Work dossier · summary and historical context
Cerealis, bishop of Castellum in Mauretania, composed this Latin polemic against the Arian bishop Maximinus, defending Nicene orthodoxy through scriptural and logical argument. The work reflects the theological conflicts of mid-5th-century North Africa under Vandal rule, where Homoian Christianity was promoted. It survives in a single manuscript tradition and was later used by Catholic controversialists as a patristic witness against Arianism. The attribution to Cerealis is secure, but Maximinus's identity remains uncertain; he may be the same figure who debated Augustine. The text lacks a critical apparatus and is preserved in early modern editions without collation against other witnesses.
This work is a rare surviving example of North African anti-Arian polemic from the Vandal period, illustrating the theological and political struggles between Nicene and Homoian Christians. It was later used by Catholic controversialists in the 16th century and relates to broader patristic debates on Trinitarian doctrine, echoing arguments found in Augustine and other Nicene fathers.
The treatise is dated to circa 440–450 CE, during the Vandal occupation of North Africa. Cerealis, bishop of Castellum in Mauretania, likely wrote it in response to Maximinus’s Arian teachings, which were promoted under Vandal rule. The work survives in a single manuscript tradition, preserved in early modern editions. Its limited circulation may reflect the disruption of North African church life under Vandal and later Islamic rule. The text is a polemic, defending Nicene orthodoxy against Homoian Christianity, and was cited by later Catholic controversialists, notably in the 16th century, as a patristic witness against Arianism. It appears in collections of anti-Arian works but never entered the liturgical tradition.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||