ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Other ·

Appendix Ad Libros Regum

Isidorus Hispalensis · ogl-pl

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 24 passages · 5,020 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

The *Appendix Ad Libros Regum* is a brief text traditionally attributed to Isidore of Seville, summarizing the succession of Hebrew kings and prophets. It survives in manuscripts of Isidore's exegetical corpus, often appended to his *In libros Regum*. The work's attribution is uncertain; it may be a later compilation drawing on Isidore's *Etymologiae* and *Chronicon*. The edition (OGL-PL) lacks critical apparatus and is based on a single printed source. The appendix was used in medieval biblical glosses and chronicles as a reference for regnal and prophetic chronology. Its content includes theological interpretations, such as the use of 'unus' to denote unity in faith, and etymological explanations like Mount Ephraim as 'fructificatio'.

The *Appendix Ad Libros Regum* matters as a witness to medieval biblical scholarship and the reception of Isidore's works. It illustrates how later compilers used Isidore's authoritative texts to create practical reference tools for exegesis and chronology. The appendix's uncertain authorship highlights the fluidity of attribution in medieval manuscript culture. Its use in glosses and chronicles shows its role in shaping medieval historical and theological understanding of the Hebrew Bible.

Historical context

The *Appendix Ad Libros Regum* is traditionally associated with Isidore of Seville (c. 560–636), a prominent Latin Church Father and encyclopedist in Visigothic Spain. Isidore's works, including his *Etymologiae* and *Chronicon*, were widely copied and used in medieval monasteries and schools. The appendix likely originated in the early medieval period, possibly in the 7th to 9th centuries, as a practical summary for biblical study. Its transmission is tied to manuscripts of Isidore's exegetical corpus, often appended to his commentary on the Books of Kings. The text's uncertain authorship reflects common medieval practices of compilation and pseudepigraphy. It was used in Carolingian and later medieval biblical glosses and chronicles, serving as a handy reference for regnal and prophetic chronology. The lack of a critical edition and manuscript stemma limits precise dating and provenance.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

141 commentary units 41 scripture24 background23 term15 structure15 caution12 reception6 sense4 parallel1 dating 0 derived notes 42 open questions 24 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: other in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 24 narrative.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:1 · narrativemedium
Source
APPENDIX AD LIBROS REGUM. De unitate fidei, et charitate, quæ plenitudo legis est. Quid vir unus! Non solum ille unus dicitur, sed omnes competentes unus dicuntur. Unam sapientiam omnes habentes unum Christum Jesum confitentur; in uno spiritu Dei replentur; inde dicit Apostolus: Omnes quidem currunt, sed unus accipit palmam (I Cor. IX, 24). Unusquisque insipientium non est unus, sed multi, quia per Scripturam insipiens, sicut luna mutatur. Luna cum videatur una esse per substantiam, per muLationem dierum semper a semetipsa alia est, et diversa; sic peccatores, qui mutantur semper scientia, et cupiunt diversa. Unus autem dicitur Deus, non de numero, sed qnia nunquam a semetipso alter efticitur. Ideo nunquam mutatur, ut est: Tu autem idem ipse es, et ansi tui non deficient Psat. CI, 28). De monte Ephraim. Id est, non de vallihus, neque de campis, non de collibus. De monte Ephraim, qui interpretatur fructificatio; id est ergo, de monte frugifero, Dominus inquit: Dominus montium, non convallium.
English
APPENDIX TO THE BOOKS OF KINGS. On the unity of faith and charity, which is the fullness of the law. What is one man! Not only is that one called such, but all the competent are called one. All having one wisdom confess one Christ Jesus; they are filled in one Spirit of God; whence the Apostle says: All indeed run, but one receives the palm (1 Cor. 9:24). Each of the foolish is not one, but many, because according to Scripture the fool, like the moon, changes. The moon, though it appears to be one in substance, through the change of days is always other and different from itself; so sinners, who are always changing in knowledge and desire diverse things. But God is called one, not by number, but because He is never made other than Himself. Therefore He never changes, as it is: You, however, are the same yourself, and your years do not fail (Ps. 101:28). From Mount Ephraim. That is, not from valleys, nor from plains, nor from hills. From Mount Ephraim, which is interpreted as fruitfulness; that is, therefore, from a fruitful mountain, the Lord says: The Lord of mountains, not of valleys.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
Elcana interpretatur possessio Dei est. Vir ille habuit duas uxores: prima nobilior Anna sterilis erat, ut fuit prima uxor sterilis Abrahæ Sarra nobilior; secunda Ægyptia Agar ignobilior fuit. Et effectus est Abraharn pater de ignobili, sic tamen post de nobili conjuge pater. Ita Elcana, qui possessio Dei, prius de secunda uxore efficitur pater, quia clauserat Deus vulvam ejns Annx, ut prius vulvam Sarrae. Post parium Phenennae aperuit Deus vulvam Annae. Phenenna interpretatur conversio, Anna gratia interpretatur. Qui vult effici possessio Dei ducat has duas uxores, et jungat sibi primum eam quæ nobilior est, gratiam; haec enim prima per fidem conjungitur, ut Apostolus ait: Gratia enim Dei salvati estis per dem (Ephes. II, 8). Secundæ conjungitur Phenennæ, id est, conversioni, quia post gratiam credulitatis morum emendatio lit.
English
Elcana is interpreted as "possession of God." That man had two wives: the first, more noble, Anna, was barren, just as the first wife of Abraham, the more noble Sarah, was barren; the second, the Egyptian Hagar, was more lowly. And Abraham became a father from the lowly one, yet later a father from the noble wife. Thus Elcana, who is "possession of God," first becomes a father from the second wife, because God had closed the womb of his Anna, just as He first closed the womb of Sarah. After the birth of Phenenna, God opened the womb of Anna. Phenenna is interpreted as "conversion," Anna is interpreted as "grace." Whoever wishes to become a possession of God should lead these two wives and join to himself first the one who is more noble, grace; for this one is first joined through faith, as the Apostle says: "For you have been saved by the grace of God through faith" (Eph. 2:8). Secondly, he joins Phenenna, that is, conversion, because after the grace of belief comes the correction of morals.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:3 · narrativehigh
Source
Prima filios nobis generat Phenenna, quia primos nobis fruclus proferimus. Et nisi convertamur a malo, non poterimus ethici patres de Anna. Phenenna filios habet, sed qui non assistunt; nec tamen inanes, nam de sacrificiis divinis edunt. Unusquisque ergo, qui convertitur a peccato, ex conversione generat opera justitiæ. Et postea excitata Anna per zelum bonum precem fundit DontiO, ut ipsa lilios generet, qui assistant Deo, hoc est, filios gratiæ, qui Deo vacent. In Evangelio hujus historiæ forma ostenditur. Videlicet Martha satagit circa frequens ministerium: explet opera conversationis, et per hæc velut filios conversationis generat. Et Maria sedens secus pedes verbi Domini, optimam partem dicitur elegisse, et intelligitur velut gratia gemina procreare. Sic Anna generat filium Samuel, qui Deo assistit, de quo dicitur: Moyses et Aaron in sacerdotibus ejus et Samuel inter eos qui invocant nomen ejus (Psalm. XCVIII, 6); quod interpretatur: Ubi ipse Deus. Ubi enim spiritus gratiae, ibi dicitur Deus, ut Paulus dicit. Et cadens in faciem adoravit Deum dicens: Vere Deus in vobis est.
