ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Treatises ·

De Sanctissima Trinitate Confessio

Eusebius Vercellenses · ogl-pl

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 13 passages · 3,118 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

The De Sanctissima Trinitate Confessio is a Latin treatise on the Trinity transmitted under the name of Eusebius of Vercelli. It survives in a single manuscript tradition, the earliest witness dating to the 9th century. The work is divided into two creedal sections and engages with Nicene theology, employing terms such as 'lux lucem' and 'processionem' to articulate the relationships among the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It glosses Greek terms OMO and USIA to explain homoousion. Modern scholarship contests the attribution to Eusebius, and the date of composition remains uncertain, with internal evidence suggesting a range from the late 4th to early 5th century.

The De Sanctissima Trinitate Confessio is significant as a witness to the development of Latin Trinitarian theology in the post-Nicene period. Its use of Nicene terminology and its glossing of Greek terms for consubstantiality reflect the transmission of Greek theological concepts into Latin. The work's later influence on Carolingian debates shows its enduring relevance in medieval Trinitarian thought, despite its contested authorship and limited manuscript circulation.

Historical context

The treatise is preserved in a single manuscript tradition, with the earliest surviving witness from the 9th century. Its attribution to Eusebius of Vercelli (d. 371) is disputed; modern scholars consider it pseudepigraphical or at least unverifiable. The text's theological content—including anti-Arian polemic, use of Nicene phrases like 'light from light', and technical Latin terms for Trinitarian processions—points to composition in a Latin-speaking Christian community engaged in post-Nicene debates. The work was later cited in medieval florilegia and influenced Carolingian Trinitarian discussions, but it never achieved wide liturgical use. No firm external evidence confirms the date, but paleography and theological references suggest a range from the late 4th to early 5th century.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

76 commentary units 19 term13 structure13 background12 caution7 scripture6 reception4 sense2 parallel 0 derived notes 20 open questions 13 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: treatise in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 13 narrative.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:1 · narrativehigh
Source
DE S. TRINITATE CONFESSIO. I. Confitemur, et credimus sanctam, atque individuam Trinitatem Patrem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum unum Dominum naturaliter esse unius substantiæ, unius naturæ, unius quoque majestatis, atque virtutis; et Patrem quidem non factum, non creatum, non genitum profitemur. Ipse enim a nullo originem duxit, ex quo et Filius nativitatem, et Spiritus sanctus processionem accepit. Fons ergo, et origo ipse est totius Divinitatis. ipse quoque Pater essentiæ suæ, qui de ineffabili substantia filium ineffabiliter genuit, nec tamen aliud, quam quod ipse est, genuit; Deus Deum, lux lucem. II. Ab ipso ergo est omnis paternitas in coelo, et in terra. Filium quoque de substantia Patris sine iuitio ante sæcula natum, nec tamen factum esse fatemur. Quia nec Pater sine Filio, nec Filius aliquando exstitit sine Patre, et tamen non sicut Filius de Patre, ita Pater de Filio, quia non Pater a Filio, sed Filius a Patre generationem accepit. Filius ergo Deus de Patre. Pater autem Deus, sed non de Filio. Pater quidem Filii, non Dens de Filio.
