machine-draft · no human review4 passages · 767 words
Work dossier · summary and historical context
Summary
De canone SS. scripturarum (On the Canon of the Holy Scriptures) is a Latin work of uncertain authorship, traditionally attributed to an anonymous writer (Incertus). It likely dates from the late 4th to early 5th century, a formative period for the biblical canon in Latin Christianity. The text survives only in later medieval manuscripts, often appended to collections of patristic canon lists, and was cited in medieval canon law compilations such as Gratian's Decretum. It provides a list of canonical books and includes commentary on Gospel order, apostolic authorship, and legendary traditions about the composition of John's Gospel. The work reflects ongoing debates about canon boundaries and the authority of scriptural texts in the early Latin Church.
De canone SS. scripturarum is significant as a witness to the development of the Latin biblical canon in the post-Nicene period. It preserves early traditions about Gospel order, apostolic authorship, and legendary motifs (e.g., the fasting of John's disciples). Its citation in Gratian's Decretum shows its authority in medieval canon law. The work also illustrates the fluidity of canon lists and the persistence of apocryphal traditions in Latin Christianity.
Historical context
The work was composed in Latin, likely in the late 4th to early 5th century, a period when the Latin Church was consolidating its biblical canon amid debates with heretical groups and Eastern traditions. The text's place of origin is uncertain, but it may have been produced in North Africa or Italy, regions active in canon formation (e.g., the Councils of Hippo and Carthage). The community was probably a Latin-speaking Christian circle concerned with defining authoritative scriptures. The genre is canon-law, specifically a canon list with explanatory notes. Transmission is fragmentary: no early independent witness survives; the work is known only through later medieval manuscripts, often embedded in larger collections. It relates to other early Latin canon lists (e.g., the Gelasian Decree, the Cheltenham List) and patristic prologues to the Gospels. The text's attribution to Incertus reflects medieval uncertainty about its authorship.
background — historical or institutional context the text presupposes
scripture — a biblical quotation or allusion
reception — later use — liturgy, canon law, daughter versions
caution — uncertainty or a contested reading
term — a Coptic word and the rendering chosen for it
dating — dating, attribution, or sequence of events
Pipeline notes
coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
registerRegister: canon-law in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
structurePassages: 4 narrative.
sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Term index
Coptic
Rendering
Count
First
no glossary terms recorded
tmp1.tmp1.opp-lat1:1 · narrativemedium
Source
FRAGMENTUM ACEPHALUM INCERTI SCRIPTORIS DE CANONE SS. SCRIPTURARUM.
I.... Quibus tamen interfuit, et ita posuit. Tectio, Evangelii librum secundo Lucam. Lucas iste medicus post ascensum Christi, cum co Paulus quasi ut juris studiosum secundum assumpsisset numeni suo ex opinione concriset 4. Dominum tamen necipse vidit in carne; et idem prout assequi potuit, ita et (Luc. cap. I) a nativitate Joannis incipet dicere.. Quarti Evangeliorum Joannis ex discipulis. Cohortantibus condiscipulis et episcopis, suis dixit: Conjejunate mihi hodie triduo, et quid cuique fuerit revelatum, alterutrum nobis enarremus. Eadem nocte revelatum Andreae ex apostolis, ut recognoscentibus cunctis Joannis suo nomine cuncta describeret. Et ideo licet varia singulis Evangeliorum libris principia doceantur, nihil tamen differt credentium fidei 9, cum uno ac principali spiritu declarata sint in omnibus omnia de nativitate, de passione, de resurrectione, de conversatione cum discipulis suis, et de gemino ejus adventu, primo in humilitate despectos, quod ro......... 11, secundum potestate regali praeclarum 13, quod futurum est. Quid ergo mirum si Joannes lam constanter singula etiam in Epistolis suis proferat, dicens in semetipso (I Joan. I, 1, 4): Quae vidimus oculis nostris, et auribus audivimus, et manus nostrae palpaverunt, haec scripsimus.
English
Fragment of an Unknown Author on the Canon of Holy Scripture.
I. ...to which, however, he was present, and so he set it down. Reading: the book of the Gospel second, Luke. This Luke, a physician, after the ascension of Christ, when Paul had taken him up as a student of law, as it were, according to his own opinion he set forth. Yet he himself did not see the Lord in the flesh; and the same, as far as he could ascertain, so also (Luke ch. 1) he begins to speak from the nativity of John. The fourth of the Gospels, John, from among the disciples. At the urging of his fellow disciples and the bishops, he said to his own: Fast with me today for three days, and whatever has been revealed to each, let us relate to one another. That same night it was revealed to Andrew, one of the apostles, that with all recognizing it, John should describe everything in his own name. And therefore, although various beginnings are taught in each of the books of the Gospels, it makes no difference to the faith of believers, since they are all declared by one principal spirit in all things concerning the nativity, the passion, the resurrection, the conversation with his disciples, and his twofold coming: first in despised humility, which ...; second, glorious in royal power, which is to come. What wonder, then, if John so consistently sets forth each thing even in his own Epistles, saying in himself (1 John 1:1, 4): What we saw with our own eyes, and heard with our ears, and our hands touched, these we have written.
tmp1.tmp1.opp-lat1:2 · narrativemedium
Source
Sic enim non solum visorem, sed auditorem, sed et scriptorem omnium mirabilium Domini per ordinem, profitetur.
