ት Tergwame Greek · Coptic · Ethiopic · Syriac · Armenian · Georgian · Latin

Greek · Other ·

Institutio elementaris

John of Damascus · khazarzar

BothSourceEnglish
JSON Dossier
machine-draft · no human review 13 passages · 2,631 words

About this work

Work dossier · summary and historical context

Summary

The Institutio elementaris (Elementary Instruction) is a brief didactic work traditionally attributed to John of Damascus (c. 675–749). It serves as an introduction to Aristotelian logic, defining basic terms such as nature, hypostasis, and difference within a Christian theological framework. The text survives in Greek manuscripts of the Damascene corpus, often grouped with the Dialectica, and was used in Byzantine monastic schools. Its transmission is tied to Byzantine educational compilations, but no critical edition of all witnesses exists. The Khazarzar edition provides no apparatus criticus or manuscript sigla, limiting its use for textual criticism.

The Institutio elementaris is significant as a concise example of how Aristotelian logic was adapted for Christian catechetical purposes in Byzantium. It influenced later medieval Latin scholasticism through partial translations, and its definitions of key terms like φύσις and ὑπόστασις reflect the standard Cappadocian ontological framework. The work also illustrates John of Damascus's didactic method and his role in transmitting Greek philosophical concepts to both Eastern and Western Christian traditions.

Historical context

The Institutio elementaris is traditionally placed in the 8th century, during the career of John of Damascus (c. 675–749), a Greek-speaking monk and theologian active in the Umayyad Caliphate, likely at the monastery of Mar Saba near Jerusalem. The work reflects the Byzantine educational tradition of using Aristotelian logic as a propaedeutic to theology, a practice rooted in the earlier Cappadocian Fathers and later systematized by John in his Dialectica. The text's addressee, John, bishop of Laodicea (possibly Laodicea in Syria or Phrygia), is otherwise unknown, suggesting a local or monastic context. Its survival in Greek manuscripts of the Damascene corpus indicates a continuous Byzantine transmission, but the lack of a critical edition and the Khazarzar edition's absence of apparatus limit precise dating and provenance. The work's use in monastic schools points to a pedagogical function within Byzantine Orthodox communities.

Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded

Annotation and terms

72 commentary units 26 term13 structure12 background11 caution4 reception4 parallel1 transmission1 dating 0 derived notes 16 open questions 13 narrative
What the kinds mean

Pipeline notes

  • coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
  • limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
  • registerRegister: other in ancient Greek; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
  • structurePassages: 13 narrative.
  • sourceSource edition: khazarzar

