est, spiritualibns actibus carnalia opera sobjeccritis. Quicunque enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, ii sunt filii Dei. Quicunque gratia Dei et Spiritu sancto gubernantur. Tunc bene agis, si ab eo agaris: econtra filii diaboli spiritu ejus aguntur, qui ab initio peccat. Non enim accepistis spiritum servitutis iterum in timore.
If you present yourselves in such a way as to be worthy to be those in whom the Holy Spirit dwells, God will not allow the temple of his Spirit to perish; but just as he raised Jesus from the dead, so he has also given us life. He will give life to your mortal bodies, because of his Spirit who dwells in you. Therefore, with your mortal bodies given life, not only will there be no consent to sin, but not even the concupiscence of the flesh to which consent might be given. Therefore, brothers, we are debtors. He does all this to show that the old law is not necessary for the faithful, which was given to the carnal and to sinners. Not to the flesh, so that we should live according to the flesh. That is, we are no longer subject to carnal custom. For if you live according to the flesh, you will die. If according to the reasoning set out above, that carnal men cannot keep righteousness. But if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh, you will live. He has explained what he said above, that the flesh, that is, you have subjected carnal works to spiritual acts. For whoever are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God. Whoever are governed by the grace of God and the Holy Spirit. Then you act well, if you are led by him; on the contrary, the sons of the devil are led by his spirit, who sinned from the beginning. For you did not receive again the spirit of slavery in fear.
Judæi acceperunt spiritum in timore, qui iios ad servitutem eogeret: quia qui timet, servus est; qui autem dlligit, filius: sicut seriptum est: Servus timet dominum, et filius diligit patrem suum. Si pater sum, ubi est honor meus? Si dominus, ubi est timor meus? Uti ergo,,,tia opCrari propter amorem nolebant, timore et necessitate coguntur; nos vero omnia voluntarie. propter dilectionem facere debemus, quasi filii. Sed accepistis spiritum adoptionis filiorum Dei. Tunc ndoptamur, quando per baptismum renascimur: nam ante filii iræ; et si fiii ine, ubi e fides naturæ? In quo clamamus, Abba Pater. Qui vocat patrem, ostendii se esse filium. In omnibus ergo debet imitari patrem, ne pro nom ne indigne usurpato, majori subjaceat pœnæ. Clamantem, id est clamare no! facientem. Ipse Spir ius testimonium reddit spiritui nostro, quod sumus fili. Testimonium est adoptionis, quod habemus spiritum, per quem sic oramus. Tantum donum accipere nemo poterat, nisi Filii gratia, quæ est arrha, hoc est do um Spiritus sancti. Si autem filii et hæredes quidem Dei, cohæredes autem Christi. Qui per gratiam efficitur filius, merebitur esse hæres, et cohæres vcro Filio fieri. Si tamen compatimur, ut et glorificemur.
The Jews received the spirit in fear, which drove them to slavery; for he who fears is a servant, but he who loves is a son: as it is written: The servant fears his master, and the son loves his father. If I am a father, where is my honor? If I am a lord, where is my fear? Therefore, as they were unwilling to do good works out of love, they are compelled by fear and necessity; but we ought to do all things voluntarily out of love, as sons. But you have received the spirit of adoption as sons of God. We are adopted then, when we are reborn through baptism: for before that we were children of wrath; and if we are sons, where is the faith of nature? In whom we cry, Abba, Father. He who calls him father shows himself to be a son. In all things, therefore, he ought to imitate the father, lest, on account of the name unworthily usurped, he be subject to a greater punishment. Crying out, that is, making us cry out. The Spirit himself bears witness to our spirit, that we are sons. It is the testimony of adoption, that we have the Spirit, through whom we thus pray. No one could receive so great a gift, except by the grace of the Son, which is the pledge, that is, the gift of the Holy Spirit. But if we are sons, we are also heirs, heirs indeed of God, but co-heirs with Christ. He who is made a son through grace will deserve to be an heir, and to become a co-heir with the Son. If indeed we suffer with him, that we may also be glorified.
