ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Other ·

Professio Fidei

Bachiarius Monachus · ogl-pl

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 18 passages · 4,527 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

The Professio Fidei is a brief creedal statement attributed to Bachiarius, a 5th-century Spanish monk. It defends Nicene orthodoxy against Priscillianist and other heterodox views. Bachiarius is known only from this work and a letter to a certain Januarius. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, first printed in the 16th century, and is closely tied to collections of early Spanish conciliar and patristic texts. It was cited by later Catholic controversialists as a witness to early Spanish orthodoxy but never achieved liturgical or canonical status. This edition does not provide a critical apparatus for manuscript variants nor resolve the debated attribution to Bachiarius.

The Professio Fidei is significant as a rare witness to early 5th-century Spanish theological discourse, particularly the defense of Nicene orthodoxy against Priscillianism. It illustrates the regional reception of Trinitarian debates and the use of creedal statements in local ecclesiastical contexts. Its disputed authorship and limited manuscript tradition highlight challenges in attributing and dating early medieval texts. The work also shows how later Catholic controversialists employed such texts to construct a narrative of continuous orthodoxy in Spain.

Historical context

The Professio Fidei is attributed to Bachiarius, a Spanish monk active in the early 5th century, a period of theological conflict in the Western Church, particularly concerning Priscillianism—a movement deemed heretical for its asceticism, apocryphal texts, and alleged Manichaean tendencies. The work likely originated in a monastic or clerical community in Hispania, where Priscillianist ideas persisted after Priscillian's execution in 386. The text defends Nicene orthodoxy, reflecting the post-Nicene consolidation of Trinitarian doctrine. Its survival in a single manuscript tradition, first printed in the 16th century, suggests limited circulation, possibly within Spanish ecclesiastical collections. The attribution to Bachiarius is debated, as he is otherwise known only from a letter to Januarius. The work's transmission is tied to early modern editions of Spanish patristic and conciliar texts, used by Catholic controversialists to assert early Spanish orthodoxy.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

106 commentary units 41 scripture21 background14 term13 structure7 reception6 caution3 sense1 parallel 1 derived notes 34 open questions 18 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: other in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 18 narrative.
  • caution1 passage(s) are fragmentary in the source; the English bridges each break and says so in the note.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:1 · narrativehigh
Source
BACHIARII FIDES. Omne quod fuit, ipsum quod erit; et non est omne recens sub sole (Eccle. i, 9, juxta LXX). Et iterum Apostolus: Omnia haec in figuram nostri contigerunt (I Cor. x, 0): quod praesentis rei probatur effectu; cum gesta olim evangelici sacramenta mysterii, iterum aetatis nostrae temporibus renovata celebrentur. Ecce nunc, quantum intelligimus. Christus a Samaritana aquam postulat, cum beatitudo tua fidem a nobis requirit. Suspectos nos, quantum video, facit, non sermo, sed regio; et qui de fide non erubescimus, de provincia confundimur. Sed absit, beatissime, ut apud viros sanctos macula nos terrenae nativitatis inficiat. Nos patriam etsi secundum carnem novimus, sed nunc jam non novimus (II Cor. v, 16), et desiderantes Abrahae filii fieri, terram nostram cognationemque reliquimus (Gen. xii, 1). Hoc autem ideo dicimus, quia sicut Samaritanis, sic nobis non creditur a Judaeis, eo quod cujusdam haeresis macula solum nostrum originale perstrinxerit: sic praesidentum quorumdam sententia judicamur, quasi liberi esse ab erroris deceptione nequeamus. Dictum est similiter quondam ab incredulis: A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse (Joan. I, 46)? et tamen inde Christus processit. Numquid, rogo, Apostolorum merita unius perfidia avaritiaque mutavit, qui, non dicam de eadem regione, sed eorum processit e latere? Numqnid patriarcharum vitam fratrum culpa turpavit?
English
THE FAITH OF BACHIARIUS. Everything that has been is itself what will be; and not everything is new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9, according to the LXX). And again the Apostle: All these things happened as a figure of us (1 Corinthians 10:0): which is proved by the effect of the present matter, since the mysteries of the Gospel sacrament, once performed long ago, are now again celebrated, renewed in the times of our age. Behold now, as far as we understand. Christ asks for water from the Samaritan woman, when your blessedness requires faith from us. It makes us suspect, as far as I see, not our speech, but our region; and we who are not ashamed of our faith, are confounded by our province. But far be it, most blessed one, that the stain of earthly birth should infect us in the eyes of holy men. We know our homeland, even if according to the flesh, but now we no longer know it (2 Corinthians 5:16), and desiring to become sons of Abraham, we have left our land and our kindred (Genesis 12:1). We say this, however, because just as the Samaritans are not believed by the Jews, so we are not believed, because a certain stain of heresy once touched our original soil: thus we are judged by the opinion of certain presiding authorities, as if we cannot be free from the deception of error. It was similarly said once by unbelievers: Can anything good come from Nazareth (John 1:46)? and yet Christ came from there. Did the perfidy and avarice of one man, who came, I will not say from the same region, but from their very side, change the merits of the Apostles? Did the fault of brothers disgrace the life of the patriarchs?