English
Phenenna first bears us sons, because we first produce the fruits of the world. And unless we turn away from evil, we cannot become spiritual fathers from Anna. Phenenna has sons, but they do not serve; yet they are not empty, for they eat from the divine sacrifices. Therefore, each one who turns from sin generates works of righteousness from that conversion. And afterward, Anna, stirred by a good zeal, pours forth a prayer to the Lord, that she herself might bear sons who serve God—that is, sons of grace, who are devoted to God. In the Gospel, the pattern of this history is shown. Namely, Martha busies herself with frequent service: she carries out the works of active life, and through these, as it were, she generates sons of active life. And Mary, sitting at the feet of the Word of the Lord, is said to have chosen the better part, and is understood to produce, as it were, twin grace. Thus Anna bears her son Samuel, who serves God, of whom it is said: "Moses and Aaron among his priests, and Samuel among those who call upon his name" (Psalm 98:6); which is interpreted as: "Where God Himself is." For where the spirit of grace is, there God is said to be, as Paul says. And falling on her face, she adored God, saying: "Truly God is in you.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
Nisi praecedant opera conversionis, non possumus dona spiritus generare in Silo. Silum nomen loci, in quo offerebantur sacrificia, priusquam templum aedificaretur in Jerusalem, et purgatio flebat peccatorum. Silum interpretatur evulsio, sive excalceatio, id est, calceamenti resolutio. Locus autem, in quo purgantur peccata, evulsio nominatur, ubi evellitur cor lapideum; et excalceatio, quia omnes, donec ad locum veniamus sanctum, calceati sumus; cum autem perveniamus ad eum, discalceari jubemur. Ut Moysi dicitur: Solve corrigiam calceamenti tui, locus enim in quo stas terra sancta est (Exod. III, 5), ut indicia mortalitatis abjiceret, quae in calceamentis pelliceis designantur. Unde Salvator dicit: Neque ealceamenta in pedibus vestris, quippe qui illam viam incederent. Qui dicit: Ego sum via, et veritas, et vita. Nemo enim viam vitae cum indicio mortalitatis incedit.
English
Unless the works of conversion precede, we cannot generate the gifts of the spirit in Silo. Silo is the name of the place where sacrifices were offered before the temple was built in Jerusalem, and where the purification of sins took place. Silo is interpreted as "uprooting" or "unshoeing," that is, the loosening of the shoe. Moreover, the place where sins are purified is called "uprooting," where the stony heart is uprooted; and "unshoeing," because all of us, until we come to the holy place, are shod; but when we arrive at it, we are ordered to be unshod. As it is said to Moses: "Loose the strap of your shoe, for the place on which you stand is holy ground" (Exod. 3:5), so that he might cast off the signs of mortality, which are signified by leather shoes. Whence the Savior says: "Nor sandals on your feet," indeed for those who would tread that way. He who says: "I am the way, and the truth, and the life." For no one treads the way of life with the sign of mortality.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
Silum, ubi est Heli, vir minus laudabilis; pro peccato enim retrorsum corruens expiravit. Si quis retrorsum convertitur a fide, et veritate, necesse est ut cadat, et continuo moriatur. Heli interpretatur extraneus; extraneus quippe a Deo, qui non tenet disciplinam, et filium non cogitat, non corripit, aut emendat, qui indulget vitiis. Filius Heli Ophni interpretatur excelsus conversionis, quia longe efficitur ab emundatione, hæc convertit ad Dominum. Duos Phinees novimus in Scriptura, illum justum filium Aaron, et injustum filium Heli. significatur Phinees oris obturatio et ont parcens. Sunt in sacerdotibus hodie uterque: qui parcit ori suo, et omnis sermo malus in sacerdote non procedit, Phinei filio Aaron comparatur. Comparantur filio Heli hi sacerdotes qui obturatum os habent, sive imperitia, vel vitio, sive conscientia peccatorum.
English
of Silo was carried out. Silo, where Eli is, a man less praiseworthy; for because of sin he fell backward and expired. If anyone turns backward from faith and truth, it is necessary that he fall and immediately die. Eli is interpreted as "foreigner"; indeed, a foreigner from God, who does not hold to discipline, and does not think of his son, does not correct or amend him, who indulges vices. Eli's son Hophni is interpreted as "high of conversion," because he is far removed from purification, which converts to the Lord. We know two Phinehases in Scripture: the just one, son of Aaron, and the unjust one, son of Eli. Phinehas signifies "obturation of the mouth" and "sparing." There are both among priests today: he who spares his mouth, and every evil word does not proceed from the priest, is compared to Phinehas son of Aaron. Those priests who have an obturated mouth, whether from inexperience or vice or consciousness of sins, are compared to the son of Eli.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:6 · narrativemedium
Source
Donec amoveret eum a lacte. De rationali iacto Annæ Samuel depellitur, quia qui Deo offertur, of. ferri ante non potuit, quam depelleretur a lacte; quandiu puer est sensibus, Paulus dicit: Lac vobis polum dedi, non escam. Omnis qui primo ab hæresi ad fidem vertitur, a lacte alitur: alienus est sermo justitiæ, et non habet sensus ad discretionem boni et mali. Parvulus non potest ascendere ad templum Dei; et ad ministeria sacerdotum interesse; sed nec mater ejus ascendit, cum posset ascendere; gratia enim est mater ejus, quæ servat eum, et enutrit. Et oravit Anna, et dixit: Nen invenitur orare, nisi per duo verba tantum, et dicit: Lætata sum in salutari tuo. Et aliud est: Quia non est Deus præter te. Apostolus autem dicit: Urale sine intermissione (I Thess. v. 17). Is. qui iu divino versatur officio., omnia gesta ejus, dictaque ad orationem reputamur, quia justus sine intermissione quae justa sunt agit. Propter hoc siue intermissione justus orabit. Et in Psalmis dicit: Elevatio manuum mearum sacrificium vespertinum (Psalm. CXL).'
