Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Acts of Paul is an apocryphal work recounting the missionary journeys and miracles of the Apostle Paul. The Geʿez version, preserved in a single fifteenth-century manuscript (EMML 1839), is a medieval translation from an Arabic Vorlage, itself derived from a lost Greek or Coptic original. The text survives only in Ethiopic, with no complete Greek or Coptic witness. In Ethiopian Orthodox tradition, it is read as edifying hagiography, often paired with the Life of Paul of Tamma, and is not considered canonical. The edition (betmas) lacks a critical apparatus, limiting reconstruction of its textual history. The narrative includes homiletic openings and parallels canonical Acts, such as Paul and Barnabas in Paphos and Perga.
The Geʿez Acts of Paul is significant as a rare witness to the medieval transmission of early Christian apocrypha in Ethiopia, illustrating how second-century traditions were adapted for local liturgical and hagiographic use. Its survival in a single manuscript highlights the fragility of such texts. The work's homiletic structure and dependence on canonical Acts provide insight into Ethiopian Orthodox reception of Pauline narratives, distinct from Western apocryphal traditions like the Visio Pauli.
The original Greek Acts of Paul dates to the late second century CE, likely composed in Asia Minor or Egypt. The Geʿez version, however, is a medieval translation, probably made between the 14th and 15th centuries, when Ethiopic Christian literature flourished under the Solomonid dynasty. The sole surviving manuscript (EMML 1839) was copied from an earlier Arabic Vorlage, reflecting the transmission of apocryphal texts through Arabic intermediaries in the Horn of Africa. The text was used in Ethiopian Orthodox liturgy and hagiography, often paired with the Life of Paul of Tamma, a local saint. Its genre is apocryphon, distinct from the Latin Visio Pauli, and it is not canonical. The Geʿez adaptation of Greek place names (e.g., Täslonqe for Thessalonica) shows linguistic adaptation. The lack of a critical edition and variant collation limits understanding of its textual history.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||