Work dossier · summary and historical context
De Conflictu Vitiorum et Virtutum is a Latin treatise on the moral struggle between vices and virtues, traditionally attributed to Augustine of Hippo but widely considered spurious by modern scholars. The work redefines persecution as an internal spiritual battle rather than physical martyrdom, using scriptural proof-texts such as 2 Timothy 3:12. It circulated under Augustine's name in medieval manuscripts and influenced later moral theology, especially in monastic contexts. The text is preserved in the Patrologia Latina edition (ogl-pl) without critical apparatus, and its style and theology diverge from Augustine's undisputed writings. The date is uncertain: if authentic, it would belong to the 5th century; if spurious, it likely originates from the early medieval period (6th–8th centuries).
De Conflictu Vitiorum et Virtutum is significant as a representative of the Pseudo-Augustinian corpus, illustrating how later authors used Augustine's authority to promote moral and ascetic teachings. It shaped medieval understandings of spiritual warfare and influenced monastic instruction on vices and virtues. The work also provides insight into the transmission and reception of patristic texts in the early medieval period.
The treatise's uncertain date and authorship reflect a common phenomenon in the transmission of patristic and early medieval texts. If authentic, it would have been composed in North Africa during Augustine's lifetime (354–430 CE), within the Latin Christian community of Hippo. If spurious, it likely emerged in a monastic scriptorium between the 6th and 8th centuries, possibly in Gaul or Italy, where moral allegories and vice-virtue conflicts were popular. The work's didactic structure and use of scriptural citations align with early medieval florilegia and sermon collections. Its attribution to Augustine in medieval manuscripts ensured its survival and influence, but modern critical scholarship has questioned its authenticity due to stylistic and theological differences from Augustine's genuine corpus. The text lacks a stemma codicum, and variant readings in other manuscripts remain unaccounted for in the Patrologia Latina edition.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||