Term index

CopticRenderingCountFirst
no glossary terms recorded
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:1 · narrativemedium
Source
Institutio elementaris Εἰσαγωγὴ δογμάτων στοιχειώδης ἀπὸ φωνῆς Ἰωάννου ταπεινοῦ μοναχοῦ πρὸς Ἰωάννην τὸν ὁσιώτατον ἐπίσκοπον Λαοδικείας. Προοίμιον Ἐν ὀνόματι τοῦ πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ καὶ τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος, τῆς μιᾶς τρισυποστάτου καὶ προσκυνητῆς θεότητος, τῆς ὁμοουσίου καὶ ζωαρχικῆς τριάδος, τοῦ ἑνὸς θεοῦ, παρ' οὗ πᾶσα δόσις ἀγαθὴ καὶ πᾶν δώρημα τέλειον ἄνωθεν εἰς ἡμᾶς κάτεισιν, ἀνοίγω τὰ μογγίλαλα καὶ βραδύγλωσσα χείλη ὁ ἁμαρτωλὸς καὶ τάλας ἐγώ, πεποιθὼς ἐπ' αὐτῷ, ὡς διὰ τὴν τῶν αἰτησάντων τὸν λόγον ταπείνωσιν καὶ τῶν ἀκουόντων ὠφέλειαν δώσει πνεῦμα σοφίας καὶ λόγον ἐν ἀνοίξει στόματός μου ὁ τῆς χάριτος κύριος καὶ πάντων τῶν ἀγαθῶν ταμιείας ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας. Ἀμήν. 1 Περὶ οὐσίας καὶ φύσεως καὶ μορφῆς. Οὐσία καὶ φύσις καὶ μορφὴ κατὰ τοὺς ἁγίους πατέρας ταὐτόν ἐστιν. Καὶ πάλιν ὑπόστασις καὶ πρόσωπον καὶ ἄτομον ταὐτόν ἐστιν. Καὶ διαφορὰ καὶ ποιότης καὶ ἰδίωμα ταὐτόν ἐστιν. Περὶ τούτων οὖν καὶ τῶν τοιούτων σκοπὸς ἡμῖν ἐστιν εἰπεῖν, περὶ ὧν καὶ ἡ ὑμετέρα συγκαταβατικῶς ἠρώτησεν ὁσιότης. Ἀρχόμενοι τοίνυν λέγομεν οὕτως περὶ οὐσίας καὶ φύσεως καὶ μορφῆς. Ἔστι μὲν ὑπερούσιος οὐσία καὶ φύσις καὶ μορφὴ ἡ ἀκατάληπτος θεότης, ὑποστάσεις δὲ αὐτῆς καὶ πρόσωπα πατήρ, υἱὸς καὶ τὸ πανάγιον πνεῦμα· ἕκαστον γὰρ αὐτῶν τελεία ὑπόστασις καὶ τέλειόν ἐστι πρόσωπον. Ἔτι δὲ καὶ πᾶν κτίσμα θεοῦ οὐσία ἐστί. Πολλὰ δέ εἰσι τὰ κτίσματα καὶ πολλὴν ἔχουσι πρὸς ἄλληλα τὴν διαφοράν·
English
Elementary Introduction of Dogmas An elementary introduction of dogmas from the voice of John, humble monk, to John, the most holy bishop of Laodicea. Prologue. In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, of the one trihypostatic and worshipful divinity, of the consubstantial and life-originating Trinity, of the one God, from whom every good gift and every perfect endowment descends from above to us, I, the sinful and wretched one, open my stammering and slow-tongued lips, trusting in Him, that for the humility of those who have requested the discourse and for the benefit of the hearers, the Lord of grace and the steward of all good things, who is God over all, blessed unto the ages, will give a spirit of wisdom and speech at the opening of my mouth. Amen. 1. On essence and nature and form. Essence and nature and form are, according to the holy fathers, the same. And again, hypostasis and person and individual are the same. And difference and quality and property are the same. Concerning these, then, and such things, it is our purpose to speak, about which your holiness has condescendingly inquired. Beginning, therefore, we speak thus concerning essence and nature and form. There is a super-essential essence and nature and form, the incomprehensible divinity; and its hypostases and persons are Father, Son, and the all-holy Spirit; for each of them is a perfect hypostasis and a perfect person. Furthermore, every creature of God is an essence. But there are many creatures, and they have great difference from one another.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:2 · narrativehigh
Source
ἄλλο γὰρ κτίσμα ὁ ἄγγελος καὶ ἄλλο ὁ ἄνθρωπος, καὶ ἕτερον βοῦς καὶ ἄλλο κύων, ἕτερον οὐρανὸς καὶ ἄλλο γῆ, καὶ ἕτερον πῦρ καὶ ἄλλο ἀὴρ καὶ ἕτερον ὕδωρ· καὶ ἁπλῶς εἰπεῖν πολλὰ εἴδη εἰσὶν ἐν τοῖς κτίσμασιν. Ἕκαστον οὖν εἶδος μία φύσις ἐστίν, οἷον πάντες οἱ ἄνθρωποι μία φύσις εἰσί, καὶ πάντες οἱ ἄγγελοι μία φύσις εἰσί, καὶ πάντες οἱ βόες μία φύσις εἰσίν· ὁμοίως καὶ τὰ λοιπὰ κτίσματα. Καὶ ἄλλη φύσις ἡ τῶν ἀγγέλων καὶ ἑτέρα ἡ τῶν ἀνθρώπων καὶ ἑτέρα ἡ τῶν βοῶν· ὁμοίως καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν λοιπῶν. 2 Περὶ ὑποστάσεως καὶ προσώπου καὶ ἀτόμου. Ἐπειδὴ δὲ πολλοί εἰσιν οἱ ἄνθρωποι, ὁ καθένα ἄνθρωπος ὑπόστασίς ἐστιν, οἷον ὁ Ἀδὰμ ὑπόστασίς ἐστι, καὶ ἡ Εὔα ἄλλη ὑπόστασις, καὶ ὁ Σὴθ ἑτέρα ὑπόστασις. Ὁμοίως καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν λοιπῶν. Ἕκαστοςἄνθρωπος ὑπόστασις ἑτέρα παρὰ τοὺς λοιποὺς ἀνθρώπους ἐστί, καὶ ἕκαστος βοῦς ὑπόστασίς ἐστι, καὶ ἕκαστος ἄγγελος ὑπόστασίς ἐστιν. Ὥστε φύσις καὶ μορφὴ καὶ οὐσία ἐστὶ τὸ κοινὸν καὶ περιέχον τὰς ὁμοουσίους ὑποστάσεις, ὑπόστασις δὲ καὶ ἄτομον καὶ πρόσωπον τὸ μερικὸν ἤγουν ἕκαστον τῶν ὑπὸ τὸ αὐτὸ εἶδος περιεχομένων. 3 Περὶ διαφορᾶς καὶ ποιότητος καὶ ἰδιώματος. Εἴπομεν, ὅτι πολλά εἰσιν εἴδη καὶ διάφοροι οὐσίαι, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ καθ' ἑκάστην οὐσίαν καὶ εἶδος διάφοροι ὑποστάσεις. ∆ιαφέρουσιν οὖν καὶ ἑκάστη οὐσία τῆς ἑτέρας οὐσίας καὶ ἑκάστη ὑπόστασις τῆς ἑτέρας ὑποστάσεως. Ἐκεῖνο τοίνυν τὸ πρᾶγμα, ἐν ᾧ διαφέρει οὐσία οὐσίας καὶ εἶδος εἴδους ἢ ὑπόστασις ὑποστάσεως, λέγεται διαφορὰ καὶ 1 Ερευνητικό έργο: ∆ΡΟΜΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΠΙΣΤΗΣ – ΨΗΦΙΑΚΗ ΠΑΤΡΟΛΟΓΙΑ.