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
Numquid prophetarum oracula, pseudoprophetarum commenta falsarunt? Core illo Levitico in baeresim declinante, numquid reliqua cognatio ex hac stirpe descendens, maculam ex propinquitate contraxit? Pontificis filiis ignem offerentibus alienum, germani eorum sacerdotali funguntur officio, et inculpatos se a crimine fratrum ministerii sui honore testantur. (??)Nicolao diacono in haeresim declinante, gloriosa collectorum fratrum in virtutibus Dei opera refulserunt. Crimen nobis regionis intenditur. Quisquis hoc dicit, legat Christum Samaritanum (Joan. viii,48): in qua provincia, non solum haeresis, sed idololatriae criminibus servierunt. In domo a profani et sceleratissimi Achab Abdias servus Domini inventus est, qui corporibus prophetarum meruit copulari. In a Sarepta Sidoniae, inter Chananaeorum scelestissimum genus, vidua fidelis reperitur, et prophetarum hospita eligitur. Magister idololatriae et caput haeresis Balaam, ut Christum praedicaret, admissus est. Job ex Esau profani et infidelis stirpe descendit. Ruth cognata generis Christi, Moabitis esse describitur, cujus origo in aeternum ab Ecclesiae foribus abdicatur. Abraham caput fidei de Chaldaeorum stirpe descendit, quibus vernacula et naturalis magicae artis impietas est. Magis Christum adorantibus, vetera errorum non imputantur opprobria. Moysi AEgyptiorum artibus erudito prophetalis spiritus gratia condonatur.
English
Did the oracles of the prophets falsify the fictions of the false prophets? When that Levite Korah turned aside into heresy, did the rest of the kindred descending from this stock contract a stain from their proximity? When the sons of the high priest offered alien fire, their brothers perform the priestly office and, by the honor of their ministry, testify that they are blameless of the crime of their brethren. When the deacon Nicolaus turned aside into heresy, the glorious works of the assembled brothers in the virtues of God shone forth. The crime of the region is charged against us. Whoever says this, let him read that Christ was called a Samaritan (John 8:48): in which province they served not only heresy but also the crimes of idolatry. In the house of the profane and most wicked Ahab, the servant Obadiah was found, who merited to be joined to the bodies of the prophets. In Sarepta of Sidon, among the most wicked race of the Canaanites, a faithful widow is found and is chosen as the hostess of the prophets. The master of idolatry and head of heresy, Balaam, was admitted to proclaim Christ. Job descended from the profane and unfaithful stock of Esau. Ruth, a relative of the race of Christ, is described as a Moabite, whose origin is forever excluded from the doors of the Church. Abraham, the head of the faith, descended from the stock of the Chaldeans, to whom the native and natural impiety of the magic art belongs. The Magi, adoring Christ, are not charged with the old reproaches of their errors. Moses, educated in the arts of the Egyptians, is granted the grace of the prophetic spirit.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:3 · narrativehigh
Source
Jam in Christo renatis terrenae provinciae error ascribitur? Si e agnoscimus patriam, erubescamus et culpam; mihi enim civitas cui renovatus sum, regio effecta vel patria est. Nihil mihi de terrenis affinitatibus ascribatur, quibus renuntiasse memini. Quisquis est, qui me provinciae cognatione aestimat infidelem, ipse infidelem se esse noverit; quia aut oblitus est, aut lubricum putat, quod in baptismo confessum esse cognoscit: sine dubio enim non relinquit terrenam cognationem, qui me de patrio errore confutat. Certe secundum institutionem actus humani, pater patriam facit. Qualiter mihi patria in terra esse dicitur, cui ex praecepto coelesti Patrem in terra vocare, aut habere non sinitur (Matth. xxiii, 9)? Vis enim, ut evidentibus tibi per me hoc probetur exemplis, qui patriae culpas errorem? Nonne Novatiani hoc genere a catholicis dissidentes, probrosae haeresis lepram judicio contraxere perverso, eo quod ante actam culparum seriem crediderunt etiam posteris ascribendam, et non tam haeresim odere quam plebem? Si pro culpa unius, totius provinciae anathemanda generatio est, damnetur et illa beatissima a discipula, hoc est, Roma, de qua nunc non una, sed duae vel tres, aut eo amplius haereses pullularunt; et tamen nulla earum cathedram Petri, hoc est, sedem Fidei, aut tenere potuit aut movere.
English
Now among those reborn in Christ, is the error of an earthly province to be imputed? If we acknowledge the homeland, let us blush for the fault as well; for me, the city in which I have been reborn has become my region or homeland. Let nothing be ascribed to me from earthly affinities, which I remember having renounced. Whoever judges me unfaithful by reason of provincial kinship, let him know that he himself is unfaithful; for he has either forgotten, or considers slippery, what he knows was confessed in baptism: without doubt, he does not abandon earthly kinship who refutes me concerning ancestral error. Certainly, according to the institution of human custom, the father makes the homeland. How is a homeland said to exist for me on earth, when by divine precept I am not permitted to call or have a Father on earth (Matthew 23:9)? Do you wish, then, that I prove this to you through evident examples, you who impute the faults of a homeland as error? Did not the Novatians, dissenting from Catholics in this manner, contract the leprosy of a shameful heresy by a perverse judgment, because they believed that a series of past faults was also to be ascribed to posterity, and hated not so much the heresy as the people? If for the fault of one, the entire generation of a province is to be anathematized, let that most blessed city, the disciple, that is, Rome, be condemned as well, from which now not one, but two or three, or even more heresies have sprouted; and yet none of them could hold or move the chair of Peter, that is, the seat of Faith.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
Damnentur postremo (??)et omnes provinciae, de quibus diversi erroris rivuli manavere. Ille vas electionis et gentium Doctor (Act. xx, 9), lapso Eutycho de tertio tecto, credo, aliquid de Trinitate erranti, restituit calorem fidei, et vitam reddidit, hoc est, veniam relaxavit. Nos fortasse adhuc in fenestra, id est, in lucis via et fidei splendore residentes, severi nimium judices, non ex discussione, sed ex suspectione condemnant: nescientes, quia quo judicio judicaverint, judicabitur de eis (Matth. vii, 2), et qui fratri suo dixerit racha, reus erit gehennae ignis (Matth. v, 22). Racha enim, vacuus interpretatur. Et quis est vacuus, nisi cujus interiora carent fidei veritate, et est velut aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens (1 Cor, xiii, 1)? Ille, qui una tantum nocte Christum viderat, ait contribulis suis: Numquid lex nostra judicat hominem, niti prius audiat qum agit (Joan. vii, 51)? Et hi qui tot annorum Domini sectatores sunt, prius judicant, quam id unde judicant, audiant atque cognoscant? Si ante cognitionem promenda est sententia, cur legislator praecepit (Levit, xiv, seqq.) ne antequam introeat sacerdos, et videat domum quae cariosae vel tinnientis lepra haeresis scindatur, immunda judicetur? Ne, quaeso, beatissime frater, male de provincia sentiatur.