English
Confession on the Most Holy Trinity. I. We confess and believe that the holy and undivided Trinity—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—is one Lord, naturally of one substance, of one nature, and also of one majesty and power; and we profess that the Father indeed is not made, not created, not begotten. For He Himself derived origin from no one, from whom the Son received birth and the Holy Spirit procession. He is therefore the source and origin of the whole Divinity. He is also the Father of His own essence, who ineffably begot the Son from ineffable substance, yet begot not something other than what He Himself is: God from God, light from light. II. From Him, therefore, is all paternity in heaven and on earth. We also declare that the Son, born from the substance of the Father without beginning before the ages, is not made. For neither did the Father ever exist without the Son, nor did the Son ever exist without the Father, and yet the Father is not from the Son as the Son is from the Father, because the Father did not receive generation from the Son, but the Son from the Father. The Son is therefore God from the Father. The Father, however, is God, but not from the Son. The Father is indeed the Father of the Son, not God from the Son.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
Ille autem Filius Patris, et Deus de Patre, aequalis tamen per omnia Filius Deo Patri, quia non esse cœpit aliquando, nec desiitFilius unius cum Patre substantiæ creditur, sic quod a et homousion Patri dicitur, hoc est ejusdem cum Patre substantiae: OMO enim Graece unum, USIA vero substantia dicitur, quod utrumque conjunctum sonat unam substantiam. Non enim de nihilo, neque de alia substantia, sed de Patris utero, id est, de Substantia ejusdem Filius genitus, vel naturæ credendus est. III. Sempiternus ergo Pater, sempiternus et Filius; quod si Pater semper fuit, semper babuit Filium, cui Pater esset, et ob hoc Filium de Patre natum sine initio confitemur. Nec eumdem Filium Dei pro eo, quod de Patre sit genitus dissectae naturæ a portiunculam nominamus. Sed perfectum Patrem, perfectum Filium sine diminutione, sine dissectione genuisse asserimus, quia solius divinitatis est inæqualem Filium non habere. Hic etiam Filius Dei natura est Filius, e non adoptione, quem Deus Pater nec vo luntate, nec necessitate genuisse credendus est, quia nulla in Deo necessitas capit, nec voluntas sapientiam prævenit.
English
But the Son is of the Father, and God from the Father, yet the Son is equal to God the Father in all things, because He did not at some time begin to be, nor did He cease. The Son is believed to be of one substance with the Father, so that He is also called *homoousion* with the Father, that is, of the same substance as the Father: for *OMO* in Greek means "one," and *USIA* means "substance," and the two together signify one substance. For the Son is to be believed to have been begotten, or to be of the same nature, not from nothing, nor from another substance, but from the Father's womb, that is, from His substance. III. Therefore the Father is eternal, and the Son is eternal; for if the Father always was, He always had a Son to whom He was Father, and on this account we confess the Son to have been born from the Father without beginning. Nor do we call the same Son of God a portion of a divided nature because He was begotten from the Father. But we assert that the perfect Father begot the perfect Son without diminution, without division, because it belongs to the divinity alone not to have an unequal Son. This Son of God is Son by nature, not by adoption, and God the Father is to be believed to have begotten Him neither by will nor by necessity, because no necessity is contained in God, nor does will precede wisdom.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:3 · narrativehigh
Source
IV. Sanctum quoque Spiritum, quem tertiam in Trinitate personam unum, atque æqualem cum Deo Patre, et Filio crediMus esse Deum unius substantiæ, unius naturæ, non tamen genitum, vel creatum, sed ab utroque procedentem amborum esse Spiritum. Hic etiam Spiritus sanctus, nec ingenitus, nec genitus creditur. Ne si ingenitum dixerimus, duos patres dicamus, aut si genitum, duos filios pradicare monstremus. Quod tamen nec Patris tantum, nec Filii tantum, sed simul Patris, et Filii Spiritus dicitur. Nec enim de Patre procedit in Filium, vel de Filio a procedit ad sanctifacandam creaturam, sed simul ab utrisque processisse monstratur, quia charitas, sive sanctitas amborum esse agnoscitur. IIic igitur Spiritus sanctus missus ab utrisque, sicut Filius a Patre creditur, sed minor Patre, et Filio non habetur c, sicut, et Filium propter assumptam carnem minorem Patre et Spiritu sancto esse testamur.