Acta autem omnium Apostolorum sub uno libro scripta sunt. Lucas optime Theophile (Act. i, 1) comprehendit, quia sub praesentia ejus singula gerebantur; sicut et semote (Joan, XXI, 18, 19) passionem Petri evidenter de(??)larut 18, sed (Rom. XV, 24, 28) profectionem Pauli ab urbe ad Spaniam proficiscentis.
Epistola autem Pauli, quae, a quo loco, vel qua ex causa directe sint, voluntatibus intelligere ipse declarant 24; primum omnium Corinthiis schisma haeresis interdicens, deinceps Callactis circumcisionem, Romanis autem ordine Scripturarum, sed et principium earum esse Christum intimans, prolixius scripsit. De quibus singulis necesse est a nobis disputari, cum ipse beatus apostolus Paulus sequens praedecessoris sui Joannis ordinem, nonnisi nominatim septem Ecclesiis scribat ordine tali. Ad Corinthios prima 26, ad Ephesios secunda, ad Philippenses tertia, ad Colossenses quarta, ad Galatas quinta, ad Thessalonicenses sexta, ad Romanos septima. Verum Corinthiis et Thessalonicensibus licet pro corretione iteretur, una tamen per omnem orbem Ecclesia diffuse esse denoscitur 29. Et Joannes enim in Apocalypsi, licet (Apoc. copp. I et II) septem Ecclesiis scribat, tamen omnibus dicit.
English
For thus he professes himself not only a spectator, but a hearer, and also a writer of all the Lord’s miracles in order.
Now the Acts of all the Apostles are written in one book. Luke best comprehends this for Theophilus (Acts 1:1), because each event took place in his presence; just as also, separately (John 21:18–19), he clearly declares the passion of Peter, but (Romans 15:24, 28) the journey of Paul setting out from the city to Spain.
Now the Epistles of Paul—from what place, or for what reason they were sent—declare themselves to those willing to understand (24); first of all to the Corinthians forbidding schism and heresy, then to the Galatians concerning circumcision, but to the Romans concerning the order of the Scriptures, and also intimating that Christ is their beginning, he wrote at greater length. Concerning each of these it is necessary for us to discuss, since the blessed apostle Paul himself, following the order of his predecessor John, writes only by name to seven churches in this order: first to the Corinthians (26), second to the Ephesians, third to the Philippians, fourth to the Colossians, fifth to the Galatians, sixth to the Thessalonians, seventh to the Romans. But although to the Corinthians and Thessalonians it is repeated for correction, yet one Church is known to be diffused throughout the whole world (29). And John also in the Apocalypse, although (Apocalypse, chapters 1 and 2) he writes to seven churches, yet speaks to all.
tmp1.tmp1.opp-lat1:3 · narrativemedium
Source
Verum ad Philemonem una, et ad Titum una, et ad Timotheum duas pro affectu et dilectione, in honore tamen Ecclesiae catholicae, in oratione ecclesiasticae disciplinae, sanctificatae sunt. Fertur etiam ad Landecenses, alia Alexandrinos, Pauli Duae. Freindall. Fort. Laodicenses aliae. Routh. Fort. haeresim. Routh. nomine fictae ad haeresem Marcionis et alia plura quae iu catholicam Ecclesiam recipi non potest, Fel enim cum melle misceri non congruit. Epistola sane Judae, et superscripti Joannis duas in catholica habentur. Et Sapientia ab amicis Salomonis in honorem ipsius scripta, Apocalyp is etiam Joannis et Petri tantum recipimus, quam quidam ex nostris legi in Ecclesia nolunt.
Pastorem vero nuperrime temporibus nostris in urbe Roma Herma conscripsit, sedente cathedra urbis Romae Ecclesiae Pio episcopo (47-48) fratre ejus. Et ideo legi eum quidem oportet, se publicare vero in Ecclesia populo, neque inter Prophetas completum numero, neque inter Apostolos, in finem temporum potest
English
Truly, one to Philemon, and one to Titus, and two to Timothy, out of affection and love, yet in honor of the Catholic Church, in the prayer of ecclesiastical discipline, have been sanctified. There are also said to be others: to the Laodiceans, another to the Alexandrians, two of Paul. Freindall. Perhaps Laodiceans, others. Routh. Perhaps heresy. Routh. Fictitiously named after the heresy of Marcion, and many other things which cannot be received into the Catholic Church, for gall cannot be mixed with honey. The Epistle of Jude, and the two of the aforementioned John, are held in the Catholic Church. And Wisdom, written by friends of Solomon in his honor, and also the Apocalypse of John and of Peter alone do we receive, which some of ours do not wish to be read in the Church.
But the Shepherd was written very recently in our times in the city of Rome by Hermas, while Pius, his brother, was sitting in the episcopal chair of the Church of the city of Rome. And therefore it ought indeed to be read, but it cannot be published to the people in the Church, neither counted among the Prophets in full number, nor among the Apostles, unto the end of time.
tmp1.tmp1.opp-lat1:4 · narrativemedium
Source
Arsinoi autem, sen Valentini, vel Mitiadis, nihil in totum recipimus, qui etiam novum Psalmorum librum Marcioni conscripserunt una cum Basilide Assianum Catafrygum constitutorem 39.
English
But of Arsinoë, or of Valentinus, or of Miltiades, we receive nothing at all, who also wrote a new book of Psalms for Marcion, together with Basilides of Assos, the founder of the Cataphrygians.