English
Let all provinces from which rivulets of diverse error have flowed be condemned as well. That vessel of election and Teacher of the Gentiles (Acts 20:9), when Eutychus had fallen from the third story and, I believe, erred concerning something of the Trinity, restored the warmth of faith and gave back life, that is, granted pardon. Perhaps we, still sitting at the window—that is, on the path of light and in the splendor of faith—are condemned by overly severe judges, not from examination but from suspicion; they do not know that by the judgment with which they have judged, judgment will be passed on them (Matthew 7:2), and that whoever has said "racha" to his brother will be guilty of the fire of Gehenna (Matthew 5:22). For "racha" is interpreted as "empty." And who is empty, if not one whose inner parts lack the truth of faith, and who is like sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal (1 Corinthians 13:1)? That man who had seen Christ for only one night said to his fellow tribesmen: "Does our law judge a man unless it first hears what he does" (John 7:51)? And these who are followers of the Lord of so many years—do they judge before they hear and know that about which they judge? If a sentence is to be pronounced before knowledge, why did the lawgiver command (Leviticus 14 ff.) that a house be not judged unclean before the priest enters and sees whether it is afflicted with the leprosy of decay or of tinkling heresy? I beg you, most blessed brother, let no ill be thought of the province.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
Non latet enim perspicaciam tuam, quia cum in adventu arcae Dominicae Dagonis caput in centum partes cum utrisque pedibus comminutum sit, spina ejus integra superfuisse describitur (I Reg. v, 4, sec. LXX), Nos enim Dagonis caput sive pedes, membra mundi, id est, orientem et occiduum esse sentimus;4 in quibus partibus sub praesentia legis omnis errorum contrita perversitas est. Tuum sit enim judicare, quae sit medietas spinae, in qua adhuc nodorum compago dissoluta perdurat. Ut quid, rogo, quaeritur provincia mea? Peregrinus ego sum, sicut omnes patres mei (Psal. xxxviii, 17). Verumtamen si magnopere quaeritur, ubi natus sim, accipiatur confessio mea, quam in baptismi nativitate respondi: non enim mihi patria confessionem, sed confessio patriam dedit; quia credidi, et accepi (Matth, xxi,22). Nec me offuscet Samaritana conditio; quia Christum interrogatus ad puteum credidi, et purgatus a lepra infidelitatis agnovi. Verumtamen quia apostolicae eruditionis instituta nos commovent [An. commonent] (1 Pet. iii, 15), ut omnibus poscentibus nobis rationem de fide et spe quae in nobis est, proferamus; non moremur fidei nostrae regulam beatitudini tuae,1 qui artifex es ipsius a aedificii demonstrare.
English
It is not hidden from your perspicacity that when, at the arrival of the Ark of the Lord, the head of Dagon was shattered into a hundred pieces along with both feet, its spine is described as having survived intact (1 Sam. 5:4, according to the LXX). For we understand the head or feet of Dagon to be the members of the world, that is, the East and the West; in which parts, under the presence of the Law, all perversity of errors has been crushed. It is for you to judge what the middle of the spine is, in which the joining of the knots still persists unresolved. Why, I ask, is my province sought? I am a stranger, as are all my fathers (Ps. 38:17). Yet if it is greatly sought where I was born, let my confession, which I gave in the nativity of baptism, be accepted: for not my homeland gave me confession, but confession gave me a homeland; because I believed, and I received (Matt. 21:22). Nor should the Samaritan condition obscure me; because, when questioned at the well, I believed in Christ, and, cleansed from the leprosy of unfaithfulness, I acknowledged him. Yet, since the precepts of apostolic teaching urge us (1 Pet. 3:15) to set forth to all who ask the reason for the faith and hope that is in us, let us not delay in demonstrating the rule of our faith to your Beatitude, who are the very artisan of that edifice.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:6 · narrativehigh
Source
Sed ne forte hoc ipsum suspicionem infidelitatis incutiat, quod tardius ad interrogata respondeo; credimus Deum esse: quod fuit, erat; quod erat, erit, numquam aliud, semper idem: Pater Deus, Filius Deus, Spiritus sanctus Deus: unus Deus, et unus filius de Patre, Spiritus sanctus Patris et Filii. Unius Trinitatis ista substantia, et tria ista unam habentia voluntatem. Nec communicans major, nec accipiens minor: nec est secundus a primo, nec tertius de secundo; quia sic nos prophetica instituta docuerunt dicendo: Non ascendes per gradus ad altare meum (Exod. xx, 26). Altare enim velut quamdam basem Fidei suspicamur, unde vitalis cibi participantur alimenta; quia altare ex proprietate nominis sui, nonnisi sublimium rerum alta cognitio est. Divisum enim per syllabas nomen altaris, inchoatumque de fine, res alta significatur et sonat. Ad hanc Fidem per gradus ascendere non debemus, ne inaequaliter sentiendo, de inferiore ad superiorem transitum faciamus; sed aequali gradu nostri cordis intrare, ut unius substantiae, unius potestatis, unius virtutis, et Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum sentiamus. Pater enim principale nomen divinitatis per se, quod creditur, et quod dicitur Pater Deus, Filius Deus ex Patre, non ex se, e sed Patris. Pater Deus, et Filius Deus: sed non idem Pater, qui Filius; sed idem esse creditur Pater, quod Filius.
