Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Scripta Dubiae Auctoritatis — SS Marcus is a Latin pseudepigraphical work attributed to Pope Mark (reigned 336), surviving only in a single heavily corrected 9th-century manuscript (Vatican, Pal. lat. 220). The text, of uncertain date and origin, shows non-classical Latin features suggesting a late antique or early medieval composition. It was never cited by medieval authorities and appears in no library catalogues before the 15th century. The work's attribution to Mark is first recorded in the 9th-century manuscript with no earlier external confirmation. The text includes anachronistic references, such as a joint address with Athanasius (died 373), and conflated biblical citations, indicating it is a later forgery, possibly arising from anti-Arian polemic.
The Scripta Dubiae Auctoritatis — SS Marcus is significant as a pseudepigraphical text that illustrates the production of spurious apostolic and patristic literature in the early medieval period. Its inclusion in early modern conciliar collections influenced debates on the authenticity of Nicene canons. The work's survival in a single corrected manuscript highlights the challenges of textual transmission and the role of scribal intervention in shaping the reception of dubious authorities.
The work's sole manuscript, Pal. lat. 220, was produced in the late 9th century, likely in a Carolingian scriptorium, possibly in the region of Lorsch or Mainz, given its provenance. The text's Latin, with non-classical forms and syntactical anomalies, points to composition in late antiquity or the early Middle Ages, not the apostolic age. The attribution to Pope Mark (336) is first attested in this manuscript, with no earlier witnesses. The work was never cited by medieval canonists or theologians, and it appears in no known library catalogue before the 15th century, suggesting limited circulation. The text's content, including anachronistic references to Athanasius and conflated biblical citations, aligns with later anti-Arian polemic. The manuscript shows signs of heavy correction, and the edition does not collate marginalia or the corrector's hand, complicating transmission history. The work was included in the Labbé edition of councils (1671–1672) among spuria, shaping early modern debates on Nicene legislation.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||