Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Carmen Sodoma is a late antique Latin hexameter poem retelling the destruction of Sodom from Genesis 19. Written in an elevated epic style influenced by Vergil and Ovid, it blends biblical narrative with classical mythological exempla. The poem survives in a single manuscript tradition, often appended to works of Tertullian, but modern scholarship rejects that attribution on stylistic and doctrinal grounds. Its date is uncertain, with linguistic and metrical features suggesting a 4th–5th century origin. The work was occasionally cited in medieval florilegia and Genesis commentaries but never achieved liturgical or canonical status. This edition presents the text with minimal emendation, noting textual cruces and conjectures without resolving authorship or date.
The Carmen Sodoma is a rare example of late antique Christian epic poetry that freely blends biblical narrative with classical mythological imagery, illustrating the cultural synthesis of the period. Its uncertain authorship and date make it a case study in pseudepigraphy and textual transmission. The poem's vivid descriptions of divine judgment and its use of Vergilian and Ovidian diction offer insight into how educated Christians adapted pagan literary forms for theological purposes.
The Carmen Sodoma was likely composed in the Latin-speaking Christian world of late antiquity, possibly in North Africa or Italy, between the 4th and 5th centuries. Its author, unknown, wrote in a learned hexameter style that echoes Vergil and Ovid, indicating a literary education typical of elite Christian poets of the period. The poem survives in a single manuscript tradition, often copied alongside the genuine works of Tertullian (c. 155–220 CE), but its ascription to him is now rejected due to differences in style, vocabulary, and theology. The work was transmitted through medieval monastic libraries, where it was occasionally excerpted in florilegia and commentaries on Genesis. It never entered the mainstream liturgical or canonical tradition, remaining a scholarly curiosity. The text shows signs of scribal corruption and lacunae, and no definitive reconstruction of the original has been achieved.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||