Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Homilia De Epiphania, attributed to Sedatus, bishop of Béziers (c. 480–510), is a Latin homily for the feast of the Epiphany. It presents the three traditional Epiphany events—the star guiding the Magi, the baptism of Christ, and the miracle at Cana—as a unified typological scheme. The text survives only in a lost medieval manuscript and was first printed in the 17th century; the OGL-PL edition reproduces that print. Its inclusion in the 1568 Roman Breviary for the Octave of Epiphany attests to later liturgical use. Authorship remains uncertain, as no contemporary witness confirms Sedatus, and stylistic similarities to other anonymous Gallic homilies have led some scholars to question the attribution.
The homily is significant as a witness to the early Latin Epiphany tradition, illustrating the tripartite scheme of star, baptism, and Cana miracle that shaped Western liturgical practice. Its inclusion in the Roman Breviary (1568) shows its enduring influence. The disputed authorship and fragmentary transmission highlight the challenges of attributing late antique homilies and underscore the need for careful textual criticism.
The homily is set in late antique Gaul, likely composed between 480 and 510, during Sedatus's episcopal tenure in Béziers (Biterrae). This period saw the decline of Roman authority and the rise of Visigothic rule, alongside ongoing theological debates and liturgical development in the Latin Church. The text reflects the early Latin Epiphany tradition that combined the Nativity star, the baptism of Christ, and the Cana miracle—a tripartite scheme also found in sermons of Leo the Great (5th c.). The homily's language and typological exegesis align with late antique Latin preaching. Its transmission is precarious: it survives in a single medieval manuscript (now lost) and was first printed in the 17th century. The OGL-PL edition reproduces that printed text without collating other witnesses or providing a critical apparatus. The attribution to Sedatus is unsupported by external contemporary evidence, and stylistic parallels to other anonymous Gallic homilies raise doubts about authorship.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||