machine-draft · no human review7 passages · 1,665 words
Work dossier · summary and historical context
Summary
The Consultatio sive Commonitorium ad Sanctum Augustinum is a Latin treatise by Orosius, addressed to Augustine of Hippo, composed ca. 414–415. It serves as a formal consultation and personal memorandum on Priscillianist errors, reflecting Orosius’s deferential tone and doctrinal focus. The work survives in a single medieval manuscript tradition, often appended to Augustine’s writings, and was cited by later canonists and heresiographers but never achieved liturgical or conciliar authority. Its dual title signals its function as both a consultation and a memorandum, a genre common in late antique theological correspondence.
The Consultatio is a key source for understanding early 5th-century anti-Priscillianist polemic and Orosius’s role as a theological intermediary between Augustine and Spanish bishops. It provides insight into the genre of late antique theological correspondence and the use of rhetorical strategies in doctrinal disputes. Its survival in a single manuscript tradition highlights the fragility of such texts and their dependence on association with major patristic authors.
Historical context
Orosius wrote the Consultatio ca. 414–415 after fleeing the Vandals to Hippo, where he sought Augustine’s guidance on Priscillianist errors. The work is addressed directly to Augustine, framing Orosius as a humble petitioner. It survives in a single medieval manuscript tradition, often appended to Augustine’s works, with no evidence of early independent circulation. The dating rests on Orosius’s known movements: he arrived in Hippo around 414 and left for Palestine shortly after. The work reflects the post-Conciliar context of the early 5th century, when Priscillianism remained a live controversy in the Western church. Orosius’s emphasis on his involuntary departure from his homeland aligns with the rhetorical posture of a humble petitioner, and the closing plea for correction by word rather than sword echoes contemporary debates about imperial coercion in heresy cases.
background — historical or institutional context the text presupposes
term — a Coptic word and the rendering chosen for it
scripture — a biblical quotation or allusion
reception — later use — liturgy, canon law, daughter versions
sense — what the passage says
caution — uncertainty or a contested reading
Pipeline notes
coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
registerRegister: other in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
structurePassages: 7 narrative.
sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Term index
Coptic
Rendering
Count
First
no glossary terms recorded
tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:1 · narrativehigh
Source
CONSULTATIO SIVE COMMONITORIUM OROSII AD AUGUSTINUM DE ERRORE PRISCILLIANISTARUM ET ORIGENISTARUM.
Beatissimo patri AUGUSTINO cpiscopo, OROSIUS.
i. Jam quidem suggesseram Sanctitati tum, sed Commonitorium suggestæ rei tunc offerre meditabar, eum te expeditum animo ab aliis dictandi necessitatibus esse sensissem. Sed quoniam domini mei, filii tui, Eutropius ct Paulus episcopi, eadem qua et ego puer' vester, salutis omnium utilitate permoti, commonitorium jam dederunt de aliquantis haeresibus, nec tamen omnes significarunt; necesse fuit me festinato edere et coacervare in unum omnes perditionum arbores cum radicibus et ramis suis, et offerre ignienti spiritui tuo, ut tu viso agmine perspectaque nequitia, permetiaris quam possis dispositionem adhibere virtutis Tu tantum, beatissime pater, malignas aliorum plantationes vel insertiones erue atque succide, et veram sparge sementem, nobis de tuis fontibus rigaturis. Ego testem Deum spondeo, ct incrementumi operis tui spero, quia terra illa quæ nunc ingratos fructus insincere culta exhibet, si cam de manna ilio rerondito tu apud me mandando et replendo visitavers, usque in centesinum fructum profusa aliquando liber ius ubertate proficiet. Per te Dominus Deus noster, pcr te, inquam, beate pater, quos castigavit in gladio. emendet in verbo.
English
Consultation or Memorandum of Orosius to Augustine on the Error of the Priscillianists and Origenists.
To the most blessed father AUGUSTINE, bishop, OROSIUS.
I. I had indeed already suggested this to Your Holiness, but I was planning to offer a memorandum of the suggested matter at that time when I had sensed that you were free in mind from other necessities of dictation. But since my lords, your sons, the bishops Eutropius and Paul, moved by the same concern for the salvation of all, which is also that of me, your child, have already given a memorandum concerning some heresies, yet have not indicated all, it became necessary for me to hasten to produce and heap together into one all the trees of perdition with their roots and branches, and to offer them to your fiery spirit, so that you, having seen the battle line and perceived the wickedness, may measure what disposition of virtue you can apply. Do you, most blessed father, only root out and cut down the malignant plantings or grafts of others, and scatter the true seed, with us to water from your springs. I pledge God as witness, and I hope for the increase of your work, because that land which now, uncultivated insincerely, exhibits ungrateful fruits, if you visit it with that hidden manna, by commanding and filling through me, will one day, flowing forth with a hundredfold abundance, profit with a freer fertility. Through you, our Lord God, through you, I say, blessed father, may he correct in word those whom he has chastised with the sword.
tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
Ad te per Deum missus sum; de te per cum spero, dum considero qualiter actum est, quod huc venirem. Agnosco cur vcnerim: sine voluntate, sine necessilate, sine consensu de patria egressus sum, occulta quadam vi actus, donec in istius terrae littus allatus sum. Hic demum in cum resipui intellectum quod ad te venire mandabar. Impudentem non judices, si accipis confitentem. Fac me ad dilectam dominam meam idoneum negotiatorem inventa margarita (Matth. xin, 40), non fugilivum servum eversa substantia reverti. Dilacerati gravius a doctoribus pravis, quam a cruentissimis hostibus sumus. Nos confitemur offensam, tu pervides plagam: quod solum superest adjuvante Domino largire medicinam. Breviter ergo et quid ante male plantatum convaluit, ct quid ostea pcjus insertum prævaluit, ostendam.
Priscillianus, primum in co Manichæis miserior, quod ex Veteri quoque Testamento h:rresim conGrmavit, docens animam quæ a Deo nata sit, de quodam promptuario procedere, profitcri ante Deum se pugnaturam, instrui adhortatu angelorum: dehinc descendentem per quosdam circulos a principatibus malignis capi, et secundum volintatem victoris principis in corpora diversa contrudi, eisque adscribi chirographum.
English
I was sent to you by God; through him I hope for you, as I consider how it came about that I came here. I recognize why I came: without will, without necessity, without consent I left my homeland, driven by some hidden force, until I was brought to the shore of this land. Here at last I came to my senses and understood that I was commanded to come to you. Do not judge me shameless if you accept me confessing. Make me a suitable merchant for my beloved mistress, having found a pearl (Matt. 13:40), not a runaway slave returning with squandered substance. We have been more grievously torn apart by wicked teachers than by the most bloodthirsty enemies. We confess the offense, you see the wound: what alone remains, with the Lord’s help, grant the medicine. Briefly, therefore, I will show both what was badly planted earlier and grew strong, and what was later grafted worse and prevailed.
Priscillian, first of all more wretched in this with the Manichaeans, because he confirmed his heresy also from the Old Testament, taught that the soul, which is born from God, proceeds from some storehouse, professes before God that it will fight, is instructed and exhorted by angels; then, descending through certain circles, it is captured by malignant principalities, and according to the will of the victorious prince is thrust into various bodies, and a bond is assigned to them.
tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:3 · narrativemedium
Source
Unde ct Mathesim prævalere firmabat, asserens quod hoc chirographum solverit Christus, et aflixerit cruci per passioncm sunm: sicut it se Piiscillianus in quadam epistola sua dicit: Hæc prima sapientia est, in animarum typis divinarum virtutum intelligere naturas, et corporis dispositionem. In qua obligatum cœlum videtur et terra, omnesque principatus sæculi videntur adstricti sanctorum dispositiones superare. Nam primum Dei circuium et mittendarum in carne animarum divinum chirographum, Angelorum et Dei et omnium animarum consensibus fabricatum Patriarchae tenent, qui I contra formalis militae opus possident: I et reliqua. Tradidit autem nomina Patriarcharum membra esse animæ, eo quod esset Ruben in capite, Juda in pectore, Levi in corde, Benjamin in femoribus: et similia. Contra autem in membris corporis, cœli signa esse dispos ta, id est, arietem in capite, taurum in cervice, geminos in brachiis, cancrum in pectore, etc. Volcus subintelligi tenebras aeternas, et ex his principem mundi processisse. Et hoc ipsum confirmans ex libro quodam, qui inscribitur Memoria Apostolorunt, ubi Salvator interrogari a discipulis videtur secreto, et ostendere quia de parabola evangelica quae habet, Exiit seminans seminare semen suum (Matth.
English
From this he used to affirm that Mathesis prevailed, asserting that Christ had dissolved this bond and affixed it to the cross through his passion, as Priscillian himself says in a certain letter of his: "This is the first wisdom: to understand the natures of divine powers in the types of souls, and the disposition of the body." In this, heaven and earth seem bound, and all the principalities of the age appear constrained to surpass the dispositions of the saints. For the first circuit of God and the divine bond of souls to be sent into flesh, fabricated with the consents of angels, God, and all souls, the Patriarchs hold—who possess the work of formal militia against it—and the rest. Moreover, he taught that the names of the Patriarchs are members of the soul, in that Ruben is in the head, Judah in the chest, Levi in the heart, Benjamin in the thighs, and similar things. Conversely, in the members of the body, the signs of the heavens are arranged, that is, Aries in the head, Taurus in the neck, Gemini in the arms, Cancer in the chest, etc. Volcus is understood to mean eternal darkness, and from these the prince of the world proceeded. And he confirms this very thing from a certain book entitled *Memoria Apostolorum*, where the Savior is seen to be secretly questioned by the disciples and to reveal that from the evangelical parable which has, "The sower went out to sow his seed" (Matt.
tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
XIII, 3), non fuerit seminator bonus: asserens, quia si bonus fuisset, non fuisset negligens, non vel secus viam, vel in petrosis, vel in incultis jaceret semen; volens intelligi hunc esse seminantem, qui animas captas spargeret in corpora diversa quæ vellet. Quo etiam in libro de principe humidorum et. de principe ignis plurima dicta sunt, volens intelligi, arte, non potentia Dei, omnia bona agi in loc mundo. Dicit cnim esse virginem quamdam lucem, quam Deus, volens darc pluviam hominibus, principi humidorum ostendat: qui dum eam apprehendere cupit, commotus consudet, et luviam faciat, et destitutus ab ea, rougitn suo tonitrua concitet. Trinitatem autem solo verbo loquebatur: nam unionem absque ulla existentia aut proprietate asserens, sublato et, Patrem 3, Filium, ct Spiritum sancium, hunc esse unum Christum dicebat.
Tunc duo cives mei, Avitus, et alias Avitus, cum jam lam turpem confusionem per se ipsam veritas sola nudaret, peregrina petiei unt. Nam unus Jerosolymam, alius Romam profectus est. Reversi, unus retulit Origenem, alius Victorinum: ex his duobus, alter alteri cessit; Priscillianum tamen ambo damnarunt. Vicloriuum parum noviinus; quia adhuc pcne ante editiones suas, Victorini sectator cessit Origeni. Coeperunt ergo ex Origcne magnifica plura proponi, quæ ex modica occasione veritas ipsa præcederet. Di.
English
XIII, 3) he was not a good sower: asserting that if he had been good, he would not have been negligent, nor would he have cast seed along the road, or among rocks, or in uncultivated ground; intending it to be understood that this is the sower who scatters captured souls into various bodies as he wishes. In that same book, many things are also said concerning the prince of moistures and the prince of fire, intending it to be understood that all good things in this world are accomplished by art, not by the power of God. For he says that there is a certain virgin light, which God, wishing to give rain to men, shows to the prince of moistures; who, when he desires to seize her, becomes agitated, sweats, and produces rain, and when deprived of her, stirs up thunder with his roar. He spoke of the Trinity only in word: for asserting a union without any existence or property, and with the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit removed, he said that this is the one Christ.
Then two of my fellow citizens, Avitus and another Avitus, when the shameful confusion was already being laid bare by truth itself, sought foreign lands. For one set out for Jerusalem, the other for Rome. Upon their return, one reported Origen, the other Victorinus; of these two, one yielded to the other; yet both condemned Priscillian. We know little of Victorinus; because even before his own publications, the follower of Victorinus yielded to Origen. Therefore, many magnificent things began to be proposed from Origen, which truth itself would precede on slight occasion.
tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
dicimus enim de Trinitate doctrinam satis sanam, omnia quae facta essent, a Duo facta esse, et omuia bona valde, et facta de nihilo: tunc deinde Scripturarum solutiones satis sobrias Omnia hæc statiin a sapientibus fideli pristinorum expurgatione suscepta sunt. Remansit sola offensa de nihilo. Credere enim persuasum crat esse animam: non tamen persuaderi poterat factam esse de nihilo; argumentantes, quia voluntas de nihilo esse non possit. Hoc pene usque ad nunc manet 2. Isti vero Aviti duo, et cum his sanctus Basilius Græcus qui hæc beatissime docebant 3, qu dam ex libris ipsius Origenis non recta, ut nuper intelligo 4, tradiderunt. Primum omnium antequam facta apparerent, semper in Dei sapientia facta mansisse dicentes, hoc verbo: Deus enim quæcumque fecit faciendo non coepit. Deinde dixerunt Angelorum, Principatuum, Potestatum, animarum ac dæmonum, unum principium, et unam esse substantiam: et vel archangelo, vel animae, vel dxmoni locum pro meri torum qualitate datum esse, utentes hoc verbo: Majorem locum minor culpa promeruit. Mundum novissime ideo esse factum, ut in eo animæ purgarentur, quai ante peccaverunt.
