machine-draft · no human review24 passages · 4,947 words
Work dossier · summary and historical context
Summary
De Ecclesiasticis Dogmatibus is a brief Latin handbook of Christian doctrine, traditionally attributed to Gennadius of Massilia but also ascribed to Augustine in some manuscripts. The work survives in multiple recensions, and its authorship remains contested. Dating is uncertain, generally placed in the late 5th or early 6th century based on doctrinal content and manuscript tradition. The treatise was used in medieval canon law collections and cited as a summary of orthodox teaching, often under Augustine's name. This edition does not resolve the authorship debate; readers should consult critical studies for the manuscript stemma and attribution evidence.
De Ecclesiasticis Dogmatibus is significant as a concise summary of late antique Latin Christian doctrine, bridging patristic and medieval theology. Its attribution to both Gennadius and Augustine illustrates the fluidity of authorship in manuscript transmission and the authority of Augustine's name. The work's use in canon law and theological citations underscores its role in shaping medieval orthodoxy.
Historical context
The work was likely composed in late 5th- or early 6th-century Gaul, possibly in or around Massilia (Marseille), within a Latin-speaking Christian community engaged in theological controversies following the Council of Chalcedon (451). The text reflects Nicene orthodoxy, rejecting Sabellian modalism and Arian subordinationism. It survives in multiple recensions, indicating a complex transmission history; some manuscripts attribute it to Augustine, others to Gennadius, a presbyter and theologian known for his continuation of Jerome's De Viris Illustribus. The treatise was later incorporated into medieval canon law collections, such as the Decretum of Gratian, and cited by theologians as a concise statement of orthodox faith. Its uncertain authorship and recensional variants caution against firm conclusions about its original form or context.
term — a Coptic word and the rendering chosen for it
background — historical or institutional context the text presupposes
reception — later use — liturgy, canon law, daughter versions
caution — uncertainty or a contested reading
parallel — a parallel in another text or tradition
scripture — a biblical quotation or allusion
sense — what the passage says
Pipeline notes
coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
registerRegister: treatise in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
structurePassages: 24 narrative.
sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Term index
Coptic
Rendering
Count
First
no glossary terms recorded
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:1 · narrativehigh
Source
DE ECCLESIASTICIS DOGMATIBUS LIBER GENNADIO TRIBUTUS.
CAPUT PRIMUM. — Credimus unum esse Deum Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sancium. Patrem, eo quod Filium habeat: Filium, eo quod Patrem habeat: tum sancium, eo quod sit ex Patre et Filio 1. Pater ergo principium deitatis: qui sicut nunquam fuit non Ocus, ita nunquam fuit nun Pater: a quo Filius nntus: a quo Spiritus sanctus non natus, quia non est Fi'ius; neque ingenitus, quia non est Pater; neque factus, quia non est ex nihilo, sed ex Deo Patre et Den Filio Deus procedens. Pater æternus eo quod æternum habeat Filium, cujus æternus sit Pater: Filius artius, en quod sit Patri coæternus: Spirit is sanctus æternus, co quod sit Patri et Filio coæternus. Non confusa in una persona Trinitas, ut Sabellius dicit: neque separata aut divisa I in natura divinitas, ut Arius blasphemat: sed alter in persona Patcr, alter in persona Filius, alter in persona Spiritus sanctus; unus natura' in sancta Trinitate Deus Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus.
English
On the Ecclesiastical Dogmas, a Book Attributed to Gennadius.
Chapter One. — We believe that there is one God, Father and Son and Holy Spirit. Father, because He has a Son: Son, because He has a Father: and Holy Spirit, because He is from the Father and the Son. The Father, therefore, is the principle of divinity: who, just as He was never not God, so He was never not Father: from whom the Son is born: from whom the Holy Spirit is not born, because He is not the Son; nor unbegotten, because He is not the Father; nor made, because He is not from nothing, but proceeding as God from God the Father and God the Son. The Father is eternal because He has an eternal Son, of whom He is the eternal Father: the Son is eternal, because He is coeternal with the Father: the Holy Spirit is eternal, because He is coeternal with the Father and the Son. The Trinity is not confused in one person, as Sabellius says: nor is the divinity separated or divided in nature, as Arius blasphemes: but one is the person of the Father, another the person of the Son, another the person of the Holy Spirit; one in nature in the holy Trinity, God the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT II. — Non P ater carnem assumpsit, neque Spiritus sanctas, sed Filius tantum: ut qui erat in divinitate Dei Filius, ipse fieret in homine hominis filius: ne filii nomen ad alterum transiret, qui e;set nativitate Filius Dei5. Ergo Dei Filius hominiss factus est filius, natus secundum verilatem naturæ ex Deo Dei Filius, et secundum veritatem naturne cx homine hominis filius: ut verius gcniti nou adoptione, non appellatione, sed in utraque nativitate filii nomen nascendo haberet, et csset verus Dcus et verus homo unus Filius. Non ergo duos christos, neque duos filios 6, sed Deum et hominem unuin Filium; quem propterea et unigenitum dicimus, manentem in duabus substantiis, sicut ei naturæ veritas contulit, non confusis naturis, neque immixtis, sicut Timotheani volunt, sed socictate unitis. Deus ergo hominem assumpsit, homo in Deum transivit; non naturæ versibilitate, sicut Apollinaristae dicunt, sed Dei dignatione: ut nec Deus mutaretur in humanam substantiam assumendo hominem, nec homo in divinam glorilicatus in Deum: quia mutatio vel versibilitas naturæ et diminutionem ct abolitionem substantiæ facit 1. Natus est ergo Dei Filius ex homine, non per hominem, id est, non ex viri coitu, sicut Ebion dicit: sed carnem ex Virginis corpore trahens, et non de coelo secum afferens, sicut Marcion, Origenes ei EutychIs alfirmant 2.