English
Until she weaned him from milk. Samuel is driven away from the rational breast of Anna, because he who is offered to God could not be brought forward before he was weaned from milk; as long as he is a child in his senses, Paul says: I have given you milk, not solid food. Everyone who is first converted from heresy to the faith is nourished on milk: the language of justice is foreign to him, and he has no capacity for discerning good and evil. A little child cannot ascend to the temple of God, nor take part in the ministries of the priests; but his mother does not ascend either, though she could ascend; for grace is his mother, who preserves him and nourishes him. And Anna prayed, and said: She is not found to pray except through only two words, and she says: I have rejoiced in your salvation. And the other is: Because there is no God besides you. But the Apostle says: Pray without ceasing (1 Thess. 5:17). For one who is engaged in divine office, all his deeds and words are reckoned as prayer, because the just man without ceasing does what is just. For this reason the just man will pray without ceasing. And in the Psalms it says: The raising of my hands is the evening sacrifice (Psalm 141).
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
Elevat manus actus suos. Aliter, Moyse elevante manum, vincebat Israel, demittente vero, vincebat Amalech, quia donec famulus elevat actas suos ad Dominum, vincit plebs Dei; cum autem demiserit actus suos, vincit Amalech inimicus Dei. Ama inquit: Exsultavit cor meum. Necessario addidit, in Domino. Ut Paulus dixit: Gaudete in Domino (Philipp. IV. 4). Quia potest quis gaudere in carnalibus. Cum me bomines laudant, non in Domino gaudeo; si gaudeo, pungar. Propter verbum Domini cornua justorum. Id vel dicentes: In te inimicos nostros ventilabimus cornu (Psalm. XLIII, 6). In Graeco laeta testatio. Quia ergo cornu petimus vel cornu ventilabimus. Cornua justi, quia de crucis Christi apicibus justis conTeruntur. In his deslruemus adversarias potestates de anima nostra. Dein plantatur in nobis vinea. Dilatatum est os meum, id est, per meditationem verbi Dei ad elevationem cordis veniamus, etiam Apostolo dicente: Os meum dilatatum est ad vos, o Corinthii (II Cor. VI, 11). Ex altitudine enim cordis ori sapientia ministratur.
English
He raises his hands, his deeds. Alternatively, as Moses raised his hand, Israel conquered; when he lowered it, however, Amalek conquered, because as long as the servant raises his deeds to the Lord, the people of God conquer; but when he has lowered his deeds, Amalek, the enemy of God, conquers. He says, "Love": My heart rejoiced. He necessarily added, "in the Lord." As Paul said: Rejoice in the Lord (Philippians 4:4). Because one can rejoice in carnal things. When men praise me, I do not rejoice in the Lord; if I rejoice, I am pricked. On account of the word of the Lord, the horns of the just. Either saying: In you we will toss our enemies with the horn (Psalm 43:6). In Greek, a joyful testimony. Because, therefore, we seek the horn or we will toss with the horn. The horns of the just, because the just are crushed by the points of Christ's cross. In these we will destroy the adversarial powers from our soul. Then a vine is planted in us. My mouth was opened, that is, through meditation on the word of God we come to the elevation of the heart, even as the Apostle says: My mouth was opened to you, O Corinthians (2 Corinthians 6:11). For from the height of the heart, wisdom is ministered to the mouth.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:8 · narrativemedium
Source
Quia dilautus sum in salutari tuo, id est, si lætatus fuero in salutare Domini, tunc dilatatum est os meum. Non est sanctus, sicut Deus. Distinctione utitur: non dixit, nisi Dominus, sed nullus est, sicut Dominus. Non est Deus, prceter te, id est, nihil eorum quae sunt naturaliter. Qui solus ea; cui, quod es, a nullo datum est. Nam et umbra ad comparationem corporis nuu est, et fumus ad comparationem iguis non est. Nolite multiplicare loqui excelsa. Ut Salomon dicit: Altiora te ne quæsiveris (Eccli. III, 22). De quibus praecipitur tibi haec intelligere: Nolite multiplicare loqui, nisi de Patre, et Filio, et Spiritu sancto, ut plenus manifestum fiat, quod loquimur? Post hæc tria nibil loquaris. Nou exeat inaniloquium de ore vestro, ut Apostolus ait: Quia me liberabit de corpore mortis hujus (Rom. VII, 24)? Aliter: Angelus Satanæ, qui me colaphizet (II Cor. XII, 7). It! est, ne magna de me ipso loquar. Non exeat magniloquium de ore vestro. Non declines cor meum in verba malitiæ ad excusandas excusantiones in peccatis (Psalm. CXL, 4).
English
Because I am washed in your salvation, that is, if I have rejoiced in the salvation of the Lord, then my mouth is opened wide. There is no saint like God. He uses a distinction: he did not say, "except the Lord," but "there is none like the Lord." There is no God except you, that is, nothing of those things which exist naturally. Who alone is that; to whom, what he is, has been given by no one. For shadow compared to body is nothing, and smoke compared to fire is nothing. Do not multiply speaking of lofty things. As Solomon says: Do not seek things higher than yourself (Ecclus. 3:22). Concerning which it is commanded to you to understand this: Do not multiply speaking, except about the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, so that what we speak may become fully manifest? After these three, speak nothing. Let no idle talk go out of your mouth, as the Apostle says: Who will free me from this body of death (Rom. 7:24)? Otherwise: The angel of Satan, who strikes me (2 Cor. 12:7). That is, do not speak great things about myself. Let no boastful speech go out of your mouth. Do not incline my heart to words of malice for making excuses in sins (Ps. 140:4).
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:9 · narrativemedium
Source
Et Salomon dicit: Occasiones quærit piger, et dicit: Leo foris. Idem dicit: Diabolus subsannabit me, ut mulier me seduxit (Proverb. XVIII, 1; XXII, 13). Justus primum accusator sui est, Injustus non est sui accusator, sed aliorum. Donec quis peccat, neque justus est, nec accusator sui. Non enim qui agit accusat. Arcus potentium infirmatus. Si indutus sis armis Dei, scuto fidei, et galea salutis, et gladio spiritus, arcus potentium munimentis tali bus firmabitur. Et infirmi accincti sunt robore, ut est: Quæ stulta sunt mundi elegit Deus, ut conjundat fortia (/ Cor, xn, 8). Infirmus populus est gentilis, qui alienus a Testamento Dei adeptus est fortitudinem, ut Propheta dicit: Fortitudo mea et laudatio mea Dominus (Psalm. CXVII, 14); id est, fortuudo ipse Christus est. Usfue sterilis mater nostra est Ecclesia. Et hæc peperit septem, id est, septenarium numerum.