English
But lest this very thing—that I respond more slowly to the questions—should inspire suspicion of unfaithfulness: we believe that God exists; what He was, He was; what He was, He will be, never other, always the same: Father God, Son God, Holy Spirit God: one God, and one Son from the Father, Holy Spirit of the Father and the Son. This is the substance of the one Trinity, and these three have one will. Neither does the greater communicate, nor the lesser receive; nor is the second from the first, nor the third from the second; because the prophetic institutions have taught us thus, saying: "You shall not ascend by steps to my altar" (Exod. 20:26). For we suspect the altar to be, as it were, a certain base of Faith, from which the nourishment of life-giving food is shared; because the altar, from the property of its name, is the high knowledge of sublime things alone. For the name of the altar, divided into syllables and begun from its end, signifies and sounds a high thing. To this Faith we ought not to ascend by steps, lest, by thinking unequally, we make a transition from the lower to the higher; but we should enter with an equal step of our heart, so that we may perceive the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as of one substance, one power, one might. For the Father is the principal name of the divinity through Himself, which is believed, and which is said: Father God, Son God from the Father, not from Himself, but from the Father. Father God, and Son God: but the Father is not the same as the Son; yet the Father is believed to be the same as the Son.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
Et Spiritus sanctus, non Pater ingenitus, sed Spiritus ingeniti Patris. Filius genitus, non Spiritus Filius, sed ipse Filius, super quem a Patre missus est Spiritus. Itaque, cum ingenitus Pater sit, cujus est Spiritus, incaute Spiritus sanctus dicitur ingenitus, ne duo ingeniti, aut duo Patres a ab infidelibus aestimentur. Filius Patris ante saecula genitos a Patre, non potest alium genitum habere consortem; ut credatur unigenitus, et duo geniti non dicentur. Pater enim unus ingenitus, Filius unos est genitus, Spiritus sanctus a Patre procedens, Patri et Filio coaeternus; quoniam unum opus, et una in Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancte voluntatis operatio est. Pater ingenitus, Filius genitus, Spiritus sanctus a Patre procedens, Patri et Filio coaeternus; sed ille nascitur, hic procedit, sicunt in Evangelio beati Joannis legitur: Spiritus qui a Patre procedit, ipse vebis annuntiabit omnia (Joan. xv, 26, et xvi, 13). Itaque Spiritus sanctus, nec Pater esse ingenitos, nec Filius genitus, aestimetur; sed Spiritus sanctus, qui a Patre procedit. Bed non est aliud quod procedit, quam quod unde procedit. Si persona queritur, Deus est.
English
And the Holy Spirit is not the unbegotten Father, but the Spirit of the unbegotten Father. The Son is begotten, not the Spirit Son, but the Son Himself, upon whom the Spirit was sent by the Father. Therefore, since the Father is unbegotten, whose Spirit He is, the Holy Spirit is incautiously called unbegotten, lest two unbegotten ones, or two Fathers, be supposed by the unfaithful. The Son of the Father, begotten before the ages by the Father, cannot have another begotten companion, so that He may be believed to be only-begotten, and two begotten ones shall not be spoken of. For the Father is one unbegotten, the Son is one begotten, the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father, coeternal with the Father and the Son; since the work is one, and the operation of the will in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit is one. The Father is unbegotten, the Son is begotten, the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father, coeternal with the Father and the Son; but He is born, this one proceeds, as is read in the Gospel of the blessed John: "The Spirit who proceeds from the Father, He will announce everything to you" (John 15:26, and 16:13). Therefore, let the Holy Spirit be considered neither the unbegotten Father, nor the begotten Son; but the Holy Spirit, who proceeds from the Father. But that which proceeds is not other than that from which it proceeds. If a person is sought, He is God.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:8 · narrativehigh
Source
Haec per hoc tripartita conjunctio et conjuncta divisio, et in personis excludit unionem, et in personarum distinctione obtinet unitatem, Sicque eredimus beatissimam Trinitatem; quod unius naturis e est, unius deitatis, unius ejusdemque virtutis atque substantiae; nec inter Patrem ei Fidium et Spiritum sanctum sit ulla diversitas, nisi quod ille Pater sit, et hie Filius, et ille Spiritus sanctus; Trinitas in subsistentibus personis, Unitas in natura atque substantia. Filium quoque credimus in novissimis diebus natum esse de Virgine et Spiritu sancto, carnem naturae humanae et animam suscepisse. In qua carne et passum et se pullum, resurrexisse a mortuis credimus et fatemur; et in eadem ipsa carne in qua jacuit in sepulcro, post resorrectionem ascendisse in coelum, unde venturam ex speetamus ad judicium vivorum et mortuorum; Vi(??)- ginem quoque de qua natum scimus, et virginem ante partum, et virginem post partum, ne consortes Elvidiani erroris habeamur.
English
This threefold conjunction and conjoined division excludes union in the persons and maintains unity in the distinction of persons. And thus we believe the most blessed Trinity: that it is of one nature, one deity, one and the same power and substance; nor is there any diversity between the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, except that He is the Father, and He is the Son, and He is the Holy Spirit; Trinity in subsisting persons, Unity in nature and substance. We also believe that the Son was born in the last days from the Virgin and the Holy Spirit, and that he took on flesh of human nature and a soul. In that flesh we believe and confess that he suffered and was buried, and rose from the dead; and in that same flesh in which he lay in the tomb, after the resurrection he ascended into heaven, whence we expect him to come to judge the living and the dead. We also know the Virgin from whom he was born, and that she was a virgin before birth and a virgin after birth, lest we be considered partakers of the Elvidian error.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:9 · narrativehigh
Source
Carnem a quoque nostrae resurrectionis fatemur integram atque perfectam, hujus, in qua vivimus in praesenti saeculo, aut bonis artibus gubernamur, aut malis operibus subjacemus, ut possimus in ipsa, aut pro malis poenarum tormenta sustinere, aut pro bonis bonorum praemia acquirere: neque, ut quidam absurdissime, aliam pro hac resurrecturam dicimus, sed hanc ipsam, nullo omnino ei vel membro amputato, vel aliqua corporis parte desecta. Hic est nostrae Fidei thesaurus, quem signatum ecclesiastico Symbolo quod in baptismo accepimus, custodimus. Sic coram Deo corde credimus: sic coram hominibus labiis confitemur; ut et hominibus cognitio sua fidem faciat, et Deo imago sua testimonium reddat. Hic est baculus defensionis nostrae, quo murmurantium adversus nos ora feriamus, qui nos per viam hujus saeculi transeuntes, jugo consuctudinis, non studio rationis oblatrant. Hoc scutum fidei nostrae, quo obtrectantium verborum et venenata suspicionum spicula repellimus ae vitamus, ne aliquod in nobis patens membrum et de protectione fide, nudum, sermo inimici qui ad feriendum destinatur, inveniat. Sed sileamus de his, quia nobis nunc, non repercutiendi, sed vitandi tantum hostis cura suscepta est.