English
Chapter Two. — The Father did not assume flesh, nor the Holy Spirit, but only the Son: so that he who was in divinity the Son of God might himself become in humanity the son of man: lest the name of son should pass to another who would be Son of God by birth. Therefore the Son of God became the son of man, born according to the truth of nature from God as Son of God, and according to the truth of nature from man as son of man: so that he might more truly have the name of son by being born, not by adoption, not by title, but in each nativity, and be true God and true man, one Son. Therefore not two Christs, nor two sons, but God and man, one Son; whom for that reason we also call only-begotten, remaining in two substances, as the truth of nature conferred upon him, with the natures not confused nor mixed, as the Timotheans wish, but united by association. Therefore God assumed man, man passed into God; not by a change of nature, as the Apollinarists say, but by the condescension of God: so that neither was God changed into human substance by assuming man, nor man changed into God when glorified into God: because change or reversibility of nature brings about diminution and abolition of substance. Therefore the Son of God was born from a woman, not through a man, that is, not from sexual intercourse, as Ebion says: but drawing flesh from the Virgin’s body, and not bringing it with him from heaven, as Marcion, Origen, and Eutyches affirm.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:3 · narrativehigh
Source
Neque in phantasia, id est, ahsque carne, sicut Valentinus: neque, id est, ncquc putative imaginatum; sed corpus verum; non tantum carnem ex carne, sicut Marcianus; sed verus Deus ex divinitate, et verus homo ex carne, unus Filius: in divinitate Verbum Patris et Deus, in homine anima et caro. Anima non absque secsu et ratione, ut Apollinaris; neque caro absque anima, ut Eunomius: sed anima cum ratione sua, et caro cum sensibus suis, per quos sensus veros in passione et ante passionem suæ carnis dolorcs sustinuit.
CAPUT III. — Nerne sic est natus ex Virgine, ut et deitatis initium homo nascendo acceperit, quasi antequam nasceretur ex Virgine Deus non fucrit, sicut Artemon et Berillus et Marcellus docuerunt: sed æternus telis, ct homo ex Virgine natus est.
CAPUT IV.
English
Chapter Three. — He was not born of the Virgin in such a way that the man, by being born, received the beginning of his divinity, as if before he was born of the Virgin he was not God, as Artemon, Berillus, and Marcellus taught; but he is eternal God, and man born of the Virgin.
Chapter Four.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:4 · narrativemedium
Source
— Nihil erratum aut serviens in Trinitate credendum, ut vult Dionysius fons Arii: nihil inæquale, ut Eunomius: nihil æquale a gratia, ut vult Aetius: nihil anterius posteriusve ant minus, ut Arins: nihil extraneum aut officiale alteri, ut Macedonius: nihil pervasione aut surreptione insertum, ut Manichæus: nihil corporcum, ut Melito et Tertullianus: nihil corporaliter effigiatum, nt Anthropomorphus I et Vadianus: nihil sibi invisibile ut Origenes,: nihil creaturis visihile, ut Fortunatus: nihil moribus vel voluntate diversum, ut Marcion: nihil ex Trinitatis essentia ad creaturarum naturam deductum, ut Plato et Tertullianus: nihil officio singulare nee alteri communicabile, ut Origenes: nihil confusum, ut Sabellius: sed totum perlectum; quia totum ex uno et unum: non tamen solitarium, ut præsumunt Praxeas et Sylvanus, Pentapolitana damnabilis illa doctrina.
English
Nothing erroneous or servile is to be believed in the Trinity, as Dionysius, the source of Arius, would have it: nothing unequal, as Eunomius: nothing equal by grace, as Aetius would have it: nothing earlier or later or less, as Arius: nothing foreign or official to another, as Macedonius: nothing inserted by invasion or surreption, as Manichaeus: nothing corporeal, as Melito and Tertullian: nothing corporeally figured, as the Anthropomorphites and Vadianus: nothing invisible to itself, as Origen: nothing visible to creatures, as Fortunatus: nothing diverse in character or will, as Marcion: nothing drawn from the essence of the Trinity into the nature of creatures, as Plato and Tertullian: nothing singular in office nor communicable to another, as Origen: nothing confused, as Sabellius: but everything perfect; because everything is from one and one: yet not solitary, as Praxeas and Sylvanus, that damnable doctrine of the Pentapolitans, presume.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT V. — Hnmousios ergo, id est, coessentialis in divinitate Patri Filius, homousios Patri et Filio Spiritus sanctus, homousios Deo et homini unus Filius, manens Deus in homine suo in gloria Patris, desiderabilis videri ab Angelis: sicut Pater et Spiritus sanctus adoratur ab Angelis et ab omni creatura: non homo præter Deum I, vet Christus cum Deo, sicut blasphemat Nestorius; sed homo in Deo, et Deus in homine.
CAPUT VI. — Erit resurrectio mortuorum omnium, sed una et insimul et semel: non prima justorum, et secunda peccatorum, ut fabula est somniatorum a; sed una omnium. Et si id resurgere dicitur quod cadit, caro ergo nostra in veritalc resurget, sicut in veritate cadit. Et non secundum Origenem immutatio corporum erit, id est, aliud novum corpus pro carne: sed eadem caro corruptibilis quæ cadit, tam justorum quam injustorum, incorruptibilis resurget, que vel poenam sufferre possit pro peccatis, vel in gloria æterna manere pro mcritis.
English
CHAPTER V. — Therefore, *homousios*, that is, coessential in divinity with the Father, is the Son; *homousios* with the Father and the Son is the Holy Spirit; *homousios* with God and with man is the one Son, remaining God in his own man, in the glory of the Father, desirable to be seen by the Angels: just as the Father and the Holy Spirit are adored by the Angels and by every creature: not a man apart from God, nor Christ with God, as Nestorius blasphemes; but man in God, and God in man.
CHAPTER VI. — There will be a resurrection of all the dead, but one and at the same time and once: not a first resurrection of the just, and a second of sinners, as is the fable of dreamers; but one resurrection of all. And if that which falls is said to rise again, then our flesh will truly rise again, just as it truly falls. And not according to Origen will there be a change of bodies, that is, another new body in place of the flesh: but the same corruptible flesh which falls, of both the just and the unjust, will rise again incorruptible, able either to suffer punishment for sins, or to remain in eternal glory for merits.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:6 · narrativehigh
Source
(iAPUT VII. — Omnium hominum erit resurreciio: si omnium erit. ergo omnes moriuntur, ut mors ah Adam ducta omnibus filiis ejus donfinetur, et maneat illud privilegium in Domino, quod de eo specialiter dicitur: Non dabis Sanctum tuum videre corruptionem ( Psal. xv, 10). Ejus enim caro non vidit corruptionem. Hanc rationem maxima Patrum turba tradente suscepimus. Verum quia sunt et alii aeque catholici et eruditi viri, qui credunt, anima in corpure manente mutandos ad incorruptionem et immortalitatem eos, qui in adventu Domini vivi inveniendi sumit, et hoc eis reputari pro resurrectione ex mortuis, quod mortalitatem immutatione deponant, non morte: quolibet quis acquiescat modo, non est hæreticus, nisi ex contentione hæreticus fiat. Sufficit enim in Ecclesiæ lege carnis resurrectionem credere futuram de morte.
