Work dossier · summary and historical context
The 'Supplementa minora ad quaestiones ad Marinum' is a brief Greek commentary by Eusebius of Caesarea, surviving in a single medieval manuscript with lacunae and scribal corrections. Likely composed in the early 4th century as a supplement to his lost 'Quaestiones ad Marinum', the work addresses textual and exegetical problems in the Gospels. It survives primarily through catenae and florilegia, which excerpt Eusebius's solutions. The addressee Marinus is otherwise unknown. The text presents a binary division of Christian life—ascetic and civic—and contrasts Christian worship with pagan sacrifice, echoing Platonic ideals. A scribal error misattributing a Malachi quotation to Isaiah is noted. The Khazarzar edition lacks manuscript sigla, collation, or critical apparatus, hindering verification against the source tradition.
The 'Supplementa minora' is a key witness to Eusebius's exegetical methods and his engagement with gospel textual problems. It preserves fragments of the lost 'Quaestiones ad Marinum' and reflects early Christian apologetic and ascetic ideals. Its survival in catenae and florilegia demonstrates its use in monastic and theological anthologies, linking it to broader traditions of biblical commentary and textual criticism in late antiquity.
Eusebius of Caesarea (c. 260–340 CE) was a bishop, historian, and exegete active in Roman Palestine. The 'Supplementa minora' was likely written in the early 4th century, after his main 'Quaestiones ad Marinum', but no external evidence fixes the date precisely. The work belongs to the genre of gospel commentary and textual criticism, addressing discrepancies and harmonizing passages. It survives in a single medieval manuscript, probably copied in a Byzantine monastic or scholarly context, with signs of lacunae and scribal correction. The supplement was rarely cited in later Greek exegesis; its influence is mainly indirect through catenae that excerpt Eusebius's gospel solutions. The addressee Marinus is otherwise unknown, and the work's genre and context remain uncertain. The Khazarzar edition does not record manuscript sigla or collation details, making it difficult to verify the text against the source tradition. No critical apparatus or stemma is provided, so readers cannot assess variant readings or scribal interventions.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||