Work dossier · summary and historical context
Cyril of Alexandria's Commentarii in Matthaeum is a fragmentary Greek commentary on the Gospel of Matthew, surviving only through later catenae and translations. Composed likely in the 420s–430s, it reflects Cyril's Alexandrian exegetical method, typological interpretation, and early Christological concerns. The work draws on Old Testament typology—Abraham as a type of believers, David as a type of Christ—and emphasizes the distinction between Christ's divine and human natures, notably in interpreting 'son of man.' The present edition, based on Migne's Patrologia Graeca via a digital transcription by khazarzar, lacks critical apparatus and does not distinguish original Cyrilline passages from later additions. The commentary influenced medieval exegesis through Syriac and Latin translations.
The Commentarii in Matthaeum is significant as a rare witness to Cyril's early exegetical work and his development of Alexandrian Christology before the Nestorian crisis. Its typological readings—linking Abraham, David, and Adam to Christ—illustrate patristic methods of biblical interpretation. The commentary's fragmentary survival and transmission through catenae exemplify the challenges of reconstructing ancient Christian literature. It also influenced medieval Latin exegesis, showing the enduring impact of Greek patristic thought.
Cyril of Alexandria (c. 376–444) composed this commentary in Greek, likely in Alexandria during the 420s–430s, after his early exegetical works and before the Nestorian controversy intensified (c. 428). The work belongs to the Antiochene and Alexandrian exegetical traditions, though Cyril's approach is distinctly Alexandrian, emphasizing typology and Christological unity. The original Greek text is lost; it survives only in fragments preserved in Greek catenae (chain commentaries) and in Syriac and Latin translations. These catenae, compiled from the 6th century onward, excerpted patristic commentaries, often without attribution or with paraphrases. The present edition reproduces Migne's PG text (19th century), which itself relied on earlier printed editions and manuscripts. The commentary's transmission thus involves layers of selection and redaction, making it difficult to ascertain the original form. Cyril's exegesis here anticipates his later Christological arguments, particularly the distinction between Christ's human and divine natures, which became central to the Nestorian controversy.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||