Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Vita Sancti Maximi, attributed to Dynamus Patricius, is a hagiographic account of Maximus, a fifth-century Gallic saint. The work survives in a single twelfth-century manuscript (Vat. lat. 1234) and claims contemporary authorship, but linguistic evidence points to a seventh- or eighth-century composition. It was never adopted into the Roman Breviary, and its feast day (June 25) appears only in local Gallican calendars. The text includes a dedicatory epistle to Pope Urbicus, employing common hagiographic topoi such as the humility topos ('rurali sermone') and reliance on earlier materials, notably a lost collection by Faustus of Riez. The edition is based on Laurentius Surius' sixteenth-century Acta Sanctorum, reflecting Counter-Reformation transmission.
The Vita Sancti Maximi is significant as a witness to local Gallic hagiography and the construction of saintly cults in post-Roman Gaul. Its survival in a single manuscript and exclusion from the Roman Breviary highlight the regional nature of such texts. The work also illustrates the use of earlier sources (Faustus of Riez) and the humility topos, common in hagiographic literature. Its transmission through Surius' collection reflects the role of Counter-Reformation scholarship in preserving medieval vitae.
The Vita Sancti Maximi is set in fifth-century Gaul, a period of political and ecclesiastical consolidation after the collapse of Roman authority. Maximus, a bishop or abbot, was venerated locally, and the text likely originated in a Gallic monastic or episcopal community. The work's claim to be by a contemporary (Dynamus Patricius) is a common hagiographic fiction; linguistic features suggest a seventh- or eighth-century date, when such vitae were often composed to bolster local cults. The sole surviving witness is a twelfth-century manuscript (Vat. lat. 1234), indicating limited circulation. The text was never incorporated into the Roman Breviary, remaining a local tradition. Its transmission through Surius' Acta Sanctorum (sixteenth century) shows how Counter-Reformation scholarship preserved and shaped such texts. The reference to Faustus of Riez (c. 405–490) as a source suggests an earlier hagiographic tradition, now lost, possibly in papyrus or parchment rolls ('vetera chartarum volumina').
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||