Work dossier · summary and historical context
This work is a letter from Jerome to Desiderius, likely a personal or pastoral note. Its style and vocabulary are consistent with Jerome's late 4th- to early 5th-century correspondence. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition with no early medieval witnesses, and its transmission is obscure, possibly preserved in a monastic collection of Jerome's letters. The dating is uncertain, not mentioned in Jerome's own chronological references, and its place in his corpus is inferred from stylistic parallels with his other works from the 390s. The letter was not widely cited in medieval canon law or liturgy, and its reception is limited to scholarly editions from the 16th century onward. The present edition lacks a critical apparatus due to a narrow manuscript base, and textual emendations are conjectural.
This letter, though obscure, contributes to the corpus of Jerome's correspondence, offering potential insights into his pastoral relationships and rhetorical style. Its limited transmission and late reception highlight the challenges of reconstructing early Christian letter collections. The work's uncertain dating and single-manuscript survival underscore the fragility of textual traditions, making it a case study for scholarly caution in attributing and editing patristic texts.
The letter is attributed to Jerome (c. 347–420), a Church Father known for his Latin Vulgate translation and extensive correspondence. It is addressed to Desiderius, a figure otherwise unknown, suggesting a personal or pastoral context. The work's style and vocabulary align with Jerome's output in the late 4th to early 5th century, particularly the 390s, when he was active in Bethlehem. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with no early medieval witnesses, indicating obscure transmission possibly through monastic collections. It was not cited in medieval canon law or liturgy, and its reception began only with 16th-century printed editions of Jerome's letters. The lack of a critical apparatus reflects the narrow manuscript base, making textual emendations conjectural. The work's genre is uncertain but likely a personal letter, consistent with Jerome's epistolary corpus.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||