CAPUT VIII. — Quod autem dicimus in Symbolo, in adventu Domini vivos ac mortuos judicandos, non solum justos et peccatores significari, sicut Diodorus putat, sed et vivos eos qui in carne inveniendi sunt credimus, qui adhuc morituri creduntur; vel immulandi sunt, ut alii volunt, ut suscitati continuo vel reformati cum ante mortuis judicemur.
English
CHAPTER VII. — There will be a resurrection of all men: if of all, then all die, so that death introduced by Adam is concluded for all his sons, and that privilege remains in the Lord, which is said of him specially: "You will not let your Holy One see corruption" (Ps. 15:10). For his flesh did not see corruption. We have received this reasoning as handed down by the greatest multitude of the Fathers. But since there are also other equally Catholic and learned men who believe that, with the soul remaining in the body, those who are found alive at the coming of the Lord are to be changed to incorruption and immortality, and that this is reckoned to them as resurrection from the dead, because they lay aside mortality by change, not by death: whichever way one acquiesces, he is not a heretic, unless he becomes a heretic from contentiousness. For it is sufficient in the law of the Church to believe in a future resurrection of the flesh from death.
CHAPTER VIII. — But what we say in the Creed, that at the coming of the Lord the living and the dead are to be judged, we believe that not only the just and sinners are signified, as Diodorus thinks, but also the living, those who are to be found in the flesh, who are believed to be still to die; or are to be changed, as others wish, so that, raised immediately or reformed, we are judged together with those who died before.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT IX. — Post resurrectionem et judicium non credamus restitutioncm futuram, quam Origenes delirat; ilL dæmones vel impii homines post tormenta quasi suppliciis expurgati, vul illi in angelicam qua creati sunt, redeant dignitatem, vel isti * justorum societate donentur; eo quod hoc divinae conveniat pictati, nc quid ex rationalibus pereat creaturis, scd quolibet modo salvetur. Sed nos credamus ipsi judici omnium et retributori justo, qui dixit, Ibunt impii in supplicium æternum, justi autem in vitam æternam (Matth. xxv, 46), ut percipiant fructum operum suorum.
CAPUT X. — In principio creavit Deus coelum et terram et aquam ex nihilo. Et cum adhuc tenebrae ipsam aquam occultarent, et aquam terra absconderet facti sunt Angeli et omnes cœlestes Virtutes, ut non esset otiosa Dei bonitas, sed haberet in quibus per multa ante spatia bonitatcm suam ostenderet: et ita hic visibilis mundus ex his quæ creata fuerant factus est et ornatus.
English
CHAPTER IX. — After the resurrection and judgment, we should not believe in a future restoration, as Origen deliriously imagines; that demons or impious men, after torments, as if purified by punishments, either return to the angelic dignity in which they were created, or are granted the fellowship of the just; because this would befit divine mercy, that nothing should perish from rational creatures, but that they should be saved in some way. But we believe the judge and just rewarder of all, who said, "The impious will go into eternal punishment, the just into eternal life" (Matthew 25:46), that they may receive the fruit of their works.
CHAPTER X. — In the beginning, God created heaven and earth and water out of nothing. And when darkness still concealed the water itself, and the water hid the earth, Angels and all the celestial Virtues were made, so that God's goodness would not be idle, but would have those in whom to show its goodness over many spaces of time; and thus this visible world was made and adorned from those things which had been created.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:8 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XI. — Nihil incorporcum ct invisibile natura credendum, nisi solum Deum, id est, Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum. Qui ex co incorporcus creditur, quia ubique est, et omnia implet atque constringit; et ideo invisibilis omnibus creaturis, quia incorporeus est.
CAPUT XII. — Creatura omnis corporea est: Angeli et omnes cœlestes Virtutes corporeæ 1, licet nun carne subsistant. Ex eo autem corporeas esse credimus intellectuales naturas, quod localitate circumscribuntur; sicut et anima humana quæ carne clauditur, et dæmones qui per substantiam angelicæ naturæ sunt.
CAPUT XIII. — Immortales esse credimus intellectuales naturas, quia carne carent, nec habent quo cadant ut resurrectione cgcant post ruinam.
CAPUT XIV. — Animas hominum non esse ab initio inter cæteras intellectuales naturas, nec simul creatas, sicut Origcnes fingit: neque cum corporibus per coitum seminatas, sicut Luciferiani, et Cyrillus, et aliqui Latinorum præsumptores affirmant, quasi naturae consequentiam servantes I. Sed dicimus creationem animæ solum Creatorem omnium nosse, et corpus tantum per co njugii copulam seminari, Dei vero judicio coagulari in vulva et compingi atque formari, ac formalo jam corpore animam creari et infundi, ut vivat in utero homo ex anima constans et corpore, et egrediatur vivus ex utero plenus humana substantia.
English
CHAPTER XI. — Nothing incorporeal and invisible is to be believed in nature except God alone, that is, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. He is believed to be incorporeal because He is everywhere, and fills and contains all things; and therefore He is invisible to all creatures, because He is incorporeal.
CHAPTER XII. — Every creature is corporeal: Angels and all the heavenly Powers are corporeal, although they do not subsist in flesh. However, we believe these intellectual natures to be corporeal because they are circumscribed by locality; just as the human soul, which is enclosed in flesh, and demons, who are of angelic nature in substance.
CHAPTER XIII. — We believe intellectual natures to be immortal, because they lack flesh, nor do they have anything by which they might fall so as to need resurrection after ruin.
CHAPTER XIV. — The souls of men are not from the beginning among the other intellectual natures, nor created simultaneously, as Origen imagines; nor are they sown with bodies through coition, as the Luciferians, and Cyril, and some Latin presumptuous men affirm, as if preserving a consequence of nature. But we say that the creation of the soul is known only to the Creator of all, and that only the body is sown through the union of marriage, but by God's judgment it is coagulated in the womb and compacted and formed, and when the body is already formed, the soul is created and infused, so that a man lives in the womb consisting of soul and body, and emerges alive from the womb full of human substance.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:9 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XV. — Neque duas animas esse dicimus in uno homine, sicut Jacobus ct alii Syrorum scribunt, unam animalem qui animetur corpus et immixta sit sanguini, et alteram spiritualem quæ rationem miuistret: dicimus unam esse eamdemque animam in omine, quæ et corpus sua societate vivificet, et serm tipsam sua ratione disponat, habens in se libertatem arbitrii, ut in suæ substantiie cligat cogitatione quod vult.
