ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Treatises ·

De Baptismo Primum

Concilia Carthaginiensia · ogl-pl

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 7 passages · 1,510 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

De Baptismo Primum is an editorial compilation of synodal letters and decrees from Carthaginian councils held between 255 and 258 CE, presided over by Cyprian. The work addresses the rebaptism of heretics, particularly Novatians, and records the African church's stance that heretical baptism is invalid. Transmitted in Latin manuscripts from the 8th–9th centuries, it is often appended to Cyprian's epistolary corpus. The text was later cited by Augustine and medieval canonists in anti-Donatist debates, though its original context was anti-heretical. The edition in the Patrologia Latina presents only the conciliar documents, not a unified treatise.

De Baptismo Primum documents a pivotal moment in early Christian sacramental theology, establishing the African church's position on rebaptism that later influenced the Donatist controversy. It provides primary evidence for 3rd-century conciliar procedures and the role of Cyprian. The work's transmission in Cyprianic corpora and its citation by Augustine and medieval canonists highlight its enduring authority in debates over baptismal validity and ecclesial unity.

Historical context

The councils were held in Carthage (North Africa) between 255 and 258 CE, during the episcopate of Cyprian (c. 210–258). The community was the Latin-speaking African church, which had a tradition of rebaptizing heretics, a practice traced to Bishop Agrippinus (c. 200) and Tertullian. The immediate controversy involved the Novatianist schism: Novatian, a rigorist antipope (c. 251), denied readmission to the lapsed without rebaptism, while his followers used Catholic rites, complicating the validity of their baptisms. The councils, prompted by a layman named Magnus, affirmed the African practice. The text survives in multiple Latin manuscripts, the earliest from the 8th–9th centuries, often within Cyprian's letter collections. It was transmitted through early modern editions by Erasmus, Pamelius, Rigaltius, and Baluze, and later included in the Patrologia Latina. The dating of the first council is contested (255 or 256 CE).