English
For an angel is one creation and a human another, and an ox is different and a dog different, heaven is one thing and earth another, and fire is one thing and air another and water another; and to speak simply, there are many species among the creatures. Each species, then, is one nature, for example all humans are one nature, and all angels are one nature, and all oxen are one nature; similarly for the remaining creatures. And the nature of angels is one, and that of humans another, and that of oxen another; likewise for the rest. 2 On hypostasis and person and individual. Since there are many humans, each individual human is a hypostasis, for example Adam is a hypostasis, and Eve is another hypostasis, and Seth is another hypostasis. Similarly for the rest. Each human is a hypostasis different from the other humans, and each ox is a hypostasis, and each angel is a hypostasis. So that nature and form and essence are the common and that which encompasses the consubstantial hypostases, while hypostasis and individual and person are the particular, that is, each of those contained under the same species. 3 On difference and quality and property. We have said that there are many species and different essences, and likewise within each essence and species there are different hypostases. Therefore each essence differs from the other essence, and each hypostasis from the other hypostasis. That thing, then, by which essence differs from essence and species from species or hypostasis from hypostasis, is called difference and
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:3 · narrativehigh
Source
Εργαστήριο ∆ιαχείρισης Πολιτισµικής Κληρονοµιάς, www.aegean.gr/culturaltec/chmlab. Χρηµατοδότηση: ΚΠ Interreg ΙΙΙΑ (ETΠΑ 75%, Εθν. πόροι 25%). Πανεπιστήµιο Αιγαίου, Τµήµα Πολιτισµικής Τεχνολογίας και Επικοινωνίας, © 2006. Επιτρέπεται η ελεύθερη χρήση του υλικού µε αναφορά στην πηγή προέλευσής του. ποιότης καὶ ἰδίωμα, οἷον διαφέρει ὁ ἄνθρωπος τοῦ ἀγγέλου, ὅτι ὁ μὲν ἄγγελος ἀθάνατός ἐστιν, ὁ δὲ ἄνθρωπος θνητός· τὸ ἀθάνατον καὶ θνητὸν διαφορὰ καὶ ποιότης καὶ ἰδίωμά ἐστιν. Πάλιν διαφέρει ὁ Ἀδὰμ τοῦ Σήθ, ὅτι ὁ μὲν Ἀδὰμ πατήρ ἐστι τοῦ Σήθ, ὁ δὲ Σὴθ υἱὸς τοῦ Ἀδάμ.Ἡ πατρότης οὖν καὶ ἡ υἱότης διαφοραί εἰσιν· ἐν τούτοις γὰρ διαφέρουσιν ἀλλήλων ὁ Ἀδὰμ καὶ ὁ Σήθ. Καὶ πάντα τὰ τοιαῦτα διαφοραὶ λέγονται καὶ ποιότητες καὶ ἰδιώματα, οἷον τὸ λογικὸν καὶ τὸ ἄλογον, τὸ θνητὸν καὶ τὸ ἀθάνατον, τὸ δίπουν, τὸ τετράπουν, τὸ αἰσθητικὸν καὶ τὸ ἀναίσθητον, τὸ σιμὸν καὶ τὸ γρυπόν, τὸ λευκὸν καὶ τὸ μέλαν, τὸ μακρὸν καὶ τὸ κολοβὸν καὶ πάντα τὰ τοιαῦτα. 4 Περὶ οὐσιώδους καὶ ἐπουσιώδους διαφορᾶς ἤγουν φυσικῆς διαφορᾶς καὶ συμβεβηκότος. Πᾶν πρᾶγμα, ᾧτινι διαφέρει εἶδος ἑτέρου εἴδους καὶ οὐσία ἑτέρας οὐσίας, οὐσιώδης καὶ φυσικὴ καὶ συστατικὴ λέγεται διαφορὰ καὶ ποιότης καὶ φυσικὸν ἰδίωμα καὶ ἰδίωμα φύσεως. Οἷον διαφέρουσιν ὁ ἄγγελος καὶ ὁ ἄνθρωπος ἀλλήλων κατὰ τὸ ἀθάνατον καὶ θνητόν· τὸ ἀθάνατον οὐσιώδης καὶ φυσικὴ καὶ συστατικὴ διαφορὰ τοῦ ἀγγέλου ἐστὶ καὶ ἰδίωμα φυσικόν. Ὁμοίως καὶ τὸ θνητὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου. ∆ιαφέρουσι πάλιν ὁ ἄνθρωπος καὶ ὁ βοῦς ἀλλήλων, ὅτι ὁ μὲν ἄνθρωπος λογικός ἐστιν, ὁ δὲ βοῦς ἄλογος.
English
quality and property, for example, a human differs from an angel in that an angel is immortal, but a human is mortal; the immortal and the mortal are a difference and a quality and a property. Again, Adam differs from Seth, in that Adam is the father of Seth, but Seth is the son of Adam. Fatherhood and sonship, then, are differences; for in these Adam and Seth differ from each other. And all such things are called differences and qualities and properties, for example, the rational and the irrational, the mortal and the immortal, the bipedal, the quadrupedal, the sentient and the insentient, the snub-nosed and the hook-nosed, the white and the black, the long and the short, and all such things. 4 On essential and non-essential difference, that is, natural difference and accident. Every thing by which one species differs from another species and one substance from another substance is called an essential and natural and constitutive difference and quality and natural property and property of nature. For example, an angel and a human differ from each other according to the immortal and the mortal; the immortal is an essential and natural and constitutive difference of the angel and a natural property. Likewise also the mortal of the human. Again, a human and an ox differ from each other, in that a human is rational, but an ox is irrational.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:4 · narrativehigh
Source
