ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Latin · Treatises ·

De Noe

Sanctus Ambrosius · ogl-csel

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 107 passages · 26,734 words

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

De Noe is a Latin treatise by Ambrose of Milan, likely composed in the late 380s as part of his exegetical series on Old Testament figures. The work offers an allegorical and moral exposition of Noah, emphasizing the difficulty of understanding a just man's mind—a theme rooted in classical and Christian introspection. Ambrose reframes Noah's survival after the Flood as a divine act creating a 'seedbed of righteousness' (iustitiae seminarium). The text survives in a single medieval manuscript tradition, with the earliest witness a 9th-century codex; the CSEL edition collates several later copies. Ambrose's interpretation influenced later medieval typology, especially in liturgical readings for Lent and in the works of Bede and Rabanus Maurus.

De Noe is significant for its allegorical interpretation of Noah, which shaped medieval typology and liturgical readings for Lent. It reflects Ambrose's synthesis of classical philosophy (e.g., Platonic and Stoic ideas of the soul's ascent) with biblical exegesis. The treatise also provides insight into late 4th-century Christian thought on righteousness, grief, and spiritual refuge, influencing later figures like Bede and Rabanus Maurus.

Historical context

Ambrose (c. 339–397) was bishop of Milan, a key figure in late 4th-century Latin Christianity. De Noe was composed after his Hexaemeron, likely in the late 380s, during a period of ecclesiastical turbulence and personal grief (e.g., the death of his brother Satyrus). The treatise belongs to Ambrose's exegetical series on Old Testament figures, reflecting his allegorical method influenced by Origen and Philo. The text survives in a single medieval manuscript tradition; the earliest witness is a 9th-century codex, with later copies collated for the CSEL edition. The CSEL edition occasionally emends the Latin to classical norms, and variant readings from later medieval copies are selectively noted. The work's transmission suggests limited circulation but enduring influence in monastic and liturgical contexts.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

