Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Scholia in Acta attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria are a set of Greek exegetical notes on the Acts of the Apostles. Their attribution to Athanasius is traditional but disputed, and they survive only embedded in later Byzantine catenae, not as independent manuscripts. The scholia cannot be firmly dated; stylistic considerations suggest a 4th–5th century origin, but the earliest manuscript evidence is medieval. They were incorporated into Greek catena traditions on Acts and cited by Byzantine commentators but never circulated independently in the Latin West. The modern edition by khazarzar relies on 19th-century printed editions of catenae, not direct manuscript collation, and lacks a critical apparatus. The work is often confused with Athanasius' genuine exegetical fragments; scholars should consult CPG 2 for reliable spuria.
The Scholia in Acta illustrate the reception of Acts in late antique and Byzantine exegesis, particularly through the catena tradition. They also shed light on the polemical use of Athanasius' authority in later debates, such as those against the Novatians. The work's uncertain attribution and fragmentary transmission exemplify the challenges of studying patristic texts preserved only in catenae.
The Scholia in Acta are traditionally ascribed to Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373), a key figure in the Arian controversy and bishop of Alexandria. However, the attribution is uncertain; the scholia may be a later compilation or the work of another author. They survive only as excerpts in Greek catenae on Acts, which are collections of patristic comments assembled from the 6th century onward. The earliest manuscript witnesses are medieval, and no independent transmission exists. The scholia were used by Byzantine exegetes but were unknown in the Latin West. The modern edition by khazarzar is based on 19th-century printed editions of catenae, not on direct collation of manuscripts, and provides no critical apparatus or manuscript sigla. The work is often confused with Athanasius' genuine exegetical fragments; the Clavis Patrum Graecorum (vol. 2) lists it among spuria. The scholia reflect concerns such as the Novatianist controversy, suggesting a context of intra-Christian polemic over penance and purity.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||