ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Greek · Letters ·

Epistula ad Theodosium imperatorem

Epiphanius · khazarzar

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 3 passages · 579 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

The Epistula ad Theodosium imperatorem, attributed to Epiphanius of Salamis (c. 315–403), is a Greek letter urging Emperor Theodosius I to uphold orthodox faith and oppose Arianism. Written in the late 4th century, it reflects the post-Constantinian context of imperial involvement in doctrinal disputes and asserts episcopal authority. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition with possible scribal interpolations; the khazarzar edition lacks critical apparatus, manuscript sigla, and collation, hindering verification. Cited in later Byzantine florilegia as a witness to orthodox imperial correspondence, it influenced hagiographical accounts of Epiphanius but was not included in canonical collections.

The letter is significant as a primary source for late 4th-century episcopal-imperial relations and anti-Arian polemic. It illustrates how bishops like Epiphanius leveraged their authority to influence imperial policy. Its later use in Byzantine florilegia shows its role in shaping orthodox tradition, though its authenticity and textual reliability remain uncertain due to the lack of critical edition.

Historical context

The letter is dated to the late 4th century, likely after Theodosius I's accession in 379 and before Epiphanius' death in 403. Epiphanius, bishop of Salamis in Cyprus, was a prominent heresiologist and defender of Nicene orthodoxy. Theodosius, who made Nicene Christianity the state religion, actively intervened in ecclesiastical disputes, including Arianism. The letter exemplifies the growing role of bishops in shaping imperial religious policy. The Greek text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with possible scribal interpolations; the khazarzar edition provides no apparatus, variants, or lacunae. Its transmission is obscure, but it was cited in later Byzantine florilegia as a patristic witness to orthodox imperial correspondence, though not included in canonical collections.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

17 commentary units 4 background3 structure3 reception2 term2 scripture2 caution1 sense 0 derived notes 5 open questions 3 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: letter in ancient Greek; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 3 narrative.
  • sourceSource edition: khazarzar — Migne PG text (public domain); khazarzar host and the digitising project state no licence for this layer

