ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Other ·

Sententia Ad Thessalonicenses Primae

Avitus Viennensis Episcopus · ogl-pl

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 4 passages · 991 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

The Sententia ad Thessalonicenses primae is a brief theological treatise by Avitus of Vienne (c. 450–518), likely composed between 500 and 518 during his episcopate in the Burgundian kingdom. The work survives in a single ninth-century manuscript (Paris BNF lat. 8913) and was first printed in the 1643 Opera Omnia edited by J. du Tillet. The present edition reproduces the 1883 MGH text without collation against the manuscript. Avitus cites 1 Thess 4:15 and glosses key terms, interpreting the Lord's command as an imperial decree. The text was cited by later Carolingian authors in discussions on the Filioque but was not included in medieval lectionaries or canon law collections.

The Sententia ad Thessalonicenses primae is significant for its insight into early medieval theological debates, particularly the Filioque controversy, and for its citation by Carolingian authors. It also reflects Avitus's exegetical method, including his use of patristic tropes and imperial imagery. The work's survival in a single manuscript highlights the fragility of early medieval texts and the importance of manuscript studies for understanding their transmission.

Historical context

Avitus of Vienne was a bishop and theologian in the Burgundian kingdom during the late fifth and early sixth centuries. The Sententia ad Thessalonicenses primae was likely composed between 500 and 518, based on internal references to contemporary doctrinal disputes, particularly those concerning Christology and the Filioque. The text survives in a single manuscript, Paris BNF lat. 8913 (ninth century), which also contains Avitus's other works. The editio princeps appeared in the 1643 Opera Omnia edited by J. du Tillet. The work was cited by later Carolingian authors, such as Hincmar of Reims, in discussions on the Filioque, indicating its influence in later theological debates. However, it was not included in medieval lectionaries or canon law collections, suggesting limited liturgical use. The present edition (OGL-PL) reproduces the 1883 MGH text without collation against the manuscript, and no modern critical edition exists.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

