Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Coena [Falso Inscripta] is a late antique Latin text falsely attributed to Cyprian of Carthage. Its title, meaning 'Supper,' suggests a meal setting, likely a symposium or polemical allegory. The work survives in a single manuscript tradition with no early citations, and its attribution to Cyprian is a later scribal addition. Dated to the 3rd century on stylistic and thematic grounds, this dating relies solely on internal evidence. The text was included in some early modern editions of Cyprian's works but excluded from the critical edition by Hartel (CSEL). It has no known liturgical or canonical use. The base text for this edition comes from a single printed source (ogl-pl) without collation against other witnesses.
The Coena is significant as an example of early Christian parody or allegory, offering insight into the literary creativity of late antique Christianity. Its false attribution to Cyprian illustrates the dynamics of pseudepigraphy and canon formation. The work's survival, though fragmentary, contributes to the corpus of Pseudo-Cyprianic literature, which includes diverse genres from satire to exegesis. It also highlights the challenges of editing texts with uncertain transmission and no external witnesses.
The Coena is a product of late antique Latin Christianity, likely composed in North Africa or the western Mediterranean, where Pseudo-Cyprianic literature flourished. Its date is uncertain, with the 3rd century proposed based on stylistic parallels to other early Christian satire, but no external evidence confirms this. The text's survival in a single manuscript tradition suggests limited circulation, possibly within monastic or scholarly circles. Its false attribution to Cyprian reflects a common practice of ascribing anonymous works to authoritative figures to enhance their prestige. The work's genre—a parodic or allegorical banquet list—resembles the Cena Cypriani, another Pseudo-Cyprianic text, and may engage with contemporary debates on heresy or morality. The lack of early citations or manuscript colophons hinders precise dating and provenance, leaving its community and original context obscure.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||