English
We confess the flesh of our resurrection to be whole and perfect, that same flesh in which we live in the present age, and by which we are either governed by good arts or subjected to evil works, so that in it we may either endure the torments of punishments for evil deeds or acquire the rewards of goods for good deeds. And we do not say, as some most absurdly do, that another flesh will rise in place of this one, but this very flesh itself, with no member whatsoever amputated from it, nor any part of the body cut off. This is the treasure of our Faith, which we guard, sealed with the ecclesiastical Symbol that we received in baptism. Thus we believe in our hearts before God; thus we confess with our lips before men: so that our knowledge may make faith for men, and its image may bear witness for God. This is the staff of our defense, with which we strike the mouths of those murmuring against us, who, as we pass through the way of this age, bark at us from the yoke of custom, not from the zeal of reason. This is the shield of our faith, with which we repel and avoid the words of detractors and the poisoned darts of suspicions, lest any member in us lie open and naked from the protection of faith, and the enemy’s speech, which is aimed to strike, find it. But let us be silent about these things, because for us now the care is not to strike back, but only to avoid the enemy.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:10 · narrativehigh
Source
Jam vero, si etiam illud a nobis quaeritur, qualiter de anima sentiamus, factam credimus esse, sicut legimus in Hieremia propheta per regem Sedeciam dicentem: Vivit Dominus, qui fecit nobis animam istam (Jerem. xxxviii, 16).2 Si autem quaeritur, unde sit facta, nescire me fateor, quia nec usquam legisse cognosco: et ideo nec de imperitia erubesco, quia lectione non doceor, neque periculum formido, quia quae non lego, non praesumo, ne transgressor propheticorum inveniar praeceptorum, qui mandat sanguinem non manducari, adjiciens, (Levit. xviii, 14), quia omnis carnis sanguis anima est. Quid enim est sanguinem manducare, nisi de anima disputare? Et ideo carnem quae vobis in Adam fundata est, possumus dicere ex mundi qualitatibus e substantiae Deo artifice et auctore compactam; sanguinem enim ad basem fundamus altaris; id est, ut ipsi qui creavit, scire unde creaverit, relinquamus. Basis enim altaris velut quaedam radix profunditatis est, cujus secreto etiam rationem animae jungamus, de qua disputare non possumus. Et ideo nec partem dicimus Dei animani, sicut quidam asserunt, quia Deus impartibilis et indivisus et Impassibilis est: anima vero diversis passionibus mancipata, sicut quotidianus rerum exitus probat.
English
Now if it is also asked of us what we think concerning the soul, we believe it to have been made, as we read in the prophet Jeremiah through King Zedekiah saying: "As the Lord lives, who made this soul of ours" (Jer. 38:16). But if it is asked from what it was made, I confess I do not know, because I do not recall having read it anywhere; and therefore I am not ashamed of my ignorance, since I am not taught by reading, nor do I fear danger, because I do not presume upon what I do not read, lest I be found a transgressor of the prophetic precepts, which command that blood not be eaten, adding (Lev. 17:14) that the blood of all flesh is the soul. For what is it to eat blood, but to dispute about the soul? And therefore we can say that the flesh which was founded in you in Adam was compacted from the qualities of the world, with God as artisan and author of its substance; for we place blood at the base of the altar; that is, we leave it to the one who created to know from what he created. For the base of the altar is like a certain root of depth, to whose secret we also join the reason of the soul, about which we cannot dispute. And therefore we do not say that the soul is a part of God, as some assert, because God is impartible, undivided, and impassible; but the soul is subject to various passions, as the daily outcome of events proves.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:11 · narrativehigh
Source
Nec de creatura aliqua factam dicimus, ne eam faciamus viliorem reliquis creaturis, quibus domina, si bene egerit, constituta est; sed ex Dei tantum voluntate formari, cujus potentiae non necessaria est materia, ex qua quod voluerit operetur, sed ipsa voluntas ejus materia a eorum, quae fieri aut esse mandaverit. Sed nec illi assertioni tradimus manus, qua quidam superfluo delectantur, ut credant animas ex transfusione generari; quia contradicit huic suspicioni beatus David dicendo: Scitote quoniam Dominus ipse est Deus: ipse fecit nos, et non ipsi nos (Psal. xcix, 3). Et alibi: Qui finxit singillatim corda eorum (Psal. xxxii, 15). Ubi hic transfusio inveniet locum, ubi aut singillatim corda finguntur, aut dicitur: ipse fecit nos, et non ipsi nos? Qui ergo ex tranfusione dicunt animas generari, id asserere dicuntur, quia ipsi nos faciamus. Sed hoc praescientia prophetalis objurgat dicendo: Ipse fecit nos, et non ipsi nos. Absque sola igitur Trinitate, omne quod in coelis sive in terris et mari potentatur, agitur, movetur, creaturam esse credimus et fatemur.
