ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Homilies ·

Sermones. De Urbis Excidio

Augustinus · ogl-pl

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 17 passages · 4,188 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

Augustine's sermon 'De Urbis Excidio' was delivered shortly after the Visigothic sack of Rome in 410, likely in 411 or early 412. It addresses both Christian and pagan crises, offering a pastoral response to the disaster. The sermon survives in multiple manuscript families, with the text in OGL-PL based on the Maurist edition (1679–1700), collated against earlier codices. It was excerpted in medieval homiliaries and cited by later authors such as Bede and Aquinas for its theodicy and critique of pagan gods, shaping Western views on divine providence. Augustine uses classical exempla and biblical figures like Daniel to reframe pagan narratives for Christian moral instruction.

This sermon is a key early response to the sack of Rome, shaping Christian theodicy and apologetics. It influenced later thinkers like Bede and Aquinas, and its use of biblical figures like Daniel became a standard patristic topos in penitential literature. The sermon also illustrates Augustine's homiletic strategy of reframing pagan narratives for Christian moral instruction.

Historical context

The sermon was delivered in Hippo Regius (modern Annaba, Algeria) in the early 5th century, shortly after the Visigothic sack of Rome in 410. This event shocked the Roman world, prompting pagan accusations that Christianity had weakened the empire and Christian despair over divine justice. Augustine, as bishop of Hippo, responded with this homily to console his congregation and defend Christian faith. The sermon survives in Latin, transmitted through multiple manuscript families; the OGL-PL edition relies on the Maurist edition, which collated earlier codices but did not record variants from the earliest extant manuscripts (e.g., Verona LVIII [49]). It was later excerpted in medieval homiliaries and cited by Bede and Aquinas, influencing Western theodicy. The sermon's genre is a homily, employing rhetorical strategies that reframe classical exempla for Christian moral instruction.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

100 commentary units 24 scripture17 structure17 background13 reception10 term9 caution6 sense4 parallel 0 derived notes 29 open questions 17 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: homily in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 17 narrative.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-pl — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:1 · narrativehigh
Source
S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI DE URBIS EXCIDIO SERMO. CAPUT PRIMUM. — 1. Danielis exemplo confitentis peccala sua, redarguit eos qui de Urbis excidio murmurant contra Deum. Noe, Daniel et Job, quos significent. Intueamur primam lectionem sancti Danielis propl:elae, uhi cum audivimus orantem, ct mirati sumus, non solum peccata populi sui, fed et sua propria confiontem. Nam post ipsam orationem, cujus quidem verba indicabant eum non solum depre. catorem, sed etiam confessorem; post ipsam ergo orationem, tum orarem, inquit, et confiterer peccata mea et peccata populi mei Domino Deo meo (Dan. ix, 20). Quis ergo est qui se sine peccato esse profiteatur, cum Daniel peccata propria confitetur? Nam superbo cuidam dictum est per Ezrchielem prophetum: Numquid tu sapientior quam Daniel (Ezech. XXVIII, 5)? In trihus item quihusdam sanctis viris, per quos tria genera hominum significat Deus quæ liberaturus est, quando magna tribulatio superventura est generi humano, eliam hunc Danielem posuit: et dixit quod nemo inde liberabitur, nisi Noe, Daniel et Joh ( Id. XIV, 14). Et quidem manifestum est quod in Itis tribus nominibus tria quædam, ut dixi, genera hominum significat Deus.
English
Sermon of Saint Aurelius Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, on the Destruction of the City. Chapter 1. — 1. By the example of Daniel confessing his own sins, he refutes those who murmur against God concerning the destruction of the City. What Noah, Daniel, and Job signify. Let us consider the first reading of the holy prophet Daniel, where we heard him praying, and we marveled, not only that he confessed the sins of his people, but also his own. For after that prayer itself, the words of which indeed indicated that he was not only a suppliant but also a confessor; after that prayer, therefore, he says: “While I was praying, I confessed my sins and the sins of my people to my Lord God” (Dan. 9:20). Who, then, is there who professes to be without sin, when Daniel confesses his own sins? For it was said to a certain proud man through the prophet Ezekiel: “Are you wiser than Daniel?” (Ezek. 28:5). Likewise, among certain three holy men, through whom God signifies the three kinds of people whom he is to liberate when a great tribulation is about to come upon the human race, he also placed this Daniel: and he said that no one will be liberated from it except Noah, Daniel, and Job (Ezek. 14:14). And indeed it is clear that in these three names God signifies three certain kinds of people, as I have said.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:2 · narrativehigh
Source
Jam enim tres illi viri dormierunt, et apud Deum sunt spiritus eorum, et corpura eorum in terra fluxerunt: exspectant resurrectioncm et ad dexterum collocationem, nec aliquam in hoc mundo tribulationem timent, unde se cupiant liberari. Quomodo ergo de illa tribulatione liberabuntur Noe, Daniel et Job? Quando dicebat ista Ezechiel, solus forsitan Daniel in corpore fuit. Nam Noe et Job jam olim dormierant, et somno mortis patribus appositi fuerant. Quomodo ergo potcrant de imminente tribulatione liberari, jam oliin de carne liberali? Sed in Noe significantur boni præpositi qui regunt et gu. bernant Ecclesiam, quomodo Noe in diluvio gubernavit arcam. III Daniele significantur omnes sancti continentes: in Job omnes conjugati juste ct bene vivcntes. Hæc enim tria genera bominum de illa tribulatione liberat Dens. Tamen quantum sit commendatus Daniel, cx hoc apparet, quod unus ex illis tribus meruit nominari: et tamen confitetur peccata sua. Daniele ergo confitente peccata sua, cujus superbia non contremiscal, cujus inflatio non rcsidat, cujus tumor et clatio non cobibeatur? Quis glorietur castum se habere cor, aut quis glorietur mundum se esse a peccaio (Prov. xx, 9)?
