Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Regula Monasterii Tarnatensis is a Latin monastic rule of uncertain authorship, traditionally linked to the monastery of Tarnatum (modern Tarnant, France). Likely composed in the 6th or 7th century, it survives in a single manuscript witness, which may contain scribal errors or interpolations. The rule had limited later influence and is not cited in major canonical collections. Its provisions include procedures for admitting candidates, assigning them to a senior, testing obedience, and handling property donations. The text reflects late Roman and early medieval legal concerns, such as fugitive slaves or coloni entering monastic life. The edition lacks a critical apparatus or stemma, requiring consultation of the manuscript facsimile for paleographic details.
The Regula Monasterii Tarnatensis provides a rare glimpse into the monastic life of a small, possibly rural community in Merovingian Gaul. Its parallels with the Rule of the Master and the Rule of Benedict highlight shared traditions in early Western monasticism. The rule's unique provisions, such as compensating a monk for animals brought to the monastery, offer insights into local economic practices. Despite its limited influence, it contributes to the diversity of early medieval monastic rules and underscores the regional variations in monastic observance.
The Regula Monasterii Tarnatensis was composed in Latin, likely in the 6th or 7th century, in the region of Tarnatum (modern Tarnant, France). The monastery was part of the early medieval monastic landscape in Gaul, where rules such as the Rule of the Master and the Rule of Benedict were influential. The text's survival in a single manuscript suggests limited circulation and a localized community. Its language and institutional parallels with other early medieval rules indicate a date in the Merovingian period. The rule's provisions, such as investigating whether a candidate is bound by servitude, reflect late Roman legal concerns about fugitive slaves or coloni. The text's transmission is obscure, and its attribution to an 'Auctor Incertus' underscores the lack of external evidence. The rule was not widely used in later reforms, remaining a minor witness to early monastic practice.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||