English
And Solomon says: The lazy man seeks excuses, and says: A lion is outside. The same says: The devil will mock me, as a woman seduced me (Proverbs 18:1; 22:13). The just man is first his own accuser; the unjust man is not his own accuser, but of others. So long as one sins, he is neither just nor his own accuser. For he who acts does not accuse. The bow of the mighty is weakened. If you are clad in the arms of God—the shield of faith, the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the spirit—the bow of the mighty will be strengthened by such defenses. And the weak are girded with strength, as it is: God has chosen the foolish things of the world, to confound the strong (1 Corinthians 12:8). The weak people is the Gentile, who, alien to the Testament of God, has acquired strength, as the Prophet says: My strength and my praise is the Lord (Psalm 117:14); that is, strength itself is Christ. Our sterile mother is the Church. And she has given birth to seven, that is, the number seven.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:10 · narrativemedium
Source
Et caro mea habens plurimos fructus carnis, fornicationem, immunditiam, impudicitiam, idololatriam, veneficia, coutentiones, æmulationes, incitationes, dissensiones. Sterilis, id est, anima; uam aliquando non afferebat fructus jusitiæ; nec pcr fidem Christi repleta est spiritu sapientiae, et intel. lectus, et consilii, et fortitudinis, et sclentiæ, et pietatis, et timoris Dei. Deus mortificat, et vivificat. Mortificat me, cum essem mortuus peccato, et tunc vivificat me, cum me facit vivere Deo. Verus David, servans oves patris sui, apprehendit leonem, et interfecit. Titulus psalmi est; Ipsi David, quondo filius persequebatur eum. Hoc factum legimus in libris Regum, illum non dilectum inique, sed humiliatum pic, accepisse a Domino discip inam, sustinuisse medicinam, non retributionem iniquitati. Ille David '.dabitis, sed alius David forli9 manu Dominus Jesus Christus.
English
And my flesh, having many fruits of the flesh—fornication, uncleanness, shamelessness, idolatry, sorceries, contentions, rivalries, incitements, dissensions. Barren, that is, the soul, which once did not bear fruits of justice; nor was it filled through the faith of Christ with the spirit of wisdom, and of understanding, and of counsel, and of fortitude, and of knowledge, and of piety, and of fear of God. God kills and brings to life. He kills me, when I was dead in sin, and then he brings me to life, when he makes me live for God. The true David, keeping his father's sheep, seized the lion and killed it. The title of the psalm is: To David himself, when his son was pursuing him. We read this deed in the books of Kings: that he, not unjustly loved, but piously humbled, received from the Lord a discipline, endured a medicine, not a requital for iniquity. That David is not the one you will give, but the other David, strong of hand, is the Lord Jesus Christ.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:11 · narrativemedium
Source
Praeterita enim illa facta figuræ futurorum erant. Agnoscamus quemadmodum et Christum filius suus persequebatur. Habebat Christus filios, de quibus dicebat: Non jejunant filii sponsl, quandiu cum iltis est sponsus. Inter boe fuit persecutor Judas. De proximi vel defuncti fratri. copula. Ex lege proximo defuncti vel fratri copula deferebatur ejus uxoris, ut semen fratris vel proximi suscitaret. Inde eat quod Ruth, licet ipsa alienigena, tamen quia maritum habuerat ex Judæis, qui reliquerat superstitem proximum, eam colligentem manipulos suæ messis, quibus aleret socrum, Boz vidit, et amavit. Non aliter eam accepit uxorem, nisi calceamentum ejus ante solvisset, cui uxor debebatur ex lege. Historia simplex, sed alta mysteria; aliud enim gerebatur, aliud figurabatur. Designabatur enim futurus ex Judaeis Christus,qui proximi sui, hoc est, populi mortui semen doctrinae coelestis semine resuscitaret.
English
For those past deeds were figures of future ones. Let us recognize how even Christ was persecuted by his own son. Christ had sons, of whom he said: "The sons of the bride do not fast as long as the bridegroom is with them." Among them was the persecutor Judas. Concerning the marriage of a deceased or near relative. By law, the marriage of the wife of a deceased brother or near relative was transferred, so that the seed of the brother or relative might be raised up. Hence it is that Ruth, although herself a foreigner, yet because she had had a husband from among the Jews, who had left a surviving relative, Boaz saw her gathering the sheaves of her harvest, with which she fed her mother-in-law, and he loved her. He did not take her as wife otherwise than by first untying his shoe, to whom the wife was owed by law. A simple story, but deep mysteries; for one thing was being done, another was being figured. For Christ, who was to come from the Jews, was being designated, who would raise up the seed of his relative, that is, of the dead people, by the seed of heavenly teaching.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:12 · narrativemedium
Source
Cui calceameutum nuptiale Ecclesiæ copulandæ perscripta legis spiritualia deterebant? Non Moyses sponsus. Illi enim dicimur: Solve calceamenta, ne ex similitudine nominis sponsus Ecclesiae crederetur. Non alius sponsus, sed solus Christus erat, de quo dixit Joannes: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est (Joan. III, 29). Illius igitur calceamentum solvitur; hujus solvi non potest, sicut Joannes: Non sum dignus, inquit, solvere corrigiam et reliqua. Solus ergo sponsus Christus est: cui illa veniens ex gentibus spunsa ante inops, atque jejuna, sed jam Christi meaM dives, innubaque, manipulos fecundæ segetis verbi reliquias gremio ligat mentis interno, ut exhaustam illam viduam morte filii atque inopem defuncti populi matrem novis pascat alimentis, non relinquens destitutam, et novos quærens. Solus ergo sponsus est Christus, qui nec synagogæ ipsi manipulos suæ messis invideat. (Jtinam se non ipsa excluderet, habuit, quos per se collegisset, quia populus ejus morluus est, quasi filio indigena defuncto per Ecclesium manipulos. qnibus viveret, colligebat, quos venientes in exsultatione portabant, sicut scriptum est, Venientes autem vanient, et reliqua.