English
For already those three men have fallen asleep, and their spirits are with God, and their bodies have flowed away in the earth: they await the resurrection and the placing at the right hand, and they fear no tribulation in this world from which they might wish to be freed. How then will Noah, Daniel, and Job be freed from that tribulation? When Ezekiel was saying these things, perhaps Daniel alone was still in the body. For Noah and Job had long since fallen asleep, and had been laid to rest with the sleep of death among their fathers. How then could they be freed from an impending tribulation, having already long since been freed from the flesh? But in Noah are signified the good prelates who rule and govern the Church, as Noah governed the ark in the flood. In Daniel are signified all the continent saints: in Job, all the married who live justly and well. For these three kinds of people God frees from that tribulation. Yet how much Daniel is commended appears from this, that he was worthy to be named as one of those three: and yet he confesses his sins. Therefore, with Daniel confessing his sins, whose pride does not tremble, whose inflation does not subside, whose swelling and elation is not restrained? Who shall boast that he has a chaste heart, or who shall boast that he is clean from sin (Prov. 20:9)?
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:3 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPET II. — Cur Deus non pepercit Urbi propter justos. Justi duobus modis. Et mirantur homines, ei utinam tantum mirarentur, et non etiam blasphemarent, quaudo corripit Deus genus humanum, et flagellis pite castigationis exagitat, exercens ante judicium disciplinam, ct plerumque non eligens quem flagellet, nolens invenire quem damnet. Flagellat enim simul justos Ut injustos: quanquam quis justus, si Daniel peccata propria confitetur? i. Lecta cst ante dies lectio libri Genescos, quæ nos. nisi fallor, multum fecit intentos, ubi Abraham dicit Domino, utrum si inveniat in civitate quinquaginta justos, parcat civitati propter eos, an cum ipsis perdat civitatem. Et respondit ci Dominus, quod si inveniat in civitate quinquaginta justos, parcat civitati. Dciude Abraham adjecit ad interrogationem, et quxsivit utrum si minus fuerint quinque, et remaneant quadraginta quinque, similiter parcat. Respondit Deus, parcere se et propter quadraginta quinque. Quid multa? Paulatim interrogando, et ex illo numcro detrahendo pervenit ad decem, et quæsivit a Domino, utrum si decem justos in civitate compererit, perdat eos cum reliquis innumerabilibus malis, an propter decem justos parcat potius civitati. Respondit Deus, etiam propter decem justos non se perdere civitatem (Gen. XVIII, 23-32). Quid ergo dicimus, fratres?
English
CHAPTER II. — Why God Did Not Spare the City for the Sake of the Righteous. The Righteous in Two Ways. And men marvel, and would that they only marveled and did not also blaspheme, when God chastises the human race and shakes it with the scourges of paternal correction, exercising discipline before the judgment and often not choosing whom He scourges, unwilling to find whom He condemns. For He scourges the just together with the unjust: although who is just, if Daniel confesses his own sins? i. A reading from the book of Genesis was read some days ago, which, unless I am mistaken, made us very attentive, where Abraham says to the Lord, whether if he finds fifty just men in a city, He will spare the city for their sake, or will destroy the city along with them. And the Lord answered him, that if he finds fifty just men in a city, He will spare the city. Then Abraham added to the inquiry and asked whether if there were fewer than five, and forty-five remained, He would similarly spare. God answered that He would spare even for forty-five. What more? By gradually questioning and subtracting from that number, he came to ten, and asked the Lord whether if he found ten just men in a city, He would destroy them along with the countless wicked, or rather spare the city for the sake of ten just men. God answered that He would not destroy the city even for ten just men (Gen. 18:23-32). What then do we say, brothers?
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:4 · narrativehigh
Source
Occurrit enin nobis quæstio valida ct vehemens, preserlim ab hominibus qui Scripturis nostris impietate insidiantur, non qui eas pietate perquirunt; et dicunt, maxime de recenti excidio tantæ urbis: Non erant Romae quinquaginta justi? In tanto numero fidelium, tanto numero sanctimonialium, continentium, tanto numero servorum et ancillarum Dci, nec quinqnaginta justi inveniri potuerunt, nec quadraginta, nec triginta, nec viginti, nec decem? Si autem incredibilc est, quare non Deus propter quinquaginta, vel etiam propter decem justos pepercit illi civitati? Scriptura non fallit, si se homo non fallat. Cum da justitia quæritur, et Deus de justitia respondet; justos quærit ad regulam divinam, non ad regulam humanam. Cito ergo respondeo: Aut invenit ibi tot justos, et pepercit civitati; aut si non pepercit civitati, nec justos invenit. Sed respondetur mihi, manifestum, esse quod Deus non pepercit civitati. Respondeo ego: Ino mihi non est manifestum. Perditio enim civitatis ibi facta non est, sicut in Sodomis facta est. De Sodomis enim quæstio crat, quando Deum Abraham in-, terrogavit. Deus autem dixit, Non perdam civitatem: uon dixit, Non flagello civitatem. Sodomis non pepercit, Sodomam perdidit: Sodomam penitus igne consumpsit, quam ad judicium non distulit, sed in eam exercuit quod aliis malis ad judicium reservavit.