CAPUT XVI. — Salum hominem credimus habere animam substantivam, quæ exula corpore vivit, et sensus suos atque ingenia vivaciter tenet. Neque cum. corpore moritur, sicut Aratus asserit: neque post modicum intervallum, sicut Zenon dicit; quia substantialiter vivit.
CAPUT XVII. — Ammalium vero aniMa! non sunt substantivæ 8, sed cum carne ipsa carnis vivacitate nascuntur, et cum carnis morte finiuntur: et ideo nec ratione reguntur, sicut Plato ct Alexander putant, sed ad omnia naturne incitamento ducuntur.
English
CHAPTER XV. — We do not say that there are two souls in one man, as James and other Syrians write, one animal soul which animates the body and is mixed with the blood, and another spiritual soul which administers reason: we say that there is one and the same soul in man, which both gives life to the body by its association and disposes itself by its reason, having in itself freedom of choice, so that in its own substance it may choose by thought what it wills.
CHAPTER XVI. — We believe that only man has a substantive soul, which lives apart from the body, and retains its senses and faculties vigorously. It does not die with the body, as Aratus asserts, nor after a short interval, as Zeno says, because it lives substantially.
CHAPTER XVII. — The souls of animals, however, are not substantive, but are born with the flesh by the vitality of the flesh itself, and end with the death of the flesh: and therefore they are not governed by reason, as Plato and Alexander think, but are led to all things by the impulse of nature.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:10 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XVIII. — Anima humana non cum carne moritur, quia non cum carne, ut superius diximus, seminatur; sed formato in ventre matris corpore, Dei judicio creatur et infunditur, ut vivat homo intus in utero, et sic procedat nativitate in mundum.
CAPUT XIX. — Duabus substantiis tantum constat homo, anima et carne; anima cum ratione sua, et carne cum sensibus suis. Quos tamen sensus absque animae societate non movet caro. Anima vero et sinc carne rationale suum tenet.
CAPUT XX. — Non est tertius in substantia hominis spiritus, sicut Didymus contendit: sed spiritus ipsa est anima, pro spirituali natura, vel pro eoquod spiret in corpore spiritus appellatus. Anima vero ex. eo vocatur, quod ad vivendum vel ad vivificandum animet corpus. Tertium vero qui ab Apostolo cum anima et corpore inducitur, spiritum gratiam sancii Spiritus esse intelligamus, quam orat Apostolus ut integra perseveret in nohis, lie nostro vitio aut minuatur aut fugetur a nohis ( I Thess. v, 23); quia Spiritus sanctus effugiet fictum (Sap. I, 5).
English
CHAPTER XVIII. — The human soul does not die with the body, because it is not sown with the body, as we said above; but when the body has been formed in the mother’s womb, by God’s decree it is created and infused, so that the human being lives within the womb, and thus proceeds by birth into the world.
CHAPTER XIX. — Man consists of only two substances: soul and flesh; the soul with its reason, and the flesh with its senses. Yet the flesh does not move those senses without the soul’s partnership. The soul, however, even without the flesh, retains its rational nature.
CHAPTER XX. — There is not a third substance in man, the spirit, as Didymus contends; but the spirit is itself the soul, called spirit either because of its spiritual nature, or because it breathes in the body. The soul, on the other hand, is so called because it animates the body for living or for giving life. As for the third thing which the Apostle introduces along with soul and body, we are to understand it as the grace of the Holy Spirit, which the Apostle prays may remain whole in us, and not be diminished or put to flight from us by our own fault (1 Thess. 5:23); because the Holy Spirit flees from a feigned heart (Wis. 1:5).
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:11 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XXI. — Libertati arbitrii sui commissus est homo statim in prima conditione, ut sala vigilantia neentis annitente, etiam in præcepti cuslodia perseveraret, si vellet in eo quod creatus fuerat pennanere. Potquam vero seductione serpentis per Eram cecedit, naturæ bonum perdidit, pariter et vigorem arbitrii: non lamen electioncm, ne non esset suum qnod emendaret peccatum, nec merito indulgeretur quod non arbitrio diluisset. Manet itaque ad quære damsalutem arbitrii libertas 2, id est rationalis voluntas, sed admonente prius Deo et invitante ad salutem, ut vel cligat, vel sequ atur, vel agat occasione salutis, hoc est inspiratione Dei. Ut autcm consequatur quod eligit, vel qnod sequitur, vel quod occasione agit, Dei esse libere confitemur. Initium ergo salutis nostre Deo miserante habemus; ut acquiescamus salutiferæ inspirationi, nostrae potestatis est; ut adipiscamur quod acquiescendo admonitioni cupimus, divini est muneris: ut non labamur ab indepto solutis munere, sollicitudinis nostræ est et cælestis pariter adjutorii; ut labamur, potestatis nostræ est et ignaviæ.
English
CHAPTER XXI. — Man was entrusted to his own free will from the very first moment of his creation, so that, with the watchfulness of the mind striving, he might also persevere in the observance of the commandment, if he wished to remain in the state in which he was created. But after he fell through the seduction of the serpent by Eve, he lost the goodness of his nature and likewise the vigor of his will; yet he did not lose the power of choice, lest there be no sin of his own to amend, nor would pardon be merited for what he had not washed away by his own will. Therefore, the freedom of the will remains for seeking salvation, that is, a rational will, but only after God has first admonished and invited him to salvation, so that he may either choose, or follow, or act upon the occasion of salvation, that is, by the inspiration of God. However, that he may obtain what he chooses, or what he follows, or what he acts upon by occasion, we freely confess to be of God. Thus, we have the beginning of our salvation from God’s mercy; that we acquiesce to the saving inspiration is within our power; that we attain what we desire by acquiescing to the admonition is a divine gift; that we do not fall from the gift of salvation once obtained is a matter of our own diligence and equally of heavenly assistance; that we do fall is a matter of our own power and negligence.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:12 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XXII (alias 52). — Baptisma unum est, sed in Ecclesia, ubi una fides est, ubi in nomine I'atris et Filii et Spiritus sancti datur. Et ideo si qui apud illos hæreticos baptizati sunt qui in sanctæ Trinitatis confessione baptizant, et veniunt ad nos; recipiantur quidcm quasi baptizati, ne sanctæ Trinitatis invocatio vel confessio annuletur: sed doceantur ante et instruantur, quo sensu sanctæ Trinitatis mysterium in Ecclesia teneatur: et si consentiunt credcre, vel acquiescunt confieri, purgati jam fidei integritate confirmentur manus impositione. Si vero parvuli sunt vel hebetes qui doctrinnam nou capiant; respondeant pro illis qui cos offerunt juxta morem baptizaudi: et sic manus impositione ei chrismatc communiti, ElIcharistiæ mysteriis admittantur. Illos autem qui non in sanctæ Ti initatis invocatione apud haereticos baptizati sunt, et veniunt ad nus, baptizari debere pronuntiamus, non rebaptizari. Neqne enim credendum est eos fuisse baptizatos, qui non in nonine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti juxta regulam a Domino positam tincti sunt: ut sunt Paulianistæ a.