English
IV. We also believe the Holy Spirit, whom we hold to be the third person in the Trinity, one and equal with God the Father and the Son, to be God of one substance, of one nature, yet neither begotten nor created, but proceeding from both, to be the Spirit of both. This Holy Spirit is believed to be neither unbegotten nor begotten. For if we were to say unbegotten, we would be speaking of two fathers; or if begotten, we would be proclaiming two sons. He is called, however, not the Spirit of the Father alone, nor of the Son alone, but simultaneously the Spirit of the Father and the Son. For He does not proceed from the Father into the Son, nor from the Son to sanctify the creature, but is shown to have proceeded from both at once, because He is acknowledged to be the love or holiness of both. Therefore this Holy Spirit is sent by both, just as the Son is believed to be sent by the Father, but He is not considered lesser than the Father and the Son, just as we testify that the Son, on account of His assumed flesh, is lesser than the Father and the Holy Spirit.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
V. Haec est sancta Trinitas, ut fert credi relata narratio, quae non triplex, sed ternitas et dici, et credi potest. Nec recte dici debet ut in uno Dco sit Trinitas, sed unus Deus Trinitas e in relativis personarum nominibus, Pater ad Filium, Filius ad Patrem, Spiritus sanctus ad utrosque refertur, quæ cum relative tres personæ dicantur, una tamen natura, id cst substantia creditur. Nec sicut tres personas, ita tres substantias praedicamus, sed unam substantiam, tres autem personas f. VI. Quod enim Pater est non a se, sed ad Patrem est. Similiter, et Spiritus sanctus non a se, sed ad Patrem et Filium relative refertur in eo, quod Patris et Filii Spiritus praedicatur. Item cum dicimus Deus non ad aliquid dicitur, sicut Pater ad Filium, vel Filius ad Patrem, vel Spiritus sanctus ad Patrem, et Filium, sed ad se specialiter dicitur Deus. Nam etsi de singulis personis interrogaremur, Deum necesse est, fateamur. Deus ergo Pater, Deus Filius, Deus Spiritus sanctus, singulariter dicitur, non tamen tres Dei, sed unus est Deus.
English
V. This is the holy Trinity, as the related account holds it to be believed, which can be called and believed not as triplex, but as ternitas. Nor should it rightly be said that the Trinity is in one God, but that one God is the Trinity, and in the relative names of the persons, Father is referred to the Son, the Son to the Father, the Holy Spirit to both; and although they are called three persons relatively, yet one nature, that is, one substance, is believed. Nor do we proclaim three substances as we do three persons, but one substance and three persons. VI. For what the Father is, He is not from Himself, but is relative to the Father. Likewise, the Holy Spirit is not from Himself, but is referred relatively to the Father and the Son in that He is proclaimed the Spirit of the Father and the Son. Again, when we say "God," it is not said in relation to something, as Father is to Son, or Son to Father, or Holy Spirit to Father and Son, but "God" is said especially in an absolute sense. For even if we were asked about each person individually, we must confess God. Therefore, God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit is said individually, yet not three Gods, but one God.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
VII. Item, et Pater omnipotens, et Filius omnipolens, et Spiritus sanctus omnipotens singulariter,dicuntur, nec tamen tres omnipotentes, sed unus omnipotens. Sicut, et unum lumen unumque principium prædicatur. Singulariter ergo ut unaquæque persona plenus Deus, et totae tres personæ unus Deus confitetur, et creditur una illis non divisa, atque æqualis majestas, deitas, atque potestas, nec minoratur a in singulis, nec augetur in tribus. VIII. Quia nec aliquid abest cum unaquaeque persona Deus singulariter dicitur, nec amplius cum totæ tres personæ unus Deus enuntiatur. Hæc ergo sancta Trinitas, quæ unus est, et verus Deus non recedit a numero, nec capitur numero c. In relatione enim personarum nunterus cernitur. In divinitatis vero substantia quid innumeratum sit, non comprehenditur. Ergo hoc solum numerum insinuat, quod ab invicem sunt, et in hoc solum numero carent, quod ad se sunt a. Nam ita huic sanctæ Trinitali unum naturale convenit nomen, ut in Iribns personis non possit esse plurale. Ob hoc secundum illud in sacris litteris dicitur Dominus, Dominus noster, et magna virtus ejus, et sapientiæ ejus non est numerus (Psal. CXLVI, 5). Nec quid tres has personas esse dicimus unum Deum, eumdem esse Filium, quem Patrem, aut eumdem, quod Spiritus sanctus est, Patrem, vel Filium dicere poterimus.