English
A strong and pressing question arises for us, especially from men who assail our Scriptures with impiety, not from those who search them with piety; and they say, especially concerning the recent destruction of so great a city: Were there not fifty just men in Rome? In so great a number of the faithful, so great a number of nuns and celibates, so great a number of servants and handmaidens of God, could not even fifty just men be found, nor forty, nor thirty, nor twenty, nor ten? But if it is incredible, why did God not spare that city for the sake of fifty, or even for the sake of ten just men? Scripture does not deceive, if man does not deceive himself. When justice is sought, and God answers concerning justice, He seeks the just according to a divine rule, not according to a human rule. Therefore I answer quickly: Either He found so many just men there, and He spared the city; or if He did not spare the city, He found no just men. But it is answered to me that it is manifest that God did not spare the city. I answer: It is not manifest to me. For the destruction of the city did not happen there as it happened in Sodom. For the question was about Sodom, when Abraham questioned God. But God said, I will not destroy the city: He did not say, I will not scourge the city. He did not spare Sodom, He destroyed Sodom: He utterly consumed Sodom with fire, which He did not defer for judgment, but He inflicted upon it what He reserves for other evil men for judgment.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:5 · narrativehigh
Source
Prorsus nullus de Sodomis evasit; nihil hominis relictum est, nihil pecoris, nihil domorum: cuncta omnino ignis absorbuit. Ecce quomodo Deus perdidit civitatem. Ab urbe autem Roma quam multi exierunt et redituri sunt, quam multi manserunt et evaserunt, quam multi in locis sanctis nee tangi potuerunt! Sed captivi, inquiunt, multi ducti sunt. Hoc et Daniel, non ad supplicium suum, sed ad solatium cæterorum. Sed multi, inquiunt, occisi sunt. Hoc et tot justi Prophet:e a sanguine Abel usque ad sanguinem Zachariae (Matth. XXIII, 35): hoc etiam tut Apostoli, hoc ipse Dominus Prophetarum et Apostolorum. Sed multi, inquiunt, tormentis variis excruciati sunt. Putamusne quisquam tantum quantum Job? Horrenda nobis nuntiata sunt; strages facta, incendia, rapinae, interfectiones, excruciationes hominum. Verum est, multa audivimus, omnia gcmuimas, sape flevimus, vix consolati sumus; non abnuo, non nego multa nos audisse, multa in illa urbe esse commissa.
English
Absolutely no one escaped from Sodom; nothing of man was left, nothing of beast, nothing of houses: fire consumed everything entirely. Behold how God destroyed that city. But from the city of Rome, how many have departed and will return, how many have remained and escaped, how many in holy places could not even be touched! "But captives," they say, "many were led away." This too was Daniel, not for his own punishment, but for the consolation of the rest. "But many," they say, "were killed." This too happened to all the just prophets from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zacharias (Matthew 23:35): this also to the Apostles themselves, this to the Lord Himself of the Prophets and Apostles. "But many," they say, "were tortured with various torments." Do we think anyone suffered as much as Job? Horrible things have been reported to us: slaughter has occurred, fires, plunderings, killings, tortures of men. It is true, we have heard many things, we have groaned over everything, we have often wept, we have been scarcely consoled; I do not deny, I do not gainsay that we have heard many things, that many things were committed in that city.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:6 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT III. — In rastatione Urbis nihil gravius accidit calamitate Job. Vcrumtamcn, fratres mei (intendat Charitas vestra quod dico), audivimus librum sancti Job, quod perditis rebus, perditis filis, nec ipsam carnem quae illi sola remanserat, salvum ponit obtinere; sed percussus gravi vulnere a capite usque ad pedes, sedebat in stercore, putrescens ulcere, sanie fluens, vermibus scatens, tormentis acerbissimis dolorum cruciatus. Si nobis sic nuntiaretur universa civitas sedere, sedere, inquam, civitas universa, nullo ibi sano, in gravissimo vulnere, et sic putrescere vermibus vivos, quomodo mortui putruerunt: quod erat gravius? hocne, an illud bellum? Puto quod mitius in carnem humanam ferrum saeviret, quam vermes; tolerabilius de vulneribus sanguis erumperet, quam de putredine sanies distillaret. Cadaver corrumpi respicis, et horrescis: sed idco minor paena, quod absens anima. At vero in Job præsens anima quae sentiret, ligata ne fugeret, subjecia ut doleret, compuncta ut blaspbemaret 1. Sustinuit autem I tribulationem Job, et deputatum est illi ad magnam justitiam. Non ergo quisquam attendat quid patiatur, sed quid faciat. Homo, in eo quod pateris, potestas tua non est: in eo quod facis, voluntas tua vel nocens vel innocens est.