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
khazarzar-epiphanius-epistula-ad-theodosium-imperatorem:1 · narrativehigh
Source
̓Επιφανίου ἐπισκόπου Κύπρων Ἐπιστολὴ πρὸς Θεοδόσιον τὸν βασιλέα. τὴν εἰδωλολατρείαν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ τῇ ἑαυτοῦ κακοτεχνίᾳ ὁ διάβολος ἐμηχανήσατο καὶ ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ ἔσπειρε τοῦτο καὶ ἐθεμελίωσε καὶ τοὺς ἀνθρώπους ἀπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ ἀπέστρεψε· νῦν δὲ πάλιν μετὰ τὰς αἱρέσεις καὶ τὰ εἴδωλα εἰς ἀρχαίαν εἰδωλολατρείαν τοὺς πιστοὺς καθείλκυσε καὶ ἠπάτησε. εἰσφέρει ἑαυτὸν ἐν τῇ ἐπιστολῇ τῇ πίστει τῶν ἐν Νικαίᾳ πατέρων ἐκ νέας ἡλικίας ἠκολουθηκέναι καὶ ὡς οἱ γονεῖς αὐτοῦ ἐν ταύτῃ γεγέννηνται καὶ τὴν αὐτὴν εἶχον ὁμολογίαν. νοήσει γὰρ ἡ σὴ εὐσέβεια εἰ πρέπον ἐστὶν ἔχειν ἡμᾶς θεὸν ζωγραφητὸν διὰ χρωμάτων. ἤκουσα ὡς καὶ τὸν ἀκατάληπτον υἱὸν τοῦ θεοῦ τινὲς γράφειν ἐπαγγέλλονται οὐ μέμνημαί τι τοιοῦτον ἰδών. 23 Τίς τῶν παλαιῶν πατέρων Χριστοῦ εἰκόνα ζωγραφήσας ἐν ἐκκλησίᾳ ἢ ἐν οἴκῳ ἰδίῳ κατέθετο ἢ ἐν βήλοις θυρῶν; τίς τῶν ἀρχαίων ἐπισκόπων Χριστὸν ἀτιμάσας ἐζωγράφησεν; τίς τὸν Ἀβραὰμ καὶ Ἰσαὰκ καὶ Ἰακώβ, Μωυσέα τε καὶ τοὺς προφήτας ἢ Πέτρον ἢ Ἀνδρέαν ἢ Ἰάκωβον ἢ Ἰωάννην ἢ τοὺς λοιποὺς ἀποστόλους οὕτως παρεδειγμάτισεν καὶ ἐθριάμβευσεν; ἅμα δὲ καὶ ψεύδονται, ἐξ ἰδίας αὐτῶν ἐννοίας μορφὰς τῶν ἁγίων ἄλλως καὶ ἄλλως ἀνατυποῦντες, ποτὲ μὲν γέροντας ποτὲ δὲ νεωτέρους τοὺς αὐτοὺς*, ἃ μὴ ἑωράκασιν ἐμβατεύοντες. κόμην γὰρ ἔχοντα τὸν σωτῆρα γράφουσιν ἐξ ὑπονοίας διὰ τὸ Ναζωραῖον αὐτὸν καλεῖσθαι, ἐπείπερ οἱ Ναζιραῖοι κόμας ἔχουσιν.
English
Epiphanius, bishop of Cyprus, Letter to the Emperor Theodosius. The devil contrived idolatry in the world by his own evil craft, and sowed this in the world and established it, and turned men away from God. But now again, after the heresies and the idols, he has dragged the faithful down into ancient idolatry and deceived them. He introduces himself in the letter as having followed the faith of the fathers at Nicaea from his youth, and that his parents were born in this faith and held the same confession. For your piety will perceive whether it is fitting for us to have a God depicted by means of colors. I have heard that some even undertake to depict the incomprehensible Son of God; I do not recall having seen any such thing. 23 Which of the ancient fathers painted an image of Christ and placed it in a church or in his own house or on door curtains? Which of the ancient bishops dishonored Christ by painting him? Who thus paraded and triumphed over Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and the prophets, or Peter, Andrew, James, John, and the rest of the apostles? Moreover, they lie, fashioning forms of the saints from their own imagination, now as old men, now as younger, the same ones, intruding upon things they have not seen. For they paint the Savior with long hair, from the supposition that he is called a Nazorean, since the Nazirites have long hair.
khazarzar-epiphanius-epistula-ad-theodosium-imperatorem:2 · narrativehigh
Source