English
We say that the teaching concerning the Trinity is quite sound: that all things which were made were made by God, and that all things are very good, and were made from nothing. Then, the quite sober solutions of the Scriptures were all immediately taken up by the wise faithful through a cleansing of the old [teachings]. Only the offense concerning "from nothing" remained. For it was firmly believed that the soul exists; nevertheless, it could not be persuaded that it was made from nothing, they arguing that a will cannot be from nothing. This has remained almost up to the present. But these two Aviti, and with them the holy Basil the Greek, who taught these things most blessedly, handed down certain things from the books of Origen himself which were not correct, as I recently understand. First of all, saying that before things made appeared, they always remained made in the wisdom of God, using this phrase: "For God, whatever he made, he did not begin by making." Then they said that angels, principalities, powers, souls, and demons have one beginning and one substance, and that a place was given to each—whether to an archangel, or to a soul, or to a demon—according to the quality of their merits, using this phrase: "A greater place was earned by a lesser fault." Finally, they said that the world was made so that in it souls which had previously sinned might be purified.
tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:6 · narrativehigh
Source
Ignem sane æternum, quo peccatores puniantur, neque esse ignem verum, neque æternum, prædicaverunt, dicentes, dictum esse ignem, propriæ conscientiæ punitionem: alternum autem juxta etymologiam græcam, non esse perpetuum, etiam latino testimonio adjecto; quia dictum sit, in æternum, et, in sæculum sæcuti (Psal. IX, 6, etc.) postposuerit aLterno: ac sic qmnes peccatorum animas post purgationem conscientias in unitatem corporis Christi esse redituras. Voluerunt etiam de diauolo asserere, sed non praevaluerunt: eo quod cum substantia in eo bona facta perire non possit, exusta in totum malitia, diaboli aliquando salvandam esse substantiam. De corpore vero Domini sic tradiderunt: quia cum usque ad nos veniens Filius Dei post lot millia annorum, otiosus eo usque non fuerit, sed praedicans remissionem angdis, potestatibus, atque universis superioribus, cum qualitatem Corne eorum quos visitaret assumeret, usque ad palpabilitatem carnis assumptionis specie transivisse: hoc passione et resurrectione determinans, rursus donee usque ad Patrem veniret ascendendo tenuasse: ita neque depositum unqnam fuisse corpus, nec in corpore ullo regnantem circumscribi Deum.
English
They indeed preached that the eternal fire by which sinners are punished is neither true fire nor eternal, saying that what is called fire is the punishment of one's own conscience; and that "alternum," according to Greek etymology, is not perpetual, adding also a Latin testimony, because it is said "in aeternum" and "in saeculum saeculi" (Psalm 9:6, etc.) placed after "alternum": and thus that all the souls of sinners, after the purgation of their conscience, would return into the unity of the body of Christ. They also wished to assert something concerning the devil, but did not prevail: because, since the substance created good in him cannot perish, with all malice burned away, the substance of the devil is to be saved at some time. Concerning the body of the Lord, they taught thus: that when the Son of God came down to us after many thousands of years, he was not idle up to that time, but preached remission to angels, powers, and all the higher beings, and that, as he would assume the quality of the bodies of those he visited, he passed through to the appearance of the assumption of palpable flesh: determining this by his passion and resurrection, and again, until he came to the Father, he thinned out by ascending: so that the body was never laid down, nor is God, reigning in any body, circumscribed.
tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
Creaturam quoque subjectam corruptioni, non volentem, intelligendam esse dicebant, solem et lunam et stellas; et hæc non elementarios esse fulgores, sed rationales potestates: præbere autem servitium corruptioni, propter eum qui subjecit in spe (Rom. VIII, 20).
Hoc, sicut retinere potui, breviter expositum cst, ut perspectis omnibus morbis mediciuam adbibere festines. Est veritas Christi in me, quia propter venerabilem reverentiam Sanctitatis tu:e esse impudens non auderem, nisi evidenti judicio et ordinatione Dei ad illius tanti et talis populi, cui sicut peccanti plaga imposita est, sic post plagam cura debetur, remedia proferenda te electum, me missum esse cognoscerem. Memor mci, beatissime pater, multorumque qui mecum velut ros eloquium tuum ut super eos descendat exspectant, esse dignare.
English
They said that a creature subject to corruption, not willing, is to be understood—the sun, the moon, and the stars; and that these are not elemental lights, but rational powers; and that they render service to corruption because of him who subjected them in hope (Rom. 8:20).
This, as I have been able to retain it, has been briefly set forth, so that, having examined all the maladies, you may hasten to apply the remedy. The truth of Christ is in me, because I would not dare to be impudent out of reverence for your Holiness, unless I recognized by evident judgment and ordinance of God that you have been chosen, and I sent, to bring remedies to that great and such a people, upon whom, as a punishment has been inflicted for sinning, so after the punishment a cure is due. Deign to remember me, most blessed father, and the many who with me, like dew, await your eloquence to descend upon them.
Citation. Tergwame, “Consultatio Sive Commonitorium Ad Sanctum Augustinum”, tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/tmp717.tmp717.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl ·
licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License ·
model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor ·
provider: Relace ·
cost: $0.0039 ·
generated 2026-11-15.