English
CHAPTER III. — In the sacking of the City, nothing more grievous befell than the calamity of Job. But, my brothers (let your Charity attend to what I say), we have heard the book of holy Job: that after losing his property, after losing his sons, he could not even keep safe the flesh that alone remained to him; but, struck with a severe wound from head to foot, he sat in dung, rotting with sores, flowing with pus, teeming with worms, tormented by the most bitter agonies of pain. If we were told that a whole city sat thus—sat, I say, a whole city, with no one healthy, in the gravest wound, and rotted alive with worms as the dead rot—which would be more grievous: this, or that war? I think the sword would rage more mildly against human flesh than worms; blood would burst more tolerably from wounds than pus drip from putrefaction. You look at a corpse decaying and you shudder: but that is a lesser punishment because the soul is absent. But in Job, the soul was present, feeling, bound so that it could not flee, subjected so that it might suffer, pierced so that it might blaspheme. Yet he endured the tribulation of Job, and it was counted to him as great righteousness. Therefore, let no one attend to what he suffers, but to what he does. Man, in what you suffer, your power is not yours; in what you do, your will is either harmful or innocent.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:7 · narrativehigh
Source
Patiebatur Job, stabat mulier relicta sola, non ad consolationem, sed ad tentaticnem; non quoe afferret medicinam, sed quae moneret blasphemiam: Dic aliquid, inquit, in Deum, et morere. Videte quemadmodum illi mori beneficium fuit, et tale beneficium nemo dabat. Sed in bis omnibus quae sancta anima sustinebat, patientia exercebatur, fides probabatur, mulier confutabatur, diabolus vincebatur. Spectaculum magnum, et in illa foeditate putredinis praeclara pulchritudo virtutis I Vastat latenter inimicus: aperte malum suadet inimica; adjutorium diaboli, non mariti; Eva nova, sed ille non vetus Adam: Dic aliquid in Deum, et movere. Blasphemando extorque, quod precando non pates impetrare. Locuta es, inquit, tanquam una ex insipientibus mulieribus. Attendite verba fortis fidelis; attendite verba furis putrescentis, intus integri: Locuta es, inquit, tanquam una ex insipientibus mulieribus. Si bona percepimus de manu Domini, mala non sustinebimus (Job I, et II)? Pater est; numquid amandus blandiens, et respuendus corripiens? Nonne patcr est, et promittens vitam, et imponens disciplinam? Exciditne tibi: Fili, accedens ad servitutem Dei, sta in justitia et timore, et pra'para animam tuam ud tentationem?
English
Job suffered; his wife was left alone, not for consolation, but for temptation; not to bring medicine, but to urge blasphemy: "Say something," she said, "against God, and die." See how for him death was a benefit, and such a benefit no one was giving. But in all these things which the holy soul endured, patience was exercised, faith was tested, the wife was refuted, the devil was conquered. A great spectacle, and in that foulness of decay, the splendid beauty of virtue! The enemy ravages secretly; the enemy openly urges evil; the devil's helper, not a husband's; a new Eve, but he was not the old Adam: "Say something against God, and die." "Wrest from me by blaspheming what you cannot obtain by praying." "You have spoken," he said, "like one of the foolish women." Attend to the words of the strong, faithful man; attend to the words of the man rotting on the outside, whole within: "You have spoken," he said, "like one of the foolish women. If we have received good things from the hand of the Lord, shall we not endure evil things?" (Job 1 and 2). He is a father; is he to be loved when he caresses, and rejected when he corrects? Is he not a father, both when promising life and when imposing discipline? Has it slipped your mind: "Son, approaching the service of God, stand in justice and fear, and prepare your soul for temptation"?
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:8 · narrativehigh
Source
Omne quod tibi applicitum fuerit, accipe; et in dolore sustine, et in humilitate tua patienrium habe: quoniam in igne probatur aurum et argenium, homines vero acceptabiles in camino humiliationis (Eccli. II, 1-5)? Exciditne tibi: Quem enim diUgit Dominus, corripit; flagellat autem omnem Filium quem recipit (Prov. III, ii, et Hebr. XII, 6)? CAPUT IV. —4. Cruciatus temporales cum gehenna comparati quam leves. Cogita quoslibet cruciatus, extende animum in quaslibet in hac vita poenas humanas; compara ad gehennam, et Icve cst omne qund cogitas. Hic temporalis, ibi æternus cst, et Qui torquct et qui torquetur. Numquid adhuc patiuntur, qui illo tempore passi sunt, quoRoma vastata esi? Dives autem ille adhuc apud inferos patitur (Luc. XVI, 1926). Arsit, ardet, ardebit; vivet usque ad judicium: recipiet carnem, non ad beneficium, sed ad supplicium. Illas pœnas timeamus, si Deum timemus. Quidquid hic passus fuerit homo, si corrigatur, emendatio est: si nec sic corrigatur, duplex damnatio est. Et hic enim luit poenas temporales, et ibi experictur alternas. Dico Charitati vestrae, fratres: martyres certe sanctos laudamus, glorificamus, admiramur; dies eorum pia solemnitate celebramus, merita eoram veneramur, et, si possumus, imitamur.
