Latin · Other ·
Prosperus Conversus / Prosper Ex Manichaeo Conversus · ogl-pl
Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Anathematismi et Fidei Catholicae Professio is a Latin profession of faith and set of anathemas against Manichaean doctrines, composed by a convert from Manichaeism named Prosper. The work survives in a single manuscript tradition within the Patrologia Latina, with no known early medieval copies. It belongs to the genre of anti-heretical doctrinal statements and was used in later patristic collections as a witness to anti-Manichaean polemic, though it did not achieve wide liturgical or canonical authority. The text likely dates to the 5th century, based on internal references to Manichaean controversies and Prosper's known period of activity. The edition lacks a critical apparatus, and the Latin text may contain scribal errors or interpolations.
The Anathematismi et Fidei Catholicae Professio is significant as a direct witness to the doctrinal formulas used to combat Manichaeism in the 5th century. It provides insight into the specific beliefs targeted by orthodox Christians and the ritual of subscription to anathemas. The work relates to Augustine's anti-Manichaean writings and later patristic collections, though its limited transmission suggests it was not as influential as other anti-heretical texts.
The work is attributed to Prosper, a convert from Manichaeism active in the 5th century, likely in the Latin-speaking western Roman Empire. Manichaeism, founded by Mani in the 3rd century, posited two coeternal principles of light and darkness, whose mixture trapped divine light in the material world. The text reflects the intense anti-Manichaean polemic of the 4th–5th centuries, particularly in North Africa and Italy, where Augustine of Hippo wrote extensively against the sect. The anathematisms were designed to be read aloud and subscribed by suspected Manichaeans, imposing excommunication on those who held condemned propositions. The work survives only in a single manuscript tradition edited by J.-P. Migne in the Patrologia Latina, with no known early medieval copies, suggesting limited transmission. The text may have been used in later patristic collections but did not achieve wide authority. The Latin text shows variants, such as between 'fructuum' and 'fruticum', indicating scribal uncertainty.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||