Ἰδοὺ τὸ λογικὸν οὐσιώδης διαφορὰ καὶ συστατικὴ τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ἐστί, τὸ δὲ ἄλογον τοῦ βοός. Ὁμοίως καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν λοιπῶν εἰδῶν καὶ οὐσιῶν καὶ φύσεων καὶ μορφῶν. Πᾶν δὲ πρᾶγμα, ἐν ᾧ διαφέρει ὑπόστασις τῆς ὁμοειδοῦς καὶ ὁμοουσίου ὑποστάσεως, λέγεται ἐπουσιώδης διαφορὰ καὶ ποιότης καὶ ὑποστατικὸν ἰδίωμα καὶ χαρακτηριστικὸν ἰδίωμα, τοῦτό ἐστι τὸ συμβεβηκός· οἷον διαφέρει ἄνθρωπος ἑτέρου ἀνθρώπου, ὅτι ὁ μέν ἐστι μακρὸς ὁ δὲ κολοβός, ὁ μὲν λευκὸς ὁ δὲ μέλας· ὁ μὲν ὑγιαίνει ὁ δὲ νοσεῖ, ὁ μέν ἐστι πατὴρ ὁ δὲ υἱός. Ταῦτα καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα πάντα ἐπουσιώδεις εἰσὶ διαφοραὶ καὶ ποιότητες καὶ ὑποστατικὰ καὶ χαρακτηριστικὰ ἰδιώματα καὶ συμβεβηκότα. Καὶ ἁπλῶς εἰπεῖν, ὅσα ἐν πάσαις ταῖς ὑπὸ τὸ αὐτὸ εἶδος ὑποστάσεσιν ὁμοίως θεωροῦνται καὶ ὧν ἄνευ ἀδύνατον συστῆναι τὴν οὐσίαν καὶ τὸ εἶδος, οὐσιώδης λέγεται διαφορά· Ὅσα δὲ ἔν τισι τῶν ὁμοειδῶν ὑποστάσεων εἰσίν, ἔν τισι δὲ οὔκ εἰσι, συμβεβηκότα καὶ ἐπουσιώδη εἰσί. 5 Περὶ χωριστοῦ καὶ ἀχωρίστου συμβεβηκότος. Τῶν συμβεβηκότων τὰ μέν εἰσι χωριστά, τὰ δὲ ἀχώριστα. Ἀχώριστα μέν, ἐν οἷς διαφέρει ὑπόστασις ἄλλης ὑποστάσεως, αὐτὴ δὲ ἑαυτῆς οὐ διαφέρει· οἷον ὁ δεῖνα ὁ ἄνθρωπος διαφέρει ἄλλου ἀνθρώπου, ὅτι αὐτὸς μὲν σιμός ἐστιν ἐκεῖνος δὲ γρυπός, ὅτι ὁ μὲν γλαυκὸς ὁ δὲ μελανόφθαλμος. Αὐτὸς δὲ ἑαυτοῦ οὐ διαφέρει· ὁ γὰρ σιμὸς πάντοτε σιμός ἐστι καὶ ὁ γρυπὸς πάντοτε γρυπός ἐστι, καὶ οὐκ ἐνδέχεται τὸν αὐτὸν ποτὲ μὲν σιμὸν εἶναι, ποτὲ δὲ γρυπόν. Ταῦτα δὲ λέγονται ἀχώριστα συμβεβηκότα, διότι, ἐπειδὰν γένωνται ἔν τινι, οὐκέτι χωρίζονται αὐτοῦ. Ὅμως δὲ συμβεβηκότα εἰσίν·
English
Behold, the rational is an essential and constitutive difference of a human, but the irrational is that of an ox. Similarly also in the case of the remaining species and substances and natures and forms. Everything in which a hypostasis differs from a conspecific and consubstantial hypostasis is called an accidental difference and quality and hypostatic property and characteristic property, that is, an accident; for example, a human differs from another human in that one is tall and the other short, one is white and the other black, one is healthy and the other ill, one is a father and the other a son. These and all such things are accidental differences and qualities and hypostatic and characteristic properties and accidents. And to speak simply, all things that are observed similarly in all hypostases under the same species and without which it is impossible for the substance and the species to subsist are called an essential difference; but those that are present in some of the conspecific hypostases and are not present in others are accidents and accidental. 5. On the separable and inseparable accident. Of accidents, some are separable, others inseparable. Inseparable are those in which a hypostasis differs from another hypostasis, but does not differ from itself; for example, a certain human differs from another human in that he himself is snub-nosed and the other is hook-nosed, in that one is blue-eyed and the other black-eyed. But he himself does not differ from himself; for the snub-nosed is always snub-nosed and the hook-nosed is always hook-nosed, and it is not possible for the same person to be at one time snub-nosed and at another time hook-nosed. These are called inseparable accidents because, when they come to be in someone, they are no longer separated from him. Nevertheless, they are accidents.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:5 · narrativehigh
Source
ἐνδέχεται γὰρ καὶ μὴ εἶναι σιμὸν καὶ εἶναι ἄνθρωπον, καὶ μὴ εἶναι γρυπὸν καὶ εἶναι ἄνθρωπον· οὐ πᾶς γὰρ ἄνθρωπος σιμὸς οὐδὲ πᾶς ἄνθρωπος γρυπός, πᾶς δὲ ἄνθρωπος λογικός, καὶ ὁ μὴ ὢν λογικὸς οὐκ ἔστιν ἄνθρωπος. Χωριστὰ δέ εἰσιν, ὅσα καὶ ὁ αὐτὸς ἄνθρωπος ἤγουν ἡ αὐτὴ ὑπόστασις ποτὲ μὲν ἔχει, ποτὲ δὲ οὐκ ἔχει, οἷον τὸ νοσεῖν καὶ ὑγιαίνειν, τὸ καθέζεσθαι καὶ ἀνίστασθαι, τὸ χαίρειν καὶ λυπεῖσθαι καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα. 6 Περὶ ὁμοουσίων καὶ ἑτεροουσίων. Ὁμοούσια καὶ ὁμοφυῆ καὶ σύμμορφα καὶ ὁμοειδῆ καὶ ὁμογενῆ εἰσιν, ὅσα ὑπὸ τὸ αὐτὸ εἶδος καὶ ὑπὸ τὴν αὐτὴν οὐσίαν εἰσίν, οἷον Πέτρος, Παῦλος καὶ οἱ λοιποὶ Ερευνητικό έργο: ∆ΡΟΜΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΠΙΣΤΗΣ – ΨΗΦΙΑΚΗ ΠΑΤΡΟΛΟΓΙΑ. Εργαστήριο ∆ιαχείρισης Πολιτισµικής Κληρονοµιάς, www.aegean.gr/culturaltec/chmlab. Χρηµατοδότηση: ΚΠ Interreg ΙΙΙΑ (ETΠΑ 75%, Εθν. πόροι 25%). Πανεπιστήµιο Αιγαίου, Τµήµα Πολιτισµικής Τεχνολογίας και Επικοινωνίας, © 2006. Επιτρέπεται η ελεύθερη χρήση του υλικού µε αναφορά στην πηγή προέλευσής του.
English
For it is possible both not to be snub-nosed and to be a human, and not to be hook-nosed and to be a human; for not every human is snub-nosed nor is every human hook-nosed, but every human is rational, and he who is not rational is not a human. Separable are those which the same human, that is, the same hypostasis, sometimes has and sometimes does not have, such as being ill and being healthy, sitting and standing, rejoicing and grieving, and the like. 6 On Homoousia and Heteroousia. Homoousia and homophyē and symmorphia and homoeidē and homogeneia are those which are under the same form and under the same substance, such as Peter, Paul, and the rest.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:6 · narrativehigh