English
VII. Likewise, the Father is omnipotent, and the Son is omnipotent, and the Holy Spirit is omnipotent, each individually, yet they are not three omnipotents, but one omnipotent. Just as one light and one principle are proclaimed. Therefore, each person individually is acknowledged as fully God, and all three persons together are confessed as one God, with one undivided and equal majesty, divinity, and power, which is neither diminished in the individuals nor increased in the three. VIII. For nothing is lacking when each person is individually called God, nor is there anything more when all three persons are declared one God. Therefore, this holy Trinity, which is one and true God, does not recede from number, nor is it grasped by number. For number is perceived in the relation of the persons. But in the substance of divinity, what is uncounted is not comprehended. Thus, number only indicates that they are distinct from one another, and they lack number only in that they are in themselves. For this holy Trinity has one natural name, so that in three persons it cannot be plural. On this account, it is said in sacred scripture: "Lord, our Lord, and great is his power, and of his wisdom there is no number" (Psalm 146:5). Nor, when we say that these three persons are one God, can we say that the Son is the same as the Father, or that the Father or the Son is the same as what the Holy Spirit is.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:6 · narrativehigh
Source
IX. Non enim ipse est Pater, qui Filius, necFilius ipse, qui Pater, nec Spiriius sanctus ipse, qui est vel Pater, vel Filius, cum tamen ipse sit Pater, quod Filius, ipse sit Filius, quod Pater, ipse Spiritus sanctus, quod esi Pater, et Filius, id est natura unus Deus. Cum enim dicimus non ipsum esse Patrem quem Filium, ad personarum distinctionem refertur. X. Cum autem dicimus ipsum esse Patrem, quod Filium, ipsum Filium, quod Patrem, ipsum Spiritum sanctum, quod Patrem et Filium, ad naturam, qua Deus est, vel substantiam pertinere monstratur. Quoad substantiam unum sunt, personas enim distinguimus, non Deitatem separamus. Trinitatem igitur in personarum distinctione agnoscimus, unitatem propter naturam vel substantiam profitemur. Tria ergo ista unum sunt natura scilicet, non persona, nec tamen tres istæ personae separabiles existimandæ sunt, cum e nulla ante aliam, nulla post aliam, nulla sine alia vel exstitisse, vel quidpiam operasse aliquando credatur. Inseparabiles enim inveniuntur et ineo, quod sunt, et in eo quod faciunt f; ita inter generantem Patrem, et generatum Filium vel procedentem Spiritum sanctum nullum fuisse creditnus temporis intervallum, quo aut genitor genitum aliquando præcederet, aut genitus genitori deesset, aut procedens Sphitus Patri, vel Filio posterior appareret.
