Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Fragmenta attributed to Pope Silvester I survive only as scattered quotations in later canonical collections, with no complete manuscript witness. The edition reconstructs the work from these fragments, which likely date from the 5th or 6th century and reflect later concerns about church property and clerical discipline. The attribution to Silvester I (314–335) is traditional but unverifiable. The fragments were cited in the Pseudo-Isidorean Decretals (9th century) to support papal authority over episcopal property disputes, though their authenticity was already questioned by early modern scholars. The original order and completeness of the fragments cannot be determined; the arrangement follows the sequence in the source edition (ogl-pl), which is editorial.
The Fragmenta attributed to Silvester I are significant as a witness to the development of papal authority in the early medieval period, particularly in property disputes. Their use in the Pseudo-Isidorean Decretals highlights the importance of forged or pseudepigraphical texts in shaping canon law. The fragments also illustrate the challenges of reconstructing early Christian literature from later citations, and the caution required in attributing works to early popes.
The fragments attributed to Silvester I survive only in later canonical collections, with no complete manuscript witness. The attribution to Silvester I (pope 314–335) is traditional but unverifiable; the fragments likely date from the 5th or 6th century, reflecting later concerns about church property and clerical discipline. They were cited in the Pseudo-Isidorean Decretals (9th century) to support papal authority over episcopal property disputes, though their authenticity was already questioned by early modern scholars. The text is in Latin and belongs to the genre of decretals or canonical letters. Its transmission is fragmentary, with the edition reconstructing the work from scattered quotations. The original order and completeness cannot be determined; the arrangement follows the source edition (ogl-pl), which is editorial. The fragments likely originated in a Western Christian context, possibly in Rome or Gaul, and reflect the growing authority of the papacy in ecclesiastical disputes.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||