English
We do not say that it is made from any creature, lest we make it more base than the other creatures over which it is set as mistress, if it acts rightly; but we believe it to be formed solely by the will of God, whose power does not require matter from which to work what it wills, but His will itself is the matter of those things which He has commanded to come into being or to exist. Nor do we surrender to that assertion in which some take excessive delight, that souls are generated by transmigration; for the blessed David contradicts this suspicion, saying: "Know that the Lord Himself is God: He Himself made us, and not we ourselves" (Ps. 99:3). And elsewhere: "Who fashioned their hearts one by one" (Ps. 32:15). Where will transmigration find a place here, where hearts are fashioned one by one, or where it is said: "He Himself made us, and not we ourselves"? Therefore, those who say that souls are generated by transmigration are said to assert that we make ourselves. But this prophetic foreknowledge rebukes them, saying: "He Himself made us, and not we ourselves." Therefore, apart from the Trinity alone, we believe and confess that everything which has power, is acted upon, or is moved in the heavens or on earth and sea is a creature.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:12 · narrativemedium
Source
Diabolum non ita factum sentimus, ut diabolus est, nec propriam habuisse naturae suae genus, ut diabolus nasceretur, et hoc cognomen meritura dedisse, non Deum: nec ingenitum esse, quia Deus non est; nec factum esse diabolum, quia Deus malum non fecit, sed angelum bonum factum, sicut Scriptura demonstrat: Per bonum operatum est mihi omnem concupiscentiam (Rom. vii, 8). Malum enim angelum fuisse sic credo, ut Apostolus dicit: Datus est mihi stimulus carnis meae, angelus Satanae qui me colaphizet (II Cor. xii, 7). Et alibi: Nisi venerit refuga et discessio (II Thess. ii, 3). Ergo qui nunc refuga est, fuit aliquando intuitu Creatoris, et in illa gradus sublimitate e quae scripta a prophetis, cum dicitur: Et tu eras consignatio similitudinis, et corona decoris (Ezech. xxviii, 12), et reliqua; et alibi: Quomodo de coelo cecidit Lucifer, qui mane oriebatur (Isai. xiv, 12). Hunc boni et mali capacem dicimus accepisse ex factore naturam, immortalitatis gloria et honore circumdatum; accepisse etiam scientiae dignitatem; qui elatus in superbiam, suum credidit esse quod non erat; quoniam qui eum fecerat, Dominum non videbat. Ego sum, inquit, et non est alius praeter me (Isai. xlvii, 12). Inde terrae deputatus est et cineri, ut scriptum est: Quid superbis? terra et cinis (Eccli. x, 9), et, Initium peccationis superbia (Ibid., 15).
English
We do not think that the Devil was made as the Devil is, nor that he had his own kind of nature, so that he was born the Devil and that this name was to be given to him as a merit, not from God: nor that he is unbegotten, because he is not God; nor that he was made the Devil, because God did not make evil, but that he was made a good angel, as Scripture shows: "Through the good, every desire has been worked in me" (Rom. 7:8). For I believe that he was an evil angel, as the Apostle says: "A goad of my flesh has been given to me, an angel of Satan who strikes me" (2 Cor. 12:7). And elsewhere: "Unless the renegade and the apostasy come" (2 Thess. 2:3). Therefore, he who is now a renegade was once in the sight of the Creator, and in that sublimity of rank which is written by the prophets, when it is said: "And you were the seal of likeness, and the crown of beauty" (Ezek. 28:12), and the rest; and elsewhere: "How did Lucifer, who rose in the morning, fall from heaven?" (Isa. 14:12). We say that this one, capable of both good and evil, received from the maker a nature, surrounded by the glory and honor of immortality; he also received the dignity of knowledge; who, lifted up in pride, believed to be his own what was not; because he did not see the Lord who had made him. "I am," he said, "and there is no other besides me" (Isa. 47:12). Thence he was consigned to earth and ashes, as it is written: "Why are you proud? earth and ashes" (Sir. 10:9), and, "The beginning of sin is pride" (Sir. 10:15).
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:13 · narrativehigh
Source
Qui tartaro et igni perpetuo deputatus, perennis est poenae, non immortalis vitae. Credimus omnem creaturam Dei quae ad usus ciborum a conditore concessa est, bonum esse, sicut et i factum est: Et vidit Deus, quia bona sunt valde (Gen. i, 30, 31). Sed ab his ad tempus abstinere, non pro superstitione religionis neque abominatione creaturae Dei, sed pro continentia carnis, utile esse sentimus secundum Apostoli consilium, qui dicit: Bonum est non manducare carnem, neque bibere vinum (Rom. xiv, 21); atque cum libuerit, uti; et cum delectaverit, abstinere, in hominis potestate consistere. Conjugia probamus, quae Deo auctore concessa sunt: continentiam in ipsis praedicamus; virginitatem, utpote egregium germen, et ex effeta trunci radice procedens, extollimus et miramur. Justorum peccatorumque distantiam, non ex conditione creatoris, sed arbitrio credimus accedere voluntatis. Poenitentiam peccatorum plenissima fide suscipimus, ac veluti secundam gratiam suspicamur, sicut Apostolus ad Corinthios dicit: Volui per vos venire, ut secundam gratiam habeatis (II Cor. i, 15).
English
He who is consigned to Tartarus and perpetual fire is of everlasting punishment, not of immortal life. We believe that every creature of God which has been granted by the Creator for use as food is good, just as it was made: "And God saw that they were very good" (Gen. 1:30, 31). But to abstain from these for a time, not out of religious superstition nor abhorrence of God's creature, but for the sake of continence of the flesh, we consider useful according to the counsel of the Apostle, who says: "It is good not to eat meat, nor to drink wine" (Rom. 14:21); and that when one wishes, to partake, and when it pleases, to abstain, lies within a person's power. We approve of marriages, which are granted by God as author; we preach continence within them; virginity, as a distinguished shoot proceeding from a barren trunk's root, we extol and admire. The distinction between the just and sinners, we believe, arises not from the condition of the Creator but from the choice of the will. We embrace penance for sins with the fullest faith, and regard it as a second grace, as the Apostle says to the Corinthians: "I wished to come through you, so that you might have a second grace" (2 Cor. 1:15).