English
IX. For the Father is not himself the Son, nor is the Son himself the Father, nor is the Holy Spirit himself who is either the Father or the Son, although the Father is the same as the Son, the Son is the same as the Father, the Holy Spirit is the same as the Father and the Son, that is, one God by nature. For when we say that the Father is not the same person as the Son, this refers to the distinction of persons. X. But when we say that the Father is the same as the Son, the Son the same as the Father, the Holy Spirit the same as the Father and the Son, it is shown to pertain to the nature by which He is God, or to the substance. In respect to substance they are one; for we distinguish the persons, but we do not separate the Godhead. Therefore we acknowledge the Trinity in the distinction of persons, and we profess the unity on account of the nature or substance. Thus these three are one by nature, not by person, nor yet are these three persons to be considered separable, since it is believed that none ever existed before another, none after another, none without another, nor ever performed any work. For they are found to be inseparable both in what they are and in what they do; so that between the generating Father and the generated Son or the proceeding Holy Spirit, we believe there was no interval of time in which either the begetter ever preceded the begotten, or the begotten was absent from the begetter, or the proceeding Spirit appeared later than the Father or the Son.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
Ob hoc ergo inseparabilis et inconfusa hæc Trinitas a nobis et praedicatur, et creditur. Tres igitur istæ personae dicuntur juxta quod majores definiunt, ut cognoscantur, non ut separenlur. Nam si attendamus illud, quod Scriptura sacra dicit de sapientia: splendor est lacis æternæ (Sap. VII,; Heb. I, 3), sicut splendorem luci videmus inseparabiliter inhærere, sic confitemur Filium a Paire separari non posse. Tres ergo illas unius, atque ineparabilis naturæ personas sicut non confundimus, ita separabiles nullatenus prædicamus. Quandoquidem ita nobis hoc dignata est ipsa Trinitas evidenter ostendere, cum etiam in his nominibus quibus voluit singillatim personas agnosci, unam sine alia non permittat intelligi, nec Pater absque Filio agnoscitur, nec sine Patre Filius invenitur. Relatio quippe ipsa vocabuli personas separari vetat, quas etiam dum non simul nominat, simul insinuat. Nemo autem audire potest unumquodque istorum nominum, in quo non intelligere cogatur, et alterum.
English
Therefore, this Trinity is proclaimed and believed by us as inseparable and unconfused. These three persons, then, are so called according to the definitions of the greater authorities, that they may be known, not that they may be separated. For if we attend to what Sacred Scripture says of Wisdom: "the splendor of the eternal light" (Wisdom 7:; Hebrews 1:3), just as we see the splendor inseparably inhere in the light, so we confess that the Son cannot be separated from the Father. Therefore, those three persons of one and inseparable nature we neither confuse, nor do we in any way proclaim them as separable. Inasmuch as the Trinity itself has deigned to show this to us clearly, since even in those names by which it wills the persons to be individually known, it does not permit one to be understood without the other: neither is the Father known without the Son, nor is the Son found without the Father. For the very relation of the term forbids the persons to be separated, which, even when it does not name them simultaneously, it implies them together. No one, moreover, can hear any one of these names without being compelled to understand the other as well.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:8 · narrativehigh
Source
XI. Cum igitur haec tria sint unum, et unum tria, est tamen unicuique personæ manens sua proprietas. Pater enim aeternitatem habet sine nativitate, Filius nativitatem cum aeternitate, Spiritus vero Sanctus processionem sine nativitate cum æternitate. De his tribus personis solam Filii personam pro liberatione humani gencris hominem verum sine peccato a de sancta et immaculata Maria Virgine credimus assumpsisse, de qua novo ordine, novaque nativitate est genitus, quia intacta Virginitas virilem coitum nescivit, et fecunda per Spiritum sanctum carnis materiam ministravit. Qui partus Virginis nec ratione colligitur, nec exemplo monstratur. Quod si ratione colligitur, non est mirabile. Si exempto monstratur, non est singulare. Nec tamen Spiritus sanctus Pater esse credendus est Filii pro eo, quod Mana eodem Spiritu sancto obumbrata concepit b, ne Patres Filii videamur asserere, quod nefas est dici. In quo mirabili conceptu ædificante sibi Sapientia donnum, Verbum caro factum eat, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, ). Nec tamen verbum ipsum in carne conversum, atque mutatum est, ut desisteret esse Deus, quod homo esse voluisset. Sed ila Verbum caro factum est, ut non tantum ibi sit verbum Dei, et bominis caro, sed etiam rationalis hominis anima, atque hoc totum, et Deus dicatur propter Deum, et homo propter hominem.
