Work dossier · summary and historical context
The De Altercatione Ecclesiae Et Synagogae Dialogus is a fictional debate between personified Church and Synagogue, a common late-antique and medieval polemical genre. Transmitted among Augustine's writings, its authenticity is doubted by modern scholarship, which considers it pseudepigraphical. The work survives in numerous manuscripts, often appended to genuine Augustinian texts, and its inclusion in the Patrologia Latina reflects medieval attribution rather than critical consensus. Usually dated to the 5th century, the dialogue influenced medieval anti-Jewish polemic and canon law collections, and its allegorical format was widely imitated. No external evidence securely places it in Augustine's lifetime or corpus, and the text shows scribal corruptions. Readers should consult the Clavis Patrum Latinorum for manuscript stemma.
The dialogue is a key example of the late-antique and medieval literary genre of personified religious disputation. It influenced medieval anti-Jewish polemic and was cited in canon law collections. Its allegorical format was imitated in later disputation literature. Though pseudepigraphical, it shaped the reception of Augustine's thought on Jewish-Christian relations and remains important for studying the history of Christian anti-Judaism and the transmission of patristic texts.
The dialogue is typically dated to the 5th century, but its place and community of origin remain uncertain. It survives in Latin manuscripts, often appended to works of Augustine, reflecting a medieval ascription that modern scholars (e.g., G. F. Diercks) reject as pseudepigraphical. The genre of personified debate between Church and Synagogue was common in late antiquity and the early Middle Ages, often used for anti-Jewish polemic. The work's transmission is tied to the broader manuscript tradition of Augustine's corpus, from which it was rarely separated. Its influence extended into medieval canon law and disputation literature. The text shows signs of scribal corruption (e.g., 'nogotia' for 'negotia'), suggesting a complex transmission history. No external evidence securely places it in Augustine's lifetime, and its superscription is a medieval addition.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||