Work dossier · summary and historical context
De Amicitia is a treatise on friendship attributed to Augustine of Hippo, likely composed early in his Christian career (ca. 386–389 AD). The work adapts classical philosophical themes, particularly from Cicero's lost dialogue of the same name, to a Christian framework, defining friendship as a form of caritas centered on Christ. It survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the earliest witness a 9th-century Carolingian copy; the source edition follows the Maurist edition (1679–1700). Although cited by medieval authors such as Peter Lombard and Thomas Aquinas, its authenticity has been questioned due to stylistic anomalies and its absence from Augustine's Retractationes. The edition lacks a critical apparatus; readers are directed to the CSEL edition for textual variants.
De Amicitia is significant for its attempt to synthesize classical friendship ideals with Christian caritas, influencing medieval monastic and scholastic thought. Its disputed authorship highlights the challenges of authenticating early Christian texts. The work also illustrates the reception of Cicero in patristic literature and the development of a Christocentric model of friendship that later informed theological debates on love and community.
The treatise was likely written between 386 and 389 AD, shortly after Augustine's conversion to Christianity, during his retreat at Cassiciacum or soon after his return to Thagaste. This period saw Augustine composing philosophical dialogues that blended Neoplatonic and Christian ideas. The work engages with Cicero's De Amicitia, reflecting the late antique practice of Christianizing classical genres. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition; the earliest witness is a 9th-century Carolingian copy, indicating transmission through monastic scriptoria. Its attribution to Augustine is contested: it is absent from his Retractationes, and stylistic features suggest possible composition in a later monastic context. The edition used (ogl-pl) follows the Maurist edition of 1679–1700, which lacks a critical apparatus. Medieval authors like Peter Lombard and Thomas Aquinas cited it, shaping scholastic discussions of caritas.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||