English
XI. Therefore, while these three are one, and one is three, yet each person retains its own property. For the Father has eternity without nativity, the Son has nativity with eternity, but the Holy Spirit has procession without nativity with eternity. Of these three persons, we believe that only the person of the Son, for the liberation of the human race, assumed true man without sin from the holy and immaculate Virgin Mary, by whom, in a new order and a new nativity, he was born, because her untouched virginity knew no male intercourse, and, fertile through the Holy Spirit, she supplied the matter of flesh. This birth of the Virgin is neither grasped by reason nor shown by example. For if it were grasped by reason, it would not be miraculous; if it were shown by example, it would not be unique. Yet the Holy Spirit is not to be believed to be the Father of the Son because Mary conceived overshadowed by the same Holy Spirit, lest we seem to assert two Fathers of the Son, which is impious to say. In which miraculous conception, as Wisdom built itself a house, the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14). Yet the Word itself was not converted and changed into flesh, so that it ceased to be God, because it had willed to be man. But the Word was made flesh in such a way that there is not only the Word of God and the flesh of man, but also the rational soul of man, and this whole is called both God on account of God, and man on account of man.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:9 · narrativehigh
Source
In quo Dci Filio duas credimus esse naturas, unam Divinitatis, alteram humanitatis. XII. Quas ita in se una Christi persona univit, ut nec Divinitas ab humanitate, nrc humanitas a Divinitatc possit aliquando sejungi. Unic perfectus Deus, perfectus Homo in unitate personæ, unus est Christus. Nec tamen quia duas diximus in Filio Dei esse naturas, duas causabimus in eo esse personas, ne Trinitati, quod absit, accedere videatur quaternitas. XIII. Deus enim verbum non accepit personam hominis, sed naturam, et in aeternam personam Divinilatis temporalem accepit substantiam carnis. Item cum unius substantiæ credimus esse Patrem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum, non tamen dicimus, ut hujus Trinitatis unitatem Maria Virgo genuerit, sed tantummodo Filium, qui solus naturam nostram in unitate suæ personæ assumpsit. Incarnationem quoque hujus Filii Dei tota Trinitas operasse credenda est, quia inseparabilia sunt opera Trinitatis. Solus tamen Filius formam accepit in singularitate personæ, non in unitate Divinæ naturae. In id quod est proprium Filii, non quod commune Trinitati, quæ forma illa ad unitatem personæ quidem allata est, adeo ut Filius Dei, et Filius hominis unos sit Christus, id est Christus in his duabus naturis tribus exstat substantiis verbi, quod ad solius Dei essentiam referendum est, corporis et animæ, quod ad verum hominem pertinet.
English
In which Son of God we believe there are two natures, one of Divinity, the other of humanity. XII. These natures the one person of Christ has so united in itself that neither Divinity from humanity, nor humanity from Divinity can ever be separated. He is perfect God, perfect Man in the unity of person, one Christ. Yet, because we have said there are two natures in the Son of God, we shall not allege that there are two persons in him, lest a quaternity appear to be added to the Trinity, which God forbid. XIII. For God the Word did not assume the person of a man, but the nature, and into the eternal person of the Divinity he assumed the temporal substance of flesh. Likewise, when we believe the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit to be of one substance, we do not say that the Virgin Mary gave birth to the unity of this Trinity, but only to the Son, who alone assumed our nature in the unity of his person. Also, the incarnation of this Son of God is to be believed to have been wrought by the whole Trinity, because the works of the Trinity are inseparable. Yet only the Son received the form in the singularity of person, not in the unity of the divine nature. In that which is proper to the Son, not that which is common to the Trinity, that form was indeed brought to the unity of person, so that the Son of God and the Son of Man are one Christ, that is, Christ in these two natures consists of three substances: of the Word, which is to be referred to the essence of God alone, and of body and soul, which pertain to the true man.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:10 · narrativemedium
Source
Habet igitur ih se geminam substantiam divinitatis suæ et humanitatis nostræ. Hic etiam per hoc, quod de Deo Patre sine vitio prodiit natus tantum. Nam neque factus, neque prædestinatus accipimur. XIV. Per hoc tamen, quod de Maria Virgine natus est, et prædestinatus esse credendus est. Ambæ tamen in illo generationes mirabiles, quia, et de PaIre ante sæcula sine inaUre genitus, et in fine sacculorum de matre sine patre est generatus. Quod tamen cundum quod est Deus creavit Mariam, secundum quod homo est creatus ex Maria, ipse Pater Maria: matris suæ, et Filius. XV. Item per hoc quod Deus est, æqualis est Patri, per hoc quod homo, minor est Patre. Item ct major, et minor esse credendus est. In forma enim Dei etiam ipse Filius se ipso major est propter humanitatem assumptam. Quia Divinitas niajor est. In forma autem hominis etiam ipse Filius se ipso mojor est ad humanitatem, quæ minor divinitate accipitUr. Ita secundum divinitatem, quæ æqualis est Patri, ipse, ei Pater major est homine, quem sola Filii persona assumpsit. Item in eo, quod quæri potest, Filius sic æqualis, et minor esse creditur. Respondeamus secundum formam Dei servi (Philip. II, 7) minor et Patre et Spiritu sancto. Quia nec Spiritus Sanctus dicitur Pater c. Sed sola Filii persona suscepit carnem, per quam minor esse creditur illis personis duabus.