Source
2 κατὰ μέρος ἄνθρωποι καὶ πάντες οἱ βόες καὶ πάντες οἱ κύνες, ὁμοίως καὶ τὰ λοιπά. Ἑτεροούσια δὲ καὶ ἑτεροφυῆ καὶ ἑτερόμορφα καὶ ἑτεροειδῆ καὶ ἑτερογενῆ εἰσι τὰ ὑπὸ ἄλλο καὶ ἄλλο εἶδος καὶ ἄλλην καὶ ἄλλην οὐσίαν ὄντα οἷον ἄνθρωπος καὶ ἵππος καὶ βοῦς καὶ κύων καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα. 7 Περὶ γένους καὶ εἴδους. Τὸ γένος εἰς εἴδη διαιρεῖται οἷον τὸ ζῷον ἢ λογικὸν ἢ ἄλογον· ἰδοὺ τὸ μὲν ζῷον γένος ἐστὶ τοῦ λογικοῦ καὶ τοῦ ἀλόγου, τὸ δὲ λογικὸν καὶ τὸ ἄλογον εἴδη εἰσὶν τοῦ ζῴου. Πάλιν τὸ λογικὸν διαιρεῖται εἰς θνητόν, ἄνθρωπον, καὶ ἀθάνατον, ἄγγελον. Τὸ λογικὸν γένος ἐστὶ τοῦ θνητοῦ καὶ τοῦ ἀθανάτου, τὸ δὲ θνητὸν καὶ τὸ ἀθάνατον εἴδη τοῦ λογικοῦ. Ἵνα οὖν σαφέστερον γένηται τὸ λεγόμενον, ἄνωθεν τὸν λόγον ποιησώμεθα. Γένος ἐστὶ γενικώτατον τὸ πρῶτον γένος, ὃ γένος ὂν οὐκ ἔστιν εἶδος διὰ τὸ μὴ ἔχειν ἐπάνω ἕτερον γένος, εἰδικώτατον δὲ εἶδος τὸ ἔσχατον καὶ ὑποβεβηκὸς εἶδος, ὅπερ εἶδος ὂν οὐκ ἔστι γένος διὰ τὸ μὴ ἔχειν ἕτερα εἴδη ἐξ αὐτοῦ τεμνόμενα. Εἰσὶ δὲ μεταξὺ τοῦ γενικωτάτου γένους καὶ τῶν εἰδικωτάτων εἰδῶν γένη τε καὶ εἴδη, γένη μὲν τῶν ὑποκάτω, εἴδη δὲ τῶν ἐπάνω, ἅτινα καλεῖται ὑπάλληλα. Οἷον γενικώτατον γένος ἐστὶν ἡ οὐσία· οὐ γὰρ ἔχει ἐπάνω αὐτῆς ἄλλο γένος, διὸ οὐδέ ἐστιν εἶδος. Αὕτη διαιρεῖται εἰς σῶμα καὶ ἀσώματον, τὸ σῶμα τέμνεται εἰς ἔμψυχον καὶ ἄψυχον, τὸ ἔμψυχον τέμνεται εἰς αἰσθητικὸν καὶ ἀναίσθητον, τὸ αἰσθητικὸν εἰς λογικὸν καὶ ἄλογον, τὸ λογικὸν εἰς θνητὸν καὶ ἀθάνατον. Ἔστιν οὖν τὸ μὲν ἀσώματον λογικὸν καὶ ἀθάνατον·
English
individual humans and all oxen and all dogs, and similarly the rest. Things that are under another and another species and another and another substance—such as human and horse and ox and dog and the like—are heteroousian, heterophyē, heteromorphic, heteroeidetic, and heterogeneic. 7 On genus and species. Genus is divided into species, for example, animal into rational or irrational; behold, animal is the genus of rational and irrational, while rational and irrational are species of animal. Again, rational is divided into mortal—human—and immortal—angel. Rational is the genus of mortal and immortal, while mortal and immortal are species of rational. So that what is said may become clearer, let us make the account from above. Genus is the most generic: the first genus, which, being a genus, is not a species because it has no other genus above it; the most specific species is the last and subordinate species, which, being a species, is not a genus because it has no other species cut from it. Between the most generic genus and the most specific species there are both genera and species—genera in relation to those below, species in relation to those above—which are called subaltern. For example, the most generic genus is substance; for it has no other genus above it, therefore it is not a species. This is divided into body and incorporeal; body is cut into animate and inanimate; animate is cut into sentient and insentient; sentient into rational and irrational; rational into mortal and immortal. Thus the incorporeal is rational and immortal.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:7 · narrativehigh
Source
ἀσώ ματον δὲ ἐνταῦθα λέγω οὐσίαν οἷον ψυχήν, ἄγγελον, δαίμονα· ἕκαστον τούτων εἰδικώτατον εἶδός ἐστιν. Σῶμα δὲ ἔμψυχον αἰσθητικὸν τὸ ζῷον, ζῷον δὲ λογικὸν θνητὸν ἄνθρωπος, ὅς ἐστιν εἰδικώτατον εἶδος, ζῷον δὲ ἄλογον ὑλακτικὸν κύων, ὅς ἐστιν εἰδικώτατον εἶδος. Εἶτα σῶμα ἔμψυχον ἀναίσθητον τὸ φυτόν. Σῶμα παντελῶς ἄψυχον γῆ, ἀήρ, ὕδωρ, πῦρ, ὧν ἕκαστον εἰδικώτατον εἶδος ὑπάρχει. Πρὸς δὲ πλείονα σαφήνειαν οὕτω λέγομεν. Ἡ οὐσία, ἥτις περιέχει ὑπερουσίως μὲν τὴν ἄκτιστον θεότητα, γνωστικῶς δὲ καὶ περιοχικῶς πᾶσαν τὴν κτίσιν, γενικώτατόν ἐστι γένος. Αὕτη ἢ ἀσώματός ἐστι καὶ νοερὰ καὶ ἀθάνατος ὡς θεός, ἄγγελος, ψυχή, δαίμων, –ἢ σῶμα ἄψυχον ὡς πῦρ, ἀήρ, ὕδωρ, γῆ, –ἢ σῶμα φυτικὸν ὡς ἄμπελος, φοῖνιξ, ἐλαία καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα, –ἢ σῶμα ἔμψυχον αἰσθητικόν, τουτέστι ζῷον, ὡς ἵππος, κύων, ἐλέφας καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα, –ἢ σύνθετος ἐκ σώματος καὶ ἀσωμάτου ψυχῆς ὡς ἄνθρωπος. Τούτων ἡ μὲν οὐσία ὡς πρώτη καὶ καθολικωτέρα καὶ περιεκτικὴ πάντων γενικώτατόν ἐστι γένος. Τούτου δὲ τοῦ γενικωτάτου γένους εἴδη εἰσὶ τὸ ἀσώματον, τὸ ἄψυχον σῶμα, τὸ φυτικὸν σῶμα, τὸ ἔμψυχον καὶ αἰσθητικὸν σῶμα, τουτέστι τὸ ζῷον. Ταῦτα λέγονται εἴδη καὶ γένη ὑπάλληλα· εἴδη γάρ εἰσι τῆς οὐσίας ὡς ἐξ αὐτῆς τεμνόμενα. Ἕκαστον δὲ αὐτῶν διαιρεῖται εἰς ἕτερα εἴδη καὶ περιεκτικὸν καὶ καθολικώτερον αὐτῶν ἐστι·
English