English
Everything that is applied to you, accept; and in pain endure, and in your humility have patience: for gold and silver are tested in fire, but acceptable men in the furnace of humiliation (Ecclus. 2:1-5)? Has it escaped you: For whom the Lord loves, he corrects; and he scourges every Son whom he receives (Prov. 3:12, and Heb. 12:6)? CHAPTER IV. — 4. Temporal torments compared to gehenna, how light. Think of any torments, stretch your mind to any human punishments in this life; compare them to gehenna, and everything you think of is light. Here it is temporal, there it is eternal, both the one who tortures and the one who is tortured. Do those who suffered at that time when Rome was laid waste still suffer? But that rich man still suffers in the underworld (Luke 16:19-26). He burned, he burns, he will burn; he will live until the judgment: he will receive flesh, not as a benefit, but as a punishment. Let us fear those punishments, if we fear God. Whatever a man suffers here, if he is corrected, it is correction: if he is not corrected even so, it is a double damnation. For here he pays temporal penalties, and there he will experience eternal ones. I say to Your Charity, brothers: we certainly praise, glorify, and admire the holy martyrs; we celebrate their days with pious solemnity, we venerate their merits, and, if we can, we imitate them.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:9 · narrativehigh
Source
Est profecto, est magna martyrum gloria; sed nescio utrum minor gloria fuit sancti Job: nec tamen ei dicebatur, Thus pone idolis, sacrifica diis alienis, nega Christum; dicebatur tamen, Blasphema Deum. Nec dicebatur, ut intelligeretur, Si blasphomavoris, putredo omnis abscessura sanitasque reditura cst: sed, Si blasphomaveris, dicebat inepta et insulsa mulier, morieris, et moriendo tormentis carebis. Quasi vero morienti blasphemo non aeternus dolor succederet. Mulier fatua praesentis putredinis horrebat molestiam, aeternam flammam minime cogitabat. Ferebat ille præsens malum, ne incideret in futurum. Tenebat cor a mala cogitatione, linguam a maledicto; servabat animae integritatem in putredine corporis. Videbat quid in futurum evadebat; ideo quod patiebatur, ferebat. Sic, sic unusquisque christianus quando aliquam afflictionem corporis patitur, gehennas cogitet, ct videat quam leve est' quod patitur. Non murmuret adversum Deum, non dicai: Deus, quid tibi feci, quare ista patior? Imo dicat quod dixit ipse Job quamvis sanctus: Exquisisti omnia peccata mea, et ea tanquam in sacculo signasti (Job XIV, 16, 17). Non se ausus est dicere sine peccato, qui patiebatur, non ut puniretur, sed ut probaretur. Hoc dicat unusquisquo cum patitur.
English
Indeed, there is great glory of the martyrs; but I know not whether the glory of blessed Job was less; yet it was not said to him, "Burn incense to idols, sacrifice to alien gods, deny Christ"; it was said to him, however, "Blaspheme God." Nor was it said, so that he might understand, "If you blaspheme, all the rot will depart and health will return"; but, "If you blaspheme," said the foolish and senseless woman, "you will die, and by dying you will be free from torments." As if, for a dying blasphemer, eternal pain would not succeed. The foolish woman shuddered at the annoyance of present rot, but gave no thought to the eternal flame. He bore the present evil, lest he fall into a future one. He kept his heart from evil thought, his tongue from a curse; he preserved the integrity of his soul in the rot of his body. He saw what he was escaping in the future; therefore he bore what he suffered. Thus, thus every Christian, when he suffers some affliction of the body, should think of Gehenna and see how light is what he suffers. Let him not murmur against God, let him not say: "God, what have I done to you, why do I suffer this?" Rather let him say what Job himself, though holy, said: "You have searched out all my sins, and sealed them as in a sack" (Job 14:16, 17). He who suffered, not to be punished but to be tested, did not dare to call himself without sin. Let each one say this when he suffers.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:10 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT V. — 5. Justi Romæ an non exstiterint, ut propter ipsos Urbi parceretur. Peccata quæ non ficte confiteantur omnes habent. Fuerunt Romæ quinquaginta justi, imosi modum humanum consideres, millia justorum: si regulam perfectionis, nemo justorum existit. Quicumque Romæ qui se audeat justum dicere, a me non audit I: Numquid tu sapientior quam Daniel (Ezech. XXVIII, 3)? Audi ergo illum confitentem peccata sua (Dan. IX, 20). An forte cum confitebatur, mentiebatur? Hinc ergo habebat peccatum, quia de suis peccatis Deo mentiebatur. Sed aliquando argumentantur homines, et dicunt, Debet et homo justus Deo dicere quia peceator est: quamvis sciat nullum se habere peccatum, tamen dicat Deo, Habeo peccatum. Miror si ista consilii sanitas appellanda est. Quis te facit non habere peccatum? nonne Deus qui sanat animam Luam! Si tamen non habes peccatum. Nam considera; et invenies, non peccatum, sed pecrata. Tamen si prorsus uon habes peccatum, nonne illius beneficium est, cui dixisti: Ego dixi, Domine, miserere mei; sana animam meam, quoniam peccavi tibi (Psal. XL, 5)? Si ergo fine peccato est anima tua. sanata est omni modo anima tua: si sanata cst omni modo anima tua, quare ingratus es inedico tuo, ut dicas vulnus esse adhuc, ubi omnem unitatem ille jam fecit?
English
CHAPTER V. — 5. Whether there were any righteous in Rome, so that the city might be spared on their account. All have sins which they do not feign to confess. There were in Rome fifty righteous; if you consider the human measure, thousands of righteous; if you apply the rule of perfection, no one was righteous. Whoever in Rome dares to call himself righteous, I do not hear him: Are you wiser than Daniel (Ezekiel 28:3)? Listen, then, to him confessing his sins (Daniel 9:20). Or perhaps when he confessed, he was lying? From this, then, he had a sin, because he lied to God about his sins. But sometimes people argue and say, A righteous man ought to say to God that he is a sinner, even though he knows he has no sin; yet he should say to God, I have a sin. I wonder if this is to be called sound advice. Who makes you have no sin? Is it not God, who heals your soul? If, however, you have no sin. For consider; and you will find, not a sin, but sins. Yet if you have absolutely no sin, is it not the benefit of him to whom you said: I said, Lord, have mercy on me; heal my soul, because I have sinned against you (Psalm 40:5)? If, therefore, your soul is without sin, your soul is completely healed; if your soul is completely healed, why are you ungrateful to your physician, so that you say there is still a wound, where he has already made complete unity?