618 commentary units 119 scripture111 background103 structure97 term68 reception53 sense35 caution26 parallel5 dating1 transmission 4 derived notes 155 open questions 107 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: treatise in Latin; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 107 narrative.
  • caution3 passage(s) are fragmentary in the source; the English bridges each break and says so in the note.
  • scripture1 scriptural phrase match(es) noted: John 4:10.
  • sourceSource edition: ogl-csel — Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:101 · narrativehigh
Source
sensus autem altior hoc habet, quia insipiens praesentia tantummodo uidet, quae in oculis sunt, futura non respicit, praeterita non cogitat, sapiens autem et praeterita recordatur et futura considerat omnis ergo mens sapiens retrorsum ambulat, hoc eat praeterita spectat nec naturae quodam usu impeditur: nihil uacuum, nihil nudum suorum patitur esse gestorum. operit quae aliter gesta sunt amictu quodam et gratia uel praesentis operis uel futuri, ut nihil indecorum praetereat, nihil inornatum relinquat. unde et apostolus superiora obliuiscebatur, priora appetebat, sed obliuiscebatur, ut absconderet persecutionis errores, ut tegeret superiora delicta bonisque operibus obumbraret. beati enim et illi quorum tecta peccata sunt, id est si tegantur bonis factis et operiantur uirtutum sequentibus disciplinis. Et sobrius inquit factus est Noe a uino. manifestum est ex ebrietate intercedente somno sobrios fieri homines, mens autem sobria est, quando et praeterita et futura cognoscit. sobria ergo erat mens iusti et quando ebria putabatur; est enim praeclarum poculum inebrians iustos. ille autem uere inebriatus erat qui ridebat patrem. quia enim neque praeteritam generationis gratiam neque praesentem reuerentiam patris neque futuram poenam paternae iniuriae considerabat, uere ebrius erat et quod putabat uidere se non uidebat. erat in illo profunda caecitas qui patrem uidere non poterat.
English
But the deeper sense has this: that the foolish man sees only the present, what is before his eyes; he does not look to the future, he does not think of the past. But the wise man both remembers the past and considers the future. Therefore every wise mind walks backward, that is, it looks to the past, nor is it hindered by some habit of nature: it suffers none of its deeds to be empty, none to be bare. It covers what have been done otherwise with a certain cloak and grace, either of present or of future work, so that nothing unseemly passes by, nothing unadorned is left behind. Whence also the Apostle forgot the former things, sought after the earlier ones—but he forgot, so as to hide the errors of persecution, so as to cover over the earlier faults and overshadow them with good works. For blessed are those also whose sins are covered, that is, if they are covered over with good deeds and overlaid with the following disciplines of the virtues. "And Noah," it says, "became sober from the wine." It is clear that from intervening drunkenness men become sober through sleep. But the mind is sober when it knows both the past and the future. Therefore the mind of the just man was sober even when it was thought to be drunk; for there is a glorious cup that intoxicates the just. But that man was truly drunk who laughed at his father. For because he considered neither the past grace of his begetting, nor the present reverence due to his father, nor the future punishment for the injury to his father, he was truly drunk, and what he thought he saw, he did not see. There was in him a profound blindness, who could not see his father.
stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:102 · narrativehigh
Source
nam si uidisset patrem, non utique risisset; neque enim ridendus, sed uerendus est pater. multo autem amplius mentem iusti insipiens uidere non poterat. quomodo enim uidebat qui in eo putabat ebrietatis errorem, ubi erat perfectus sapientiae ceterarumque uirtutum uapor? sicut scriptum est: uapor eat enim uirtutis dei. quando enim mens magis sobria est quam tunc, quando naturam omnium rerum temporumque praesentium et futurorum ita spectat negotia, ut nulla in eo temporalis titubantia ebrietatis appareat? ' quaero etiam qua ratione, cum ante medium dixerit inter filios Cham, nunc iuniorem constituat. sic enim scriptum est: cognouit Noe omnia quae fecit ei filius iunior. numquid ante scriptura in ordine generationis en-auit? non utique. quid ergo? contraria nunc scripta sunt? non arbitror. quomodo igitur soluitur, nisi iuniorem non aetate, non tempore accipias, sed rudem sensus et in quadam intellectus infantia constitutum, qui doctrinam prouectioris aetatis non hauserit nec perceperit senile consilium? cani enim quidam sunt sensus hominum. et ideo inquit: quom ueneris ad seniorum concilium, claude os tuum, ut habet alibi sententia: discendum enim tibi prius est quam loquendum. aures ergo paratas habe, ut aliquid de sapientium consiliis consequaris. lingua reprimenda est, auditio praeparanda.
English
For if he had seen his father, he certainly would not have laughed; for a father is not to be laughed at, but to be revered. But much more could the foolish man not see the mind of a righteous man. For how could he see, who supposed there was the error of drunkenness where there was the perfect vapor of wisdom and of the other virtues? As it is written: "For the vapor of the virtue of God goes forth." For when is the mind more sober than when it so contemplates the affairs of all things and times, present and future, that no temporal unsteadiness of drunkenness appears in it? I also ask by what reasoning, when earlier it said among the sons of Ham, it now calls him the younger. For it is written thus: "Noah knew all that his younger son had done to him." Did the Scripture not previously set forth the order of generation? Certainly not. What then? Are contrary things now written? I think not. How then is it resolved, unless you take "younger" not by age, not by time, but as one raw in understanding and placed in a certain infancy of intellect, who has not drunk in the teaching of a more advanced age nor received the counsel of the elderly? For there are, as it were, certain gray hairs of human understanding. And therefore it says: "When you come to the council of elders, close your mouth," as another saying has it: "For you must first learn before you speak." Therefore have your ears ready, so that you may gain something from the counsels of the wise. The tongue is to be restrained, the hearing prepared.
stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:103 · narrativehigh
Source
Benedicens filium suum Sem ait Noe: benedictus dominus deus Sem. et erit Chanaan seruus eius. et dominum et deum dixit et specialiter deum filii sui, cui nomen est Sem, eo quod deus iustorum, hoc est deus mentium, non uallium, qui gratiam habeant uirtutis excelsae. deinde qua ratione, cum filius eius Cham peccauerit, non ipsum, sed filium eius seruituti addixit? et fortasse ideo quod plus afficitur pater iniuriis filii sui, maxime quarum ipse reus et auctor exsistat, et uehementius contristatur sui peccati damnationem a filio persolutam, qui non tam suo quam patris merito puniretur: deinde quia, cum doctrinae paternae discipulus esset filius et pessimarum aemulus cogitationum, uno corpore uterque uteretur et mente eademque malitia. indifferenter igitur uel paternae uel suae malitiae filius pretium luit, quoniam improbitatis commune consortium est. quod igitur pro patris soluit improbitate sine dubio et pro sua soluit culpae eius reus uel certe diutius poena producitur, cum etiam ad filium usque pertendit et successoris afflictio in tempora.
English
Blessing his son Sem, Noah said: “Blessed is the Lord God of Sem. And Canaan shall be his servant.” And he said “Lord” and “God,” and specifically the God of his son, whose name is Sem, because he is the God of the righteous, that is, the God of minds, not of valleys, who possess the grace of exalted virtue. Then, for what reason, when his son Cham sinned, did he not condemn him, but his son, to servitude? And perhaps for this reason: that a father is more deeply affected by the injuries of his son, especially those of which he himself is the guilty party and the author, and is more vehemently grieved that the punishment for his own sin is paid by his son, who would be punished not so much by his own as by his father’s merit. Then, because, since the son was a disciple of his father’s teaching and an emulator of his most wicked thoughts, each used the same body and the same mind and the same malice. Therefore, the son indifferently pays the price either for his father’s malice or for his own, since the partnership in wickedness is common. Therefore, what he pays for his father’s wickedness, he undoubtedly also pays for his own guilt, being guilty of it, or certainly the punishment is prolonged, since it extends even to the son, and the affliction of the successor continues into later times.
stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:104 · narrativehigh
Source
multa profertur. hoc secundum litteram. ceterum non tam hic homines quam mores conprehenduntur, quorum in utroque una natura. nam Cham 'calor' Chanaan 'conmotio* et 'inquietudo'. qui autem calidus est utique inquietus atque conmotior est. in duobus igitur erat una passio et unus affectus. itaque cum alter addicitur, uterque damnantur. cur sanctus igitur Noe benedicens filium suum Iapheth ait: dilatet dominus Iapheth et habitet in domibus Sem et fiat Chanaan seruus eius? diximus supra Iapheth quasi indifferens bonum significari. indifferentia autem latitudinem habet, quae est in salute uigore decore fortitudine diuitiis gratia nobilitate amicis potestatibus et ceteris. sed haec licet indifferentia bona sint, tamen plerisque nocuerunt, qui ea non cum sapientia et iustitia possederunt. multos enim ebrios fecere diuitiae, nobilitas et potestas superbos, pulchritudo luxuriosos, cuius suffragio alienae mentis corruperint castitatem. ergo pro utentis affectu horum quae diximus indifferentia est, quorum usus aut uirtutibus regitur aut certe sine gubernatione uirtutum fraudi esse incipiunt quae possunt esse utilitati.
English
Much is said. This according to the letter. But it is not so much men as their characters that are comprehended here, whose nature is one in each of the two. For Cham means 'heat,' Chanaan 'commotion' and 'restlessness.' Now he who is hot is certainly restless and more agitated. Therefore in the two there was one passion and one disposition. Thus when one is condemned, both are damned. Why then does holy Noah, blessing his son Japheth, say: "May the Lord enlarge Japheth, and may he dwell in the houses of Sem, and may Chanaan be his servant"? We have said above that Japheth signifies an indifferent good. Now indifferent things have breadth, which consists in health, vigor, beauty, strength, riches, grace, nobility, friends, powers, and the rest. But these, although they are indifferent goods, have nevertheless harmed many who have possessed them without wisdom and justice. For riches have made many drunk, nobility and power have made them proud, beauty has made them lustful, by whose favor they have corrupted the chastity of another's mind. Therefore, according to the disposition of those who use them, these things we have spoken of are indifferent, whose use is either governed by virtues or, certainly, without the governance of virtues, those things which could be of benefit begin to be a fraud.
stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:105 · narrativehigh
Source
Nuac quoniam post diluuium Noe dicitur uixisse trecentis et quinquaginta annis nequaquam praetereundum putamus. nam in trecentis crucem Christi significari certum est, cuius typo iustus a diluuio liberatus est. in quinquaginta iubelaeus est numerus remissionis, quo spiritus sanctus missus a caelo est gratiam humanis pectoribus infundens. perfecto igitur numero remissionis et gratiae iustus curriculum uitae huius impleuit. de generatione inquit lapheth: Rodus et aliae insulae nationum sunt. non inmerito latitudo dicitur, quando etiam in alteram partem naturae, hoc est maritima generatio eius processit. uere enim tamquam latitudo non fuit eo contenta, quod in usum hominibus natura praescripserat, hoc est terrae possessione, uerum etiam introgressa est mare, ad insulas usque processit. hoc secundum litteram. secundum altiorem autem sensum, eo quod ea quae extra sunt, quae dicuntur bona, diuitiae potestates honores, quasi diffunduntur latius nec tantum his contenti sunt diuites quae in manibus et in conspectu sunt, sed longe lateque diffundunt suas cupiditates, dum aut pecuniarum conpendium de ulterioribus quaeritur aut honor a pluribus aut potestas diffusior aut cupiditas.