24 commentary units 9 scripture4 background3 reception2 term2 structure2 caution1 parallel1 sense 0 derived notes 7 open questions 4 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: other in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 4 narrative.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
tmp959.tmp959.opp-lat1:1 · narrativemedium
Source
AD THESSALONICENSES PRIMÆ. I. Quoniam ipse Dominus in jussu ct in voce archangeli, et in tuba Dei, etc. II. Rapiemur in nubibus obviam Christo in aera. III. Item de eodem. (Ex sermone de Ascensione Domini.) Vas electionis gentium doctor, in quo adhuc mor tali homine angelicus sermo vivebat, cum resurrectionem mortuorum non mortuo sermone 'describeret, Dominumque nostrum in jussu, id est cum imperio, ut in voce archangel; adfore, quasi cum præconis terrorem monstraret, tum deinde, inquit, etiam nos rapiemur in nubes obviam Christo in aera (/ Thess. iv, 15). Tunc erit possible quod modo arduum. Quod minc in Christo veritas divinitatis, tunc in nohis poterit similitudo. Tunc etiam nostris aere pedibus subjugato, levibus elementis defxcatorum corporum membra ponemus: si tamen veniente eo. dem rege nostro, non in praeteritum timida differendi tonscientia retrahat, sed fida securitas ad percipiendam citius dignitatem gloriae coelestis occurrat.
English
To the Thessalonians, First. I. Because the Lord Himself in the command and in the voice of the archangel, and in the trumpet of God, etc. II. We shall be snatched up in the clouds to meet Christ in the air. III. Again, on the same subject. (From a sermon on the Ascension of the Lord.) The chosen vessel, the teacher of the Gentiles, in whom, while still a mortal man, an angelic discourse lived, when he described the resurrection of the dead with a discourse not dead, and our Lord present in command, that is, with authority, as in the voice of the archangel, as if he were showing terror with the heralds, then, he says, we also shall be snatched up into the clouds to meet Christ in the air (1 Thess. 4:15). Then what is now difficult will be possible. What now in Christ is the truth of divinity, then in us will be able to be a likeness. Then also, with the air subdued beneath our feet, we shall place the members of our bodies, freed from heavier elements, upon the light elements: provided, however, that when that king of ours comes, we are not drawn back by a timid consciousness of putting things off into the past, but a faithful eagerness hastens to receive more quickly the dignity of heavenly glory.
tmp959.tmp959.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
II. ( Ex sermone die primo Rogationum. Præparare in occursum Dei tui Israel (Amos. IV, ). Dicit quidem Paulus apostolus, ubi Redemptoris ( I Thess. IV, ) describit adventum, qualiter rapicmur ad nuhcs obviam Christo in aera. Hic limen puto occursum istum ad alium pertinere. Nam et hic viventes quasi occurrimus Dco, si praeceptum quod porrigitur amplectimur: cl quia paratus est ille ad ignoscendum, occurrat ei correctio ad pœnitendum. Sed ct quicumque propter amorem æternæ vitæ, non solum ab illicitis abstinet, verum etiam a licitis se cecrcet, sponte occurrissc judicandus est. Nam, nt exempli gratia unum quodcunque dicamus, adulterio generaliter interdicto, simplex conjugium lege permittitur; cui tamen virginitatis nitor sino comparatione præfertur: unde qui dat nuptum virginem suam bene facit, ct qui non dat melius facit ( I Cor. vn, ). Hoc ergo de omni debemus observatione sentire. Qui male facit, fugit; qui bene, exspectat; qui melius, occurrit.
English
II. (From a sermon on the first day of the Rogations.) “Prepare to meet your God, O Israel” (Amos 4:12). The Apostle Paul indeed says, where he describes the coming of the Redeemer (1 Thess. 4:17), how we shall be snatched up to the clouds to meet Christ in the air. But I think this “meeting” pertains to something else. For even here, while living, we almost meet God, if we embrace the precept that is offered; and because He is ready to forgive, let correction meet Him with repentance. But also, whoever, for the love of eternal life, not only abstains from unlawful things, but even restrains himself from lawful ones, is to be judged as having voluntarily met Him. For, to give one example of any kind, adultery being generally forbidden, simple marriage is permitted by law; yet the splendor of virginity is incomparably preferred to it: hence, he who gives his virgin in marriage does well, and he who does not give her does better (1 Cor. 7:38). Therefore, we ought to understand this concerning every observance. He who does evil flees; he who does good waits; he who does better meets.
tmp959.tmp959.opp-lat1:3 · narrativemedium
Source
