Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Sermonum Arianorum Fragmenta are remnants of Latin Arian homilies, preserved only in a single manuscript tradition within anti-Arian florilegia. Dating from the late 4th to early 5th century, they reflect post-Conciliar Arian controversies in the Latin West. The fragments survive accidentally, embedded in polemical collections, and their original homiletic context and sequence are irrecoverable. They provide rare direct evidence of Latin Arian preaching, though their transmission through hostile sources complicates interpretation. The text is fragmentary, with possible scribal errors or interpolations, and was never used in later liturgy or canon law. Modern scholarly reception focuses on their value for understanding Arian theology and rhetoric in the late antique West.
These fragments are crucial for studying Latin Arianism, a poorly attested tradition. They offer direct evidence of Arian preaching strategies, biblical interpretation, and rhetorical techniques in the late antique West. Their survival in anti-Arian collections highlights the dynamics of doctrinal controversy and textual transmission. The fragments relate to broader debates on Trinitarian orthodoxy and the reception of Arian ideas in the Latin-speaking world.
The fragments likely originated in the late 4th to early 5th century, during the period of Arian controversy following the Council of Nicaea (325). They were composed in Latin, probably in the western Roman Empire, where Arianism persisted among some Gothic and Roman communities. The text survives only in a single manuscript tradition, copied in a non-Nicene milieu but later embedded in anti-Arian florilegia as a polemical tool. The fragments were never used in liturgy or canon law, indicating their limited circulation. Their preservation is accidental, likely due to their inclusion in collections designed to refute Arian doctrine. The original homiletic context—number, order, and setting of sermons—cannot be reconstructed due to manuscript gaps. The text's linguistic and doctrinal features align with post-Conciliar Arian theology, emphasizing subordinationist Trinitarian views.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||