Latin · Treatises ·
Chidelbertus II Rex Francorum · ogl-pl
Work dossier · summary and historical context
The 'Constitutio De Abolendis Reliquiis Idolatriae' is a modern editorial title for a capitulary attributed to a Frankish king named Chidelbertus II, a figure unattested in independent historical records. The sole surviving witness is a 10th-century manuscript (BnF lat. 1234) showing signs of scribal interpolation, especially in the anathemas. The text lacks the formal structure of early medieval royal decrees and may be a composite of homiletic and penitential material. It was cited by 16th-century Catholic controversialists as evidence of early Frankish opposition to pagan survivals but never included in official canon law collections. The edition's critical apparatus is based solely on the base manuscript, without collation against 17th-century transcriptions.
The text is significant as a purported early medieval royal decree against pagan survivals, reflecting the ongoing Christianization of Gaul. However, its uncertain attribution and manuscript transmission raise questions about its authenticity and date. It illustrates how later Catholic controversialists used such texts to argue for early Frankish opposition to paganism, and it highlights the challenges of studying medieval forgeries and misattributions.
The work is attributed to a supposed Merovingian or Carolingian king named Chidelbertus II, but no independent historical record confirms such a ruler. The text survives in a single 10th-century manuscript, suggesting it may be a later forgery or misattribution from the Carolingian period. The genre 'constitutio' is anachronistic; the text lacks the formal structure of early medieval royal decrees and may be a composite of homiletic and penitential material. The manuscript shows signs of scribal interpolation, especially in the anathemas. The work was cited by 16th-century Catholic controversialists as evidence of early Frankish opposition to pagan survivals, but it was never included in any official collection of canon law. The edition does not collate the manuscript against the two known 17th-century transcriptions, which may contain variant readings.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||