Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Old Georgian version of Dorotheus of Gaza's Teachings and Letters survives in a single manuscript (Sinai georg. 35), copied in the 10th–11th centuries. Dorotheus (c. 505–565/580) was a monk and abbot near Gaza; his teachings and letters were compiled posthumously. The Georgian translation likely dates to the 9th–10th centuries, based on paleographic and codicological evidence. The manuscript includes marginal notes and liturgical rubrics, indicating its use in monastic reading cycles. The present edition is based on this single witness, without collation of other Georgian or Greek manuscripts, so it may not represent the earliest or most complete form of the translation.
The Old Georgian Dorotheus is a rare witness to the early reception of this key ascetic author in the Georgian tradition. It attests to the cross-cultural exchange of monastic literature between Greek and Georgian communities in Palestine and Sinai. The manuscript's liturgical annotations show how Dorotheus's teachings were adapted for communal reading, shaping Georgian monastic spirituality. Its survival in a single copy underscores the fragility of such translations and the need for further study of the Georgian manuscript heritage.
The Georgian translation of Dorotheus of Gaza's works was produced in a monastic milieu, likely in Palestine or at Sinai, where Georgian monks were active from the 5th century onward. The sole surviving manuscript, Sinai georg. 35, was copied in the 10th–11th centuries, but the translation itself probably dates to the 9th–10th centuries, a period of flourishing Georgian literary activity in the Holy Land. Dorotheus's original Greek works were compiled after his death (c. 565–580) and circulated widely in Byzantine monastic circles. The Georgian version reflects the integration of Dorotheus into the ascetic curriculum of Georgian monasteries, as shown by liturgical rubrics and marginal notes. The text's transmission is precarious, relying on a single witness, and its relationship to the Greek tradition remains unclear due to lack of collation.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||