Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Quaestiones in evangelia is a Greek commentary attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria, surviving in a single manuscript tradition with lacunae and interpolations. It employs an erotapokriseis (question-and-answer) format to blend scriptural exegesis with doctrinal clarification, focusing on Gospel passages. The work was widely used in Byzantine catechetical and monastic settings, influencing later exegetical collections and florilegia. Its attribution to Athanasius (c. 296–373) is traditional but not secure; it may date from the late fourth or early fifth century, reflecting later theological concerns. The source edition (khazarzar) lacks a critical apparatus, and readers should consult G. Dorival’s 2005 critical edition for manuscript variants and patristic parallels.
The Quaestiones in evangelia is significant as a witness to the development of the erotapokriseis genre in early Christian exegesis and catechesis. It reflects the theological concerns of the late fourth and early fifth centuries, particularly regarding Christology and Mariology. Its influence on Byzantine monastic and catechetical traditions underscores its role in shaping later exegetical methods and doctrinal instruction.
The Quaestiones in evangelia is traditionally attributed to Athanasius the Great of Alexandria (c. 296–373), but the attribution is not secure; the work may date from the late fourth or early fifth century, reflecting later theological concerns such as Christological debates and the defense of Mary’s perpetual virginity. It survives in a single Greek manuscript tradition, with lacunae and later interpolations that complicate reconstruction of the original. The text was widely used in Byzantine catechetical and monastic settings, influencing later Greek exegetical collections and florilegia. The erotapokriseis genre was common in early Christian literature for teaching and clarifying doctrine. The work’s references to Herodian rulers and Jewish marriage customs indicate a learned author familiar with Gospel backgrounds. The source edition (khazarzar) does not include a critical apparatus; the reader should compare with the critical edition by G. Dorival (2005) where available.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||