Σφάλλονται δὲ οἱ τοὺς τύπους αὐτῷ συνάπτειν πειρώμενοι· οἶνον γὰρ ἔπινεν ὁ σωτήρ, ὃν οἱ Ναζιραῖοι οὐκ ἔπινον. οὐ πρέπον... ἐστὶ θεὸν ἔχειν ἡμᾶς ἐν χρώμασι καὶ μέλεσι ζωγραφούμενον. καὶ αὐτὸ γὰρ ὅπερ πλάσσουσιν ἀπὸ ἰδίας ἐννοίας διανοούμενοι, ψεύδονται. γράφουσι γὰρ Πέτρον τὸν ἅγιον ἀπόστολον οἱ πλάνοι γέροντα ἄνδρα, τὴν κεφαλὴν καὶ τὸ γένειον κεκαρμένον· γράφουσι δὲ καὶ τὸν ἅγιον Παῦλον ἄλλοι μὲν ἀναφαλαντέα, ἄλλοι δὲ φαλακρὸν γενειήτην καὶ τοὺς ἄλλους μαθητὰς ψιλῶς κεκαρμένους. εἰ τοίνυν κόμην εἶχεν ὁ σωτήρ, οἱ δὲ ἄλλοι μαθηταὶ ἦσαν κεκαρμένοι καὶ μὴ ἦν αὐτὸς κεκαρμένος καὶ ἴσος αὐτοῖς φαινόμενος, τίνι τῷ λόγῳ οἱ Φαρισαῖοι καὶ οἱ γραμματεῖς τριάκοντα ἀργύρια ἐδίδουν τῷ Ἰούδᾳ μισθοῦ χάριν, ὅπως φιλήσας αὐτὸν ὑποδείξῃ αὐτοῖς ὅτι "οὗτός ἐστιν ὃν ζητεῖτε", δυνάμενοι καὶ δι' ἑαυτῶν καὶ ὑπ' ἄλλων γνῶναι διὰ τοῦ σημείου τῆς κόμης ὃν ἐζήτουν εὑρεῖν καὶ μὴ μισθὸν δοῦναι; ὁμολογεῖ, πρῶτα μὲν ὡς χλεύη τοῖς πολλοῖς ἐπὶ τοῖς ληρῳδουμένοις αὐτῷ προὔκειτο, ἔπειτα δὲ ὅτι καὶ τοῖς συνεπισκόποις καὶ συλλειτουργοῖς συμβουλεύσας ταῦτα περιαιρεθῆναι οὐκ ἠκούσθη. εὕρομεν ἐν τῷ τέλει τῆς ἐπιστολῆς ἔμφασιν τοιάδε περιέχουσαν· ὅτι πολλάκις λαλήσας τοῖς συλλειτουργοῖς μου περιαιρεθῆναι τὰς εἰκόνας οὐκ ἐδέχθην παρ' αὐτῶν οὐδὲ πρὸς βραχὺ ἀκοῦσαι τῆς ἐμῆς φωνῆς ἠνέσχοντο. ὅπως τὰ βῆλα τὰ ἔχοντα τοιαύτην γραφὴν συλλεγέντα εἰς ταφὴν τῶν πτωχῶν προχωρήσειεν, τὰ δὲ ἐν τοίχοις διὰ χρωμάτων λευκανθῆναι.
English
They are mistaken, however, who attempt to attach images to him; for the Savior drank wine, which the Nazirites did not drink. It is not fitting... for us to have God depicted in colors and limbs. For even that which they fashion, conceiving it from their own imagination, they falsify. For the deceivers depict the holy apostle Peter as an old man, with his head and beard shorn; and they depict the holy Paul, some as balding in front, others as bald with a beard, and the other disciples as clean-shaven. If, then, the Savior had long hair, while the other disciples were shorn and he himself was not shorn and appeared equal to them, for what reason did the Pharisees and scribes give thirty silver pieces to Judas as a reward, so that by kissing him he might indicate to them that "this is the one you seek," when they could have known through themselves or through others by the sign of his hair the one they sought to find, without giving a reward? He confesses, first, that this was set before the many as a mockery in the nonsense attributed to him, and then that, having advised his fellow bishops and fellow ministers to remove these things, he was not heard. We found at the end of the letter an indication containing the following: that having spoken many times to my fellow ministers about removing the images, I was not accepted by them, nor did they endure to hear my voice even briefly. That the veils having such a depiction might be gathered for the burial of the poor, and those on walls might be whitewashed with colors.
khazarzar-epiphanius-epistula-ad-theodosium-imperatorem:3 · narrativehigh
Source
30 Τὰ δὲ ἐν μουσαρίῳ προληφθέντα γραφῆναι, ἐπειδὴ δυσχερές ἐστι τὸ τοιοῦτον ἀνασκεύασμα, εἰ μὲν δυνατὸν ἀνασκευασθῆναι, καλόν· εἰ δὲ ἀδύνατον, ἀρκεσθῆναι τοῖς προγεγονόσι καὶ μηκέτι τινὰ ζωγραφεῖν οὕτως.
English
As for the things previously taken up to be painted in a mosaic, since such a construction is difficult to dismantle, if it is possible to dismantle it, that is good; but if it is impossible, let us be content with what has been done before and no longer paint anyone in this way.
Citation. Tergwame, “Epistula ad Theodosium imperatorem”, khazarzar-epiphanius-epistula-ad-theodosium-imperatorem:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/khazarzar-epiphanius-epistula-ad-theodosium-imperatorem#s1
Colophon. Source: khazarzar · licence: Migne PG text (public domain); khazarzar host and the digitising project state no licence for this layer · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0020 · generated 2026-11-15.