English
Now since after the flood Noe is said to have lived three hundred and fifty years, we think it by no means to be passed over. For in three hundred the cross of Christ is certainly signified, by whose type the just man was freed from the flood. In fifty is the jubilee number of remission, by which the Holy Spirit was sent from heaven, pouring grace into human breasts. Therefore by the perfect number of remission and grace the just man completed the course of this life. Concerning the generation of Japheth it says: Rhodes and other islands of the nations. Not undeservedly is breadth spoken of, when even into another part of nature, that is, the maritime, his generation proceeded. For truly as breadth it was not content with what nature had prescribed for the use of men, that is, possession of the land, but also entered the sea, advanced even to the islands. This according to the letter. But according to the higher sense, because those things which are external, which are called goods—riches, powers, honors—are spread more widely, nor are the rich content only with those things which are in their hands and in sight, but they spread their desires far and wide, while either profit from money is sought from farther regions, or honor from more people, or more widespread power, or desire.
stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:106 · narrativehigh
Source
Nunc quaero qua ratione Cham illiua improbi filium Chum seniorem scriptura fuisse memorauit? duo genera terrae, unum uelut harenosum et puluerulentum, immo ut expressius dicam puluis, aliud genus terrae fructiferum atque fecundum, hoc est terra solidior et profunda. quid igitur improbus nisi puluerem generat, ex quo generatio esse non possit? ideoque propheta puluerem impiis conparauit dicens: non sic impii, non sic, sed tamquam puluis, quem proicit uentus a facie terra.e, eo quod etiam secundum altiorem sensum infecunda sit impiorum anima,, quae fructus utiles generare non possit. qua ratione etiam Chus Nembroth gigantem generat, qui erat uenator ante deum? unde dictum est: sicut Nembroth gigans uenator ante deum. quid aliud igitur puluis et harena generaret nisi terrenum hominem, eo quod impius caelestibus terrena praeponat. gigantes enim fabula inducuntur aduersum superna pugnare uoluisse et terreno ascensu ascendendum ad caelestia putauerunt.
English
Now I ask for what reason Scripture recorded that Cham, that wicked man, fathered Chus the elder? There are two kinds of earth: one, as it were, sandy and dusty—or, to speak more plainly, dust—and another kind of earth, fruitful and fertile, that is, a more solid and deep soil. What, then, does the wicked man generate but dust, from which no generation can arise? Therefore the prophet compared dust to the impious, saying: “Not so the impious, not so, but like dust which the wind casts from the face of the earth,” because, even according to a higher sense, the soul of the impious is barren, unable to produce useful fruits. For what reason also does Chus generate the giant Nembroth, who was a hunter before the Lord? Whence it is said: “Like Nembroth the giant, a hunter before the Lord.” What else, then, would dust and sand generate but an earthly man, because the impious man prefers earthly things to heavenly? For giants are introduced in fable as having wished to fight against the heavens and thought that the celestial could be reached by an earthly ascent.
stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:107 · narrativehigh
Source
altiore autem sensu illud significatur, quod qui terrenas diligit uoluptates et eas sequitur et putat his se posse ad dei gratiam peruenire et regnum caeleste huiusmodi erroribus deferendum, is aduersum caelestia contumaci proeliatur affectu. propterea in prouerbio est de eo qui deliquerit: 'sicut Nembroth gigans uenator ante deum'. Nembroth autem per interpretationem Aethiops dicitur. color Aethiopis tenebras animae squaloremque significat, qui aduersus lumini est, claritatis exsors, tenebris inuolutus, nocti similior quam diei. uenatoris quoque ustis in siluis, inter feras ac bestias conuersatio eius. inrationabilis ergo miscetur inrationabilibus passionibus et ea quae sunt malitiae agrestis atque praedurae uenator huiusmodi explorare consueuit atque his potiri atque delectari. denique Nembroth huius principium regni Babylon, hoc est 'confusio' eo quod malitia et potestas non in simplicitate et puritate, non in distinctione uirtutis, sed in confusione uitiorum est.
English
But in a higher sense, this is signified: that he who loves earthly pleasures, pursues them, and thinks that by such errors he can attain the grace of God and that the heavenly kingdom is to be conferred by such means, that man fights against heavenly things with a stubborn passion. Hence there is a proverb concerning one who has sinned: 'Like Nimrod the giant hunter before God.' Now Nimrod is interpreted to mean 'Ethiopian.' The color of the Ethiopian signifies the darkness and squalor of the soul, which is opposed to light, devoid of brightness, wrapped in darkness, more like night than day. The hunter's custom is in the forests, his dwelling among wild beasts and animals. Therefore the irrational is mingled with irrational passions, and a hunter of this kind is accustomed to explore, to seize, and to delight in those things which are of a wild and harsh malice. Finally, the beginning of this Nimrod's kingdom was Babylon, that is, 'confusion,' because malice and power consist not in simplicity and purity, not in the distinction of virtue, but in the confusion of vices.
Citation. Tergwame, “De Noe”, stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/stoa0022.stoa039.opp-lat1#s1
Colophon. Source: ogl-csel · licence: Available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0494 · generated 2026-11-15.