English
Therefore he has in himself a twofold substance, of his own divinity and of our humanity. And this, because he proceeded from God the Father without defect, being born only. For we understand him as neither made nor predestined. XIV. Yet, because he was born of the Virgin Mary, he is to be believed as also predestined. Both generations in him, however, are miraculous, because he was born of the Father before the ages without a mother, and at the end of the ages he was born of a mother without a father. Yet, according to what he is as God, he created Mary; according to what he is as man, he was created from Mary; he himself is both the son of his mother Mary and the Son of the Father. XV. Likewise, because he is God, he is equal to the Father; because he is man, he is less than the Father. Likewise, he is to be believed as both greater and lesser. For in the form of God, the Son himself is greater than himself on account of the humanity he assumed, because the divinity is greater. But in the form of man, the Son himself is also greater than himself with respect to the humanity, which is understood as lesser than the divinity. Thus, according to the divinity, which is equal to the Father, he himself and the Father are greater than the man, whom the person of the Son alone assumed. Likewise, in that which may be asked, the Son is believed to be both equal and lesser. Let us answer according to the form of the servant of God (Philippians 2:7): he is lesser than both the Father and the Holy Spirit. For the Holy Spirit is not called the Father, etc. But the person of the Son alone took on flesh, through which he is believed to be lesser than those two persons.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:11 · narrativemedium
Source
Item hic Filius a Deo Patre et Spiritu sancto inseparilbiliter discretus creditur esse persona ab homine assumpto ex Maria. Item cum in homine una exstat persona i, cum Patre vero, et Spiritu sancto natura Divinitatis suæ substantia, missus tamen Filius non solum a Patre, sed a Splritu Sancto missus esse credendus est. In eo, quod ipse per Prophetam dicit: Et nunc Dominus, misit me, et spiritus ejus (Isai. XLVIII, 16). A se ipso quoque missus accipitur a pro eo, quod sine parabolis, non solum voluntas, sed et operatio tulius trinitatis agnoscitur. Hic enim qui ante saecula unigenitus est vocatus spiritualiter, primogenitus est factus. Unigenitus propter Divinitatis substantiam. Primogenitus propter assumptae carnis naturam, in qua suscepli hominis forma juxta evangelicam veritatem sine peccato conceptus, sine peccato natus, sine peccato mortuus creditur, qui solus pro nobis peccator est factus, id est sacrificium pro peccatis nostris. Et tamen passionem ipsam, salva Divinitate sua pro delictis nostris sustinuit, morique judicatus, et cruci veram carnis mortem excepit. Tertia quoque die virtute propria suscitatus de sepulcro surrexit.