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:14 · narrativemedium
Source
Vetus et novum Testamentum aequali fidei lance suscipimus; ac veluti currentis per signa ponderis libra, sic testimoniorum gesta mobili meditatione pensamus. Nec a evacuantes historiae fidem, credimus universa gesta esse quae legimus; sed juxta doctrinam Apostolicam sensum in his spiritualem, prout Dominus dederit, perscrutamur: qui tamen sensus ad typum Christi Ecclesiaeque pertineat; aut in morum emendationem correctionemque proficiat. Et hoc ipsum juxta illud, quod Apostolus ait: Omnia haec in figuram nostri contigerunt (I Cor. x, 6). Et alibi beatus Petrus: Omnis sermo interpretatione indiget (II Pet. i, 20). Omnem scripturam quae ecclesiastico canoni non congruit neque consentit, non solum non suscipimus, verum etiam velut alienam a Fidei veritate damnamus. Peregrinis atque ignotis fabulis de scripturarum continentia, non facile accommodamus assensum; neque cito nova doctrina aurium nostrarum intrat cavernas, quia legimus Virginem novam aliam in secreto, quam rudem vel secretam suspicamur esse doctrinam; quae ob hoc prohibetur inspici, ne hominum corda, commentitia, sub specie veritatis, sermonum pulchritudine suavitateque decipiat.
English
We receive the Old and New Testament with an equal balance of faith; and just as a scale runs through the marks of its weight, so we weigh the deeds of the testimonies with mobile meditation. Nor do we, by emptying the trustworthiness of history, believe that all the deeds we read are not; but according to Apostolic teaching we search out the spiritual sense in them, as the Lord shall have granted: which sense, however, pertains to the type of Christ and the Church, or advances toward the correction and amendment of morals. And this very thing is according to what the Apostle says: All these things happened as a figure of us (1 Cor. 10:6). And elsewhere blessed Peter: Every speech needs interpretation (2 Pet. 1:20). Every scripture which does not agree with nor consent to the ecclesiastical canon, we not only do not receive, but we also condemn as alien to the truth of the Faith. To foreign and unknown fables concerning the content of the scriptures, we do not readily give our assent; nor does new doctrine quickly enter the caverns of our ears, because we read of another new Virgin in secret, which doctrine we suspect to be crude or secret; which is forbidden to be inspected for this reason, lest it deceive the hearts of men, by means of fabrications, under the appearance of truth, with the beauty and sweetness of words.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:15 · narrativehigh
Source
Virgo est illa doctrina, quae nulli viro ecclesiastico vel catholico cognita est; sed inter mulieres semper adolevit, id est, animas, quae semper discentes, omni spiritui deceptionis credula se facilitate commiscent, non curae habentes unde concipiant; cum Dominus in Lege mandaverit, ne non nisi de tribu sua in conjugio copuletur, id est, illi fidei intellectus, qui ex patrum semine, hoc est, doctrina descendit, et Abrahae qui primus in praeputio credidit, prosapia nobilitatur et genere. Virgo est illa doctrina, quae tantum in secreto sibi placet, et in publicum erubescit exire. Hanc talem, non solum fugimus, verum etiam publica voce damnamus, stultum e docentes hoc credere, quod aut ipsi defendere non possumus, aut ad aures publicas non debeat pervenire. 7.3 Jejunia attentiora secundum ecclesiasticam regulam disciplinamque servamus, ut tribus temporibus anni masculinum nostrum (Exod. xxxiv, 23), hoc est, opus virtutis quod caetero operi praecellat, appareat: ac si quando jejunia indicta Ecclesiae, tunc nos cupimus, non solum de usu consuetudinarii, verum etiam a conversatione, fabulis, salutationibus quae fabulas interserunt, jejunare.
English
That doctrine is a virgin which is known to no ecclesiastical or catholic man; but it has always grown up among women, that is, among souls which, always learning, credulously mingle themselves with every spirit of deception, having no care from whom they conceive; although the Lord commanded in the Law that one should not be joined in marriage except from one's own tribe, that is, that understanding of faith which descends from the seed of the fathers, that is, from doctrine, and is ennobled and distinguished by the lineage of Abraham, who first believed in the foreskin. That doctrine is a virgin which pleases itself only in secret and blushes to go out into public. Such a doctrine we not only flee, but also condemn with a public voice, teaching that it is foolish to believe what we ourselves cannot defend, or what ought not to reach public ears. 7.3 We observe more attentive fasts according to ecclesiastical rule and discipline, so that at three times of the year our masculine element (Exod. 34:23), that is, the work of virtue which excels other work, may appear: and whenever fasts are proclaimed by the Church, then we desire to fast not only from customary use, but also from conversation, from tales, from greetings which interweave tales.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:16 · narrativemedium
Source
Et a cum haec, teste Deo, ita, ut scribimus, sentiamus; tamen non sic nobis de veritate blandimur, ut si forte sacerdotes sive doctores, qui sunt capita populi et colomnae ecclesiarum, quodlibet ex his quae professi sumus, probantes (aliquid) rectius quid dixerint, pigri simus in eorum sententiam transire; praeceptumque meminimus scriptum: Interrogate patres vestros, ei dicent vobis (Deut. xxxii, 7). Neque enim tam stulti sumus, ut quibus capita pro sanctificatione submittimus, his corda nostra humiliare nolimus. Pastor est: quo vocaverit, sequar: quod dixerit, ruminabo; quia ipse scit sibi pro custodia mea reddendam esse rationem (Heb. xiii, 17). Haec e sint, de quibus inierim vobis ad praesens occurrere potui: si quae aut studio praeteriisse, aut te adhuc titillare videantur, sine verecundia interrogare dignare, ut sine cunctatione respondeam, et aut emender de errore, aut confirmer in Fide. Testor omni legenti verba professionis hujus, quoniam si quis dempserit de his, demet Deus de libro vitae partem ejusdem (Apoc. xxii, 19). Etenim ille qui nos crediderit aliud labiis loqui, aliud corde tenere; sicut superius dixi, cor nostrum Deus potest inspicere. Ipsi obtulimus labia ad confessionem: de quibus possunt homines judicare, satisfecimus; ac sic duobus testibus stabit omne verbum nostrum (Deut.
