Work dossier · summary and historical context
The surviving fragments of Cyril of Alexandria's commentary on the Books of Kings (Fragmenta in libros Regum) are preserved only in Byzantine catenae and later florilegia, with no continuous manuscript extant. Cyril, bishop of Alexandria from 412 to 444, likely composed the commentary during his episcopate, though a more precise date is unknown. The fragments, written in Greek, belong to the genre of biblical commentary and were excerpted for liturgical and doctrinal use, particularly in the Catenae in libros Regum. The khazarzar edition presents the Greek text without critical apparatus, omitting variant readings or lacunae from the catena witnesses. The fragments show Cyril engaging with the Septuagint text, referencing prophetic voices (e.g., Isaiah 53:7), and incorporating extra-biblical traditions, such as Solomon's apostasy to Baalim (cf. Josephus, Ant. 8.13.4) and Jeroboam's golden calves at Dan and Bethel (1 Kings 12:28-30).
These fragments provide rare insight into Cyril of Alexandria's exegesis of the historical books of the Old Testament, a relatively understudied area of his corpus. They demonstrate his engagement with the Septuagint, his use of extra-biblical traditions (e.g., Solomon's apostasy), and his typological reading of Kings in light of Christological themes. The fragments also illustrate the transmission of patristic commentary through Byzantine catenae, highlighting the liturgical and doctrinal reuse of Cyril's work in later centuries.
Cyril of Alexandria served as patriarch from 412 to 444, a period marked by Christological controversies, especially the Nestorian dispute leading to the Council of Ephesus (431). His commentary on Kings was likely produced during this Alexandrian episcopate, though no precise date can be assigned. The work survives only in fragmentary form, embedded in Byzantine catenae—compilations of patristic exegesis on biblical books—and later florilegia. These catenae, particularly the Catenae in libros Regum, were created for liturgical and educational purposes, preserving excerpts from Cyril's commentary alongside those of other Church Fathers. The fragments reflect Cyril's exegetical method, which combined literal interpretation with typological and allegorical readings, often drawing on the Septuagint and extra-biblical traditions. The transmission through catenae indicates the commentary's authority in Byzantine Orthodox circles, though the lack of a continuous manuscript limits our understanding of its original scope and structure. The khazarzar edition, lacking critical apparatus, does not account for textual variants or lacunae in the catena witnesses, cautioning against over-reliance on its presentation.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||