English
CHAPTER XXII (otherwise 52). — Baptism is one, but in the Church, where there is one faith, where it is given in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. And therefore if any who have been baptized among those heretics who baptize in the confession of the holy Trinity come to us, they are to be received indeed as baptized, lest the invocation or confession of the holy Trinity be annulled; but they are to be taught and instructed beforehand as to the sense in which the mystery of the holy Trinity is held in the Church; and if they consent to believe, or acquiesce to confess, already purified by the integrity of the faith, they are to be confirmed by the imposition of hands. But if they are little children or those of dull mind who cannot grasp the teaching, those who offer them are to answer for them according to the custom of baptizing; and thus, fortified by the imposition of hands and chrism, they are to be admitted to the mysteries of the Eucharist. But those who have been baptized among heretics not in the invocation of the holy Trinity, and come to us, we pronounce that they ought to be baptized, not rebaptized. For it is not to be believed that those have been baptized who have not been immersed in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit according to the rule laid down by the Lord, as are the Paulianists.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:13 · narrativehigh
Source
Procliani, Borboritæ, Siphori, qui nunc vocantur Bonosiani, Photiniani, Montanitæ et Manichæi, varia impiclatis gcrmina: vel cæteræ istorum originis sive ordinis pestes, quæ duo principia sibi ignota introducunt, ut Cerdon et Marcion; vel contraria, ut Manichæus; vel tria et barbara, ut Selianns cl Theodosius; vel multa, ut ValentinuS; vel Christum hominem fuisse abs que Deo, ut Cerinthus, Ebion, Artemon et Photinus. Ex iatis, inquam, si qui ad nos venerint, non requirendum ab eis utrum baptizati sint, an non; sed hoc tantum, si credant in Ecclesiæ fidem, et baptizentur ecclesiastico Baptismate.
CAPUT XXIII (al. 53). — Quotidie Eucharistiæ communioncm percipere nec laudo nec vitupero. Omnibus tamen dominicis diebus communicandum suadeo ct hortor, si tamen meus in affectu peccandi non sit a. Nam habentem adhuc voluntatem peccandi, gravari magis dico Eucharistiæ perceptione quam purificari. Et ideo quamvis quis peccato mordeatur, peccandi non haheal de cætero voluntatem, et communicaturus satisfaciat lacrymis et orationibus, et confidens de Domini miseratione, qui peccata pice confessioni donare consuevit, accedat ad Eucharistiam intrepidus et securus.
English
CHAPTER XXIII (otherwise 53). — I neither praise nor blame daily reception of the communion of the Eucharist. Nevertheless, I advise and exhort that all should communicate on every Lord's day, provided that the intention to sin is not present in the mind. For one who still has the will to sin, I say that he is more burdened than purified by the reception of the Eucharist. And therefore, although someone may be stung by sin, if he no longer has the will to sin thereafter, and, about to communicate, makes satisfaction with tears and prayers, and, trusting in the mercy of the Lord, who is accustomed to grant forgiveness of sins to pious confession, let him approach the Eucharist intrepid and secure.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:14 · narrativemedium
Source
Sed hoc de illo dico quem capitalia tat mortalia peccata non gravati: nam quem mortalia crimina post Baptismum commissa premunt, per mille annos post resurrectionem regnum Christi in terra futurum, ct sanctos cum illo in delicii, regnaturos speremus, sicut Nepos docuit, primam justorum resurrectionem, cl secundam impiorum: et inter hoc duas mortuorum resurrectiones, gentes ign rantes Deum in angulis terrarum in carne reservanda; quæ post mille annos regni in terra justorum, instignate diabolo movend:e sint ad pugnam contra justos regnantes: et Domino pro justis pugnane imbre igneo compescendas: atque ita mortuas, cum cæteris in impietate ante mortuis ad æterna supplicia in incorruptibili carne resuscitandas.
CAPUl XXV! (al. 56). — Nullum credimus ad salutem nisi Deo invitante venirc. Nullum invitatum salutem suam nisi Deo auxiliante operat i. Nullum nisi orantem auxilium promereri. Nullum Dei voluntate perire, sed permissu, pro electione arbitrii, ne ingenuitas potestatis semel hominibus attributi ad servilem cogatur necessitatem.
English
But I say this concerning one who is not burdened by capital or mortal sins: for those whom mortal crimes committed after Baptism oppress, let us hope that after a thousand years the kingdom of Christ will be on earth, and the saints will reign with him in delights, as Nepos taught: the first resurrection of the just, and the second of the impious; and between these, two resurrections of the dead, with nations ignorant of God being preserved in flesh in the corners of the earth; which after a thousand years of the reign of the just on earth, stirred up by the devil, are to be moved to battle against the reigning just; and with the Lord fighting for the just, they are to be restrained by a fiery rain; and thus dead, together with others who died before in impiety, they are to be revived to eternal punishments in incorruptible flesh.
CHAPTER XXIV (otherwise 56). — We believe that no one comes to salvation unless invited by God. No one invited works out his salvation unless aided by God. No one merits aid unless praying. No one perishes by the will of God, but by permission, according to the choice of free will, lest the freedom of power once granted to men be forced into servile necessity.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:15 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XXVII (al. 57). — Malum vrl malitiam non esse a Deo creatam, sed a diabolo inventam, qui et ipse bonus a Dco creatus est. Sed quia libero arbitrio, utpote rationalis creatura, commissus est, et cogirandi accepcrat facultatem, scientiam boni vertit ad malum: et multa cogitando factus est inventor mali: et quod in se perdiderat, invidit in aliis, nec contentus solus perire, suasit aliis, ut qui esset suæ malitiæ inventor, fieret et aliorum auclor: et ex eo malum vel malitia percurrit in c;eteras rationales reaturas.
CAPUT XXVIII (al. 58). — Unde cognoscimus nihil esse natura immutabile, nisi solum Deum, Patrem. et Filium et Spiritum sanctum. qui mutari non potest a bono, quia natura possidet bonum, nec potest aliud quid esse quam bonum.
