Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Sermo De Obedientia Et Humilitate is a Latin homily traditionally attributed to Augustine of Hippo but of uncertain authorship. Surviving in multiple medieval manuscript families, it is often grouped with other minor Augustinian homilies. The sermon's style and theology align with late fourth- to early fifth-century North African preaching, though no firm date can be assigned. It was cited in medieval monastic florilegia on obedience and humility, influencing Benedictine and Cistercian spirituality, and appears in the Breviarium Monasticum for the season after Pentecost. The present edition reproduces a single early printed source without manuscript collation, leaving variant readings, especially in biblical citations, unrecorded.
The sermon is significant for its influence on medieval monastic spirituality, particularly within Benedictine and Cistercian traditions, where it was used in florilegia on obedience and humility. Its uncertain attribution highlights the challenges of authenticating works in the Augustinian corpus, while its stable manuscript tradition and liturgical use underscore its enduring appeal in monastic contexts.
The sermon's textual tradition is relatively stable but lacks a critical edition. It survives in multiple medieval manuscript families, often grouped with other minor Augustinian homilies. Attribution to Augustine is traditional but unconfirmed by external witnesses; the style and theology are consistent with late fourth- to early fifth-century North African preaching, but no firm date can be assigned. The homily was cited in medieval monastic florilegia on obedience and humility, influencing Benedictine and Cistercian spirituality, and appears in the Breviarium Monasticum for the season after Pentecost. The present edition (ogl-pl) reproduces a single early printed source without collation against manuscripts, leaving variant readings, especially in biblical citations, unrecorded. The reference to Ham's curse (Genesis 9:25) and a citation attributed to Daniel 13:50 (possibly from the deuterocanonical Susanna and the Elders) suggest engagement with both canonical and deuterocanonical texts. A loose citation of Luke 10:16 or a similar synoptic passage indicates imprecise biblical referencing, possibly due to scribal error.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||