By “incorporeal” here I mean a substance such as soul, angel, demon; each of these is a most specific species. A body that is animate and sentient is an animal; a rational mortal animal is a human, who is a most specific species; an irrational barking animal is a dog, which is a most specific species. Then a body that is animate but insentient is a plant. A body that is wholly inanimate is earth, air, water, fire, each of which exists as a most specific species. For greater clarity we speak thus. Substance, which contains in a superessential manner the uncreated divinity and cognitively and comprehensively the whole creation, is the most generic genus. This is either incorporeal and intellectual and immortal, as God, angel, soul, demon; or an inanimate body, as fire, air, water, earth; or a vegetative body, as vine, palm, olive and the like; or an animate sentient body, that is, an animal, as horse, dog, elephant and the like; or a composite of body and incorporeal soul, as a human. Of these, substance as primary and more universal and comprehensive of all is the most generic genus. The species of this most generic genus are the incorporeal, the inanimate body, the vegetative body, the animate and sentient body, that is, the animal. These are called subaltern species and genera; for they are species of substance as cut from it. Each of them is divided into other species and is comprehensive and more universal than them.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:8 · narrativehigh
Source
περιέχει γὰρ ἡ μὲν ἀσώματος οὐσία θεόν, ἄγγελον, ψυχήν, δαίμονα, τὸ δὲ ἄψυχον σῶμα γῆν, ὕδωρ, ἀέρα, πῦρ, τὸ δὲ φυτικὸν σῶμα ἄμπελον, ἐλαίαν, φοίνικα καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα, τὸ δὲ ἔμψυχον καὶ αἰσθητικὸν ἤτοι τὸ ζῷον ἵππον, βοῦν, κύνα καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα, ἔτι δὲ καὶ τὸν ἐξ ἀσωμάτου ψυχῆς καὶ σώματος συντεθειμένον ἄνθρωπον. Ἔστιν οὖν ὑπόστασις μὲν καὶ ἄτομον καὶ πρόσωπον πατήρ, υἱὸς καὶ τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον· περιεκτικὸν δὲ αὐτῶν εἶδος ἡ ὑπερούσιος καὶ ἀκατάληπτος θεότης. Ἔτι ὑποστάσεις εἰσὶ Μιχαήλ, Γαβριὴλ καὶ οἱ λοιποὶ κατὰ μέρος ἄγγελοι· εἶδος δὲ περιεκτικὸν αὐτῶν ἡ ἀγγελικὴ φύσις. Ἔτι ὑποστάσεις εἰσὶ Πέτρος, Παῦλος, Ἰωάννης καὶ οἱ λοιποὶ κατὰ μέρος ἄνθρωποι· περιεκτικὸν δὲ αὐτῶν εἶδος ἡ ἀνθρωπότης. Αὖθις ὑποστάσεις Ερευνητικό έργο: ∆ΡΟΜΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΠΙΣΤΗΣ – ΨΗΦΙΑΚΗ ΠΑΤΡΟΛΟΓΙΑ. Εργαστήριο ∆ιαχείρισης Πολιτισµικής Κληρονοµιάς, www.aegean.gr/culturaltec/chmlab. Χρηµατοδότηση: ΚΠ Interreg ΙΙΙΑ (ETΠΑ 75%, Εθν. πόροι 25%). Πανεπιστήµιο Αιγαίου, Τµήµα Πολιτισµικής Τεχνολογίας και Επικοινωνίας, © 2006. Επιτρέπεται η ελεύθερη χρήση του υλικού µε αναφορά στην πηγή προέλευσής του.
English
For the incorporeal substance contains God, angel, soul, demon; the inanimate body contains earth, water, air, fire; the vegetative body contains vine, olive, palm and the like; the animate and sentient body, that is the animal, contains horse, ox, dog and the like, and also the human being composed of incorporeal soul and body. Thus father, son, and the holy spirit are a hypostasis and an individual and a person; their encompassing species is the superessential and incomprehensible divinity. Further, Michael, Gabriel, and the other individual angels are hypostases; their encompassing species is the angelic nature. Further, Peter, Paul, John, and the other individual humans are hypostases; their encompassing species is humanity. Again, hypostases
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:9 · narrativehigh
Source
3 εἰσὶν ὁ δεῖνα καὶ ὁ δεῖνα ὁ ἵππος· καὶ περιεκτικὸν αὐτῶν εἶδος ὁ ἵππος ὁ ἁπλῶς. Πάλιν ὑποστάσεις εἰσὶ τόδε καὶ τόδε τὸ φυτὸν τῆς ἐλαίας· περιεκτικὸν δὲ αὐτῶν εἶδος ἡ ἁπλῶς ἐλαία. Ἰστέον οὖν, ὡς τὰ περιεκτικὰ τῶν ἀτόμων μόνον εἴδη λέγονται εἰδικώτατα οἷον ὁ ἄγγελος, ὁ ἄνθρωπος, ὁ ἵππος, ὁ κύων, ἡ ἐλαία, ὁ φοῖνιξ καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα, τὰ δὲ περιεκτικὰ τῶν εἰδικωτάτων εἰδῶν μόνον γένη λέγονται καὶ εἴδη ὑπάλληλα οἷον τὸ ἀσώματον, τὸ σῶμα, τὸ ἄψυχον, τὸ ἀναίσθητον, τὸ φυτικόν, τὸ ἔμψυχον, τὸ αἰσθητικόν, τὸ ζῷον, τὸ λογικόν, τὸ ἄλογον, τὸ θνητόν, τὸ ἀθάνατον, τὸ δίπουν, τὸ τετράπουν, τὸ ἑρπυστικόν, τὸ πτηνὸν καὶ πάντα τὰ τοιαῦτα, τὰ περιέχοντα μὲν τὰ εἰδικώτατα εἴδη καὶ γένη αὐτῶν ὄντα καὶ συστατικαὶ αὐτῶν διαφοραί, περιεχόμενα δὲ ὑπὸ τοῦ γενικωτάτου γένους, ἥτις ἐστὶν ἡ οὐσία. Καὶ ἄλλως δὲ περὶ τῶν αὐτῶν διαληπτέον. Πάντα, ὅσα ἑνὶ προστάγματι θεοῦ ἐγένοντο, ἑνὸς γένους εἰσίν, οἷον προσέταξεν ὁ θεὸς γενέσθαι ἰχθύας, καὶ ἐγένοντο διαφοραὶ ἰχθύων πολλαί· πάντες οἱ ἰχθύες ἑνὸς γένους εἰσίν, ἑκάστη δὲ διαφορὰ ἰχθύων εἶδός ἐστιν. Πάλιν προσέταξεν ὁ θεὸς ἐξαγαγεῖν τὰ ὕδατα πετεινά, καὶ ἐγένοντο διαφοραὶ πολλαὶ πετεινῶν· πάντα τὰ πετεινὰ ἑνὸς γένους εἰσίν, ἑκάστη δὲ διαφορὰ τῶν πετεινῶν εἶδός ἐστι τοῦ γένους ἐκείνου τῶν πετεινῶν. Ὁμοίως καὶ ἐπὶ ἑρπετῶν καὶ κτηνῶν καὶ θηρίων καὶ βοτανῶν καὶ λαχάνων καὶ δένδρων.
English