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

42 commentary units 9 background9 scripture7 structure6 reception5 term3 caution2 dating1 sense 2 derived notes 13 open questions 7 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: treatise in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 7 narrative.
  • caution1 passage(s) are fragmentary in the source; the English bridges each break and says so in the note.
  • scripture1 scriptural phrase match(es) noted: John 4:10.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:1 · narrativehigh
Source
ANNO CHRISTI CCLV, S. STEPHANI III. CARTHAGINENSE CONCILIUM SUB CYPRIANO QUINTUM, DE BAPTISMO PRIMUM. (Erasm. I, 12; Pamel. Rigalt. Baluz. LXX; Oxon. Lips. LXX; Paris. LXIX; Routh. Rell. Scr. et 135.) PROOEMIUM. Postquam in Africana Ecclesia Agrippino, vel etiam Tertulliano auctore, usus rebaptizandi cos qui ab haereticis baptizati erant, jam diu antehac frequentatus fuisset, eamque Novatianus, ut saltem hoc modo lapsos, quos immundos esse docebat, per Baptismum ab omni sua immunditia ablutos in Ecclesiam reciperet, aemulatus fuisset; Magnus, homo laicus, occasione Novatianorum, eamdem tunc temporis baptizandi formam ac ritum cum Catholicis observantium, dubitavit primus, an ad Ecclesiam revertentes rebaptizari deberent, quos a Novatianis baptizatos esse scirent. Ex episcopis primi reperiuntur fuisse Numidae, qui de iterando haereticorum Baptismate ad Cyprianum aliosque episcopos, ad synodum hanc Carthagine coactos, litteras conscripserunt.
English
In the year of Christ 255, under Stephen III, the Fifth Carthaginian Council under Cyprian, the First on Baptism. (Er. I, 12; Pam., Rig., Bal. LXX; Ox., Lip. LXX; Par. LXIX; Routh, Rell. Scr. et 135.) PREFACE. After the practice of rebaptizing those who had been baptized by heretics had long been frequent in the African Church, with Agrippinus or even Tertullian as its author, and after Novatian had emulated this, so that at least in this way he might receive back into the Church the lapsed, whom he taught to be unclean, washed clean of all their impurity through Baptism; Magnus, a layman, taking occasion from the Novatians, who at that time observed the same form and rite of baptizing as the Catholics, was the first to doubt whether those returning to the Church, who were known to have been baptized by the Novatians, ought to be rebaptized. The first bishops found to have written letters to Cyprian and other bishops gathered at this synod in Carthage concerning the repetition of heretical Baptism were those of Numidia.
stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
Prima igitur synodica hac de re consultatio, anno Valeriani et Gallieni imperatorum 4, habita haec est, ut Cypriani Epistola 73, ad Jubaianum ostendit, in qua cum ex Africanis alii, juxta apostolicam traditionem sentirent non esse rebaptizandos eos qui legitime ab haereticis baptizati sunt: alii vero contra existimarent, unum Baptismum duntaxat esse unius Ecclesiae, ideoque apud haereticos qui extra Ecclesiam sunt, Baptismum verum et catholicum esse non posse; hac inquisitione praevia, tandem definitum esi, cum unum sit in sancta Ecclesia Baptisma, neminem foris extra Ecclesiam baptizari posse: traditionem apostolorum male interpretantes, male etiam loquentes universaliter constringentes, addiderunt, ut ex epistola Cypriani ad Quintum constat, illos qui a Catholicis rite baptizati ad haereticos defecissent, non per Baptismum, sed per solam manuum impositionem recipiendos esse, si ad Ecclesiam redire contendant. Baron. anno Christi 258, num. usque ad inclusive. Quibus omnibus ita constitutis, Januario caeterisque Numidiae episcopis sententiam ac definitionem hujus synodi, prout ipsi per litteras ad synodum scriptas expetiverant, hac synodica epistola, quam infra ex Cypriano hic subjecimus, significarunt.
English
The first synodical consultation on this matter, held in the fourth year of the emperors Valerian and Gallienus, is shown by Cyprian’s Epistle 73 to Jubaianus, in which, while some of the African bishops, according to apostolic tradition, thought that those who had been legitimately baptized by heretics should not be rebaptized, others on the contrary judged that there is only one Baptism, that of the one Church, and therefore among heretics, who are outside the Church, true and Catholic Baptism cannot exist. After this preliminary inquiry, it was finally defined that, since there is one Baptism in the holy Church, no one can be baptized outside the Church. Those who misinterpreted the apostolic tradition, and also spoke wrongly, binding universally, added, as appears from Cyprian’s epistle to Quintus, that those who, having been duly baptized by Catholics, had fallen away to heretics, should be received, if they seek to return to the Church, not by Baptism, but by the mere imposition of hands. Baronius, in the year of Christ 258, numbers inclusive. With all these matters thus settled, Januarius and the other bishops of Numidia, having requested by letter the opinion and definition of this synod, were informed of them by this synodical epistle, which we subjoin below from Cyprian.
stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:3 · narrativemedium
Source
CYPRIANUS, LIBERALIS, CALDONIUS, JUNIUS 49·, PRI- MUS, CAECILIUS, POLYCARPUS, NICOMEDES, FELIX, MARRUTIUS, SUCCESSUS, LUCIANUS, HONORATUS, FORTUNATUS, VICTOR, DONATUS, LUCIUS, HERCU- LANUS, POMPONIUS, DEMETRIUS, QUINTUS, SATUR- NINUS, MARCUS, ALIUS SATURNINUS ALIUS DONA- TUS, ROGATIANUS, SEDATUS, TERTULLUS, HORTEN- SIANUS, ITEM ALIUS SATURNIUS, SATTIUS, JANUARIO50 SATURNINO, MAXIMO, VICTORI, ALIO VICTORI, CAS- SIO, PROCULO, MODIANO, CITTINO GARGILIO, EUTYCIANO, ALIO GARGILIO, ALIO SATURNINO, NEMESIANO. NAMPULO, ANTONIANO, ROGATIANO, HONORATO FRATIBUS, SALUTEM. I. Cum simul in concilio essemus, fratres charissimi, legimus litteras vestras quas ad nos fecistiset51 de iis qui apud haereticos et schismaticos baptizati videntur, an ad Ecclesiam catholicam, quae una et vera est, venientes baptizari debeant. De qua re quanquam et ipsi illic veritatem et firmitatem catholicae regulae teneatis, tamen quoniam consulendos nos pro communi dilectione existimastis, sententiam nostram non novam promimus, sed jam pridem ab antecessoribus nostris statutam et a nobis obsevatam vobiscum pari consensione52 conjungimus [vid. not.], eensentes scilicet et pro certo tenentes neminem foris baptizari extra Ecclesiam posse, cum sit Baptisma unum in sancta Ecclesia constitutum, et scriptum sit. Domino dicente (Hier.
English
Cyprian, Liberalis, Caldonius, Junius 49, Primus, Caecilius, Polycarpus, Nicomedes, Felix, Marrutius, Successus, Lucianus, Honoratus, Fortunatus, Victor, Donatus, Lucius, Herculanus, Pomponius, Demetrius, Quintus, Saturninus, Marcus, another Saturninus, another Donatus, Rogatianus, Sedatus, Tertullus, Hortensianus, also another Saturnius, Sattius, to Januarius, Saturninus, Maximus, Victor, another Victor, Cassius, Proculus, Modianus, Cittinus Gargilius, Eutychianus, another Gargilius, another Saturninus, Nemesianus, Nampulus, Antonianus, Rogatianus, Honoratus, brothers, greetings. I. When we were together in council, most beloved brothers, we read your letter which you sent to us concerning those who are seen to have been baptized among heretics and schismatics, whether, when coming to the Catholic Church, which is one and true, they ought to be baptized. Concerning this matter, although you yourselves there hold the truth and firmness of the Catholic rule, nevertheless, since you thought we should be consulted out of common love, we set forth our opinion, not as new, but as long ago established by our predecessors and observed by us, and we join it with you in equal agreement, judging of course and holding for certain that no one can be baptized outside the Church, since there is one baptism established in the holy Church, and it is written, with the Lord saying (Jer.
stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
II, 13): Me dereliquerunt fontem aquoe vivoe53, et effoderunt sibi lacus detritos qui non possunt aquam portare. Et iterum divina Scriptura moneat et dicat (Prov. IX, 18, sec. LXXI: Ab aqua aliena abstine te, et fonte aquoe alievoe54 ne biberis. Oportet ergo mundari et sanctificari aquam prius a sacerdote, ut possit Baptismo suo peccata hominis qui baptizatur abluere, quia per Ezechielem prophetam Dominus dicit (Ezech. XXXVI, 25, 26): Et aspergam super vos aguam mundam, et mundabimini ab omnibus immunditiis vestris, et ab omnibus simulacris vestris emundabo vos. et dabo vobis55 cor novum et spiritum novum dabo in vobis. Quomodo autem mundare et sanctificare aquam potest qui ipse immundus est et apud quem Spiritus sanctus non est, cum Dominus dicat in Numeris (Num. XIX, 22): Et omnia quoecunque tetigerit immundus immunda erant, Aut quomodo baptizans dare alteri remissum peccatorum potest qui ipse sua peccata deponere extra Ecclesiam non potest?
English
