Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Old Georgian Catholic Epistles, preserved in manuscripts from the 10th century onward, represent a key witness to the early Georgian biblical tradition. Traditionally linked to the 5th-century Armenian missionary Mesrop Mashtots, the translation reflects the integration of the New Testament into Georgian liturgy and monastic life. The text, based on a single base manuscript without a critical apparatus, includes the Epistle of James and other Catholic letters, with distinctive Georgian expansions and moralizing imagery. Its language and phrasing show influence from patristic commentaries and local homiletic traditions, underscoring its role in shaping Georgian Christian identity and worship.
The Old Georgian Catholic Epistles are crucial for understanding the development of the Georgian biblical canon and liturgical practice. They preserve early translation techniques and theological vocabulary, reflecting the intersection of Georgian, Armenian, and Byzantine Christian traditions. The text's expansions and moralizing elements offer insights into local exegetical traditions and the adaptation of scripture for a Georgian-speaking audience.
The Old Georgian translation of the Catholic Epistles is traditionally attributed to the activity of Mesrop Mashtots and his disciples in the 5th century, when the Georgian alphabet was created and Christian texts were first rendered into Georgian. However, the earliest complete manuscript witnesses date only to the 10th century, leaving the earlier transmission history obscure. The translation was produced within the Georgian Church, likely in monastic centers such as those in Tao-Klarjeti or the Georgian monasteries on Mount Sinai. The text served liturgical purposes, with readings assigned to feast days in the Divine Liturgy and daily office. The Georgian version often expands on the Greek original, incorporating imagery from local ascetic and homiletic literature, and shows occasional influence from Armenian and Syriac traditions. The survival of multiple manuscripts indicates ongoing use and copying, though the lack of a critical apparatus limits knowledge of textual variation.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||