Work dossier · summary and historical context
The 'Historia De Excidio Hierosolymitanae Urbis Anacephalaeosis' is a Latin chronicle attributed to Ambrosius, likely composed in the 5th or 6th century. It survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the earliest witness from the 9th century. The work is a rhetorical epitome of the First Jewish–Roman War, freely adapting Josephus' 'Bellum Judaicum' for moral and theological purposes. It alters names and numbers, and includes scribal interpolations, especially in biblical quotations. The text was used in medieval florilegia and later chronicles, though its historical reliability was often questioned. This edition is based on a single printed source without full manuscript collation.
The work is significant as a late antique Christian rhetorical epitome that adapts Josephus for moral and theological purposes, reflecting the development of Christian historiography. It influenced medieval chronicles and florilegia, and its use of classical rhetorical devices, such as prosopopoeia, illustrates the blending of classical and Christian literary traditions. The text also preserves traditions of divine intervention and withdrawal, contributing to the understanding of late antique Christian views on the Jewish War.
The work is attributed to Ambrosius, but the attribution is conventional and unsupported by contemporary evidence; it likely dates from the 5th or 6th century, not the 4th. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the earliest witness from the 9th century, indicating limited circulation. The Greek title 'Anacephalaeosis' (recapitulation) frames it as a summary of earlier works, primarily Josephus' 'Bellum Judaicum'. The dating to the 42nd year after the Passion (c. AD 75) and Vespasian's first regnal year (AD 69-70) conflates events, as the Jewish War ended in AD 70. The claim that angels fought for Jerusalem reflects late antique Christian traditions of divine withdrawal due to sin, as in Eusebius' 'Historia Ecclesiastica'. The work was used in medieval florilegia and as a source for later chronicles, though its historical reliability was often questioned.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||