There are such and such an individual and such and such a horse; and their encompassing species is horse simply. Again, there are hypostases such and such a plant of the olive; and their encompassing species is olive simply. It must be understood, therefore, that only the encompassing forms of individuals are called most specific species, such as angel, man, horse, dog, olive, palm, and the like; while the encompassing forms of the most specific species are called only genera and subaltern species, such as incorporeal, body, inanimate, insentient, vegetative, animate, sentient, animal, rational, irrational, mortal, immortal, biped, quadruped, creeping, winged, and all such things—those which contain the most specific species and are their genera and constitutive differences, but are themselves contained by the most generic genus, which is substance. And otherwise we must treat of the same things. All things that came to be by one command of God are of one genus, for example: God commanded fish to come to be, and many differences of fish came to be; all fish are of one genus, and each difference of fish is a species. Again, God commanded the waters to bring forth birds, and many differences of birds came to be; all birds are of one genus, and each difference of birds is a species of that genus of birds. Similarly also with creeping things, cattle, wild beasts, herbs, vegetables, and trees.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:10 · narrativehigh
Source
Λέγεται δὲ καὶ ἓν γένος ὅλων τῶν ζῴων καὶ ἓν γένος τῶν φυτῶν ὅλων καὶ ἓν γένος τῶν παντελῶς ἀψύχων καὶ μὴ ἐχόντων ὅλως αὐξητικὴν ἢ θρεπτικὴν δύναμιν καὶ πάλιν ἓν γένος τῶν ἀσωμάτων καὶ ἓν γένος τῶν σωμάτων· λέγεται δὲ καὶ πᾶσα ἡ κτίσις ἓν γένος, καὶ πολλὰ εἴδη ὑπὸ τὸ γένος τῆς κτίσεως αἱ διαφοραὶ τῶν κτισμάτων, καὶ πᾶσα ἡ οὐσία ἓν γένος. 8 Περὶ ἐνεργείας. Ἐνέργειά ἐστι κίνησις δραστικὴ τοῦ ποιοῦντος. Ἐνέργεια δὲ φυσική ἐστι κίνησις φύσεως δραστικὴ οἷον ἡ λογικὴ τοῦ νοῦ κίνησις, τὸ ζωτικόν, τὸ αἰσθητικόν, τὸ θρεπτικόν, τὸ αὐξητικόν, τὸ γεννητικὸν καὶ ἡ καθ' ὁρμὴν κίνησις, τουτέστιν αἱ κινήσεις τοῦ σώματος, καὶ τὸ φανταστικὸν καὶ τὸ μνημονευτικὸν τό τε θυμικὸν καὶ ἐπιθυμητικὸν καὶ θελητικὸν ἤγουν ὀρεκτικὸν καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα. Πεντάτροπος δέ ἐστιν αὕτη· ἢ νοερὰ ὡς ἐπὶ ἀγγέλων καὶ πασῶν ἀσωμάτων οὐσιῶν ἁπλῇ προσβολῇ νοούντων· –ἢ λογικὴ ὡς ἐπὶ ἀνθρώπων τῶν ἐκ ψυχῆς ἀσωμάτου καὶ σώματος συντεθειμένων, οὐχ ἁπλῇ ἀλλὰ ποικίλῃ καὶ διαλογιστικῇ προσβολῇ νοούντων· –ἢ ζωτικὴ ὡς ἐπὶ ἀλόγων ζῴων αἴσθησιν μὲν ἐχόντων, μὴ λογιζομένων δὲ μηδὲ νοούντων· –ἢ φυτικὴ ὡς ἐπὶ ἀναισθήτων ἐχόντων δὲ θρεπτικὴν καὶ αὐξητικὴν καὶ γεννητικὴν δύναμιν· –ἢ ἄζωος παντελῶς ὡς ἐπὶ γῆς καὶ λίθων τῶν μήτε ζωτικὴν μήτε θρεπτικὴν μήτε αὐξητικὴν δύναμιν ἐχόντων, μὴ ἀμοιρούντων δὲ φυσικῶν τινων ἐνεργειῶν. 9 Περὶ πάθους. Πάθος ἐστὶ φυσικὸν κίνησις φύσεως παθητικὴ τοῦ πάσχοντος.
English
It is also said that there is one genus of all animals, and one genus of all plants, and one genus of things completely inanimate and lacking entirely any augmentative or nutritive power, and again one genus of incorporeal things and one genus of bodies. And all creation is also said to be one genus, and the differences among creatures are many species under the genus of creation, and all substance is one genus. 8 On Energy. Energy is a kinetic activity of that which acts. Natural energy is a kinetic activity of nature, such as the rational motion of the mind, the vital, the sensitive, the nutritive, the augmentative, the generative, and motion according to impulse, that is, the motions of the body, and the imaginative, the recollective, the spirited, the desiderative, and the volitional, that is, the appetitive, and such things. This is fivefold: either intellectual, as in the case of angels and all incorporeal substances, which understand by simple application; or rational, as in the case of humans, who are composed of an incorporeal soul and a body, understanding not by simple but by varied and discursive application; or vital, as in the case of irrational animals, which have sensation but do not reason or understand; or vegetative, as in the case of insensate things that have nutritive, augmentative, and generative power; or wholly inanimate, as in the case of earth and stones, which have neither vital nor nutritive nor augmentative power, but are not devoid of certain natural energies. 9 On Passion. Passion is a natural passive motion of that which undergoes.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:11 · narrativehigh
Source
