Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Sermones Dominicales — Monumenta Vetera Ad Arianorum Doctrinam is a collection of Latin homilies preserved in a single, lacunose manuscript with scribal corrections. Their anti-Arian polemic situates them in a post-Nicene context, likely the 4th–5th century, though no external evidence confirms a precise date. The sermons were not widely cited in medieval florilegia, suggesting limited influence within a small anti-Arian circle. Stylistic inconsistencies indicate possible multiple authorship or later interpolations. The edition lacks a critical apparatus for manuscript variants, requiring readers to consult the source for detailed textual notes. The work adapts classical imagery, such as the stadium, to spiritual allegory, reflecting a common late-antique Christian strategy of repurposing pagan culture.
The Sermones Dominicales are significant as a rare witness to post-Nicene anti-Arian preaching in Latin, employing classical imagery (e.g., the stadium) for spiritual allegory. Their limited transmission highlights the narrow circulation of such polemical works. The stylistic inconsistencies raise questions about authorship and textual integrity, making them a valuable case study for manuscript transmission and the adaptation of pagan culture in late-antique Christianity.
The sermons survive in a single manuscript tradition with significant lacunae and scribal corrections, obscuring the original text. Dating is uncertain; the anti-Arian polemic suggests a post-Nicene context, likely 4th–5th century, but no external evidence confirms a precise date. The community of origin is unknown, but the Latin language and anti-Arian focus point to a Western, possibly North African or Italian, setting. The genre is homiletic, with the sermons opening a series for the pre-Lenten season (Septuagesima). Transmission was limited; the sermons were not widely cited in medieval florilegia, indicating influence restricted to a small circle of anti-Arian writers. The edition’s attribution to a single author is conjectural; stylistic inconsistencies suggest multiple hands or later interpolations. No critical apparatus is provided for manuscript variants, so readers must consult the source edition for detailed textual notes.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||