Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily, transmitted among the spuria of John Chrysostom, addresses the healing of a paralytic and uses the physical condition as a metaphor for spiritual weakness and sin. Likely composed in the late fourth or early fifth century within the Antiochene tradition, it survives in multiple Greek manuscripts and was incorporated into Byzantine liturgical use for the feast of the paralytic. The text is included in Patrologia Graeca volume 59 under Chrysostom's name, but modern scholarship regards it as pseudonymous. Its pastoral and catechetical themes link physical healing to baptismal or penitential forgiveness, and later catenae and florilegia excerpt it for doctrinal purposes.
This homily exemplifies the late antique Christian practice of using physical healing narratives as allegories for spiritual renewal, linking baptismal or penitential forgiveness to bodily restoration. It also illustrates the fluid boundaries of authorship in the Chrysostom corpus and the liturgical adaptation of patristic texts in Byzantine worship. Its survival in multiple manuscripts and excerpting in catenae attest to its enduring pastoral and doctrinal value.
The homily was composed in Greek, probably in the late fourth to early fifth century (c. 380–403), within the Antiochene tradition of biblical exegesis and pastoral preaching. Antioch was a major center of early Christianity, known for its literal-historical interpretation of Scripture and its emphasis on moral exhortation. The work is pseudonymously attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 347–407), a prominent Antiochene preacher and later bishop of Constantinople. The text survives in multiple Greek manuscripts, often grouped with other Chrysostomica, and was used in Byzantine liturgical contexts for the second Sunday of Lent, when readings on healing miracles were common. Its inclusion in the Patrologia Graeca reflects medieval ascription rather than modern critical consensus. The homily's transmission through catenae and florilegia indicates its perceived doctrinal utility, though no critical apparatus or stemma exists for the present edition.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||