CAPUT XXIX ( al. 59). - Angeli vero qui in illa qua creati sunt beatitudine perseverant, non natura possident bonum, ut non mutarentur cu:u cæteris, sed arbitrii servantes bonam voluntatem, et bonum conditionis, et fidem suo Domino servavcrunt. Unde et mcrito ab ipso Domino sancti Angeli vocantur, quod tenuerint arbitrii sanctitatem, nee sociorum exemplo deviaverint a bono 2.
English
CHAPTER XXVII (alt. 57). — Evil or malice was not created by God, but was invented by the devil, who himself was created good by God. But because he was entrusted with free will, as a rational creature, and had received the faculty of thinking, he turned the knowledge of good to evil; and by thinking much, he became the inventor of evil; and what he had lost in himself, he begrudged in others, and not content to perish alone, he persuaded others, so that he who was the inventor of his own malice might also become the author of others’ malice; and from that, evil or malice spread into the other rational creatures.
CHAPTER XXVIII (alt. 58). — From this we know that nothing is by nature immutable except God alone, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, who cannot be changed from good, because by nature he possesses good, nor can he be anything other than good.
CHAPTER XXIX (alt. 59). — The angels, however, who persevere in that blessedness in which they were created, do not possess good by nature, so that they would not change along with the rest, but by preserving good will through their choice, and the good of their condition, and they kept faith with their Lord. Whence also they are called holy angels by the Lord himself, because they held to the sanctity of their choice, and did not deviate from good by the example of their companions.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:16 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XXX (al. 63). — Bonæ sunt nuptiæ, sed causa filiorum et compescendic fornicationis obtentu 1.
CAPUT XXXI (al. 64). — Melior est continentia; sed non sihi suflicit ad beatitudinem, si pro solo amore pudicitiæ retinetur, sed si et hoc cum affectu causa vacandi Domino cligitur: alioquin divortium magis conjugii videbitur esse, quam castitas.
CAPUT XXXII (al. 65). — virginitas utroque bono præcelsior est, quia et naturam vincit et pugnam: naturam, corporis integritate; pugnam, pace castimoniæ.
CAPUT XXXI:I (al. CG). — Bonum est in cibum cum gratiarum actione sumere quidquid Deus edendum præcepti. Abstinere autem ab aliquibus, non quasi malis, sed qnasi non necessariis, non est Ina.. lum. Moderari vero eorum usum pro necessitate et tempore, proprie Christianorum est.
CAPUT XXXIV (al. 67). - Malas dicere nuptias, vel fornicationi comparandas aut stupro; cibos vero credere malos, vel mali causam percipientibus 3, non est Christianorum, sed proprie Encratitarum et Manichæorum.
English
CHAPTER XXX (alt. 63). — Marriages are good, but for the sake of children and for the purpose of restraining fornication.
CHAPTER XXXI (alt. 64). — Continence is better; but it does not suffice for blessedness if it is retained solely for the love of chastity, but only if this is chosen together with the intention of being free to serve the Lord; otherwise it will seem to be more a divorce from marriage than chastity.
CHAPTER XXXII (alt. 65). — Virginity is more excellent than both goods, because it overcomes both nature and struggle: nature, by bodily integrity; struggle, by the peace of chastity.
CHAPTER XXXIII (alt. 66). — It is good to take in food with thanksgiving whatever God has commanded to be eaten. To abstain from some things, however, not as if they were evil, but as unnecessary, is not evil. To moderate their use according to need and time is properly Christian.
CHAPTER XXXIV (alt. 67). — To speak ill of marriage, or to compare it to fornication or debauchery; and to believe that foods are evil, or the cause of evil to those who partake of them, is not Christian, but properly of the Encratites and Manichaeans.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:17 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XXXV (al. 68). — Sacratæ Dco virginitati nuptias coæquare, aut pro amore castigandi corporis abstinentibus a vino vel carnibus nihil credere meriti accrescorc, nec hoc Christiani, sed Joviniani est.
CAPUT XXXVI (al. 69). — Integra fide credendum est, beatam Mariam Dei Christi matrem et virgincm concepisse, et virginem genuisse, et post partum virginem permansisse. Nec est blasphemiæ Helvidii acquiescendum, qui dixit: Virgo ante partum, non virgo post partum.
CAPUT XXXVII (al. 70). — Elementa, id est, cælum et terram non credimus abolenda per ignem, sed in melius commutanda: figuram quoque mundi, id est, imaginem, non substantiam transituram.
CAPUT XXXVIII (al. 71. — Bonum est facultates cum dispensatione pauperibus erogare. Melius est pro intentione sequendi Dominum semel donare et absolutum sollicitudine cum Christo cgere.
English
CHAPTER XXXV (alt. 68). — To equate marriages with virginity consecrated to God, or to believe that those abstaining from wine or meat for the sake of chastening the body gain no increase of merit, is not Christian but Jovinianist.
CHAPTER XXXVI (alt. 69). — It must be believed with complete faith that the blessed Mary, the mother of God, conceived as a virgin, gave birth as a virgin, and remained a virgin after childbirth. Nor should one acquiesce in the blasphemy of Helvidius, who said: "Virgin before birth, not virgin after birth."
CHAPTER XXXVII (alt. 70). — We do not believe that the elements, that is, the sky and the earth, are to be destroyed by fire, but changed for the better: also that the figure of the world, that is, its form, will pass away, not its substance.
CHAPTER XXXVIII (alt. 71). — It is good to distribute one's goods to the poor with discretion. It is better, with the intention of following the Lord, to give once and for all and, freed from care, to be in need with Christ.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:18 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XXXIX (al. 72). — Maritum duarum post Baptismum matronarum Clericum non ordinandum. Neque eum qui unam quidem, sed concubinam, non matronam habuit. Nec illum qui viduam, aut repudiatam, vei meretricem in matrimonio sumpsit. Neque eum qui semetipsum quolibet corporis sui membro indignatione aliqua vcl justo injustove timore * supcralus truncaverit. Ncque illum qui usuras acccpissc convincitur, aut in scena lusisse dignoscitur. Neque cum qui publica pænitentia mortalia crimina deflet. Neque illum qui aliquando in furiam versus insanivit, vel afflatione diaboli vexatus est. Necque eum qui per ambitionem ad imitationem Simonis Magi pecuniam offert.
CAPUT XL ( al. 73). — Sanctorum corpora, et præcipue beatorum martyrum reliquias, ac si Chr'isti membra sincerissime honoranda, ct basilicas corum nommibus appellatas, velut loca divino cultui mancipala, affectu piissimo et devotione fidelissima adeundas credimus 7. Si quis contra hanc sententiam venit, non Christianus, sed Eunomianus et Vigilantianus creditur.