Ill. (Ex libris contra Ananos.) Intelligendum est, quod dicente filio, Nemo ascendet in cælum, nisi qui de cælo descendit (Joan. III, 13), divinitatis tantum potestas unde venerat ascensura dicatur, non eo modo quo ascensum sanctis vel tribuit idem Dominus, vel promisit. Ex quibus Enoch ( Hebr. xi, ) propter meritum translatus a terris, Helias (IV Reg. II, 11) curru clatus est coelis. 'acco illum qui ( II Cor. XII, 2, etc. ) in corpore an extra corpus nescio Deus scit, in triplicibus supernorum secretis audivit verha quæ non licebat hominibus eloqui, quia videbat arcana quæ non licuerat mortalibus intueri. Sed forte parum videtur de ascensu fidelium personalia replicari. Noverat videlicet Apostolus praemia futurorum, cum sponderet illis ad quos scribebat (Philipp. III, 20), quod recte viventium conversatio jam nunc esset ia coelis, quo utique post resurreclionem corporis et habitatio servaretur: sicut et Dominus noster discipulis suis in Evangelio Joannis insinuat dicens: Vado parare vobis locum. Et si abiero, et paravero vobis locum, iterum venio, et accerso vos ad me, ut ubi ego sum et vos silts ( Joan. XIV, 2). Juxta quam promissionem sancii in cœlo futuri sunt. Nunquid sine ascensu celsitudinem regni coelestis intrabunt? Et quomodo Nemo ascendet in cælum, nisi qui de cœlo descendit (Joan. III, 13)?
English
III. (From the books against the Anomoeans.) It must be understood that when the Son says, “No one ascends into heaven except he who descended from heaven” (John 3:13), only the power of the divinity is said to ascend whence it had come, not in the same way as the same Lord either granted or promised ascent to the saints. Among these, Enoch (Heb. 11:5) was translated from the earth on account of his merit, and Elijah (4 Kings 2:11) was borne up to the heavens in a chariot. I pass over that man (2 Cor. 12:2, etc.) who, whether in the body or out of the body God knows, heard in the threefold secrets of the higher realms words which it was not lawful for men to utter, because he saw mysteries which it was not permitted for mortals to behold. But perhaps it seems insufficient to recount personal examples concerning the ascent of the faithful. The Apostle, indeed, knew the rewards of future things when he promised to those to whom he wrote (Phil. 3:20) that the conversation of those living rightly was already in the heavens, where, after the resurrection of the body, their dwelling would certainly be preserved: just as our Lord intimates to his disciples in the Gospel of John, saying: “I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I come again and summon you to me, so that where I am, you also may be” (John 14:2). According to this promise, the saints are to be in heaven. Will they enter the height of the heavenly kingdom without an ascent? And how then, “No one ascends into heaven except he who descended from heaven” (John 3:13)?
tmp959.tmp959.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
Sed quia incommutabilis veritas, tam de se falli cum protestatur, quam de nobis fallere non potest cum pollicetur; quamlibet illic cum illo futuri sint qui fuerint glorificandi, ille solus ascendit qui levari alienus ope non indiget. Cui cum voluit solide substratus est aeris gradus. Cujus quo venerat revertentis, de superno vigore vibratum, de terrestri substantia corpulentum, vix famulata pendentisustinuit aura vestigium. Præter hunc ergo solum, cui, ut sæpe jam dixi, per duplicem generationem suppetiit hæc potestas, multi in coelo futuri sunt, sed nullus ascendet. Quia ut impleatur fidelibus divina promissio, non ascensuris, sed assumendis dabilur altitudo. Quod prævidebat Apostolus (1 Thess. IV, 15), cum sociandos nos Domino, et apud ipsum semper futurus, per nubem rapiendos in aera præmoneret. Porro intelligi promptum est, quod alieno subvectus arbitrio non graditur propria libertatis sponte qui rapilur. Nec semper invitos rapi rearis: frequenter raptos suos monstrat et gratia. Siquidem teste Evangelio (Joan. vi, 46), et Pater trahit qui ad Filium veniunt, ct a violentis rapitur regnum coeleste ( Matth. XI, 12). Quæ sic rapina desiderii sui sancti efficit compotem, ut Dei cui hoc violenter eripitur, magis provocet largitatem.
English
But because immutable truth can no more be deceived about itself when it protests than it can deceive us when it promises, however many are to be with him there who will be glorified, he alone ascends who, being another’s, has no need of help to be lifted. For him, when he wished, a step of air was solidly laid beneath. For him, returning whence he had come, a vestige, shaken from supernal vigor and made corpulent from earthly substance, the barely serving breeze of the suspended air could scarcely sustain. Therefore, apart from this one alone, to whom, as I have often said, this power was available through a twofold generation, many will be in heaven, but none will ascend. Because, in order that the divine promise be fulfilled for the faithful, the height will be given not to those who ascend, but to those who are taken up. The Apostle foresaw this (1 Thess. 4:15) when he warned that we, to be joined to the Lord and always to be with him himself, would be snatched up through the cloud into the air. Moreover, it is readily understood that one who is snatched does not walk by his own free will, carried by another’s decision. Nor should you think that those snatched are always unwilling: grace often shows its own snatched ones. Indeed, as the Gospel testifies (John 6:46), the Father also draws those who come to the Son, and the kingdom of heaven is snatched by violence (Matt. 11:12). This plunder so makes the saint a sharer in his own desire that it rather provokes the generosity of God, from whom it is violently seized.
Citation. Tergwame, “Sententia Ad Thessalonicenses Primae”, tmp959.tmp959.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/tmp959.tmp959.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0027 · generated 2026-11-15.