English
Whose nuptial shoe was being worn down by the spiritual laws written for the joining of the Church? Not Moses the bridegroom. For we say to him: "Remove the shoes," lest from the similarity of the name he be believed to be the bridegroom of the Church. There was no other bridegroom, but only Christ, of whom John said: "He who has the bride is the bridegroom" (John 3:29). Therefore, his shoe is removed; this one's cannot be removed, as John says: "I am not worthy," he says, "to untie the strap," and so forth. Therefore, only Christ is the bridegroom: to whom that bride, coming from the Gentiles, formerly poor and fasting, but now rich through my Christ, and fruitful, binds the remnants of the abundant harvest of the word in the lap of her inner mind, so that she might feed that widow, exhausted by the death of her son and destitute, the mother of a dead people, with new nourishment, not leaving her abandoned, and seeking new ones. Therefore, only Christ is the bridegroom, who would not begrudge even the synagogue itself the sheaves of its own harvest. (If only she herself did not exclude herself, she had those whom she would have gathered by herself, because her people died, as if a native son had died, she gathered through the Church the sheaves by which she might live, which those coming in exultation carried, as it is written: "But those coming will come," and so forth.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:13 · narrativehigh
Source
Etcana pater venerabilis Samuelis, qui erat possessio Dei; Helcana quippe in possessionem Dei transfertur; animi virtute vir dicitur, et non solum vir, verum etia vir unus appellatur. Non enim iu diversa vagabundus, velut mohilis, atque instabilis, ferebatur, sed liranus, atque inconcussus persistens vir unus erat. Et idcirco in monte Ephraim frugifero morabatur, in alia scilice' conteplatione virtutum, ut a nullis subjacentibus et circumlatrantibus vitiorum cogitationibus mentis ejus sublimitas dejiceretur, vel unitas scinderetur. David cum sociis fugiens a facie Saul figurabat Christum, qui cum apostolis principem mundi lateret, nisi tantum sacerdotibus, ut demonstraret sacerdotalem cibum ad usum transiturum esse prophetam. Sive quia omnes vitam sacerdotalem debeamus imitari, sive quia omnes filii Ecclesiæ sacerdotes sunt, offerentes semetipsos Deo hostias sprituales.
English
Etcana, the venerable father of Samuel, who was the possession of God; for Helcana is translated as "into the possession of God." By the strength of his mind he is called a man, and not merely a man, but indeed a single man is he named. For he was not carried about, wandering into diverse things, like something changeable and unstable, but, steadfast and unshaken, he was a single man. And for this reason he dwelt on fruitful Mount Ephraim, that is, in another contemplation of virtues, so that the sublimity of his mind might not be cast down, nor its unity shattered, by any underlying and barking thoughts of vices. David, fleeing with his companions from the face of Saul, prefigured Christ, who, with the apostles, would hide from the prince of the world, except to the priests, so as to show that the priestly food was to pass into use for the prophet. Either because we all ought to imitate the priestly life, or because all sons of the Church are priests, offering themselves as spiritual sacrifices to God.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:14 · narrativehigh
Source
Ergo intravit David domum sacerdotis, nec sacerdos, periculo mortis proposito, hospitem recusavit; ut sive moraliter hospitalitatis gratia libenter in nos aliena pericula transferamus, sive mystice nec præsumpto mortis exitio Christum hospitio suae mentis excludant sacerdotes. Ubi Christus spiritualis nequitiæ manubias sumens, illum Goliam suis spoliis armisque (apoliavit), ibi Davit' panes petivit. Sed unum accepit, quia non Quinque libris Moysi, sed Christi corpore cibus fidelibus paratur. Doeg autem, camelorum infructuosi gregis custos, Judæ proditoris typo. implet. Sed in domo Achimelech solus Abiathar priuceps sacerdotum a persecutore Saul immunis ea... quia nomo potest nocere Christo, principi sacerdotum. Quid enim? quia David, qui retribuenti mala non reddidit, eum Saol et Jonathas bello occumberent, Gelboo montibus maledicit dicens: Montes Gelboe, nec foa, nec pluviat veniat super vos, neque sint agri primitiarum, quia ibi abjectus est clypeus Saul, quasi non esset unctus oleo. Quid ergo, Saul moriente, montes deliquerunt, qualenus in eis nec ros, nec pluvia eaderet? Sed quia Gelboe interpretatur decursus, per Saul unetum et mortuum mors mediatoris exprimitur; non immerito per Gelboe montes superba Judæorum corda signantur: quæ dum in hujus mundi desideriis defluunt, in Christi, id est, uncti, se morte miscuerunt.
English
Therefore David entered the house of the priest, and the priest, with the threat of death before him, did not refuse the guest; so that either morally we may willingly transfer dangers upon ourselves for the sake of hospitality, or mystically priests may not exclude Christ from the hospitality of their minds even at the risk of death. Where Christ, taking up the spoils of spiritual wickedness, despoiled that Goliath of his own spoils and arms, there David asked for loaves. But he received only one, because food for the faithful is prepared not by the five books of Moses, but by the body of Christ. Doeg, however, the keeper of the unfruitful herd of camels, fulfills the type of the traitor Judas. But in the house of Ahimelech, only Abiathar, the chief of the priests, was immune from the persecutor Saul... because no one can harm Christ, the chief of priests. What then? Because David, who did not return evil for evil, when Saul and Jonathan fell in battle, curses the mountains of Gilboa, saying: Mountains of Gilboa, let neither dew nor rain come upon you, nor let there be fields of firstfruits, because there the shield of Saul was cast away, as if he were not anointed with oil. What then, did the mountains sin when Saul died, so that neither dew nor rain would fall upon them? But because Gilboa is interpreted as "descent," through Saul, anointed and dead, the death of the mediator is expressed; not undeservedly, the mountains of Gilboa signify the proud hearts of the Jews: which, while they flow down in the desires of this world, have mingled themselves in the death of Christ, that is, the anointed one.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:15 · narrativemedium
Source
Et quod in eis unctus rex corporaliter moritur, ipsi ab omni gratiæ rore siccantur, de quibus et bene dicitur ut agri primitiarum esse non possint. Superbæ quippe Hebræorum mentes primitivos fructus non ferentes, quia in Redemptoris adventu ex parte maxima in perfidia remanentes, priMordia fidei sequi noluerint. Sancta namque Ecclesia in primitiis multitudine gentium fecundata vix in mundi fine Judæos, quos invenit, suscipit, extrema colligens, eos quasi reliquias frugum ponit; de quibus Isaias: Si fuerit numerus filiorum Israel quasi arenæ maris, reliquiæ salvæ fient (Isai. X, 22). Possunt demum idcirco Gelboe montes ex ore prophetae maledici, ut dum fructus, exarescenle terra, non oritur, possessores tamen sterilitatis danino feriantur, quatenus ipsi maledictionis sen. tentiam acciperent, quia apud se mortem regis suscipere, iui quitate sna exigente, meruissent.