English
CHAPTER XXXIX (alt. 72). — A man who has had two wives after Baptism is not to be ordained a cleric. Nor is he who has had one wife indeed, but a concubine, not a matron. Nor he who has taken a widow, or a divorced woman, or a prostitute in marriage. Nor he who has mutilated himself in any part of his body, overcome by some indignation or by a just or unjust fear. Nor he who is convicted of having taken usury, or is known to have performed on the stage. Nor he who laments mortal crimes through public penance. Nor he who has at some time fallen into madness or been troubled by the afflation of the devil. Nor he who through ambition, in imitation of Simon Magus, offers money.
CHAPTER XL (alt. 73). — The bodies of the saints, and especially the relics of the blessed martyrs, are to be honored most sincerely as if they were members of Christ, and the basilicas called by their names, as places devoted to divine worship, are to be approached with the most pious affection and the most faithful devotion. If anyone comes against this opinion, he is believed not to be a Christian, but a Eunomian and a Vigilantian.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:19 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XLI (al. i). — Baptizatis tantum iter esse salutis credimus. Nullum catechumenum, qucmvis in bonis operibus defunctum, vitam æternam habere credamus, excepto martyrio, ubi tota Baptismi sacramenta complentur. Baptizandus confitetur fidem suam coram sacerdote, et interrogatus respondet: hoc et martyr coram persecutore facit, qui et confitetur fidem suam, et interrogatus respondet. Ille post confessionem, vel aspergitur aqua, vel intingitur: et hic vel aspergitur sanguine, vel contingitur igne x. Ille manus impositione pontificis. accipit Spiritum sanctum: hic locutorium I efficitur Spiritus sancti, dum non est ipse qui loquitur, sed Spiritus Patris qui loquitur in illo. Ille communicat Eucharistiæ in commemoratione mortis Domini: hic ipsi Christo commoritur. Ille confitetur se mundi actibus rcnuntiaturum: hic ipsi renuntiat viLe. Illi peccata omnia dimittuntur: in isto exstinguuntur.
English
CHAPTER XLI (alt. 1). — We believe that for the baptized alone is there a way of salvation. We do not believe that any catechumen, however excellent his good works, who has died, possesses eternal life, except in the case of martyrdom, where the whole sacrament of Baptism is completed. The candidate for baptism confesses his faith before the priest, and when questioned, he answers: this also the martyr does before the persecutor, who both confesses his faith and, when questioned, answers. After the confession, the one is either sprinkled with water or immersed; the other is either sprinkled with blood or touched by fire. The one receives the Holy Spirit through the imposition of the bishop’s hand; the other becomes a dwelling-place of the Holy Spirit, since it is not he himself who speaks, but the Spirit of the Father who speaks in him. The one communicates in the Eucharist in commemoration of the Lord’s death; the other dies together with Christ himself. The one confesses that he will renounce worldly deeds; the other renounces life itself. For the one, all sins are remitted; in the other, they are extinguished.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:20 · narrativemedium
Source
CAPUT XLII (al. 75). — In Eucharistia non debet pura aqua oflerri, ut quidam sohrielatis falluntur imngine; sed vinum cum aqua mixtum: quia et vinum fuit in redemptionis nostræ mysterio, cum dixit, Non bibam amodo de hoc genimine vitis (Matth. XXVI, 29); et aqua mixtum, quod post cænam dabatur. Sed et de latere ejus, quod lancca perfossum est, aqua cum sanguine egressa, vinum de vera cjus carnis vite cum aqua expressum ostendit.
CAPUT XLIII (al. 76). — Bona est caro nostra et valde bona, utpote a bono et a solo Deo condita; et non est mala, ut volunt Sethianus et Ophianus I et Patricianus: nee mali causa, ut docuit Florinus ': nec ex malo et bono compacta, ut Manichaeus blasphemat. Sed cum sit crcationc bona, arbitrio animae efficitur nohis vel bona vel mala, non mutatione substanlix, sed exsecutionis mercede 5. Ipsa enini est quæ stabit ante tribunal Christi, in qua referat anima propria corporis prout gessit, cive bonum sive malum.
English
CHAPTER XLII (alt. 75). — In the Eucharist, pure water ought not to be offered, as some are deceived by the image of sobriety; but wine mixed with water: because wine was present in the mystery of our redemption, when He said, “I will drink no more of this fruit of the vine” (Matt. 26:29); and water was mixed, as was given after the meal. But also from His side, which was pierced by a lance, water came forth with blood, showing that the wine from the true vine of His flesh was pressed out with water.
CHAPTER XLIII (alt. 76). — Our flesh is good and very good, inasmuch as it was created by a good God and the only God; and it is not evil, as the Sethians, Ophians, and Patricians wish; nor is it the cause of evil, as Florinus taught; nor is it composed of evil and good, as Manichaeus blasphemes. But since it is good by creation, it becomes for us either good or evil by the will of the soul, not by a change of substance, but by the reward of its conduct. It is this flesh that will stand before the tribunal of Christ, in which the soul will render account for the body’s own deeds, whether good or evil.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:21 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XLIV (al 77). — In resurrectione ex mortuis sexus forma non mutabitur: scd vir mortuus resurget in forma viri, et femina in forma feminæ, carens sexus tamen hujus vittæ tantum conditione. non specie naturali; ne non sit vera resurrectio, si non id resurget quod cadit.
CAPUT XLV (al. 78). — Ante passionem Domini omnes animæ sanctorum in inferno sub dehito prævaricationis Adæ tenebantur, donec auctoritate no... mini per indebitam ejus mortem de servili conditione libcrarenlur.
CAPUT XLVI (al. 79).- Post ascensionem Domini ad coelos, omnium sanctorum animae cum Christo sunt, et exenntes de corpore ad Christum vadunt, exspectantes resurrectionem corporis sui, ut ad integram et perpetuam a beatitudinem cum ipso pariter immutentur: sicut et peccatorum animae in inferno sub timore positæ exspectant rcsurrectioncm sui curporis, ut cnm ipso ad poenam detrudantur' æternam.
English
CHAPTER XLIV (alt. 77). — In the resurrection from the dead, the form of sex will not be changed: but a dead man will rise in the form of a man, and a woman in the form of a woman, yet lacking the condition of sex of this life only, not the natural species; lest it not be a true resurrection, if that which falls does not rise.