Ἥτις τῆς μὲν φύσεώς ἐστιν ἐνέργεια, πάθος δὲ τοῦ, περὶ ὃ ἡ ἐνέργεια, οἷον γένεσις, χαρά, λύπη, ἀγωνία, ἀδημονία, φόβος, ὄκνος, κόπος, ὕπνος, ἡδονή, πόνος, θυμός, ἐπιθυμία, τομή, ῥεῦσις καὶ φθορὰ καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα. Ταῦτα καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα πάθη φυσικά εἰσι καὶ ἀδιάβλητα οὐκ ἐφ' ἡμῖν ὄντα. Μόνη δὲ ἡ ἁμαρτία παρὰ φύσιν ἐστὶν ἑκούσιον καὶ αὐθαίρετον τῆς ψυχῆς πάθος κάκιστον καὶ φθορά. 10 Περὶ θελήματος. Θέλησίς ἐστι φυσικὴ λογικὴ ὄρεξις. Καὶ πάλιν θέλησίς ἐστι φυσικὴ λογικὴ καὶ Ερευνητικό έργο: ∆ΡΟΜΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΠΙΣΤΗΣ – ΨΗΦΙΑΚΗ ΠΑΤΡΟΛΟΓΙΑ. Εργαστήριο ∆ιαχείρισης Πολιτισµικής Κληρονοµιάς, www.aegean.gr/culturaltec/chmlab. Χρηµατοδότηση: ΚΠ Interreg ΙΙΙΑ (ETΠΑ 75%, Εθν. πόροι 25%). Πανεπιστήµιο Αιγαίου, Τµήµα Πολιτισµικής Τεχνολογίας και Επικοινωνίας, © 2006. Επιτρέπεται η ελεύθερη χρήση του υλικού µε αναφορά στην πηγή προέλευσής του. 4 αὐτεξούσιος ὀρεκτικὴ τοῦ νοῦ κίνησις. Τὰ μὲν γὰρ ἄλογα οὐκ αὐτεξουσίως κινεῖται πρὸς ὄρεξιν· φυσικῶς γὰρ κινουμένης ἐν αὐτοῖς τῆς ὀρέξεως μὴ ἔχοντα ἐπιστατοῦντα τὸν λόγον ἄγονται ὑπὸ τῆς φύσεως, τῇ ταύτης ὀρέξει ἡττώμενα. Ὅθεν εὐθέως ὁρμᾷ πρὸς τὴν πρᾶξιν, εἰ μὴ ὑφ' ἑτέρου κωλυθῇ. ∆ιὸ οὐκ αὐτεξούσιά εἰσιν, ἀλλ' ὑπεξούσια. Ἡ δὲ λογικὴ φύσις ἐξουσίαν ἔχει ὑποκύψαι τῇ φυσικῇ ὀρέξει καὶ μὴ ὑποκύψαι ἀλλὰ νικῆσαι, καὶ δηλοῖ ἡ φύσις ζωῆς ἔφεσις φυσικὴ οὖσα καὶ ὑποκύπτουσα τῷ λόγῳ·
English
This is an activity of nature, but a passion of that about which the activity occurs, such as generation, joy, grief, anguish, distress, fear, hesitation, fatigue, sleep, pleasure, pain, anger, desire, cutting, flux, and corruption, and the like. These and similar passions are natural and blameless, not being within our power. Only sin is contrary to nature, a voluntary and self-willed passion of the soul, most evil and corruptive. 10 On the will. Will is a natural rational appetite. And again, will is a natural rational and self-determined appetitive motion of the mind. For irrational beings do not move self-determinedly toward appetite; for appetite moves in them naturally, and since they lack reason to preside over them, they are led by nature, being overcome by its appetite. Hence they immediately rush to action, unless hindered by something else. Therefore they are not self-determined, but subject to another. But the rational nature has the power to yield to natural appetite or not to yield but to overcome it, and the nature manifests a desire for life, which is natural and yields to reason.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:12 · narrativehigh
Source
πολλοὶ γὰρ ταύτην τῷ ἡγεμόνι λόγῳ νικήσαντες ἑκουσίως ἐχώρησαν πρὸς τὸν θάνατον καὶ τροφῆς ὄρεξιν ἀνεβάλοντο καὶ ὕπνου καὶ τῶν λοιπῶν, ἄγοντες τὴν φύσιν τῷ αὐτεξουσίῳ λόγῳ, οὐχ ὑπὸ ταύτης ἀγόμενοι. Ὥσπερ οὖν ἡ φυσικὴ ὄρεξις πάσῃ αἰσθητικῇ φύσει ἔγκειται, οὕτως ἡ αὐτεξουσιότης πάσῃ λογικῇ φύσει ἔγκειται· πᾶν γὰρ λογικὸν αὐτεξούσιον, καὶ τοῦτό ἐστι τὸ κατ' εἰκόνα θεοῦ. Θέλησις οὖν ἐστι φυσικὴ ἢ λογικὴ καὶ αὐτεξούσιος ὀρεκτικὴ δύναμίς τε καὶ κίνησις. Τὰ δὲ τῇ θελήσει ὑποκείμενα, ὧν ἐφίεται ἡ θέλησις, λέγονται θελήματα γνωμικά· οἰκείᾳ γὰρ γνώμῃ ὁρμᾷ πρὸς τὴν τούτων χρῆσιν ὁ νοῦς αὐτεξούσιος ὤν. Ταῦτα δέ εἰσιν οἷον φαγεῖν–μὴ φαγεῖν, πιεῖν–μὴ πιεῖν, ὁδεῦσαι–μὴ ὁδεῦσαι, γῆμαι– μὴ γῆμαι καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα, ἅτινα ἐφ' ἡμῖν εἰσιν, ἅτινα καὶ αὐτὰ δυνάμεθα καὶ τὰ ἀντικείμενα αὐτοῖς. Ερευνητικό έργο: ∆ΡΟΜΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΠΙΣΤΗΣ – ΨΗΦΙΑΚΗ ΠΑΤΡΟΛΟΓΙΑ. Εργαστήριο ∆ιαχείρισης Πολιτισµικής Κληρονοµιάς, www.aegean.gr/culturaltec/chmlab. Χρηµατοδότηση: ΚΠ Interreg ΙΙΙΑ (ETΠΑ 75%, Εθν. πόροι 25%). Πανεπιστήµιο Αιγαίου, Τµήµα Πολιτισµικής Τεχνολογίας και Επικοινωνίας, © 2006. Επιτρέπεται η ελεύθερη χρήση του υλικού µε αναφορά στην πηγή προέλευσής του.
English
For many, having overcome this by the governing reason, have voluntarily gone to death and deferred the desire for food and sleep and the rest, leading nature by self-determined reason, not being led by it. Just as natural desire is inherent in every sentient nature, so self-determination is inherent in every rational nature; for everything rational is self-determined, and this is what is according to the image of God. Will, therefore, is a natural or rational and self-determined appetitive power and motion. The objects underlying will, which will desires, are called gnomic wills; for the self-determined mind rushes by its own judgment to the use of these. These are such things as to eat or not to eat, to drink or not to drink, to travel or not to travel, to marry or not to marry, and the like, which are in our power, which we can do and also their opposites.
khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:13 · narrativemedium
Source
5
English
5
Citation. Tergwame, “Institutio elementaris”, khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/khazarzar-john-of-damascus-institutio-elementaris#s1
Colophon. Source: khazarzar · licence: see record · model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor · provider: Relace · cost: $0.0071 · generated 2026-11-15.