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:11 · narrativehigh
Source
Si corpus tuum languidum aut vulneratum medico ostenderes, et rogares ut tibi adhiberet curandi diligentiam, atque ille faceret, sanumque et incolumem redderet, et tu adhuc diceres, Non sum sanus: nonne esses medico ingratus? nonne esses in medicum contumeliosus? Si et Deus sanavit te, audes dicere, Adhuc vulnus habco? nec times ne tibi respondeat, Ergo ego nihil egi, aut totum quod egi effudi; non accipio mercedem, non mereor vel landen.! Avertat Deus hanc amentiam, et hanc argumentationem vanam. Dicat homo, Peccator sum, quia peccator est: dicat, Peccatum habeo, quia peccatum habet. Non enim si non habet, sapientior est quam Daniel. Ergo, fratres mei, illam quæstionem aliquando determinem. Si justi sic appellandi sunt, sicut modo quodam humano justi appellantur, secundum quamdam conversationem qua inter homines vivunt sine querela: multi tales Romæ; et propter bos pepercit Deus, multi evaserunt: sed et eis qui mortui sunt, pepercit Deus. Mortui enim in bona vita et vera justitia, in bona fide, nonne aerumnis rerum humanarum caruerunt, et ad divinum refrigerium pervenerunt? Mortui sunt poSt tribulationes, quomodo pauper ille aute januam divitis. Sed passi sunt famem? passus est et ille. Passi sunt vulnera? passus est et ille: forte minus eos canes linxerunt. Mortui sunt?
English
If you were to show your body, sick or wounded, to a physician, and ask him to apply his healing care, and he did so, and restored you to health and safety, and you still said, "I am not well," would you not be ungrateful to the physician? Would you not be insulting to the physician? If God also has healed you, do you dare to say, "I still have a wound"? Do you not fear that he might answer you, "Then I have done nothing, or I have poured out all that I did; I accept no fee, I deserve no praise"? May God avert this madness, and this vain argument. Let a man say, "I am a sinner," because he is a sinner: let him say, "I have sin," because he has sin. For if he does not have it, he is not wiser than Daniel. Therefore, my brothers, let us at last settle that question. If the righteous are to be called so in a certain human manner, according to a certain way of life by which they live among men without reproach: there were many such in Rome; and on account of them God spared them, and many escaped: but even those who died, God spared them. For those who died in a good life and true righteousness, in good faith, did they not escape the hardships of human affairs and arrive at divine refreshment? They died after tribulations, like that poor man before the rich man's door. Did they suffer hunger? He also suffered. Did they suffer wounds? He also suffered: perhaps the dogs licked them less. Did they die?
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:12 · narrativehigh
Source
mortuus est ct ille: sed quo fine audi: Contigit, inquit, mori inopem ilium, et auferri ab Angelis in sinum Abrahæ. (Luc. xvi, 20-22). CAPUT VI.—6. Quomodo Urbi Deus pepercit propter justos. Constantinopolis terrore imminentis sibi incendii emendata divinitus et servata. Utinam videre possemus oculis animas sanctorum qui in illo bello mortui sunt; tunc videretis quomodo Deus pepercerit civitati. Millia enim sanctorum in refrigerio sunt, lactantium et dicentium Dco: Gratias libi, quia nos a carnis molestiis et tormentis eruisti. Gratias tibi, quia jam nec barbaros, nec diabolum formidamus; non timemus in terra tamem, non timemus grandinem, non timemus hostem, non timemus lictorem, non timemus oppressorem: sed sumus in terra mortui. apud te, Deus, non morituri, in regno tuo salvi, dono tuo, non merito nostro. Qualis civitas est humilium quæ ista dicit? An putatis civitatem in parietibus deputandam? Civitas in civibus est, non in parietibus. Denique si diceret Deus Sodomitis, Fugite, quia incensurus sum locum istum. nonne magnum meritum eos habere diceremus, si fugerent, et flamma de cælo descendens mœnia parietesque vastaret? Nonne Deus pepercerat civitati, quia civitas migraverat, et perniciem illius ignis evaserat?
English
He also died: but hear the outcome. "It happened," he says, "that the poor man died and was carried away by angels into the bosom of Abraham" (Luke 16:20-22). Chapter VI.—6. How God spared the city because of the righteous. Constantinople, corrected by the terror of an imminent fire, was divinely saved. If only we could see with our eyes the souls of the saints who died in that war; then you would see how God spared the city. For thousands of saints are in a place of refreshment, rejoicing and saying to God: "Thank you, because you have freed us from the troubles and torments of the flesh. Thank you, because now we fear neither barbarians nor the devil; we do not fear famine on earth, we do not fear hail, we do not fear the enemy, we do not fear the executioner, we do not fear the oppressor: but we are dead on earth, with you, O God, not about to die, safe in your kingdom, by your gift, not by our own merit." What kind of city is this of the humble that speaks thus? Or do you think that a city is to be reckoned in its walls? A city is in its citizens, not in its walls. Finally, if God were to say to the Sodomites, "Flee, because I am about to burn this place," would we not say that they had great merit if they fled, and the flame descending from heaven laid waste the walls and buildings? Did not God spare the city, because the city had migrated and escaped the destruction of that fire?