English
And because in them the anointed king dies bodily, they themselves are dried up from every drop of grace, concerning which it is well said that they cannot be fields of firstfruits. For the proud minds of the Hebrews, not bearing firstfruits, because for the most part they remained in perfidy at the coming of the Redeemer, refused to follow the beginnings of the faith. For holy Church, made fruitful in the firstfruits by a multitude of nations, scarcely at the end of the world receives the Jews whom she finds, gathering them as remnants, placing them like the gleanings of the harvest; concerning which Isaiah says: If the number of the sons of Israel were as the sand of the sea, the remnant shall be saved (Isaiah 10:22). Finally, the mountains of Gilboa can be cursed by the mouth of the prophet for this reason, so that while the fruit does not arise from the parched earth, the possessors are nonetheless struck by the loss of sterility, inasmuch as they themselves would receive the sentence of the curse, because they deserved, by the demand of their own iniquity, to receive the death of the king among themselves.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:16 · narrativehigh
Source
Sic plerumque res quaelibet per historiam virtus est, per significationem culpa. Sicut aliquando res gesta in facto causa damnationis, in scripto autem prophetia virtutis. Quod verum citius ostendimus, si David factum ad medium deducamus, in uno testimonio ad utraque probaudo. Quisnam audiens non solum fidelium, sed ipsorum quoque infidelium, non detestatur, quod David in solario deambulans Bethsabee Uriæ concupiscit uxorem? quem tamen a prælio revertentem ire ad domum admonet pedes lavare. Qui protinus respundit, dicens: Arca Dei sub pellibus est, et ego iu doNno mea requiescam? Quem David ad mensam propriam suscepit, eique epistolas, per quas mori debeat tradidit. Cujus autem David in solario deambulans typum tenet, nisi ejus de quo scriptum est: In sole posuit tabernaculum suum (Psal. XVIII, 6)? Et quid est Bethsabee ducere, nisi legem litteræ carnali populo conjunctam spirituali sibi intellectu sociare?
English
Thus, quite often, any given thing is, through history, a virtue; through signification, a fault. Just as sometimes a deed, in its actual occurrence, is a cause of condemnation, but in writing, it is a prophecy of virtue. We will show this truth more quickly if we bring forward the deed of David, proving both points with a single testimony. Who, upon hearing—not only among the faithful, but even among the unbelievers themselves—does not detest that David, walking on the rooftop, coveted Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah? Yet he urged the man returning from battle to go home and wash his feet. Uriah immediately replied, saying: “The Ark of God is under tents, and shall I rest in my own house?” David received him at his own table and handed him letters by which he was to die. But whose type does David, walking on the rooftop, hold, if not that of him of whom it is written: “He has placed his tabernacle in the sun” (Psalm 18:6)? And what is it to take Bathsheba, if not to join the law of the letter, united to the carnal people, to a spiritual understanding for himself?
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:17 · narrativehigh
Source
Bethsabee enim puteus septimus dicitur, quia nimirum per cognitionem legis infusione spiritualis gratiae perfecta nobis sapientia ministratur. Quem vero Urias, nisi Judaicum populum, significat? cujus nomen interpretatum dicitur lux mea Dei. Judaicus autem populus, quia de accepta legis scientia tollitur, quasi de Dei gloriatur luce. Sed huic Uriæ David uxorem abstulit, sibique conjunxit, quia videlicet manu foliis, qui David dicitur, in carne Redemptor apparens, dum de se spiritualiter loqui legem innotuit, per hoc, quod juxta litteram tenebatur, hanc a Judaico populo extraneam demonstiavit, sibique conjunxit, qui se per illain prædicari declaravit. Uriam tamen ad domum ire David admouet pedes lavare, quia incarnatus Dominus veniens Judaico populo præcepit ut ad conscientiam redeat, et surdes operum tergat, ut spirilualiter mandata legis intelligat, et post tantam duritiam præceptorum fontem baptisimatis inveniens, ad aquam post laborem recurrat.
English
Bethsabee is called "the seventh well," because through the knowledge of the law, the infusion of spiritual grace ministers perfect wisdom to us. And whom does Urias signify, if not the Jewish people? His name, when interpreted, is said to mean "my light of God." The Jewish people, however, because they are lifted up by the knowledge of the law they have received, boast as if of the light of God. But David took this Urias's wife and joined her to himself, because, evidently, the one who is called David, the Redeemer appearing in the flesh, when he made known that the law speaks spiritually about himself, by this, that which was held according to the letter, he showed to be foreign to the Jewish people, and joined it to himself, declaring that he is preached through it. Nevertheless, David urged Urias to go home and wash his feet, because the incarnate Lord, coming, commanded the Jewish people to return to their conscience and wipe away the filth of their works, so that they might understand the commandments of the law spiritually, and, after such hardness of the precepts, finding the font of baptism, might run to the water after their labor.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:18 · narrativehigh
Source
Sed Urias, qui arcam Dei esse sub pellibus meminit, respondit. quod domuum suam intrare non possit. Ac si Judaicus populus dicat: Ego mandata Dei in sacrificiis carnalibus video, et redire ad conscientiam per spiritualem intelligentiam non requiro. Quasi enim arcam esse sub pellibus dicit, qui præcepta Dei non nisi ad exhibendum ministerium sacrificii carnalis intelligit. Hunc tamen etiam redire ad domum nolentem David advocat. Quia quamvis Judaicus populus ad conscientiam reverti contemnat, tamen Redemptor veniens mandata spiritualia prædicat, dicens: Si crederetis Moysi, crederetis forsitan et mihi; de me enim ille scripsit (Joan. v, 46). Legem itaque Judaicus populos tenet, quia ejus divinitatem loquitur, cui idem populus credere dedignatur. Unde et Urias cum epistolis ad Joab, ex quibus occidi debebat, mittitur, quia idem ipse Judaicus populus legem portat, qua convincente moriatnr. Dum enim mandata legis retinens implere nititur, ipse nimirum defert judicium unde damnetur.
