Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Homilia de lotione pedum (Homily on the Foot-Washing) is attributed to Severian of Gabala, a late fourth- to early fifth-century bishop active in Constantinople under John Chrysostom. The homily expounds on John 13:1–20, focusing on Jesus' washing of the disciples' feet, and was incorporated into the Byzantine Holy Thursday liturgy. It survives in a single Greek manuscript tradition with lacunae, and the present edition (pta) collates principal witnesses without a full critical apparatus. The work is often pseudepigraphically ascribed to John Chrysostom, reflecting common scribal practice. Severian's exegesis emphasizes themes of divine mercy (ἔλεος) and love for humanity (φιλανθρωπία), framing creation as an act of benevolence. The homily influenced later liturgical commentaries and homilies on the same pericope.
This homily is a key witness to early fifth-century Antiochene exegesis and the development of Holy Thursday liturgy. It influenced later Byzantine liturgical commentaries and homilies on the foot-washing pericope. Severian's emphasis on divine mercy and love for humanity (φιλανθρωπία) as framing creation offers a distinctive theological perspective within patristic literature, contrasting with notions of divine need (χρεία).
Severian of Gabala (fl. ca. 400–408) delivered this homily during his tenure in Constantinople, likely between 401 and 404, when he was a prominent preacher and rival of John Chrysostom. The homily belongs to the Antiochene exegetical tradition, focusing on literal and moral interpretation of Scripture. It was composed in Greek for a Constantinopolitan audience familiar with liturgical practices. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, indicating limited circulation, and was later incorporated into Byzantine Holy Thursday rites, reflecting its liturgical use. The attribution to John Chrysostom in some manuscripts is a common pseudepigraphical ascription, likely due to Chrysostom's prestige. The homily's transmission is fragmentary, with lacunae, and the present edition lacks a full apparatus of variant readings, necessitating consultation of the critical edition for textual criticism.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||