They have abandoned the fountain of living water and have dug for themselves worn-out cisterns that cannot hold water. And again divine Scripture warns and says: "Abstain from alien water, and do not drink from another's fountain." Therefore the water must first be cleansed and sanctified by a priest, so that it can wash away the sins of the person being baptized in his Baptism, because through the prophet Ezekiel the Lord says: "And I will sprinkle clean water upon you, and you will be cleansed from all your impurities, and I will cleanse you from all your idols, and I will give you a new heart and a new spirit within you." But how can one who is himself unclean and in whom the Holy Spirit is not present cleanse and sanctify water, since the Lord says in Numbers: "And everything that an unclean person touches will be unclean"? Or how can one who is baptizing give remission of sins to another when he himself cannot lay aside his own sins outside the Church?
stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
II. Sed et ipsa interrogatio quae fit in baptismo testis est veritatis. Nam cum dicimus: Credis in vitam oeternam et remissionem peccatorum per sanctam Ecclesiam?intelligimus remissionem peccatorum nonnisi in Ecclesia dari, apud haereticos autem, ubi Ecclesia non sit, non posse peccata dimitii. Itaque qui haereticos baptizare posse asserunt, aut interrogationem mutent, aut vindicent veritatem, nisi si eis et Ecclesiam tribuunt quos Baptisma habere, contendunt. Ungi quoque neccsse est eum qui baptizatus sit, ut accepto Chrismate, id est, Unctione, esse unctus Dei et habere in se gratiam Christi possit. Porro autem Eucharistia est unde baptizati unguntur olco in altari sanctificato56 Sanctificare autem non potuit olei creaturam qui nec altare habuit nec Ecclesiam. Unde nec unctio spiritalis apud haereticos potest esse, quando constet oleum sanctificari et Eucharistiam fieri apud illos omnino non posse. Scire autem et meminisse debemus scriptum esse (Psal. CXL, 6): Oleum peccatoris non ungat caput meum, quod ante in psalmis praemonuit57 Spiritus sanctus, ne quis exorbitans et a via veritatis exerrans, apud haereticos58 et Christi adversarios ungeretur. Sed et pro baptizato59 quam precem facere potest sacerdos sacrilegus et peccator, cum scriptum sit (Joan. IX, 31): Deus peccatorem non audit; sed qui eum coluerit60, et voluntatem ejus fecerit, illum audit.
English
II. But the very interrogation that takes place in baptism is a witness to the truth. For when we say: Do you believe in eternal life and the remission of sins through the holy Church? we understand that the remission of sins is given only in the Church, and that among heretics, where the Church is not, sins cannot be remitted. Therefore, those who assert that heretics can baptize must either change the interrogation or vindicate the truth, unless they also grant the Church to those whom they contend have baptism. It is also necessary that the one who has been baptized be anointed, so that, having received the Chrism, that is, the Unction, he may be an anointed of God and be able to have the grace of Christ within himself. Moreover, the Eucharist is that with which the baptized are anointed with oil sanctified on the altar. But he who had neither an altar nor a Church could not sanctify the creature of oil. Hence, spiritual unction cannot exist among heretics, since it is established that oil cannot be sanctified and the Eucharist cannot be made among them at all. But we ought to know and remember that it is written (Psalm 140:6): The oil of the sinner shall not anoint my head, which the Holy Spirit forewarned in the Psalms, lest anyone, straying and wandering from the path of truth, be anointed among heretics and adversaries of Christ. But also, what prayer can a sacrilegious and sinful priest make for the baptized, since it is written (John 9:31): God does not hear a sinner; but he who worships him and does his will, him he hears.
stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:6 · narrativehigh
Source
