Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Homilia De Passione Domini, attributed to Faustinus, is a late antique Latin homily that offers a rhetorical meditation on Christ's passion, combining exegetical interpretation with moral exhortation. Its elevated register, rhythmic clausulae, and scriptural allusions are characteristic of late antique Latin preaching. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, likely copied in a Carolingian scriptorium, with no known early medieval citations, suggesting limited circulation. Attribution to Faustinus is uncertain, and the homily may date from the 4th to 6th centuries. It is not included in any known medieval lectionary or liturgical cycle, and its reception appears limited to patristic florilegia and modern scholarly editions.
This homily exemplifies late antique Latin preaching on the passion, blending typological exegesis with moral exhortation. Its uncertain attribution and limited transmission highlight the challenges of studying non-canonical patristic works. The text's use of Old Testament typology (e.g., Abel, Abraham) reflects common patristic polemical strategies, linking it to broader traditions in Justin Martyr and Tertullian. Its survival in a single Carolingian manuscript underscores the role of medieval scriptoria in preserving late antique Christian literature.
The homily was likely composed between the 4th and 6th centuries in a Latin-speaking Christian community, possibly in North Africa or Italy, given its rhetorical style and exegetical methods. The attribution to Faustinus is uncertain; if authentic, he may have been a 4th-century bishop or presbyter, but no external witness confirms this before the 9th century. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, probably copied in a Carolingian scriptorium, indicating limited circulation. It is not included in any known medieval lectionary or liturgical cycle, suggesting it was not widely used in worship. The homily's survival in a manuscript from Saint Illidius of Clermont points to a regional transmission in Gaul. Its reception is confined to patristic florilegia and modern editions, with no early medieval citations known.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||