English
But Uriah, who remembered that the ark of God was under hides, replied that he could not enter his own house. As if the Jewish people were to say: I see the commandments of God in carnal sacrifices, and I do not seek to return to conscience through spiritual understanding. For he speaks as if the ark were under hides who understands the precepts of God only for the purpose of performing the ministry of carnal sacrifice. Yet David summons him, even though he is unwilling to return home. Because although the Jewish people disdain to return to conscience, nevertheless the Redeemer, coming, preaches spiritual commandments, saying: If you believed Moses, you would perhaps also believe me; for he wrote of me (John 5:46). Thus the Jewish people hold the Law, because it speaks of his divinity, to which same people disdain to give credence. Hence Uriah is also sent with letters to Joab, by which he was to be killed, because the same Jewish people carry the Law, by which, as it convicts, they die. For while, retaining the commandments of the Law, they strive to fulfill them, they themselves undoubtedly bear the judgment by which they are condemned.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:19 · narrativehigh
Source
Gaza enim, et Ascalon, et Accaron diversa supplicia sustinebunt. Gaza interpretatur fortitudo ejus. Omnes ergo qui sibi applaudunt in fortitudine corporis, et potentia sæculari, et dicunt cum diabolo: Fortitudinem faciam, diripientur in die iræ Domini, et ad nihilum redigentur. Ascalon quippe, quæ (inlerpretatur) pondera, vel ignis homicidæ, cum venerit dies irae, sceleris sui mensuram sentiet, et eodem quo operatus est pondere deprimetur. Et quia arsit ad effundendum sanguinem, et multas scandalizavit animas, et impletum est in ea: Virum sanguinum et dolosum abominaMur Domanus, non diripietur, ut Gaza, sed in solitudinem redacta gehennae ignibus concremabitur usque ad pulverem. Necnon et Azotus, quæ Hebraice dicitur ea David, et in lingua nostra sonat ignis generationis, clara luce testabitur. Arsit enim libidine, et generationis incendio dissipata est; et quia omnes adulterantes, quasi clibanus, corda eorum, et sagittis ardentibus vulnerati sunt. Non in tenebris, non in occulto judicio, sed in meridie, hoc est, quando sancti plenam recipient claritatem, projicientur in tenebras, et sanctorum consortium non habebunt in die judicii.
English
For Gaza, and Ascalon, and Accaron will suffer various punishments. Gaza is interpreted as "his strength." Therefore, all who applaud themselves in bodily strength and worldly power, and say with the devil, "I will do a mighty deed," will be torn apart on the day of the Lord's wrath and reduced to nothing. Ascalon, indeed, which is interpreted as "weights" or "fire of the murderer," when the day of wrath comes, will feel the measure of its crime and will be crushed by the same weight with which it operated. And because it burned to shed blood and scandalized many souls, and it was fulfilled in it: "We abhor a man of blood and deceit, O Lord," it will not be torn apart like Gaza, but reduced to desolation, it will be burned by the fires of Gehenna down to dust. Moreover, Azotus, which is called in Hebrew "ea David" and in our language sounds like "fire of generation," will testify with clear light. For it burned with lust and was destroyed by the fire of generation; and because all who commit adultery, like an oven, their hearts, were wounded by burning arrows. Not in darkness, not in secret judgment, but at midday—that is, when the saints receive full clarity—they will be cast into darkness and will not have the fellowship of the saints on the day of judgment.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:20 · narrativehigh
Source
Sed et Accaron, quæ interpretatur sterilitas, vel eradicatio, quia nullos fructus habuit., et perversitate doctrinae suæ eradicavit plurimos, ipsaque eradicabitur. Has omnes varietates intellige in animarum vitiis atque peccatis. Et quod uniuscujusque opus quale sit ignis probabit. Idcirco infirmi dijudicant sæpe multa, quae a fortibus dicuntur, quia ignorant quod in bubus calcitrantibus inclinata illa Testamenti arca, jamque casuram credens Levites erigere voluit, moxque sententiam damnationis accepit. Quid est namque mens justi, nisi area Testamenti? quæ gestata bubus calcitrantibus inclinatur, quia nonnunquam etiam qui bene praeest, dum subjicietur, populorum confusione concitus, ad dispensationis condescensionem ex sola dileclione permovetur. Sed in hoc, quod dispensatorie agitur, inclinalio ipsa fortitudinis casus putatur imperitis. Unde et nonnulli subditi contra hanc manum reprehensionis mittunt, sed protinus ipsa vitæ merita deficiunt.
English
But Accaron, which is interpreted as "barrenness" or "uprooting," because it had no fruits, and by the perversity of its teaching uprooted many, will itself be uprooted. Understand all these varieties in the vices and sins of souls. And that the work of each one, whatever it is, fire will test. Therefore the weak often judge many things that are said by the strong, because they are ignorant that in the case of the kicking oxen, the Ark of the Covenant, having been tilted and already believed to be falling, a Levite wished to set it upright, and soon received a sentence of condemnation. For what is the mind of a just man but the Ark of the Covenant? which, carried by kicking oxen, is tilted, because sometimes even one who presides well, while he is subjected, stirred by the confusion of the peoples, is moved to the condescension of dispensation out of love alone. But in this, which is done dispensationally, the tilting itself of strength is thought by the inexperienced to be a fall. Whence also some subordinates send a hand of reproof against this, but immediately the merits of life itself fail.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:21 · narrativehigh
Source
Recte Oza dicitur, qui videlicet robustus Domini interpretatur. Quoniam praesumptores quique, nisi audaci mente robustos se esse in Domino crederent, nequaquam meliorum facta vel dicta velut infirma judicarent. Dabo tibi reges in furore meo. Si ergo, irascente Deo, secundum nostra merita rectores accipimus, in illorum actione legimus, quia de sola æstimatione pensemus, quamvis plerumque electi subjacent reprobis. Inde et David Saulem pertulit, quia dignus tunc fuit qui tanta præpositi asperitate premeretur. Sic ergo, sicut merita subditorum, tribuuntur personae regnantium, ut saepe qui videntur boni, acrepto mex regimine permutentur, Scriptura dicente: Qui cor cum dignitate mutavit. Unde scriptum est: Ecce cum esses parvulus in oculis tuis, caput te constitui in tribus Israel. Sic pro qualitatibus subditorum disponuntur acta regnantium. Ut saepe pro malo gregis etiam vere boni delinquat vita pastoris. Ille enim, Deo attestante, laudalus, ille supernorum conscius David propheta, populum numerando peccavit. Et tamen vindictam populus, David peccante, suscepit.
