Latin · Other ·
Pseudo-Hieronymus / Auctor incertus (Hieronymus Stridonensis?) · ogl-pl
Work dossier · summary and historical context
The work, known as *Decem tentationes populi Israel in deserto*, is a brief moralizing catalogue attributed spuriously to Jerome. It enumerates ten trials of the Israelites in the desert, drawing on Exodus and Numbers, but the surviving text breaks off after the third temptation. Structured as a commentary on Deuteronomy 1:1-2 and Numbers 14:22-23, it employs imprecise biblical citations and a free paraphrase, suggesting a non-standard Vulgate or a lost source. Transmitted among Jerome's spuria, it was first printed in the 16th century from a single late manuscript. No critical edition exists, and the date remains uncertain, though it likely belongs to the early medieval period. The work reflects a genre of numerical lists popular in medieval exegesis.
The work exemplifies the medieval genre of numerical exegetical lists, used for moral and allegorical instruction. Its attribution to Jerome, though spurious, reflects the authority of Jerome's name in medieval manuscript culture. The text's imprecise biblical citations and free paraphrases offer insights into non-standard Vulgate traditions or lost sources. Its fragmentary survival and lack of critical edition highlight the challenges of studying spurious and poorly transmitted works.
The work's date and place of composition are unknown, but it likely originates from the early medieval Latin West, possibly within a monastic or scholarly community that produced moralizing exegetical lists. The ascription to Jerome (c. 347–420) is rejected, as the text's imprecise biblical citations and genre do not align with Jerome's known works. The work survives in a single late manuscript, first printed in the 16th century among Jerome's spuria, indicating a limited transmission. The genre of numerical lists (e.g., ten temptations) was popular in medieval exegesis, often used for moral instruction. The text's reliance on Exodus and Numbers, with a focus on the 'water of contradiction' (Meribah), suggests a typological or allegorical reading common in early medieval commentaries. The lack of a critical edition and minimal apparatus means variant readings in the ten-trial list are unrecorded, and the work's relationship to other similar catalogues (e.g., by Gregory the Great or Isidore of Seville) remains unexplored.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||