English
Likewise this Son is believed to be a person inseparably distinct from God the Father and the Holy Spirit, from the man assumed from Mary. Likewise, although in the man there exists one person, with the Father and the Holy Spirit by the nature of the substance of his divinity, yet the Son is to be believed as sent not only by the Father, but also by the Holy Spirit. In that which he himself says through the prophet: "And now the Lord has sent me, and his spirit" (Isaiah 48:16). He is also understood as sent by himself, because without parables not only the will but also the operation of the whole Trinity is recognized. For he who before the ages was called only-begotten spiritually, was made first-born. Only-begotten on account of the substance of his divinity. First-born on account of the nature of the assumed flesh, in which he, having taken up the form of a man according to the evangelical truth, is believed to have been conceived without sin, born without sin, died without sin, he who alone for us was made a sinner, that is, a sacrifice for our sins. And yet he endured that same passion, his divinity being preserved, for our sins, and was judged to die, and underwent a true death of the flesh on the cross. On the third day, raised by his own power, he rose from the tomb.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:12 · narrativehigh
Source
XVI. Hoc ergo exemplo capitis nostri confitemur veram fleri resurrectionem carnis omnium mortuorum. Nec in aeris, vel qualibet alia carne c, ut quidam delirant resurrecturos vos credimus, sed in ista, qua vivimus, consistimus et movemus. Peracto hujus sanciae resurrectionis exemplo idem Dominus noster, atque Salvator paternam ascendendo sedem repetivit, de qua numquam per divinitatem discessit. Illuc ad dexteram Patris sedens exspectatus in finem saeculorum Judex omnium vivorum et mor-,tuorum. tuorum. XVII. Inde cum sanctis omnibus veniet ad faciendum judicium, reddere unicuique mercedem proprie debitam, prout quisque gesserit in corpore positus, sive bonum, sive malum (I Cor. V, 10). Ecclesiam sanctam catholicam pretio sui sanguinis comparatam cum eo credimus in perpetuum regnaturam. Intra cujus gremium constituti unum baptisma credimus; et confitemur in remissione omnium peccatorum. Sub qua fide, et resurrectione mortuorum veraciter credimus, et futuri saeculi gaudia exspectamus.
English
XVI. By this example of our head, therefore, we confess that the true resurrection of the flesh of all the dead occurs. Nor do we believe that you will rise again in the air, or in any other flesh, as some rave, but in that flesh in which we live, stand, and move. After the completion of this holy example of resurrection, our same Lord and Savior, ascending, returned to the paternal seat, from which he never departed through his divinity. There, sitting at the right hand of the Father, he is awaited as the Judge of all the living and the dead at the end of the ages. XVII. Thence, with all the saints, he will come to render judgment, to give to each one the reward properly due, according to what each has done while placed in the body, whether good or evil (1 Cor. 5:10). We believe that the holy catholic Church, purchased with the price of his blood, will reign with him in perpetuity. Within whose bosom placed, we believe in one baptism; and we confess it for the remission of all sins. Under which faith, and the resurrection of the dead, we truly believe, and we await the joys of the future age.
stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:13 · narrativemedium
Source
Hoc tantum nobis orandum est, et petendum ut cum peracto, finitoque judicio tradiderit Filius reBoum Dco et Patri, participes nos efficiat regni sui, ut qui per hanc fidem illi inhaeremus cum illo sine fine regnemus. Haec a est confessionis nostræ fides exposita, per quam hæreticorum dogma perimitur, per quam fidelium corda mundantur, per quam etiam ad Deum gloriose acceditur, cujus sacrosanclo sapore sub triduano dierum jejunio continua relationum collatione ructantes ad ea, quae subnixa sunt sequenti die expouenda transivimus.
English
We must only pray and ask that, when the Son has handed over the kingdoms to God the Father, the judgment having been completed and finished, he make us participants in his kingdom, so that we who through this faith cling to him may reign with him without end. This is the faith of our confession set forth, through which the dogma of heretics is destroyed, through which the hearts of the faithful are purified, through which also one approaches God gloriously, and, belching forth its sacrosanct flavor with a continuous collation of relations under a three-day fast, we have passed on to those things which are to be set forth on the following day.
Citation. Tergwame, “De Sanctissima Trinitate Confessio”, stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/stoa0120f.stoa002.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0064 · generated 2026-11-15.