English
Oza is rightly so called, who is interpreted as "robust of the Lord." For all presumptuous persons, unless they believed with audacious mind that they were robust in the Lord, would by no means judge the deeds or words of better men as if they were weak. I will give you kings in my fury. If, therefore, with God angered, we receive rulers according to our merits, we read in their action that we should consider only estimation, although often the elect are subject to the reprobate. Hence David also endured Saul, because he was then worthy of being oppressed by such great harshness of a superior. Thus, just as the merits of subjects are, so are the persons of rulers granted, so that often those who seem good, once having seized the reins of government, are changed, as Scripture says: "He who changed his heart along with his dignity." Whence it is written: "Behold, when you were small in your own eyes, I made you head of the tribes of Israel." Thus, according to the qualities of subjects, the deeds of rulers are arranged. So that often, because of the evil of the flock, even the life of a truly good pastor sins. For that David, praiseworthy with God as witness, that David conscious of heavenly things, sinned by numbering the people. And yet the people received the punishment while David was sinning.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:22 · narrativehigh
Source
Cur hoc? videlicet per meritum plebium disponitur ordo rectorum. Justus vero judex peccantis vitium ex ipsorum animadversione corripuit, ex quorum causa peccavit. Sed quia ipsa voluntate superbiens, a culpa alienus non suscipit, vindictam culpae etiam ipse suscipit. Nam ira saeviens, quae corporaliter populum perculit, reclorem quoque populi intimo cordis dolore prostravit. Ibant autem in directum vaccae per viam quæ ducit Bethsames, pergentes, et mugientes, et non declinabant neque ad dexteram, neque ad sinistram. Quid igitur vaccæ, nisi fideles quosque in Ecclesia designant? Qui dum sacri eloquii praecepta conside. rant, quasi superimpositam Domini arcam portant. De quibus hoc etiam prænotandum, quia fuisse fetae memorantur, quia sunt plerique, qui in via Dei intrinsecus positi, foris carnalibus affectibus ligantur, sed non declinant a recto itinere, qui arcam Domini portant. Ecce etenim Baal Bethsames, quippe dicit domus solis. Et Propheta ait: Vobis autem, qui timetis nomen Domini, orietur sol justitiæ (Malach. iv, 2). Si igitur ad aeterni solis habitationem tendimus, dignum profecto est ut de Dei ilinere pro carnalibus affectibus non declinemus.
English
Why is this? Clearly, the order of rulers is arranged according to the merit of the peoples. A just judge, however, corrects the sin of the offender by means of the very persons through whose cause he sinned. But because he, swelling with pride in his own will, does not accept punishment for a fault from which he is not free, he himself also receives the penalty for the fault. For the raging anger, which physically struck the people, also laid low the ruler of the people with deep grief of heart. Now the cows went straight along the road that leads to Bethsames, proceeding and lowing, and they did not turn aside either to the right or to the left. What, then, do the cows signify, if not the faithful in the Church? They, while considering the precepts of sacred eloquence, carry the ark of the Lord as if placed upon them. Concerning this, it is also to be noted beforehand that they are recorded as having been with calf, because there are many who, placed inwardly on the way of God, are outwardly bound by carnal affections, but they do not turn aside from the straight path, those who carry the ark of the Lord. For behold, Baal Bethsames means "house of the sun." And the Prophet says: "But for you who fear the name of the Lord, the sun of justice will rise" (Malachi 4:2). Therefore, if we are heading toward the dwelling of the eternal sun, it is certainly fitting that we do not turn aside from the way of God on account of carnal affections.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:23 · narrativehigh
Source
Tota enim virtute pensandum est, quod vaccae Dei plaustro suppositae pergunt, et gemunt; dant ab intimis rugitus, et tamen de itinere non declinant gressus. Sic nimirum praedicatores Dei verbi, sic doctores, sic fideles quique esse intra sanctam Ecclesiam debent, ut compatiantur proximis per cbaritatem, et tamen de via Dei non exorbitent per compassionem. Nix itaque nunc innocentiae nitor et gratiae, nunc hiems et frigus charitatis intelligi potest. Quod autem legimus in Kegnorum libris, Banaiam quemdam de fortibus lsrael descendisse in cisternam, ct percussisse leonem in tempore nivis, indifferenter puto in locis illis positam nivem, quia et Christi gratia, quae in hoc mundo resplenduit, et frigus charitatis Dei, quo refrixerunt homines niris nomine potuit Scriptura sacra significari. Banaiam vero figuraliter intelligimus Salvatorem, quia juxta vim nominis sui ipse aedificator Dominus; de quo propheta vaticinaverat, quia per eum ædificandam Ecclesiam dixit: Ædificans Jerusalem Dominus. Itemque: Ædificavit Sion; quod verbum in factura Hevæ, quæ Ecclesiae typum habuil, Scriptura propria significatione posuit, dicens: Et ædificavit dominus Deus costam, quam tulerat de Adam in mulierem. Et Paulus construi eam videns, ait; Dei ædificado estis.
English
The whole matter must be weighed with all earnestness: the cows placed under the yoke of God’s wagon go forward and groan; they bellow from their depths, and yet they do not turn their steps from the path. So indeed must the preachers of God’s word, so must the teachers, so must all the faithful within holy Church be: that they may have compassion on their neighbors through charity, and yet not stray from the way of God through that compassion. Snow, therefore, can now be understood as the brightness of innocence and grace, now as the winter and cold of charity. But what we read in the books of Kings—that Benaiah, one of the mighty men of Israel, went down into a cistern and struck a lion in the time of snow—I think the snow is placed indifferently in those passages, because both the grace of Christ, which shone forth in this world, and the cold of God’s charity, by which men have grown cold, could be signified by the name of snow in sacred Scripture. Benaiah, however, we understand figuratively as the Savior, because according to the force of his name he is the Lord the builder; concerning whom the prophet had foretold that through him the Church would be built, saying: “The Lord builds Jerusalem.” And again: “He built Sion”; which word, in the making of Eve, who bore the type of the Church, Scripture placed in its proper meaning, saying: “And the Lord God built the rib which he had taken from Adam into a woman.” And Paul, seeing her being built, says: “You are the building of God.
tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:24 · narrativemedium
Source
Samuel cur ter vocatur? quia et propheta fuit, sacerdos, et dux. David annis XL primum ex tribu Juda regnavit. Roboam annis... Abia... Assa justus... Joram... Ochozias... Athalia... Johas... Amasias.,. Azarias... Joatham... Achaz... Ezechias... Manasses... Ammon... Josias... Joas... Eliachim... Joachim... Ezecbias... Astraph XIV, III annis, XLI, VII annis, L annis, IV annis, xt annis, VI annis, xiv annis, xvi annis, XXIX annis, LV armis. RUBRICA. Incipiunt capitula de libro Esdrae. De. septuaginta annis captivitatis, etc.
English
Why is Samuel called three times? Because he was a prophet, a priest, and a leader. David reigned first from the tribe of Judah for forty years. Rehoboam for ... years. Abijah ... Asa the just ... Joram ... Ahaziah ... Athaliah ... Joash ... Amaziah ... Azariah ... Jotham ... Ahaz ... Hezekiah ... Manasseh ... Amon ... Josiah ... Jehoahaz ... Jehoiakim ... Jeconiah ... Zedekiah ... fourteen, three years, forty-one, seven years, fifty years, four years, eleven years, six years, fourteen years, sixteen years, twenty-nine years, fifty-five years. RUBRIC. Here begin the chapters from the book of Ezra. On the seventy years of captivity, etc.
Citation. Tergwame, “Appendix Ad Libros Regum”, tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/tmp1410.tmp1410.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0118 · generated 2026-11-15.