English
And since we, with God as witness, hold these things as we write them, yet we do not so flatter ourselves concerning the truth that, if perchance priests or teachers, who are the heads of the people and the pillars of the churches, should approve something from among those things we have professed and declare something more correctly, we would be slow to pass over to their opinion; and we remember the precept written: "Ask your fathers, and they will tell you" (Deut. 32:7). For we are not so foolish that, having submitted our heads to them for sanctification, we would be unwilling to humble our hearts to them. He is a pastor: where he calls, I will follow; what he says, I will ruminate; because he himself knows that he must render an account for my safekeeping (Heb. 13:17). These are the things concerning which I have been able to meet with you for the present: if any things seem either to have been passed over by me through study, or still to titillate you, deign to ask without shame, so that I may answer without hesitation, and either correct from error or confirm in the Faith. I testify to every reader of the words of this profession, that if anyone removes anything from these, God will remove that person's part from the book of life (Rev. 22:19). For indeed, he who has believed that we speak one thing with our lips and hold another in our heart—as I said above, God can inspect our heart. We have offered our lips to him for confession: concerning these things, men can judge; we have satisfied; and thus our every word will stand by two witnesses (Deut.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:17 · narrativehigh
Source
xvii, 6), id est, Deo, cujus judicium in nos, si fallimus, invocamus; et hominibus, quorum suspiciones nostra confessione corrigimus, ne amplius in nobis velint male sentiendo peccare. Si quis his auditis in incredulitate perstiterit, ul non nobis fidei assensum tradat, non dubito, e quin in die judicii partem aut inter incredulum populum, aut inter falsos testes habiturus sil, et secundum judicium legis Moysi iniquitatem quam in fratre suo meditatur, sit recepturus (Deut, xix, 19), Nos enim, etsi peccatores sumus, tamen propter illa trecenta aurea scuta quae Salomon fabricavit (III Reg. xiv, 27), aerea facere non debemus. Scutum enim Fidei forma est secundum Apostolum, qui dicit: et Accipientes scutum fidei (Ephes. vi, 10). Et ille pro aureis aerea facit, qui subtracta fidei veritate, solum degenere reddit et confessione tinnitum; et cum devotus videatur in numero, tamen reus invenitur ex voto, id quod non credit confitendo. De quibus quidem dixisse beatus Apostolus suspicandus est: Habentes speciem pietatis, et virtutem ejus abnegantes (II Tim. iii, 5). Nonne videtur tibi virtus in auro, et species in sere posse sentiri? Sed optamus assertionem propheticam custodire, ut ante pedes equorum regis, qui nisi episcopi aut doctores sunt, quorum pedes veloces sunt super montes (I Isai. lii, 7), evangelizantes pacem, fidei nostrae scuta ponamus.
English
(Psalm 17:6), that is, God, whose judgment we invoke upon ourselves if we deceive; and men, whose suspicions we correct by our confession, lest they sin further by thinking ill of us. If anyone, having heard these things, persists in unbelief and does not grant us the assent of faith, I do not doubt that on the day of judgment he will have a place either among the unbelieving people or among false witnesses, and according to the judgment of the law of Moses, he will receive the iniquity which he meditates against his brother (Deuteronomy 19:19). For we, although we are sinners, nevertheless ought not to make those three hundred golden shields which Solomon fashioned (1 Kings 14:27) into bronze ones. For the shield is the form of Faith according to the Apostle, who says: "And taking up the shield of faith" (Ephesians 6:10). And he makes bronze ones instead of golden ones who, having removed the truth of faith, renders only a degenerate sound and a clatter of confession; and although he appears devout in number, yet he is found guilty in his intention, confessing what he does not believe. Concerning these, the blessed Apostle is to be suspected of having said: "Having the appearance of piety, but denying its power" (2 Timothy 3:5). Does it not seem to you that virtue can be perceived in gold, and appearance in bronze? But we wish to keep the prophetic assertion, so that before the feet of the king's horses—which are bishops or teachers, whose feet are swift upon the mountains (Isaiah 52:7), evangelizing peace—we place the shields of our faith.
tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:18 · narrativemedium
Source
Trecenta enim aurea scuta, sive beatae Trinitatis fides, sive omnium creaturarum satio, coeli, terne et moris: cursores enim qui ante pedes equorum ponunt ca, illi credendi sunt qui potuerunt dicere: Cursum consummavi (II Tim. iv, 7): quia instituti lege i huc usque ad finem servare possimus, ne illa j Suracim rex AEgypti (III Reg. xiv, 25), hoc est, diabolus, a templo nostri cordis abripiat. Excubent suffragia orationum tuarum ad Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum, cui gloria in saecula saeculorum amen.
English
Three hundred gold shields, whether the faith of the blessed Trinity or the sowing of all creatures, of heaven, earth, and the sea: for the runners who place them before the feet of horses are to be believed those who were able to say: I have finished the course (2 Tim. 4:7): because, instructed by the law, we may be able to keep them up to this end, lest that Suracim, king of Egypt (1 Kings 14:25), that is, the devil, snatch them from the temple of our heart. Let the supports of your prayers watch over Jesus Christ our Lord, to whom is glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Citation. Tergwame, “Professio Fidei”, tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/tmp378.tmp378.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0094 · generated 2026-11-15.