Work dossier · summary and historical context
Ad Eugipium is a Latin epistola by Paschasius Diaconus, addressed to Eugipius, likely the abbot of Lucullanensis. The letter functions as a dedicatory preface, probably for a hagiographical work, and reflects a monastic or scholarly exchange. Paschasius, active from the late 5th to early 6th century, writes in response to a commemoratorium (memorandum) from Eugipius, who authored the Vita Severini. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the earliest witness from the 9th century. It is cited in medieval florilegia and canon law collections for its patristic references, indicating limited but enduring influence in monastic and scholarly circles. The modern edition lacks a critical apparatus, obscuring textual uncertainties.
Ad Eugipium provides insight into early medieval epistolary and hagiographical practices, particularly the exchange between a deacon and an abbot regarding the composition of a saint's life. Its patristic citations influenced later florilegia and canon law, reflecting the work's role in transmitting authoritative texts. The letter also illustrates the expectation of wide ecclesiastical readership for hagiography, as Paschasius claims the work is suitable for the whole Church to review.
Paschasius Diaconus flourished in the late 5th to early 6th century, a period of transition in the Latin West following the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The work is addressed to Eugipius, abbot of Lucullanensis (likely a monastery near Naples), whose floruit is c. 500–530. The letter form suggests a dedicatory preface, situating the work within a monastic or scholarly exchange. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the earliest witness from the 9th century, indicating limited but continuous transmission in Carolingian and later medieval libraries. Its citation in medieval florilegia and canon law collections suggests use in scholarly and legal contexts, not liturgy. The work's dating rests on its relation to Eugipius's known activity and the absence of later references. The source edition (ogl-pl) likely relies on a modern critical edition, but the manuscript stemma is not fully established, and no critical apparatus is provided.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||