Si compatimur,patientia est, et etiam perseverantia: quia si dona Dei ante oculos nostros ponimus, quæ ille pro nobis impiis pertulit, tali adjulore, non debemus timere pati pro illo, ut conglorificemur, sicut dicit sanctus Joannes: Nunc filii Dei sumus; cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus. Existimo enim quod non sunt condignæ passiones hujus temporis, ad futuram gloriam, quæ revelabitur in nobis. Quid potest homo dignum pati gloria coelesti, etiamsi esset illa vita, qualis nunc est ista? quidquid passui fuerit a morte, plus non est quam etiam pro peccati. suis antea merebatur. Nunc autem et peccati donantur, et tunc vita aeterna dabitur, et spleud. solis, etc. Ostendit praemium, quo facilius etiam mors contemnatur, quo ad illum possit tutius perveniti. Nam scimus homines, quod pejus est, propter aurum se ultro ad bestias subrepsisae. Quod nos Deo adjutore facere debemus in tribulationibus propter Dominum: quae cum sint temporales, aeternam salutem tribuunt. Si hoc ille dicit, quid nos? Nam exspectatio creature revelationem filiorum Dei exspectat. Vanitati enim subjecta est creatura. Quidam de Adam et Eva volunt sentire creatura, quos serpens spe divi nitatis subjecerit vanitati, et corruptioni fecerit de. servire non volentes: hoc est, non ex semetipsis quia peccantes justo judicio sunt addicti; quia ei ipsi (inquiunt) liberabuntur a servitute corruptionis.
If we suffer with him, there is patience, and also perseverance: because if we place before our eyes the gifts of God, which he endured for us who were impious, with such a helper, we ought not to fear to suffer for him, so that we may be glorified together, as Saint John says: Now we are sons of God; when he appears, we shall be like him. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that shall be revealed in us. What worthy thing can man suffer for heavenly glory, even if that life were such as this present life is? Whatever he has suffered from death is no more than what he also deserved beforehand on account of his sin. But now both sins are forgiven, and then eternal life will be given, and the splendor of the sun, etc. He shows the reward, by which even death may be more easily despised, so that one may come to it more safely. For we know that men, which is worse, have of their own accord crept in among beasts for the sake of gold. This we ought to do with God as our helper in tribulations for the sake of the Lord: which, since they are temporal, bestow eternal salvation. If he says this, what should we do? For the expectation of the creature awaits the revelation of the sons of God. For the creature has been subjected to vanity. Some wish to understand the creature as Adam and Eve, whom the serpent, by the hope of divinity, subjected to vanity, and made to serve corruption, though they were unwilling: that is, not of themselves, because by sinning they were condemned by just judgment; because they themselves (they say) will be freed from the slavery of corruption.
Omnem autem creaturam, dicunt, omnes homines, quia usque ad adventum Christi fuerunt justi, quia et ipsi nondum acceperunt, sed exspectant ii spe. Nou solum autem illi; sed et nos ipsi, in quibus complei sunt, adhuc speramus, quibus dictum est: Multi prophetæ et justi cupierunt videre qaae videtis, et non viderunt. Ideo dicit: Revelationem filiorum Det exspectant; tandiu omnia sic erunt quandio erit resurrectio, postea ab actu cessabunt, et mutabuntor. secundum Scripturas. Vanitati enim subjecta: id est hominibus, qui evanuerunt, quibus alii homines ministrant. Quidquid finem babet, vanum est ad comparationem æternæ vitæ. Yanitas (inquit) vanitatum, omnia vanitas. Nec putes ipsam tibi aliquid præstitisse, cum etiam peritura et mundana donaverit. Non v,lens, sed propter eum qui subjecti eam in spe. Non sua sponte. Alii dicunt angelos, quia et ipsi creatura sunt, exspectare ut homines in angelorum dignitatem mutentur. Quia et ipsa creatura liberabitur a servitute corruptionis, in libertatem gloriae filiorunt Dei. Qui d6 mundi creatura hoc tolunl accipere, hoc dicunt: Quando glorificandi sunt ff ii Dei, tunc et ipsa creatura libera fiet a servitute: quia et ipsa laborem sentit, sicut et terra jugiter seminata sterilis efficitur. Scimus enim quod omnis crcutura ingemiscit, ei parturit usque adhuc.
But they say that every creature means all men, because even the just existed until the coming of Christ, since they too have not yet received, but await it in hope. Not only they, however, but we ourselves also, in whom these things have been fulfilled, still hope, to whom it was said: Many prophets and just men desired to see the things which you see, and did not see them. Therefore he says: They await the revelation of the sons of God; for as long as there is a resurrection, all things will be thus, afterwards they will cease from activity and be changed, according to the Scriptures. For the creature was made subject to vanity: that is, to men who have become vain, whom other men serve. Whatever has an end is vain in comparison with eternal life. Vanity of vanities, he says, all is vanity. Nor should you think that it has bestowed anything on you, since it has given even things that will perish and are worldly. Not willingly, but because of him who subjected it in hope. Not of its own accord. Others say that the angels, since they too are a creature, await that men be changed into the dignity of angels. Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption, into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God. Those who wish to understand the creature of the world in this way say this: When the sons of God are to be glorified, then the creature itself will also be made free from bondage, because it too feels labor, just as the earth, continually sown, is made barren. For we know that every creature groans and travails until now.