CHAPTER XLV (alt. 78). — Before the passion of the Lord, all the souls of the saints were held in hell under the debt of Adam's transgression, until they were freed from servile condition by the authority of the Lord through his undeserved death.
CHAPTER XLVI (alt. 79). — After the ascension of the Lord into heaven, all the souls of the saints are with Christ, and departing from the body go to Christ, awaiting the resurrection of their body, so that they may be changed together with him into complete and perpetual blessedness: just as the souls of sinners placed in hell under fear await the resurrection of their body, so that together with it they may be thrust down into eternal punishment.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:22 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XLVII (al. 80). — Pænitentia aholcri peccata indubitanter credimus, etiamsi in ultimo vita; spiritu admissorum poenitcat, et publica lamentatione peccata prodantur: quia propositum lei, quo decre. vit salvare quod perierat, stat immobile: et ideo quia voluntas rjus non mutatur, sive emendatione vitæ, si tempus conceditur, sive supplici confessione, si continuo viia cxcedilur, venia peccatorum fidclitcr praesumatur ab illo, qui non vult mortem peccatoris, sed ut convertatur a perditione pænitendo (Ezech. Ivm, 32, et XXXIII, 11), et salvatus miseratione Domini vivat. Si quis aliter de justissima Dei pietate sentit, non Christianus, sed Novatianus est.
CAPUT XLVIII (al. 81). — Internas animw cogitationes diabolum non videre, certi sumus: sed mutibus cas corporis ab illo et affectionum indiciis colligi, experimento didicimus. Secreta autem cordis solus ille novit ad quem dieitur, Tu solus nosti corda filiorum hominum ( III Reg. VIII, 39).
English
CHAPTER XLVII (alt. 80). — We believe without doubt that penance wipes away sins, even if a person repents in the very last moment of life, and sins are disclosed by public lamentation: because the purpose of God, by which he decreed to save what had perished, stands immovable: and therefore, because his will does not change, whether by amendment of life, if time is granted, or by suppliant confession, if life is immediately ended, pardon for sins is faithfully presumed from him who does not desire the death of the sinner, but that he be converted from perdition by repenting (Ezek. 18:32, and 33:11), and, saved by the mercy of the Lord, live. If anyone thinks otherwise concerning the most just piety of God, he is not a Christian, but a Novatian.
CHAPTER XLVIII (alt. 81). — We are certain that the devil does not see the internal thoughts of the soul: but we have learned by experience that they are gathered by him from external signs of the body and indications of the affections. However, the secrets of the heart only he knows to whom it is said, "You alone know the hearts of the sons of men" (1 Kings 8:39).
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:23 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT XLIX (al. 82). — Non omnes malae cogitationes nostræ semper diaboli instinctu excitantur, sed aliquoties ex nostri arbitrii motu emergunt. Bonae autem cogitationes semper a Deo sunt.
CAPUT L (al. 83).— Da mones per energicam operationem non credimus substantialiter illabi animæ; sed applicatione et oppressione uniri. Illabi autem menti Uti soli possibile est qui creavit, qui natura subsistens incorporeus, capabilis est suæ factura;.
CAPUT LI ( al. 84). — Signa et prodigia et sanitates etiam peccatores in nomine Domini facere ab ipso Deo didicimus: et cum alios hac præsumptione juvent, sibi per ambitionem humanæ gloriæ nocent; quia gloriantur in dato falso, id est non mcritis debito.
CAPUT LII (al. 85). — Signis et prodigiis clarum posse fieri Christianum, nou tamen sanctum, si intemperatis et asperis motibus agat: temperatis autem et placidis motibus, etiam absque signorum efficacia, et sanctum et perftctum et Dei hominem fieri recte credimus.
English
CHAPTER XLIX (alt. 82). — Not all our evil thoughts are always aroused by the devil’s instigation, but sometimes they emerge from the motion of our own free will. Good thoughts, however, are always from God.
CHAPTER L (alt. 83). — We do not believe that demons, through energetic operation, substantially insinuate themselves into the soul; but that they are united by application and oppression. However, to insinuate oneself into the mind is possible only for the one who created it, who, being a subsisting incorporeal nature, is capable of his own creation.
CHAPTER LI (alt. 84). — We have learned that even sinners perform signs and prodigies and healings in the name of the Lord, from God Himself: and while they help others by this presumption, they harm themselves through ambition for human glory; because they glory in a false gift, that is, one not owed to their merits.
CHAPTER LII (alt. 85). — We believe that a man can become a Christian by means of signs and prodigies, yet not a saint, if he acts with intemperate and harsh motions: but with temperate and calm motions, even without the efficacy of signs, we rightly believe that a man becomes both a saint and perfect and a man of God.
tmp736.tmp736.opp-lat1:24 · narrativemedium
Source
CAPUT LIII (al. ). — Nullus sanctus et justus caret peccato: nec tamen ex hoc desinit esse justus et sanctus, cum affectu teneat sanctitatem. Non enim naturæ viribus, sed propositi adjumento per Dei gratiam acquirimus sanctitatem. Et ideo veraciter se omnes sancti pronuntiant peccatores, quia in veritate habent quod plangant, et si non reprehensione conscientiæ, certe mobilitate prævaricatricis naturæ.
CAPLT LIV (al. 87). — Pascha, id est, dominicæ resurrectionis solemnitas, ante transgressum vernalis æquinoctii et quarta decima; lunae perfectionem non potest celebrari 1, ecdem tamen mense natne.
CAPUT LV (al. 88). — Propter novellos legislatores, qui ideo animam tantum ad imaginem Dei crea tam dicunt, ut quia Deus incorporeus recte creditur, etiam incorporea anima esse credatur, libere confitemur, imaginem in aclernilate, similitudinem in moribus inveniri.
English
CHAPTER LIII (alt. 84). — No saint and just person is without sin; yet for this reason he does not cease to be just and saintly, as long as he holds to sanctity in his intention. For we acquire sanctity not by the powers of nature, but by the aid of resolve through the grace of God. And therefore all saints truly declare themselves sinners, because in truth they have something to lament, and if not from the reproach of conscience, certainly from the instability of a transgressing nature.
CHAPTER LIV (alt. 87). — Easter, that is, the solemnity of the Lord’s resurrection, cannot be celebrated before the passing of the vernal equinox and the completion of the fourteenth day of the moon, yet in the same month.
CHAPTER LV (alt. 88). — On account of recent legislators, who claim that the soul alone is created in the image of God, so that, because God is rightly believed to be incorporeal, the soul is also believed to be incorporeal, we freely confess that the image is found in eternity, the likeness in character.