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:13 · narrativehigh
Source
Nonne ante paucos annos, Arcadio imperatore Constantinopoli (quod dice, audiunt nonnulli forsitan qui noverunt, et sunt in hoc popnlo qui et illic praesentes fuerunt), volens Deus terrere civitatem, et terrendo emendare, terrendo convertere, terrendo mundare, terrendo mutare, servo cuidam suo fideli, viro, ut dicitur, niilitari, venit in revelatione, et dixit ei civitatem venturo de caelo igne perituram; eumque admonuit ut episcopo diceret. Dictum est; non contempsit episcopus, et allocutus est populum; conversa est civitas in luctum pœnitentiæ, quemadmodum quondam illa antiqua Ninive (Jonæ III, 5). Tac. men ne putarent homines illum qui dixerat vel falsitate deceptum vel fallacia decepisse, venit dies quein Deus fuerat comminatus: intentis omnibus et exitum cum timore magno exspectantibus, noctis initio tenebrante jam mundo, visa est ignea nubes ab oriedte, primo parva, deinde paulatim ut accedebat super civitatem ita crescebat, donec toti urbi ignis terribiliter immineret. Videbatur horrenda ftamma pendere, nec odor sulphuris deerat. Omnes ad ecclesiam con fugiebant, non capiebat multitudinem locus. Raptismum extorquebat quisque a quo poterat. Non solum in ecclesia, sed etiam per domos, per vicos ac plateas salus Sacramenti exigebatur; ut fugeretur ira, non præsens utique, sed futura.
English
Was it not within the last few years, under the Emperor Arcadius at Constantinople (which I say, perhaps some who know hear, and there are in this congregation those who were present there), that God, wishing to terrify the city, and by terrifying to correct, by terrifying to convert, by terrifying to purify, by terrifying to change, came in a revelation to a certain faithful servant of his, a military man, as he is called, and said to him that the city would perish by fire coming from heaven; and he advised him to tell the bishop. It was told; the bishop did not disregard it, and he addressed the people; the city turned to the lament of penance, just as that ancient Nineveh once did (Jonah 3:5). Lest men think that the one who had spoken was either deceived by falsehood or had deceived by deceit, the day came which God had threatened: with all intent and awaiting the outcome with great fear, at the beginning of night, as the world was already growing dark, a fiery cloud was seen from the east, at first small, then gradually as it approached the city it grew, until it hung over the whole city with terrible fire. A horrible flame seemed to hang, and the smell of sulfur was not lacking. All fled to the church; the place could not hold the multitude. Each person demanded baptism from whomever they could. Not only in the church, but also through homes, through streets and squares, the safety of the Sacrament was demanded; so that the wrath might be fled, not the present one, of course, but the future one.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:14 · narrativehigh
Source
Tamen post magnam i!lam tribulationem, ubi exhibuit Deus fidem verbis suis, et revelationi servi sui, coepit, ut creverat, minui nubes, paulatimque consumpta est. Populus securus paululum factus, iterum audivit omnino esso migrandum, quod civitas esset proximo sabbato peritura. Migravit cum Imperatore tota civitas; nenio in domo remansit, nemo domum clausit: longe recedens a moenibus, et dulcia tecta respiciens, relictis charissimis sedibus voce miserabili valefccit. Et aliquot millibus tanta illa multitudo progressa, uno tumen loco fundendis ad Deum orationibus congregata, magnum fumum subito vidit, et vocem magnam emisit ad Deum: tandemque tranquillitate conspecta, missis qui renuntiarent, sollicita quæ prædicta fuerat hora transacta, ct renuntiantibus quod salva universa mœnia et tecta consisterent, omnes cum ingenti gratulalione redierunt. Nemo de domo sua quidquam perdidit, patentem omnis homo sicut dimisit invcnit.
English
Yet after that great tribulation, where God showed the faithfulness of His words and of the revelation to His servant, the cloud began, as it had grown, to diminish, and was gradually consumed. The people, having been made secure for a little while, again heard that they must absolutely migrate, because the city was to perish on the coming Sabbath. The whole city migrated with the Emperor; no one remained in a house, no one shut up a house; withdrawing far from the walls and looking back at the dear roofs, they bade farewell to their most beloved homes with a pitiful cry. And when that great multitude had advanced several miles, yet gathered in one place to pour forth prayers to God, they suddenly saw a great smoke and sent forth a great cry to God; and finally, when calm was observed, having sent men to report back, anxious because the hour that had been predicted had passed, and with the reporters saying that all the walls and roofs stood safe, all returned with immense rejoicing. No one lost anything from his house; every man found his house open just as he had left it.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:15 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT Vn. — 8. Ut Constantinopolis ita et Roma a Deo correpta potius quam perdita. Quid dicemus? Utrum ista ira Dei. an potius miscricordia fuit? Qnis dubitet misericordissimum patrem corrigere voluisse, et terrendo, non perdendo punire, quando nihil hominum, nibil domorum, nihil moenium tanta impendens præsens calamitas I læsit? Prorsus sicut solent manus erigi ad feriendum, et consternato illo qui te tendus crat, miseratione revocari, ita factum est ilii civitati. Verumtamen si eo tempore, quo illa derelicta populus universus abscessit, irrueret vastitas loco, totamque urbem sicut Sodomam, nullis saltem ruinis remanentibus, perdidisset; quis etiam sic dubitaret quod Deus pepercisset illi civitati, qua præmonita et territa, et discedente atque migrante, locus ille consumeretur? Sic minime dubitandum est pepercisse Dcum Romanæ etiam civitati, quæ ante hostile incendium in multis ex multa parte migraverat. Migrarunt qui fagerunt, migrarunt qui de corpore exierunt: multi præsentes utcumque latuerunt, multi in lacis sanctis vivi salvique servati sunt. Manu ergo emendantis Dei correpta est potius civitas illa, quam perdita: tanquam servus sciens voluntatem domini sui, et faciens digna plagis, vapulabit multis (Luc. XII, 47).