Quis autem potest dare quod ipse non habeat, aut quomodo potest spiritalia agere61 qui ipse amiserit Spiritum sanctum? Et idcirco baptizandus est et innovandus qui ad Ecclesiam rudis venit, ut intus per Sanctos sanctificetur, quia scriptum est (Levit. XIX, 2, et XX, 26): Sancti estote, quia et ego sanctus sum» dicit Dominus: ut qui in errorem62 seductus est et foris tinctus in Baptismo vero et ecclesiastico etiam hoc ipsum deponat quod homo ad Deum veniens, dum sacerdotem quaerit, in sacrilegum fraude erroris incurrit. III. Caeterum probare est haereticorum et schismaticorum baptisma consentire in id quod illi baptizaverint. Neque enim potest pars illic inanis esse et pars praevalere. Si baptizare potuit, potuit et Spiritum sanctum dare. Si autem Spiritum sanctum dare non potest, quia, foris constitutus, cum sancto Spiritu non est, nec baptizare venientem potest, quando et Baptisma unum sit, et Spiritus sanctus unus, et una Ecclesia a Christo Domino63 super Petrum64 origine unitatis et ratione65 fundata. Ita fit ut cum omnia apud illos inania et falsa sint, nihil eorum quae illi gesserint probari a nobis debeat. Quid enim potest ratum et firmum esse apud Deum quod illi faciunt quos Dominus hostes et adversarios suos dicit in Evangelio suo ponens (Luc. XI 23): Qui non est mecum, adversum me est: et qui non mecum colligit, spargit.
English
But who can give what he himself does not have, or how can he perform spiritual acts who has himself lost the Holy Spirit? And for that reason, the one who comes to the Church as a raw novice must be baptized and renewed, so that within, through the Saints, he may be sanctified, because it is written (Leviticus 19:2 and 20:26): "Be holy, for I also am holy," says the Lord: so that he who was led into error and was dipped outside in a true and ecclesiastical baptism may also lay aside this very thing, that a man coming to God, while seeking a priest, fell into the fraud of error through a sacrilegious man. III. Moreover, to approve the baptism of heretics and schismatics is to consent to what they have baptized. For that part cannot be empty and that part prevail. If he was able to baptize, he was also able to give the Holy Spirit. But if he cannot give the Holy Spirit, because, being placed outside, he is not with the Holy Spirit, he cannot baptize the one coming, since Baptism is one, and the Holy Spirit is one, and the one Church is founded by Christ the Lord upon Peter by the origin of unity and reason. Thus it happens that since everything among them is empty and false, none of those things which they have done ought to be approved by us. For what can be ratified and firm in the sight of God that they do, whom the Lord calls his enemies and adversaries in his Gospel, saying (Luke 11:23): "He who is not with me is against me; and he who does not gather with me scatters.
stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
Et beatus quoque apostolus Joannes mandata Domini et praecepta custodiens in epistola sua posuerit, dicens (I Joan. II. 18, 19): Audistis quia antichristus venit. Nunc autem antichristi multi facit sunt. Unde cognoscimus quia, novissima hora est. Ex nobis exierunt, sed non fuerunt ex nobis. Si enim fuissent ex nobis, mansissent utique nobiscum. Unde nos quoque colligere et considerare debemus an qui adversarii sunt Domini, et appellati sunt antichristi, possint dare gratiam Christi. Quare qui cum Domino sumus, et unitatem Domini tenemus et secundum ejus dignationem sacerdotium ejus in Ecclesia administramus, quaecumque adversarii ejus et antichristi faciunt repudiare et rejicere et pro profanis habere debemus, et eis qui, de errore et pravitate venientes agnoscunt unius Ecclesiae veram fidem, dare illis per omnia divinae gratiae sacramenta et unitatis et fidei veritatem· Optamus vos, fratres charissimi, seni per bene valere.
English
And the blessed apostle John also, keeping the Lord’s commands and precepts, set down in his epistle, saying (1 John 2:18-19): “You have heard that the antichrist comes. But now many antichrists have been made. Whence we know that it is the very last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of us. For if they had been of us, they would surely have remained with us.” Whence we too must gather and consider whether those who are adversaries of the Lord and are called antichrists can give the grace of Christ. Therefore, we who are with the Lord and hold the unity of the Lord and, according to his condescension, administer his priesthood in the Church, must repudiate and reject whatever his adversaries and antichrists do, and hold it as profane, and to those who, coming from error and depravity, acknowledge the true faith of the one Church, we must give them through all things the sacraments of divine grace and the truth of unity and faith. We wish you, dearest brothers, to fare well.
Citation. Tergwame, “De Baptismo Primum”, stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/stoa0356.stoa002.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0040 · generated 2026-11-15.