English
CHAPTER V. — 8. How Constantinople, and likewise Rome, were corrected by God rather than destroyed. What shall we say? Was this the wrath of God, or rather mercy? Who would doubt that the most merciful Father wished to correct, and to punish by terrifying, not by destroying, when such a great impending calamity harmed no men, no houses, no walls? Just as hands are often raised to strike, and are withdrawn in compassion when the one who was to be struck is terrified, so it happened to that city. Yet if, at the time when that city was abandoned and the whole people departed, devastation had rushed upon the place and destroyed the entire city like Sodom, with no ruins even remaining, who would then doubt that God had spared that city, which, forewarned and terrified, with its people departing and migrating, that place would be consumed? Thus it is not to be doubted that God spared even the city of Rome, which, before the hostile fire, had in many ways and in large part migrated. Those who fled migrated; those who departed from the body migrated; many who were present hid themselves in some way; many were kept alive and safe in holy places. Therefore, that city was corrected by the hand of a correcting God rather than destroyed, like a servant who knows his master’s will and does things deserving of blows, and will be beaten (Luke 12:47).
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:16 · narrativehigh
Source
CAPUT VIII. — 9. Tribulationis temporalis utilitas. Atquentinam valeat ad exemplum timoris, et mala concupiscentia sitiens mundum, et appetens perfrui perniciosissimis voluptatibus, demonstrante Domino quam sint instabiles et caducæ omnes sæculi vanitates et insaniae mendaces, potius refrenetur, quam sub flagellis dignissimis adversus Dominum murmuretur. Sed unam tribulam sentit area, ut stipula concidatur, granum mundetur; unum ignem patitur fornax aurificis, ut palea in cinerem pergat, aErum sordibus careat: sie et unam tribulationem Roma pertulit, in qua vel emendatus vel liberatus est pius; impius autem damnatus est, sive ab bac vita raptus sit ubi magis poenas justissimas lueret, sive hic remanscrit ubi damnabilius blasphemaret, aut certe pro ineffabili clementia sua Deus, quos novit salvandos, pœnitentiœ reservaret1. Non ergo nos moveat labor piorum; exercitatio est, non damnatio. Nisi forte horremus cura videmus indigna et gravia in hac terra perpeti aliquem justum, et obliviscimur quæ pertulerit justus justorum sanctus. que sanctorum. Quod passa est universa illa civitas, passus est unus. Sed videte quis unus: Rex regum Et Dominus dominantium (Apoc. XIX, 16), comprehensus, vinctus, flagelLatus, contumeliis omnibusagitatus.ligno suspensus et fixus, occisus.
English
CHAPTER V. — 9. The usefulness of temporal tribulation. But let the example of fear rather restrain the evil concupiscence thirsting for the world and seeking to enjoy the most pernicious pleasures, while the Lord shows how unstable and fleeting are all the vanities and lying follies of this age, than that under the most deserved scourges murmuring be raised against the Lord. The threshing-floor feels one tribulation, that the straw may be cut down, the grain cleansed; the goldsmith’s furnace endures one fire, that the chaff may turn to ashes, the metal be freed from impurities. So too Rome endured one tribulation, in which the pious man was either corrected or set free; the impious man, however, was condemned, whether he was snatched from this life where he would pay the most just penalties, or remained here where he would blaspheme more damnably, or certainly, by the ineffable mercy of God, He reserved for penance those whom He knew were to be saved. Therefore let not the labor of the pious move us; it is an exercise, not a condemnation. Unless perhaps we shudder when we see some just man suffering unworthy and grievous things on this earth, and we forget what the just man of the just, the saint of the saints, endured. What that whole city suffered, one suffered. But see who that one is: the King of kings and Lord of lords (Apoc. 19:16), seized, bound, scourged, driven about with every insult, hung and nailed on wood, killed.
stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:17 · narrativehigh
Source
Appende cum Christo Romam, appende cum Christo totam terram, appende cum Christo caelum et terram: nihil creatum cum Creatore pensatur, nullum opus artifici comparatur. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum eat nihil (Joan. I, 3); et tamen a persequentibus deputatus est nihil. Feramus ergo. quod nos Deus ferre voluerit; qui nobis curandis atque sanandis, quis etiam dolor sit utilis, sicut medicus novit. Certe scri. ptum est, Patientia opus perfectum habet (Jacobi I, 4): quod autem erit opus patientiæ, si nihil adversi patiamur? Cur ergo mala temporalia perpeti recusamus? An forte perfici formidamus? Sed plane oremus et ingemiscamus et ploremus ad Dominum, ut servetur erga nos quod Apostolus dicit: Fidelis Deus, qui non vos sinet tentari supra id quod potestis; sed faciet cum tentatione eliam exitum, ut sustinere possitis ( I Cor. x, 13).
English
Weigh Rome with Christ, weigh the whole earth with Christ, weigh heaven and earth with Christ: nothing created is weighed against the Creator, no work is compared to the craftsman. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made (John 1:3); and yet by the persecutors He was reckoned as nothing. Let us therefore bear what God has willed us to bear; He, like a physician, knows what pain is useful for our treatment and healing. Certainly it is written, Patience has a perfect work (James 1:4): but what will be the work of patience, if we suffer nothing adverse? Why then do we refuse to endure temporal evils? Or are we perhaps afraid to be perfected? But let us plainly pray and groan and weep to the Lord, that what the Apostle says may be preserved for us: God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you can bear; but will also make an end with the temptation, so that you may be able to endure it (1 Corinthians 10:13).
Citation. Tergwame, “Sermones. De Urbis Excidio”, stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/stoa0040.stoa064b.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-pl · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0086 · generated 2026-11-15.